No Cadillac Corvette coming, as GM rules out mid-engine luxury supercar

General Motors' luxury brand Cadillac is in the midst of (another) massive transformation, but its halo model will be an ultra-exclusive, ultra-luxury fastback… not a V8-powered supercar.
CNBC reports that GM president Mark Reuss has ruled out a Cadillac version of the mid-engine Chevrolet C8 Corvette, arguing it didn't fit into the brand's new strategy and would have to share the majority of its components with the Chevy supercar.
While he reportedly said there was potential room for more specialty, Cadillac-specific vehicles outside the ultra-luxury Celestiq, he ruled out the company's premium brand offering a version of the Corvette – something it has done before with the XLR.
"It was developed as a secondary car to the Corvette, on purpose. We would never do that," said Mr Reuss, appearing to refer to the defunct XLR.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
That's despite Cadillac offering vehicles on shared GM platforms like the Escalade large SUV, which is related to the Chevrolet Tahoe/Suburban and GMC Yukon/Yukon XL but which features unique interior and exterior styling.
Other Cadillac models are based on platforms shared with Buick, Chevrolet and GMC vehicles, apart from the CT4 and CT5 which use a version of the Alpha platform that underpinned the defunct Chevrolet Camaro.
Cadillac's first and only Corvette-based model, the XLR, entered production in 2003 and preceded the C6 Corvette by a year. While it shared the Corvette's platform, it had completely different interior and exterior styling.
Not only that, but the XLR ditched the Chevy's pushrod V8s for the double overhead cam 4.6-litre Northstar V8 developed for the Cadillac brand.
This actually produced considerably less power and torque than even the base C6 Corvette's 6.0-litre 'LS2' V8, befitting the XLR's role as more of a refined Mercedes-Benz SL rival than an out-and-out sports car.
The XLR was also offered only with an automatic transmission and a folding hardtop roof.
For 2006, Cadillac introduced the XLR-V powered by a supercharged 4.4-litre version of the Northstar V8, which produced slightly more power and torque than the base C6 Corvette.
The XLR-V became the first Cadillac to wear a base price north of US$100,000, but the XLR experiment ended in 2009 when Cadillac swung the axe on the luxury roadster. It had reportedly failed to meet sales expectations, and GM was about to go through bankruptcy proceedings.
Cadillac has since offered other models priced above the US$100,000 mark, culminating in the Celestiq which starts at around US$340,000 (~A$531,000).
However, while it has offered hot twin-turbo V6 and supercharged V8-powered models, these have predominantly been sedans.
It even developed a twin-turbo double overhead-cam V8 called the Blackwing, producing up to 410kW of power and 868Nm of torque. This ended up being produced for only a couple of model years and was seen in just one model, the CT6, US production of which was halted to make room for electric vehicle (EV) production.
But while Cadillac has previously stated a goal of going electric-only by 2030 and is yet to officially scrap this goal as some brands have done, it continues to offer high-performance sports sedans like the CT5-V Blackwing and will join the Formula 1 grid in 2026.
Mr Reuss' suggestion of other Cadillac-exclusive, specialty models potentially joining the Celestiq could point to a production future for last year's Sollei concept, a flagship electric convertible based on the Celestiq.
Should it build this, it would be the brand's first convertible since the XLR was axed in 2009.
MORE: Everything Chevrolet Corvette
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
General Motors' luxury brand Cadillac is in the midst of (another) massive transformation, but its halo model will be an ultra-exclusive, ultra-luxury fastback… not a V8-powered supercar.
CNBC reports that GM president Mark Reuss has ruled out a Cadillac version of the mid-engine Chevrolet C8 Corvette, arguing it didn't fit into the brand's new strategy and would have to share the majority of its components with the Chevy supercar.
While he reportedly said there was potential room for more specialty, Cadillac-specific vehicles outside the ultra-luxury Celestiq, he ruled out the company's premium brand offering a version of the Corvette – something it has done before with the XLR.
"It was developed as a secondary car to the Corvette, on purpose. We would never do that," said Mr Reuss, appearing to refer to the defunct XLR.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
That's despite Cadillac offering vehicles on shared GM platforms like the Escalade large SUV, which is related to the Chevrolet Tahoe/Suburban and GMC Yukon/Yukon XL but which features unique interior and exterior styling.
