How Miuccia Prada's Miu Miu films tell stories of women through a fashion lens
Since 2011, Miuccia Prada, the patron saint of smart, messy women everywhere, has been using her Miu Miu line as a platform to commission short films by female filmmakers from around the world, including Janicza Bravo, Mati Diop and Haifaa Al-Mansour.
For Miuccia, the films, which sometimes air during her fashion shows, serve as a backdrop to her clothes, which have always explored the chaotic lives of mothers, sisters, rebels, poets and punks without ever trying to reconcile their contradictions.
That has made Miu Miu the darling of the fashion industry (Miuccia is also head designer of the Prada label), the rare fashion brand to experience explosive growth at a time when sales in general are slowing.
Last year, during Art Basel Paris, Miuccia decided it was time to bring all the films together, and she enlisted Polish artist Goshka Macuga to help.
The result was an immersive performance piece of sorts that involved a cast of 35 characters from the films, brought to life by 105 actors.
It was such an unexpected hit, with 11,000 people visiting the Paris show during its five-day run, that she and Macuga decided to re-create it recently or Frieze New York.
The new show, titled Tales & Tellers , is being staged in the Terminal Warehouse, the cavernous late-19th-century building on the Far West Side of Manhattan, latterly home to the Tunnel nightclub.
And it is an altogether darker take on the state of women than the Paris event was (still, wardrobe by Miu Miu).
Here, Miuccia and Macuga talk about the endeavour in a Zoom interview.
The conversation has been edited and condensed.
There hasn't been a Miu Miu show in New York in decades, but now there is. Sort of. Why this?
Miuccia: The clothes are an excuse to have the support of the company to create these projects where women are talking about themselves, which is very important.
In my work, I have always embraced the complexity of women, the complexity of our lives, how we can succeed in developing our abilities. So it's fundamental to know what women do, what they think, in different contexts.
Macuga: All these different stories represent different social problems for women in different countries.
Like, for example, the film which I feel very close to, Nightwalk by Małgorzata Szumowska, was filmed in Poland at a time when gender issues were really repressed by our government.
It was talking about this idea of liberation within a context that was not sympathetic to difference.
Read more: Are films indeed turning into a profitable side business for fashion companies?
That sounds like the current state of the US. Is that why you wanted to bring the show here?
Miuccia: Not just America. Conservatism is everywhere in Europe. We are facing these really great problems, and this moment is really scary.
So it's a very crucial argument – that everybody has the right to their voice.
Macuga: We are taking it to the American, or New York, street at night and trying to imagine how a woman exists within this context. It's more threatening, it's more surreal.
We're looking at the concept of inside and outside, the idea of individuals coming together in a group and being empowered. How all these individual voices can come together and make a big impact.
Is this also the way you raise your voice?
Miuccia: It's hard for me to talk about politics because I am a representative of luxury. That's a very privileged group of people, so to translate that in a real democratic way is not obvious.
So I try in my own way to be political, but I have to be very careful how I make it public.
Macuga: Artists can use language that allows certain narratives to still be present, but maybe present under the umbrella of a more coded language.
You're not directly addressing anything or making a statement, but you're creating the possibility for people to project certain ideas into it.
Miuccia: What I hope is that people who come to the show feel they can express themselves – their ideas, their problems, their weakness, their struggle.
We are basically saying that change or building relationships or empowerment happens on a human level, in the instantaneous relationships that we make with other people.
Why is that important now?
Macuga: Clearly we cannot take for granted certain positive things that happen for women in society. Governments change, politics change, and the situation of women changes with that.
Miuccia: Women's liberation is not concluded at all. Sometimes, it looks like we are going backward. There is still a lot of work to do.
Is that what you are trying to convey with clothes?
Miuccia: I try to make my contribution with the instrument I have. When you make clothes, you are suggesting possible ways of being.
I am fixated on the word 'useful'. I want to try to be useful. Basically, I have the Prada Foundation, our museum. I have the fashion lines. And this is something in between that seems the most promising because it is simple.
There's more excitement, less pressure, attached to it.
Read more: Elegance with edge: The quiet power of Miuccia Prada's life in fashion
What do you mean?
Miuccia: First, when we made these little movies, no one cared one bit. We showed them at the Venice Film Festival, in a very serious environment.
