JEE Advanced AAT Results 2025: Scorecards out for BArch admissions at jeeadv.ac.in
JEE Advanced 2025 AAT Results: The Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur has released the scorecards for the JEE Advanced AAT BArch admissions at jeeadv.ac.in. Students who appeared for the exam can check the scorecards at the official website by their admit card number, date of birth. The test for getting admission for architecture courses at IITs was held on June 5 between 9 am to 12 noon. The results were declared on June 8 at 5 pm.
Candidates who qualified for the JEE Advanced AAT 2025 exam can now take admission to the Bachelor of Architecture (BArch) programs offered by IIT BHU Varanasi, IIT Kharagpur, and IIT Roorkee. The AAT exam was held offline on June 5, 2025, and only candidates who qualified for JEE Advanced 2025 were eligible to appear for the AAT exam.
JEE Advanced Rank Predictor | JEE Advanced Result Live | AIR 1 Rajit Gupta | AIR 2 Saksham Jindal | AIR 4 Parth Vartak | AIR 5 Ujjwal Kesari | AIR 7 Sahil Deo | JEE Main Female Topper | JEE Advanced Topper List | JoSAA Counselling Explained
Step 1: Visit the official website — jeeadv.ac.in
Step 2: Click on the result link under the notification section
Step 3: Enter the JEE Advanced registration number
Step 4: Click submit and download the scorecard
Candidates securing marks above the cut-off will be declared to have passed the test. There is no separate ranking in the AAT. Allotment of seats will be solely based on the category-wise All India Rank in the JEE Advanced 2025, and the BArch programme will be offered only to those candidates declared pass in the AAT.
Candidates seeking to be enrolled on the BArch programme at IIT Kharagpur, IIT (BHU) Varanasi, and IIT Roorkee need to qualify for the JEE Advanced AAT, in addition to having at least 75 per cent in class 12 board or equivalent exam to be eligible for BArch admission. However, the aggregate qualifying marks criteria for candidates from SC, ST and PwD categories for the class 12 exam is a minimum of 65 per cent.
The Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT-K) released the results for the Joint Entrance Examination-Advanced on June 2. Rajit Gupta from the IIT Delhi zone is placed in the common rank list (CRL) 1 in the JEE Advanced 2025 exam. The CRL 2, Saksham Jindal, has also scored the same marks as CRL 1 – 332 marks.
Most candidates from IIT Hyderabad zone have qualified JEE Advanced 2025 exam. As many as 12,946 students have qualified from the IIT-H zone alone, followed by 11,370 from IIT Delhi and 11,226 from the IIT Bombay zone. As many as 5,445 have qualified from IIT Roorkee zone, 5,353 from the IIT Kharagpur zone, 5,295 from the IIT Kanpur zone and 2,743 from IIT Guwahati zone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
a day ago
- India.com
CLAT 2025: Third Merit List Released At consortiumofnlus.ac.in- Check Direct Link, Other Details Here
CLAT 2025 Third Merit: The consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has officially released the third and final merit list for Common Law Admission Test Undergraduate 2025 (CLAT 2025). All the candidates who have participated in counselling rounds can now check the provisional allotment list on the official website, i.e. Candidates who have been allotted the seat will have to pay the fees of Rs. 20,000 by 23rd June, 2025 to confirm their seat till 1 PM. Last. Additionally, the deadline for the payment of confirmation fees is 27th June, 2025 till 5 PM. Candidates who are satisfied with their allotted seats can freeze their seats and if they are not then they can choose the float option. Candidates must note that the third merit list shows the closing rank for some institutes like NLSIU Bengaluru, their closing rank is 460 for general category, and closing ranks for all the categories is mentioned. The closing ranks show the final cut-offs students need to take admission into that institution under the CLAT 2025. CLAT 2025 Third Merit List; Direct Link to Download the PDF CLAT 2025 Third Merit List: Steps to Download Step 1: Go to the official website- Step 2: You will see the link of 'CLAT UG Third Allotment List' on the homepage, click on it. Step 3: Now choose the National Law University (NLU) of your choice and check the merit list. Step 4: The third merit list of that institution will appear on your screen. Step 5: Save and download the PDF for future reference. The merit list will include the details like All India Rank (AIR), the admit card number, along with vertical and horizontal reservation category. All the candidates are advised to keep checking the official websites of all the NLUs for latest updates.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
97 trees to go for alternative water tank behind Hanging Gardens
MUMBAI: In a major step towards repairing the 135-year-old Malabar Hill reservoir, the BMC has finalised the removal of 97 trees to make way for the construction of an alternative water tank on a plot behind the popular tourist spot of Hanging Gardens. The tank will ensure an uninterrupted water supply to parts of South Mumbai while the heritage reservoir undergoes crucial repairs. Of the 389 trees earlier earmarked on the plot, 189 were to be hacked, but after public resistance the number was brought down to 97. According to a civic official, 20 large trees, mostly mango, chikoo, jackfruit, Ashoka and palm, will be chopped. The rest of the trees are smaller ones. However, rare species like the Ram trees will be preserved. The plot has a huge variety of trees, among them jackfruit, junglee badam, mango, akash neem, kailashpati, jamoon, chafa, Ashoka, neem, coconut, kadipatta, amla, chikoo, reetha and many more. Botanists had surveyed the garden and estimated where a few Ashoka, jackfruit and shevga trees could be retained, depending on their size. 'We have bifurcated the tree-cutting into two segments,' said a civic official. 'Seventy-four trees will be removed where the new tank is being constructed, while 23 will be cut at the valve operations site.' In an effort to minimise the environmental impact, the BMC's waterworks department is exploring alternatives to further reduce the project's carbon footprint. 