Other Cadillac models are based on platforms shared with Buick, Chevrolet and GMC vehicles, apart from the CT4 and CT5 which use a version of the Alpha platform that underpinned the defunct Chevrolet Camaro.
Cadillac's first and only Corvette-based model, the XLR, entered production in 2003 and preceded the C6 Corvette by a year. While it shared the Corvette's platform, it had completely different interior and exterior styling.
Not only that, but the XLR ditched the Chevy's pushrod V8s for the double overhead cam 4.6-litre Northstar V8 developed for the Cadillac brand.
This actually produced considerably less power and torque than even the base C6 Corvette's 6.0-litre 'LS2' V8, befitting the XLR's role as more of a refined Mercedes-Benz SL rival than an out-and-out sports car.
The XLR was also offered only with an automatic transmission and a folding hardtop roof.
For 2006, Cadillac introduced the XLR-V powered by a supercharged 4.4-litre version of the Northstar V8, which produced slightly more power and torque than the base C6 Corvette.
The XLR-V became the first Cadillac to wear a base price north of US$100,000, but the XLR experiment ended in 2009 when Cadillac swung the axe on the luxury roadster. It had reportedly failed to meet sales expectations, and GM was about to go through bankruptcy proceedings.
Cadillac has since offered other models priced above the US$100,000 mark, culminating in the Celestiq which starts at around US$340,000 (~A$531,000).
However, while it has offered hot twin-turbo V6 and supercharged V8-powered models, these have predominantly been sedans.
It even developed a twin-turbo double overhead-cam V8 called the Blackwing, producing up to 410kW of power and 868Nm of torque. This ended up being produced for only a couple of model years and was seen in just one model, the CT6, US production of which was halted to make room for electric vehicle (EV) production.
But while Cadillac has previously stated a goal of going electric-only by 2030 and is yet to officially scrap this goal as some brands have done, it continues to offer high-performance sports sedans like the CT5-V Blackwing and will join the Formula 1 grid in 2026.
Mr Reuss' suggestion of other Cadillac-exclusive, specialty models potentially joining the Celestiq could point to a production future for last year's Sollei concept, a flagship electric convertible based on the Celestiq.
Should it build this, it would be the brand's first convertible since the XLR was axed in 2009.
MORE: Everything Chevrolet Corvette
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
General Motors' luxury brand Cadillac is in the midst of (another) massive transformation, but its halo model will be an ultra-exclusive, ultra-luxury fastback… not a V8-powered supercar.
CNBC reports that GM president Mark Reuss has ruled out a Cadillac version of the mid-engine Chevrolet C8 Corvette, arguing it didn't fit into the brand's new strategy and would have to share the majority of its components with the Chevy supercar.
While he reportedly said there was potential room for more specialty, Cadillac-specific vehicles outside the ultra-luxury Celestiq, he ruled out the company's premium brand offering a version of the Corvette – something it has done before with the XLR.
"It was developed as a secondary car to the Corvette, on purpose. We would never do that," said Mr Reuss, appearing to refer to the defunct XLR.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
That's despite Cadillac offering vehicles on shared GM platforms like the Escalade large SUV, which is related to the Chevrolet Tahoe/Suburban and GMC Yukon/Yukon XL but which features unique interior and exterior styling.
Other Cadillac models are based on platforms shared with Buick, Chevrolet and GMC vehicles, apart from the CT4 and CT5 which use a version of the Alpha platform that underpinned the defunct Chevrolet Camaro.
Cadillac's first and only Corvette-based model, the XLR, entered production in 2003 and preceded the C6 Corvette by a year. While it shared the Corvette's platform, it had completely different interior and exterior styling.
Not only that, but the XLR ditched the Chevy's pushrod V8s for the double overhead cam 4.6-litre Northstar V8 developed for the Cadillac brand.
This actually produced considerably less power and torque than even the base C6 Corvette's 6.0-litre 'LS2' V8, befitting the XLR's role as more of a refined Mercedes-Benz SL rival than an out-and-out sports car.
The XLR was also offered only with an automatic transmission and a folding hardtop roof.
For 2006, Cadillac introduced the XLR-V powered by a supercharged 4.4-litre version of the Northstar V8, which produced slightly more power and torque than the base C6 Corvette.
The XLR-V became the first Cadillac to wear a base price north of US$100,000, but the XLR experiment ended in 2009 when Cadillac swung the axe on the luxury roadster. It had reportedly failed to meet sales expectations, and GM was about to go through bankruptcy proceedings.
