
No SC, ST, OBC quota in minority college admissions: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court on Thursday stayed a decision of the Maharashtra government by which it had granted SC, ST and OBC reservations for First Year Junior College (FYJC) admission in minority institutions in the state.The bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar said, "We find substance in the submissions advanced by the counsels for the petitioners therefore the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable in any seats in minority institutions."advertisementThe bench directed the government to file a reply to its plea within four weeks and granted time to the petitioners to file a reply in two weeks after that. The bench will again hear the petition on August 6.The bench had earlier asked the Maharashtra government to consider passing a corrigendum to the Government Resolution (GR) passed on May 6, 2025, in which it had taken this decision.
However, Government Pleader Neha Bhide said that she had no instructions to withdraw the GR.While making her arguments she submitted, "The right of the minority community is not being touched by the GR. The minority community can fill up all the seats that they have. It is only at the stage when the seats remain unfilled, and the seats are surrendered that the social reservation comes into place."advertisement"The reservation would be only for the surrendered seats and this is not a case which violates constitutional mandate," Bhide added.PETITIONERS CITE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 30Petitioners lawyer Milind Sathe read article 15(5) of Constitution of India which allows the state to make special provisions by law for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes, particularly in relation to their admission to educational institutions, including private institutions, whether aided or unaided by the state, but excluding minority educational institutions.Advocate SC Naidu pointed to Article 30 of the Indian Constitution which protects the rights of minorities, both religious and linguistic, to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.It ensures that minorities can preserve and develop their unique cultures through education. This article prohibits the State from discriminating against any institution based on the fact that it is administered by a minority group, especially when granting financial aid.The lawyers also submitted that the seats that remained vacant even in the minority quota are always filled according to merit.The bench was hearing a petition filed by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce in Mumbai and another petition by Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions.FYJC GENERAL MERIT LIST RELEASED, 200 STUDENTS SCORE FULL MARKSadvertisementMeanwhile, the Maharashtra School Education and Sports Department has released the general merit list for First Year Junior College (FYJC) admissions today, June 12, 2025. Students who applied for Class 11 admission can now check their merit status on mahafyjcadmissions.in.This year, 200 students scored a perfect 500 out of 500, making the competition especially intense. The merit list is divided into four score bands: 500–400, 399–300, 299–200, and 199–175.Candidates can view or download the list by clicking on 'General Merit List' on the homepage and selecting the appropriate option. To check individual merit ranks, students must enter their application number in the search bar on the same page.Officials clarified that this is not the allotment list. Seat allocation will be based on multiple criteria including scores, reservation claims, and availability of seats as confirmed by junior colleges.As per the official notification, 'Any discrepancy found during the verification process at any level may lead to revision of the candidate's position in the General merit list. The misleading information may also lead to rejection and or cancellation of admission.'advertisementThe admission process for FYJC began on June 12 and will continue till June 14. Eligible students must complete the required formalities within this window.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Tamil Nadu BJP seeks probe after Dalit man found dead at Muslim girlfriend's home
A man identified as Dhanush was found dead in Tamil Nadu's Kanyakumari district after he allegedly died by suicide by hanging himself at the residence of a woman he had reportedly been in a relationship with. According to police sources, the incident took place on Sunday in Kulasekaram, and preliminary investigations indicate that his death followed the woman's decision to cut off contact with who belonged to a Scheduled Caste (SC) community, was employed at an IT company in Coimbatore. The woman he was in a relationship with was from the Muslim community. Police have confirmed that no suicide note was recovered from the scene, and that his family has not made any direct accusations against anyone. The BJP has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the death, pointing to the woman's reported familial links with the ruling DMK. BJP state president Nainar Nagendran has both demanded a thorough and independent investigation into the case, alleging potential political a post on X, Nagendran stated, 'Dhanush, a young man from a Hindu Scheduled Caste community who was about to marry a woman of a different religion in Kulasekaram, Kanyakumari district, has been found dead in a mysterious manner after hanging himself. That too, the fact that he hanged himself on the roof of the house of the woman he loved has created a lot of suspicion and anxiety.'advertisementHe further claimed, 'With reports that the woman's close relatives are in the DMK, the question has arisen in everyone's mind whether this case will be investigated properly.'Nagendran criticised the state government's handling of caste-related violence and urged the Tamil Nadu Police to ensure a proper autopsy is conducted without any bias. 'The police should not act unilaterally with the intention of supporting the ruling party's rhetoric,' he wrote, adding that the BJP would continue to support Dhanush's family in their demand for justice. IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC discharges CA of Chhagan Bhujbal, family in money laundering case by ED
