Scam warning over Household Support Fund
This article is from Sally Ash, IW Against Scams Partnership, and relates scam warnings connected to the Household Support Fund:
The recent extension of the Department for Work and Pensions' Household Support Fund will indeed bring much-needed relief to vulnerable island households, but it also comes with the risk of scammers exploiting the situation.
It's crucial for residents to be vigilant and verify the authenticity of any communication they receive regarding support.
The Isle of Wight Council has been actively administering genuine support schemes through this fund.
In recent months, they have assisted over 1,100 pensioner households with £75 towards utility costs and provided £25 supermarket vouchers to 290 households in financial crisis.
If you have applied for utility or food support through the Isle of Wight Council or a partner organisation, you will receive a pre-paid card or voucher via email from noreply@evouchers.com.
If you do not redeem the support, a reminder will be sent from support@evouchers.com.
Personal details will never be requested via text or email, and bank details are not required for genuine support.
For any doubts about the legitimacy of a message, you can contact the Partnerships and Support Services team at 823644 or via hsf@iow.gov.uk.
A list of partner organisations involved in the scheme can be found on the Isle of Wight Council's webpage, Food vouchers and housing, HSF.
You can also call the council's main contact centre on 821000 and ask for the team, if you are unsure.
Stay safe and ensure you verify any communication to protect yourself from potential scams.
Reporting a scam • For advice on scams call - Citizens Advice Consumer Helpline: 0808 250 5050 • To report a scam call - Action Fraud: 0300 123 2040
For more information on scams visit www.iwasp.org.uk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
DWP claimants who go abroad 'could be monitored' as new powers on horizon
The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill is expected to be rolled out from 2026, as per government-issued fact sheets. Figures from the Department for Work and Pensions indicates that the bill could lead to savings of £1.5 billion over the after five years, reports ChronicleLive. The new legislation includes provisions like driving restrictions of up to two years for repeat offenders who fail to repay falsely claimed benefits, amplified powers for the DWP to reclaim money directly from fraudsters' bank accounts, and an Eligibility Verification mechanism. READ MORE: Nationwide issues update on £200 payments and who can expect to be paid Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join This Eligibility Verification Measure permits third-party entities, such as banks, to identify potentially fraudulent benefit claimants. But it does not grant the DWP with direct access to individual bank accounts despite widespread concerns when the plans were initially announced. It will not permit investigators to monitor the spending habits of benefit recipients. Instead, it will merely allow banks to collaborate with department investigators in identifying individuals who have exceeded the eligibility criteria. For example, if a Universal Credit recipient has savings exceeding the permitted threshold of £16,000. This can happen unintentionally when legitimate claimants are unaware that a change in circumstances affects their benefits eligibility. The new powers could prevent individuals from unknowingly accumulating debt with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and discourage fraudsters from exploiting the welfare system. The Factsheets also suggest that there will be mechanisms in place to ensure "appropriate, proportionate, and effective use of the powers" to protect legitimate claimants. According to guidance on "The Government will begin implementing the Bill measures from 2026. "For the Eligibility Verification Measure, the Government will implement a 'test and learn' approach to ensure the new powers to tackle public sector fraud are being used proportionally and effectively. "DWP and the Cabinet Office will continue to work with industry to implement the new measures, consult stakeholders on Codes of Practice and publish guidance." The DWP will also have the ability to request data from additional third-party organisations, such as airlines, to verify if individuals are claiming benefits while abroad, which may contravene eligibility criteria. The factsheet also details potential penalties for banks and other financial institutions that overshare information and other safeguards that will protect legitimate benefit claimants. The new measures in the bill will also empower the Public Sector Fraud Authority to: Utilise its expertise on behalf of other departments; Enhance detection and prevention of incorrect payments through new information gathering and sharing powers; Employ robust non-criminal sanctions and civil penalties as an alternative to criminal prosecution and to deter fraud; Boost the government's ability to reclaim public money, through new debt recovery and enforcement powers; Exercise new powers of entry, search and seizure to alleviate the pressures on the police in the most serious criminal investigations; Better manage fraud in future emergencies building on lessons learned during COVID-19.
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
How much money could families get if Labour scraps two-child benefit cap?