'We will try to save some more old trees,' the official said. Sticking to its earlier strategy, the BMC has conveyed to IIT Roorkee that it will opt for a 52-MLD (million litres per day) single-tank design, abandoning an earlier, more elaborate plan to explore a three-tier system with a capacity ranging between 35 and 44 MLD. The three-tier plan included an underground tank, a ground-level tank and an overhead tank. This vertical configuration aimed to reduce land use while maintaining supply during repair periods by pumping water to the upper level when necessary. However, the civic official said that the estimated cost of the project was ₹100–125 crore, which made it non-feasible. The decision to build an alternative tank was reinforced by a recommendation from IIT-Roorkee, whose experts inspected the aging Malabar Hill reservoir in June 2024. While the BMC had initially requested the team to consider options for repair without constructing an additional tank, the IIT team maintained that a 52-MLD alternative was essential. This marks a shift from the earlier ₹698-crore plan to completely reconstruct the reservoir, which was scrapped after public resistance and intervention from local representatives, which saved the iconic Hanging Gardens above it. Malabar Hill MLA Mangal Prabhat Lodha had announced in 2024 that the BMC would only carry out repairs on the reservoir, preserving the historic structure while addressing the city's water needs. Malabar Hill's requirement is 240 MLD, and the current reservoir has a capacity of only 147 MLD. At present it supplies water primarily to A and D wards comprising areas like Nariman Point, Cuffe Parade, Churchgate, Colaba, Girgaon, Nepeansea Road and the entire Malabar Hill area.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Study warns loss of water bodies in Chennai significantly increases flood risk
Chennai: Ten years ago, a relentless downpour of 50 cm of rainfall in Chennai on December 1, 2015, followed by the release of water from the Chembarambakkam reservoir, flooded most areas and brought the city to a standstill. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A new study now warns that if the city loses its existing upstream water bodies, which currently have a capacity of 174.7 million cubic metres, to future urbanisation, flood damages could increase by 44%, deaths by 60%, and risk to the population by 40.5% if a 2015-like flood repeats. Researchers said the 2015 flood could have caused less damage if the city retained its traditional tanks, man-made water bodies designed to store rainwater. The study found flood losses could have dropped by 17% and fatalities by 12% if the lost urban tanks were still functional, with flood levels dropping by up to 0.8 m in areas like T Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Virugambakkam, and Saidapet. The population at risk would have decreased by 25.3% compared to the 2015 flood. Since the early 1900s, urbanisation has led to the loss of 13.6 million cubic metres of tank storage within the city. The remaining 174.7 million cubic metres of tank storage outside the city are also at risk. Though the urban tanks held a smaller volume than the upstream ones, their proximity to densely populated areas meant they could have intercepted rainwater before it flooded streets and homes. "The 2015 flood was primarily due to excessive rainfall. The water release from Chembarambakkam reservoir played some role, but it was only 25% of the total flow from upstream," said researcher Abinesh Ganapathy. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "The water bodies provide extra cushion to store water and reduce inflow into the Adyar River. The lakes that disappeared should have provided even more storage and moderated the flood in the city." Researchers simulated three scenarios: the actual 2015 flood (baseline), a version where lost urban tanks still existed (with tanks), and one where even upstream tanks are lost (no tanks). Compared to the 2015 scenario, if the traditional tanks were present, flooding in the lower flood hazard zones in parts of Vadapalani, Mylapore, Alwarpet, Adyar, Ashok Nagar, Ekkattuthangal, and Guindy could have dropped by 23% to 37%. When encroached tank areas are included, this reduction rose to over 60% in parts of Vadapalani, Mylapore, and Alwarpet. In contrast, if upstream tanks are also lost, flooding in the high-risk flood zones like parts of Koyambedu, Adyar, Porur, T Nagar, Nandanam, St Thomas Mount, parts of Mylapore, RA Puram, and Nungambakkam would expand by 45% to 54%. About 80,000 people and 15,000 buildings were spared from flooding in the 'with tanks' scenario, while over 1.7 lakh people and 30,000 buildings were newly affected in the 'no tanks' scenario. The study, conducted by institutions including GFZ Potsdam, IIT Roorkee, and IIT Madras, was published in Urban Climate. An earlier study led by corresponding author Nithila Devi Nallasamy projected that urban areas in the Adyar Basin will expand from 20% to 46% by 2050, putting the upstream tanks at high risk. Nivedita Sairam, a researcher from GFZ Potsdam, said, "The study shows that in addition to flood defences, we need to give room for the river and controlled urban development. Protecting water bodies plays a role in controlling weather extremes." The study supports using nature-based solutions for flood control in cities like Chennai, which face both flood risks and water scarcity. T Kanthimathinathan, coordinator, Tamil Nadu State Disaster Management Authority, said the only way to reduce flooding in the city is for urban planners to ensure the clearing and protection of the flow paths of existing water bodies to downstream systems from the impact of urbanisation. He said that between 1975 and 2008, many water bodies were lost to city expansion, including those in Nungambakkam, Mambalam, and Mogappair. Only 49, now significantly shrunk, remained. "We must give room for the water to flow," he said. "The water bodies in the upstream may shrink in size, but not disappear. The Thiruppugazh committee recommended restoration of these upstream water bodies to their original condition. If possible, they can be deepened to increase holding capacity, without affecting groundwater or the environment," he added.