Then I wanted to do an exhibit at the Prada Foundation about feminism, but while curators are used to curating objects and art, there are no curators for ideas, so it's very difficult.
But adding the fashion environment attracts many more people and allows this idea to become much more popular, much more diffused.
Suddenly, with this, everybody immediately understood. It somehow accelerated the process, and we wanted to push that. This is one of the miracles of fashion. – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
3 days ago
- Malay Mail
Viral spectacle: Influencers cash in on Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial as TikTok, YouTube coverage surges
NEW YORK, June 18 — The criminal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs is now in its sixth week of testimony — and interest among influencers and YouTubers is still soaring, as online personalities flock to the Manhattan federal courthouse to livestream their musings. Every day, it's the same routine: content creators on platforms like TikTok, Instagram and YouTube rub shoulders with legacy media organisations as they set up cell phone tripods and stage their shows, enthusiastically relaying their hot takes. The trial of Combs, once a titan of the music industry who faces life in prison if convicted on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, can't be broadcast. The federal courthouse doesn't allow cameras, laptops, phones or even wireless headphones inside. So, alongside the many journalists covering the trial, influencers hustle in and out of the courthouse throughout the day to recount the proceedings beat by beat, dropping off and picking up their electronics at security each time. One woman who goes by the TikTok name 'KealoHalika' said in the first two days of testimony she earned an estimated 10,500 followers; her account now has 40,500 followers. 'It was like craziness,' she told AFP outside the courthouse. 'It's been a lot of moving pieces. It's definitely changed my life.' People wait in line outside federal court before the sex trafficking trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs in New York City on May 13, 2025. — AFP pic Combs is incarcerated and doesn't enter or exit the courthouse publicly. But some of the high-profile attendees and witnesses do, including members of the music mogul's family and figures like Kid Cudi, the rapper who testified that Combs's entourage torched his car. These paparazzi-esque arrivals and exits are catnip for content creators to in turn feed their followers. The brief cameo of Ye, who stopped by to lend his 'support' to Combs amid the proceedings, was a particular field day for the chronically online. Donat Ricketts, a 32-year-old artist from Los Angeles, was a regular at the high-profile Tory Lanez and A$AP Rocky trials in California. He told AFP he makes between US$8,000 and US$10,000 (RM33,980 and RM42,475) a month, including through YouTube's ad revenue programme and fan donations. 'This is my first time traveling to another state to cover a case,' said the creator with about 50,000 YouTube subscribers. 'It feels like vacation, plus I'm being able to work and make money from YouTube.' Ricketts didn't study journalism — but he thinks his 'big personality' and ability to relate to online viewers sets him apart. 'This case is the turning point where mainstream media knows that the 'independent journalists' are a force to be reckoned with,' he said. Media and television crews are set up outside federal court before the sex trafficking trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs in New York City on May 15, 2025. — AFP pic 'Personal narrative' According to a 2024 Pew Research Centre study, one in five Americans get news from influencers online; for people under 30, the share jumps to 37 per cent. Reece Peck, a professor of political communication and journalism at the City University of New York, called the competition among content creators 'Darwinian.' 'They're so scared of losing their clientele or their audience. And so with that logic, that you have to constantly create content, the news cycle is such an attractive source of material,' Peck told AFP. And the Combs trial is a fount, he said: 'It's sex, it's violence, and it's celebrity.' Emilie Hagen said she does have a journalism degree but these days publishes via her Substack, also putting out content on Instagram and TikTok. 'I'm there every day providing humorous updates,' she told AFP of the Combs trial. Dozens of traditional media outlets are providing coverage and analysis of the trial. But Hagen said she's 'able to go down rabbit holes that they're not allowed to go down.' 'I don't have to stick to the daily recap,' she said. 'I can insert a personal narrative.' Many of her most fruitful videos are of 'me interacting with all of the wild people that come to the trial outside the courthouse,' she added. Hagen said she's notched 12,000 more Instagram followers and 10,000 more on TikTok since proceedings began. She said some fans have donated, which recently allowed her to hire a linesitter. Getting into the main courtroom, as opposed to overflow rooms with video feeds of the trial, can require either arriving overnight or the day prior, and many influencers along with media outlets like ABC News and The New York Times hire people to hold spots. But even with the deluge of news updates from media outlets and content streams from influencers, some people still want to see the trial for themselves. Val Solit, a teacher from Los Angeles on vacation to New York, dropped by the proceedings after having lunch in nearby Chinatown with her partner. 'I like crime and dramas,' she told AFP, likening the hype to the 1990s-era trial of O.J. Simpson. 'It was kind of fascinating to come and see it.' 'It's history in the making.' — AFP