Cadillac has since offered other models priced above the US$100,000 mark, culminating in the Celestiq which starts at around US$340,000 (~A$531,000).
However, while it has offered hot twin-turbo V6 and supercharged V8-powered models, these have predominantly been sedans.
It even developed a twin-turbo double overhead-cam V8 called the Blackwing, producing up to 410kW of power and 868Nm of torque. This ended up being produced for only a couple of model years and was seen in just one model, the CT6, US production of which was halted to make room for electric vehicle (EV) production.
But while Cadillac has previously stated a goal of going electric-only by 2030 and is yet to officially scrap this goal as some brands have done, it continues to offer high-performance sports sedans like the CT5-V Blackwing and will join the Formula 1 grid in 2026.
Mr Reuss' suggestion of other Cadillac-exclusive, specialty models potentially joining the Celestiq could point to a production future for last year's Sollei concept, a flagship electric convertible based on the Celestiq.
Should it build this, it would be the brand's first convertible since the XLR was axed in 2009.
MORE: Everything Chevrolet Corvette
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
General Motors' luxury brand Cadillac is in the midst of (another) massive transformation, but its halo model will be an ultra-exclusive, ultra-luxury fastback… not a V8-powered supercar.
CNBC reports that GM president Mark Reuss has ruled out a Cadillac version of the mid-engine Chevrolet C8 Corvette, arguing it didn't fit into the brand's new strategy and would have to share the majority of its components with the Chevy supercar.
While he reportedly said there was potential room for more specialty, Cadillac-specific vehicles outside the ultra-luxury Celestiq, he ruled out the company's premium brand offering a version of the Corvette – something it has done before with the XLR.
"It was developed as a secondary car to the Corvette, on purpose. We would never do that," said Mr Reuss, appearing to refer to the defunct XLR.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
That's despite Cadillac offering vehicles on shared GM platforms like the Escalade large SUV, which is related to the Chevrolet Tahoe/Suburban and GMC Yukon/Yukon XL but which features unique interior and exterior styling.
Other Cadillac models are based on platforms shared with Buick, Chevrolet and GMC vehicles, apart from the CT4 and CT5 which use a version of the Alpha platform that underpinned the defunct Chevrolet Camaro.
Cadillac's first and only Corvette-based model, the XLR, entered production in 2003 and preceded the C6 Corvette by a year. While it shared the Corvette's platform, it had completely different interior and exterior styling.
Not only that, but the XLR ditched the Chevy's pushrod V8s for the double overhead cam 4.6-litre Northstar V8 developed for the Cadillac brand.
This actually produced considerably less power and torque than even the base C6 Corvette's 6.0-litre 'LS2' V8, befitting the XLR's role as more of a refined Mercedes-Benz SL rival than an out-and-out sports car.
The XLR was also offered only with an automatic transmission and a folding hardtop roof.
For 2006, Cadillac introduced the XLR-V powered by a supercharged 4.4-litre version of the Northstar V8, which produced slightly more power and torque than the base C6 Corvette.
The XLR-V became the first Cadillac to wear a base price north of US$100,000, but the XLR experiment ended in 2009 when Cadillac swung the axe on the luxury roadster. It had reportedly failed to meet sales expectations, and GM was about to go through bankruptcy proceedings.
Cadillac has since offered other models priced above the US$100,000 mark, culminating in the Celestiq which starts at around US$340,000 (~A$531,000).
However, while it has offered hot twin-turbo V6 and supercharged V8-powered models, these have predominantly been sedans.
It even developed a twin-turbo double overhead-cam V8 called the Blackwing, producing up to 410kW of power and 868Nm of torque. This ended up being produced for only a couple of model years and was seen in just one model, the CT6, US production of which was halted to make room for electric vehicle (EV) production.
But while Cadillac has previously stated a goal of going electric-only by 2030 and is yet to officially scrap this goal as some brands have done, it continues to offer high-performance sports sedans like the CT5-V Blackwing and will join the Formula 1 grid in 2026.
Mr Reuss' suggestion of other Cadillac-exclusive, specialty models potentially joining the Celestiq could point to a production future for last year's Sollei concept, a flagship electric convertible based on the Celestiq.
Should it build this, it would be the brand's first convertible since the XLR was axed in 2009.
MORE: Everything Chevrolet Corvette
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Perth Now

