logo
#

Latest news with #MSKarnik

HC stays gov resolution asking minority institutions to enforce quotas in FYJC admissions
HC stays gov resolution asking minority institutions to enforce quotas in FYJC admissions

Hindustan Times

time13-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Hindustan Times

HC stays gov resolution asking minority institutions to enforce quotas in FYJC admissions

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Thursday stayed a resolution issued by the Maharashtra government on May 6, which said that minority educational institutes must have reservation for Scheduled Castes/Schedule Tribes (SC/ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in first year junior college (FYJC) admissions. Stating that social reservation should not be applicable to any seat in a minority educational institution, a division bench of justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar stayed the resolution and asked the state to update the FYJC admission portal. The court asked the state to respond in four weeks and scheduled the next hearing on August 6. The order follows petitions filed by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a minority institution that runs the Walchand College of Arts and Science and the Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce in Mumbai, and another petition by the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions. Senior advocate Milind Sathe, represented the petitioners, and said that according to the Constitution of India, minority educational institutes, both aided or unaided, need not have reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. He added that a similar government resolution issued in 2019 was also withdrawn after it was challenged in the court. The court on Wednesday had asked government pleader Neha Bhide to check whether the government was willing to drop minority institutions from the scope of the resolution. Bhide on Thursday told the court that she had not received any instructions from the government to change the resolution. She added that the resolution did not violate the Indian Constitution and said, 'It is only if the seats remain unfilled and are surrendered that the social reservation comes into place.' The high court had, on Wednesday, questioned the resolution. The court had said that this could just be a mistake by the government for which a correction can be issued, and that an order from the court was not necessary when it came to making such corrections. The Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions (MAMEI) had raised objections about the FYJC admission process for the academic year 2025-26 and said that minority colleges until recently followed a fixed seat distribution of 50% for minority quota, 10% for in-house students, 5% for management quota, and 35% for the rest, including the sports quota and ex-servicemen quota. This year, the government changed the rules for admissions to minority institutions and imposed a reservation for SC/STs and OBCs on the 35% of seats which were in the open category. MAMEI said that the previous reservation structure was legally protected and upheld by the high court and the Supreme Court, and added that the latter had earlier dismissed a petition by the state which challenged the autonomy of minority institutions.

No SC, ST, OBC quota in minority college admissions: Bombay High Court
No SC, ST, OBC quota in minority college admissions: Bombay High Court

India Today

time12-06-2025

  • Politics
  • India Today

No SC, ST, OBC quota in minority college admissions: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on Thursday stayed a decision of the Maharashtra government by which it had granted SC, ST and OBC reservations for First Year Junior College (FYJC) admission in minority institutions in the bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar said, "We find substance in the submissions advanced by the counsels for the petitioners therefore the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable in any seats in minority institutions."advertisementThe bench directed the government to file a reply to its plea within four weeks and granted time to the petitioners to file a reply in two weeks after that. The bench will again hear the petition on August bench had earlier asked the Maharashtra government to consider passing a corrigendum to the Government Resolution (GR) passed on May 6, 2025, in which it had taken this decision. However, Government Pleader Neha Bhide said that she had no instructions to withdraw the making her arguments she submitted, "The right of the minority community is not being touched by the GR. The minority community can fill up all the seats that they have. It is only at the stage when the seats remain unfilled, and the seats are surrendered that the social reservation comes into place."advertisement"The reservation would be only for the surrendered seats and this is not a case which violates constitutional mandate," Bhide CITE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 30Petitioners lawyer Milind Sathe read article 15(5) of Constitution of India which allows the state to make special provisions by law for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes, particularly in relation to their admission to educational institutions, including private institutions, whether aided or unaided by the state, but excluding minority educational SC Naidu pointed to Article 30 of the Indian Constitution which protects the rights of minorities, both religious and linguistic, to establish and administer educational institutions of their ensures that minorities can preserve and develop their unique cultures through education. This article prohibits the State from discriminating against any institution based on the fact that it is administered by a minority group, especially when granting financial lawyers also submitted that the seats that remained vacant even in the minority quota are always filled according to bench was hearing a petition filed by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce in Mumbai and another petition by Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational GENERAL MERIT LIST RELEASED, 200 STUDENTS SCORE FULL MARKSadvertisementMeanwhile, the Maharashtra School Education and Sports Department has released the general merit list for First Year Junior College (FYJC) admissions today, June 12, 2025. Students who applied for Class 11 admission can now check their merit status on year, 200 students scored a perfect 500 out of 500, making the competition especially intense. The merit list is divided into four score bands: 500–400, 399–300, 299–200, and 199– can view or download the list by clicking on 'General Merit List' on the homepage and selecting the appropriate option. To check individual merit ranks, students must enter their application number in the search bar on the same clarified that this is not the allotment list. Seat allocation will be based on multiple criteria including scores, reservation claims, and availability of seats as confirmed by junior per the official notification, 'Any discrepancy found during the verification process at any level may lead to revision of the candidate's position in the General merit list. The misleading information may also lead to rejection and or cancellation of admission.'advertisementThe admission process for FYJC began on June 12 and will continue till June 14. Eligible students must complete the required formalities within this window.

HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions
HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions

Hindustan Times

time12-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Hindustan Times

HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions

Mumbai, The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted an interim stay on the Maharashtra government's mandate to minority educational institutes to reserve seats for Schedule Castes/Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes for first-year junior college admissions. A bench of Justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar passed the order on a bunch of petitions filed by some minority institutions, challenging the May 6 resolution issued by the government's school education and sports department applying the constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. The high court said it found substance in the petitioners' arguments and hence the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable for Class 11 admissions in minority educational institutions. The HC bench said it was granting a stay on the clause of the resolution that included minority educational institutes for the reservation. It directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the matter for further hearing on August 6. The high court on Wednesday questioned the government's rationale behind the resolution and asked if it was willing to withdraw the same or issue a corrigendum clarifying that minority institutes would not be included in the reservation. On Thursday, government pleader Neha Bhide told the court that she has no instructions from the government to withdraw the resolution or issue a corrigendum. As per the pleas, Article 15 of the Constitution excludes minority educational institutes, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. The petitions claimed that under Article 30 , the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the institution. A similar GR was issued in 2019 but it was withdrawn after petitions were filed then, they said.

Bombay HC challenges inclusion of minority colleges in reservation order, cites Article 30 protections
Bombay HC challenges inclusion of minority colleges in reservation order, cites Article 30 protections

Time of India

time12-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Time of India

Bombay HC challenges inclusion of minority colleges in reservation order, cites Article 30 protections

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday questioned the rationale behind a Maharashtra government resolution (GR) directing minority educational institutions to process first-year junior college admissions by implementing Constitutional and social reservations. A bench of Justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar asked the government pleader Neha Bhide to seek instructions on whether the government was willing to issue a corrigendum or withdraw the clause in the GR issued on May 6. "Why did you (government) bring in the minority institutes in the (ambit of) the GR? Withdraw the minority institutes from this. Every time you do not need an order from the court. Withdrawing or issuing a corrigendum is not difficult," the bench told government pleader Neha Bhide and asked her to seek instructions. It may be a bonafide mistake by the government for which a corrigendum can be issued, the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on Thursday. The GR directing the implementation of SC, ST, and OBC quotas for admissions to first-year junior colleges governed by minority trusts was challenged on the ground that such institutions, both aided or unaided, are excluded from applying such reservations for socially and educationally backward classes under Article 15(5) of the Constitution. The petitions claimed that under Article 30 (1), minority institutions can establish and administer educational institutions. The petitioners claimed a similar GR was issued in 2019 too, but it was withdrawn after it was challenged in court. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Bombay HC asks state govt to remove minority colleges from the scope of reservations
Bombay HC asks state govt to remove minority colleges from the scope of reservations

Hindustan Times

time12-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Hindustan Times

Bombay HC asks state govt to remove minority colleges from the scope of reservations

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court, on Wednesday, questioned the resolution the state government had issued on May 6 which directed minority educational institutions in the state to implement constitutional and social reservations in First Year Junior College (FYJC) admissions. The court was acting upon a petition filed by two minority institutions which claimed that under article 30 (1) of the Indian Constitution, all minorities, whether religious or linguistic, had the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Justice M S Karnik and justice N R Borkar asked the government pleader Neha Bhide to check whether the government was willing to correct the resolution so that minority unaided institutions would be exempt from reservations. The court said that this could just be a mistake by the government for which a correction can be issued, and scheduled the next hearing of the petition on Thursday. The court added that an order from the court was not necessary when it came to making such corrections. The government resolution directing the implementation of reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in FYJC admissions to colleges governed by minority institutions was challenged on the ground that such institutions, both aided or unaided, are excluded from applying such reservations for socially and educationally backward classes under article 15 (5) of the Indian Constitution. A similar resolution passed in 2019 was also withdrawn after it was challenged in the court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store