The Sun
4 days ago
- The Sun
US Supreme Court rejects bid to revive copyright suit over Ed Sheeran hit 'Thinking Out Loud'
WASHINGTON: The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday a bid to revive a copyright infringement lawsuit accusing pop star Ed Sheeran of unlawfully copying from the late singer Marvin Gaye's 1973 classic "Let's Get It On" in his 2014 hit song "Thinking Out Loud." The justices declined to hear an appeal by Structured Asset Sales, a company owned by investment banker David Pullman that has a copyright interest in Gaye's song, of a judge's decision to dismiss the case. The company had sued Sheeran, his record label Warner Music and music publisher Sony Music Publishing, seeking monetary damages over alleged similarities between the two songs. Gaye, who died in 1984, collaborated with singer-songwriter Ed Townsend, who died in 2003, to write "Let's Get It On," which topped the Billboard charts. Sheeran's "Thinking Out Loud" peaked at No. 2 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 2015. Structured Asset Sales owns a share of the rights to "Let's Get It On" that previously belonged to Townsend. Its lawsuit accused Sheeran of misusing copyrighted elements of "Let's Get It On" including its melody, harmony and rhythm. U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton decided in 2023 that the musical elements that Sheeran was accused of copying were too common to merit copyright protection. The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision last year. The 2nd Circuit also rejected the Structured Asset Sales argument that Stanton should have considered elements of "Let's Get It On" that were not found in the "deposit copy" of the song's sheet music submitted to the U.S. Copyright Office. In a 2023 trial in a separate copyright lawsuit over the same issue filed by Townsend's heirs, a jury in Manhattan federal court ruled in favor of Sheeran. "It's devastating to be accused of stealing someone else's song when we've put so much work into our livelihoods," Sheeran said outside the courthouse following that verdict. Structured Asset Sales has filed another lawsuit against Sheeran based on its rights to the audio recording of "Let's Get It On." That case is currently on hold.
The Sun
4 days ago
- The Sun
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Ed Sheeran copyright appeal
WASHINGTON: The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday a bid to revive a copyright infringement lawsuit accusing pop star Ed Sheeran of unlawfully copying from the late singer Marvin Gaye's 1973 classic "Let's Get It On" in his 2014 hit song "Thinking Out Loud." The justices declined to hear an appeal by Structured Asset Sales, a company owned by investment banker David Pullman that has a copyright interest in Gaye's song, of a judge's decision to dismiss the case. The company had sued Sheeran, his record label Warner Music and music publisher Sony Music Publishing, seeking monetary damages over alleged similarities between the two songs. Gaye, who died in 1984, collaborated with singer-songwriter Ed Townsend, who died in 2003, to write "Let's Get It On," which topped the Billboard charts. Sheeran's "Thinking Out Loud" peaked at No. 2 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 2015. Structured Asset Sales owns a share of the rights to "Let's Get It On" that previously belonged to Townsend. Its lawsuit accused Sheeran of misusing copyrighted elements of "Let's Get It On" including its melody, harmony and rhythm. U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton decided in 2023 that the musical elements that Sheeran was accused of copying were too common to merit copyright protection. The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision last year. The 2nd Circuit also rejected the Structured Asset Sales argument that Stanton should have considered elements of "Let's Get It On" that were not found in the "deposit copy" of the song's sheet music submitted to the U.S. Copyright Office. In a 2023 trial in a separate copyright lawsuit over the same issue filed by Townsend's heirs, a jury in Manhattan federal court ruled in favor of Sheeran. "It's devastating to be accused of stealing someone else's song when we've put so much work into our livelihoods," Sheeran said outside the courthouse following that verdict. Structured Asset Sales has filed another lawsuit against Sheeran based on its rights to the audio recording of "Let's Get It On." That case is currently on hold.