Scrapping the two-child benefit cap could lift up to 470,000 children out of poverty, according to the latest estimates, by allowing low-income families to claim an extra £3,513 per year in universal credit for every extra child. After months of firm support for maintaining the limit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has appeared to leave the door open to the possibility of lifting the limit, put in place by the Conservative government in 2017. 'We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty,' Sir Keir said last week, in response to questions on whether he would scrap it. It came after mounting pressure from his own MPs and Reform leader Nigel Farage, who committed to scrapping the limit if he were PM. There are 1.2 million families with three or more children in the UK and around 370,000 of these are households on universal credit (UC). Families receiving UC - who are on low or no income - receive an extra £339 each month for their first child born before 2017, and £292.81 for first or second children born after 2017. This amounts to £7,581 per year for families with two children. But in most cases, parents are unable to claim UC benefits for any further children. There are rare exemptions, for example, in the case of twins, or adopted children. Most families can still claim general child benefit payments for more than two children, which amounts to £897 per child per year. But if the government scrapped the two-child benefit cap, families on UC could claim a further £3,513 per year for every extra child. However, there is an upper limit to how much families can claim in benefits with an overall cap of £22,020 a year, or £25,323 for households in London. The number of children living in poor households has been steadily increasing over the past decade, with 4.5 million children - around 1 in 3 - now living in poverty. Poverty can be defined in several ways but the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uses 'relative low income' as a marker, referring to people in households which earn below 60 per cent of the median income of £36,700 in 2024, or £14,680. Some of these children are going without essentials, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, such as food, heating, clothing or basic toiletries. Removing the two-child benefit cap could lift 350,000 out of poverty, according to analysis from researchers at the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG). A further 700,000 children could see their lives improved with the extra cash, their research has found. Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation has estimated that around 470,000 children could be taken out of poverty by lifting the cap, or 280,000 if the limit was extended to three children. Since the Labour government came into power in July last year, some 37,000 more children have been pushed into poverty by the two-child limit, according to CPAG estimates. 'No road to better living standards, economic growth and wider opportunities starts with record child poverty. The policy must go - and sooner rather than later,' said CPAG's CEO Alison Garnham. Since the cap applies to families receiving UC, the children affected are in low-income households. And 6 in 10 families affected by the two-child limit have at least one parent in work, CPAG found. The estimated cost of removing the two-child limit, extending it to three children, or removing a household cap varies. Getting rid of the cap could cost the government £3.5bn in 2029/30, according to estimates from think tank the Resolution Foundation earlier this year. Meanwhile, CPAG suggests that the move would cost £2bn. The Independent's own calculations suggest that extending the limit to three children could cost at least £1.3 bn a year; assuming that 370,000 households claim an extra £3,513 of UC each year. Consecutive governments have refused to commit to removing the cap, despite its unpopularity with voters. Last year, Sir Keir enforced the whip on seven Labour MPs who voted against their party to oppose the two-child benefit cap. The current Labour government had consistently maintained that they would not take action to remove the cap, due to tight resources in the budget; yet Sir Keir's statements last week appeared to open up the possibility of a U-turn.
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
DWP PIP cuts blamed on likes of benefit cheat mum as she's forced to pay back £20k
People have slammed the 'audacity' of a benefit cheat mum who falsely claimed more than £20,000. Sara Morris duped the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) into thinking she was so unwell she struggled to leave the house or look after herself. The mum-of-three was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2005 and exaggerated its effects to claim PIP in 2020. The 50-year-old said she could not stand at the cooker and found it difficult to get out of the bath unaided. READ MORE: Midlands area where homeowners saw £45,000 wiped from value of properties READ MORE: Dad who experienced 'terrible back pain' died nine days after going to hospital Morris also claimed she was so anxious when she left the house that even a trip to the pharmacy to collect her medication left her in tears. However, in reality she was running multiple 5km and 10km races and even posted pictures of herself competing. She had failed to tell the DWP that she was a member of the Stone Master Marathoners and was overpaid £20,528.83 between October 20, 2020 and April 25, 2023. Morris, of Walton Way, Stone, admitted dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit and was jailed for eight months in July 2024. During a recent proceeds of crime hearing, Judge Graeme Smith was told Morris benefited from her criminality to the tune of £22,386.02 and the available amount was £60,000. He ordered Morris to repay £22,386.02 within 28 days or serve nine months in prison in default. And BirminghamLive readers have slammed the mum's actions saying that people like her are the reason PIP payments are so difficult to obtain. Karen said: "People like this are the reason genuine disabled are being affected today." Victoria added: "Because of people like her we [are] going to suffer." "I'd laugh at the audacity but it's really not funny," Claire added. Wayne wrote: "How on earth did she manage to get away with it. With my arthritis and other issues I provided medical proof from consultants, doctors, medical exams, blood tests, MRIs and X-rays. "Did she manage to fool all the latter medical evidence or did no one at the DWP bother to check?" Lisa added: "So she should pay every penny back." "And this is the reason why it is so hard to get PIP," Kimberley said. She added: "I had my first two rejected so I had to get a disability professional to help me with the forms. I struggle walking because of my asthma and old injury." A court had heard how investigators carried out surveillance on Morris from February 5 to February 20, 2023. Prosecutor Regan Walters said: "On February 5 she took part in a five-mile race and was seen running without assistance and showed no signs of balance problems. "On February 11 she was seen running with the Stone Master Marathoners and showed no signs of discomfort." Morris competed in 73 races between May 2019 and December 2022. During an interview in May 2023, Morris said her MS had worsened and she was suffering from fatigue. She confirmed she had been a member of Stone Master Marathoners running club prior to making her claim and filled in her PIP form on her worst day, StokeonTrentLive reports. Paul Cliff, defending, said the 'severity' of her condition's 'impact ebbs and flows to a degree'. He said: "But it is accepted by her that the application did not give the full picture. It crossed over into the realms of dishonesty." The court heard how Morris's marriage broke down in the spring of 2020 and she did not enjoy a lavish lifestyle as a result of her fraudulent claim, Mr Cliff said. He added: "She lost her home because of financial problems and was struggling to keep her head above water financially. "The application did not give the full picture. She did say running was one of the ways she tried to manage her multiple sclerosis. "She has found it difficult to come to terms with her dishonesty." Morris must also pay a £187 surcharge. At an earlier hearing, the court was told that Morris would not have been awarded PIP had she been honest about her condition. Mr Walters said: "The benefit was paid on the basis she would notify the DWP of any changes which affected the amount of benefits. "The DWP obtained photographs of the defendant and some Facebook posts taken by Morris herself. "She had been taking part in marathons, races and orienteering. "The first photo was taken a month after she signed her initial claim form. "The defendant can be seen to have been taking part in a competitive run two days prior to making that initial claim. "At no point was information received from the defendant reporting any improvement in her condition during her claim for PIP. "The defendant reported receiving assistance in almost every aspect of her life. "On some days her stress and anxiety led to her being housebound." She added she used a walking stick when she felt tired and unsteady. "The defendant exaggerated her issues throughout the claim process."