18 hours ago

• Perth Now

Miners locked out of work over pay dispute

About 160 coal miners have been locked out of work for more than one week without pay over a bargaining dispute with their employer. The Mining and Energy Union (MEU) allege US-owned Peabody Energy retaliated after union members at the Helensburg coal mine near Wollongong in NSW stopped work for one hour in response to a 'lack of progress in negotiations.' The union was advised its members would be locked out without pay for eight days from Wednesday less than two hours after a meeting with the Fair Work Commission over the dispute. The Mining and Energy Union allege US owned Peabody Energy retaliated after union members at the Helensburgh coal mine stopped work for one hour in response to a 'lack of progress in negotiations.' Credit: News Limited Miners asked for three pay increases of 5 per cent over a three-year period and an extra $1.50 added to their hourly rate, after miners were allegedly told they would be looked after when they received a low increase under their last agreement. MEU South West District vice president Mark Jenkins said Peabody's lockout was a harsh response aimed at coercing MEU members into giving up their bargaining position. Mr Jenkins said workers had experienced several years of low wage growth compared to high inflation and cost of living pressures, but had continually set production records at the mine for their employer. 'Now, they deserve to see some of the benefit that they were promised in the last agreement,' he said. Peabody allegedly locked out of its Helensburgh coal mine about two hours after a Fair Work Commission meeting with the MEU over the dispute. Credit: News Corp Australia 'Peabody's move to lock out MEU members for over a week is nothing but an attempt to punish and intimidate workers for exercising their industrial rights.' Peabody Energy have been contacted for comment, but they told the ABC the company implemented employer response action from Wednesday until next Thursday. 'Peabody remains committed to the bargaining process and will continue to negotiate in good faith toward a new enterprise agreement,' a spokesman told the ABC.

Sydney Morning Herald

2 days ago

• Sydney Morning Herald

Snubs, subs and Trump: Albanese's NATO dilemma

Between the US review of the AUKUS submarine deal, the imposition of tariffs on Australian exports, and a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to almost double defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, the Australia-US relationship is in relatively poor state of repair at the leader-to-leader level. Loading There are risks for Albanese in spending just a couple of days in Canberra before getting back on the plane to be in The Hague for next Tuesday's summit, only to potentially be embarrassed by missing out again on a meeting with the unreliable president – though the risk is not as great as it might at first seem. The Australian prime minister will walk straight into a debate about US demands that European NATO members lift their defence spending to as much as 5 per cent – not a conversation Albanese will want to be part of, given Hegseth's comments and the fact that we currently spend about 2 per cent. And while some members of the government (and plenty of Australians) do not like Trump and think chasing a meeting amounts to kowtowing, they are wrong. The United States is Australia's most important security partner, it will be for the foreseeable future, and no matter who is in the White House, the Australian prime minister needs a strong personal relationship with the president. The federal opposition and other government critics sniff an opportunity to damage the prime minister, whether he stays in Australia and avoids a possible cancellation or if he goes and misses out again. This will not guide the prime minister's decision. At the leader-to-leader level, personal relationships are enormously consequential – they can be the 5 per cent extra that secures a tariff concession or a bigger quota of beef exports. Britain's Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, to give just three examples, have all secured benefits for their nations by moving early to meet the 47th president. Albanese is lagging, but the situation is reparable. Loading Even if Trump doesn't turn up, or if he were to cancel on Albanese again, the benefit of being there outweighs the risk. As Trump's sudden departure from the G7 reminded America's allies (as if any reminder were necessary), there are at least another three years of living in an 'America First' world – which only increases the importance of multilateral organisations. US allies have two choices: they can wring their hands about America's absent leadership, or they can get on with the quiet rebuilding of international institutions. Starmer and Macron are two leaders who have signed up to that rebuild. Albanese is another, though he knows the US relationship needs a patch and paint. Two moments at the G7 summit highlighted the benefits of turning up this week, and of going again next week. The first came just after 9am on the final day of the summit when Carney welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In his low, even voice, Zelensky outlined the latest carnage visited on Kyiv by the Russians. The capital had been smashed, he said, with 138 people injured and another 12 killed by murderous drones. But the point was not the death toll. Rather, it was the quiet dignity with which Zelensky spoke and the fact that it was face-to-face, allowing a moment for each leader to look the other in the eye. Upon such moments, friendships are forged and alliances are built. The second moment came a few hours later, during the 'family photo' of world leaders. As Albanese joined world leaders on stage, he walked straight up to Zelensky and, without saying a word, the pair embraced. That gut-instinct moment, more than any words the prime minister spoke at the summit, mattered. One of Albanese's greatest strengths over more than three decades in politics has been his ability to build and maintain a broad web of personal relationships. He's a 'relationships guy' in much the same way that Trump has been throughout his careers. Albanese and Trump will get a chance to look each other in the eye some time soon, whether it is in Holland, at the UN General Assembly in September, or at some other moment in the not-too-distant future. At that point, the questions over the relationship are likely to evaporate. As he landed back in Australia in the early hours of Thursday morning, Albanese had not made up his mind on whether to attend the summit. My tip is that if Albanese travels to Holland he will focus, at least in his public comments, on the importance of the global rules-based order, regardless of what the president does.