The Bombay High Court Monday discharged the chartered accountant (CA) of NCP leader and minister Chhagan Bhujbal and his family from a money laundering case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in 2015. The high court, while hearing the criminal revision application by CA Shyam Radhakrishna Malpani, noted that the special court committed an error in rejecting the discharge plea in March 2021. A single-judge bench of Justice Rajesh N Laddha observed that 'mere absence of due diligence by applicant does not amount to the commission or omission of an offence under Section 3 (money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).' The ED had lodged a case against Chhagan Bhujbal and others based on a complaint filed by the state Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in 2015. It was alleged that land belonging to the Regional Transport Office (RTO) in Andheri was handed over to a developer firm when Chhagan Bhujbal was the deputy chief minister and the state Public Works Department (PWD) minister of Maharashtra from 2004 to 2014. As per the agency, the said project was awarded to the developer in lieu of the construction of Maharashtra Sadan in Delhi and the RTO building in Tardeo. The ED had arrested Chhagan Bhujbal in 2015 for alleged money laundering, and he remained in custody until 2018, when the Bombay High Court granted him bail. Chhagan Bhujbal, his son Pankaj Bhujbal, nephew and former MP Sameer Bhujbal and five others were discharged by a special court in 2021 from the ACB case. In the case of Malpani, the ED had alleged that he actively participated in the offence of money laundering while serving as the CA for the entities controlled by the Bhujbals. As per the central agency, Malpani was responsible for auditing financial records and was aware of the suspicious transactions and sham arrangements carried out by these entities. Advocate Hiten Venegaonkar for ED argued that the applicant conducted audits of companies controlled by Bhujbals and, in doing so, camouflaged illicit transactions and concealed the unlawful flow of proceeds of crime generated by the Bhujbals. However, senior advocate Pranav Badheka for Malpani submitted that Chhagan Bhujbal and his family members were discharged by the special court in two predicate offences on which ED had lodged its case. Badheka argued that Malpani, who was a statutory auditor, had a limited role to form an opinion on whether company accounts are properly maintained or not and the auditor is not expected to function as an investigator. The plea claimed that Malpani audited financial accounts only for a period from the financial year ending March 2012 to 2015, and alleged proceeds of crime are claimed to have originated around 2007-08. Badheka argued that there was no evidence or material on record or in complaint to show that Malpani failed in his duties as auditor, and so he should be discharged from the case. Justice Laddha, in his order, observed that 'the role of the auditor is inherently distinct from that of the investigating agency.' 'The complaint lacks material to establish a nexus between the applicant and the alleged criminal conspiracy or money laundering activities. Moreover, the applicant has neither been named nor charge-sheeted in the related crimes, which further reinforces the absence of any direct or indirect involvement in the purported criminal conduct,' the high court held and set aside a special court order, discharging Malpani from the money laundering case.


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Alarming situation', says HC on 10 deaths per day in Mumbai local train system; suggests use of automatic doors
Expressing deep concern over the 'alarming and disturbing situation' of fatalities on Mumbai's suburban railway system, with nearly 10 deaths occurring daily, the Bombay High Court Friday suggested that the railways consider installing automatically closing doors on local trains to prevent commuters from falling off. The court said that the 'unfortunate' Mumbra train accident reported earlier this month, in which five commuters lost their lives after falling off overcrowded trains, should not have happened. It pointed out that as per an earlier response by the railways, nearly 3,588 deaths took place on the Central Railway (CR) and Western Railway (WR) suburban systems in 2024, and said that measures taken so far are insufficient. The high court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by one Yatin Jadhav, a daily commuter who raised concerns over the high rate of fatalities in the second busiest suburban railway system in the world and sought the formation of an expert panel to recommend measures to eliminate deaths due to untoward incidents. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, representing the Centre, informed the division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V Marne that the railways have a high-level monitoring committee which has a 'zero death mission' in place, and a multi-disciplinary committee headed by a senior divisional safety officer has now been formed to examine what led to the accident in Mumbai. The court then directed the concerned committees to consider the suggestions by the petitioner, represented by senior advocate Rohan Shah and advocate Surabhi Prabhudesai, and place their recommendations on record within three weeks, along with the timelines within which such measures can be implemented. 'What disturbs us is that in 2024, 3,588 deaths took place on CR and WR, which averages to 10 deaths per day. So every day, 10 Mumbaikars die while travelling on the train. And these numbers of deaths are due to falling down from a train, (being) hit by a pole or (due to) gap between the footboards and the platform. This is an alarming situation. This is your data. Though you (railways) have projected that there is a reduction of deaths by 46 per cent compared to 2009, it is still not sufficient,' Justice Marne remarked orally. CJ Aradhe added, 'This (Mumbra incident) should not have happened. But, obviously, these measures which you (railways) have taken are not sufficient… The local train (doors) should not be open so that there is no scope for overcrowding. You should provide automatic doors which close. Why can't you do that to achieve your goal? This is one of the suggestions as a layperson. We are not experts in rail safety, but probably this may be one of the major suggestions of the committee.' In August last year, the railways informed the high court that over 45,000 lives were lost in the suburban railway system in over 15 years. ASG Singh submitted that railway authorities were taking steps under its 'zero death mission', including construction of boundary walls and fencing walls near the tracks, along with partitions between tracks to avoid trespassing and crossing, besides removing some stalls on platforms which become overcrowded, and said the authorities will continue to take further steps. He further submitted that while the authorities are taking steps to improve the system, there are constraints as they can construct such walls or fences only during late-night hours as trains cannot be halted, else the entire city will come to a standstill. Singh added that the multidisciplinary committee examining the causes of the Mumbra incident shall soon suggest remedial measures, which will be produced before the court along with timelines to implement them. Seeking a response from the railway committees, the high court posted further hearing for July 14.