The Age

2 days ago

• The Age

Snubs, subs and Trump: Albanese's NATO dilemma

Between the US review of the AUKUS submarine deal, the imposition of tariffs on Australian exports, and a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to almost double defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, the Australia-US relationship is in relatively poor state of repair at the leader-to-leader level. Loading There are risks for Albanese in spending just a couple of days in Canberra before getting back on the plane to be in The Hague for next Tuesday's summit, only to potentially be embarrassed by missing out again on a meeting with the unreliable president – though the risk is not as great as it might at first seem. The Australian prime minister will walk straight into a debate about US demands that European NATO members lift their defence spending to as much as 5 per cent – not a conversation Albanese will want to be part of, given Hegseth's comments and the fact that we currently spend about 2 per cent. And while some members of the government (and plenty of Australians) do not like Trump and think chasing a meeting amounts to kowtowing, they are wrong. The United States is Australia's most important security partner, it will be for the foreseeable future, and no matter who is in the White House, the Australian prime minister needs a strong personal relationship with the president. The federal opposition and other government critics sniff an opportunity to damage the prime minister, whether he stays in Australia and avoids a possible cancellation or if he goes and misses out again. This will not guide the prime minister's decision. At the leader-to-leader level, personal relationships are enormously consequential – they can be the 5 per cent extra that secures a tariff concession or a bigger quota of beef exports. Britain's Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, to give just three examples, have all secured benefits for their nations by moving early to meet the 47th president. Albanese is lagging, but the situation is reparable. Loading Even if Trump doesn't turn up, or if he were to cancel on Albanese again, the benefit of being there outweighs the risk. As Trump's sudden departure from the G7 reminded America's allies (as if any reminder were necessary), there are at least another three years of living in an 'America First' world – which only increases the importance of multilateral organisations. US allies have two choices: they can wring their hands about America's absent leadership, or they can get on with the quiet rebuilding of international institutions. Starmer and Macron are two leaders who have signed up to that rebuild. Albanese is another, though he knows the US relationship needs a patch and paint. Two moments at the G7 summit highlighted the benefits of turning up this week, and of going again next week. The first came just after 9am on the final day of the summit when Carney welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In his low, even voice, Zelensky outlined the latest carnage visited on Kyiv by the Russians. The capital had been smashed, he said, with 138 people injured and another 12 killed by murderous drones. But the point was not the death toll. Rather, it was the quiet dignity with which Zelensky spoke and the fact that it was face-to-face, allowing a moment for each leader to look the other in the eye. Upon such moments, friendships are forged and alliances are built. The second moment came a few hours later, during the 'family photo' of world leaders. As Albanese joined world leaders on stage, he walked straight up to Zelensky and, without saying a word, the pair embraced. That gut-instinct moment, more than any words the prime minister spoke at the summit, mattered. One of Albanese's greatest strengths over more than three decades in politics has been his ability to build and maintain a broad web of personal relationships. He's a 'relationships guy' in much the same way that Trump has been throughout his careers. Albanese and Trump will get a chance to look each other in the eye some time soon, whether it is in Holland, at the UN General Assembly in September, or at some other moment in the not-too-distant future. At that point, the questions over the relationship are likely to evaporate. As he landed back in Australia in the early hours of Thursday morning, Albanese had not made up his mind on whether to attend the summit. My tip is that if Albanese travels to Holland he will focus, at least in his public comments, on the importance of the global rules-based order, regardless of what the president does.