logo
Why do we obsess over serial killers but tune out war crimes?

Why do we obsess over serial killers but tune out war crimes?

7NEWS07-06-2025

It is often said that an average person unknowingly walks past 36 murderers in their lifetime — a chilling statistic that fuels Reddit threads, true crime podcasts, and Netflix documentaries.
From the likes of Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer, society has developed a near-obsessive fascination with serial killers.
But while these individual criminals captivate millions, mass atrocities and war crimes — such as Israel's devastating war in Gaza, the civil war in Syria, the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya in Myanmar, the mass internment of Uyghur Muslims in China, or the ongoing violence in Sudan's Darfur region — often receive far less emotional engagement from the public.
So why does a single killer enthrall us more than state-sanctioned violence that claims thousands of lives?
University of Sydney criminologist Helen Easton the says the answer lies in cultural proximity and perceived relatability, not just of the killer but of the victims too.
'Part of our culture'
'We tend to be fascinated by serial killers who are part of our culture,' Easton told 7NEWS.com.au.
It feels close to home because victims of serial killings are people who live in the same cities and cultures as us.
'There's this idea of proximity, they feel close to us. They might look like us, live where we live, or share our language.'
Easton said victims of serial killers — particularly when perceived as 'random' or middle-class — generate public empathy. In contrast, victims of war crimes in distant or less culturally familiar regions often do not.
'There's a subconscious way we categorise people's value. In the case of the Rwandan genocide or violence in parts of Africa, there's often a language and cultural barrier that distances us,' she said.
Easton said with Palestine and Israel, the engagement is higher because of Israel's connection with the western world and strong ties with the US but, even then, it lacks the sense of sensationalised focus we see with serial killers.
Even fewer people know or are interested in learning about what's going on in Sudan.
But serial killers such as Bundy and Dahmer — whose crimes sprees rocked suburban America in the 1970s — continue to fascinate even years after their deaths and captivate the public through documentaries, books, and movies.
Bundy kidnapped, raped and killed dozens of young females — many of them students he abducted from their homes., college campuses or from public places by pretending he needed help — across Washington, Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, Utah and Florida from 1974 to 1978.
Serial killer and sex offender Dahmer — known as the Milwaukee Cannibal — killed and dismembered 17 young males from 1978 to 1991, with many of his horrendous crimes taking place inside his suburban home.
The enduring interest in both those cases compares with UK serial killer Steve Wright, whose five victims in 2006 were sex workers.
Easton's own research into Wright, who was convicted in 2008, underscores this selective attention — saying in many cases, it is the worth of the victim rather than the brutality of the crimes that shapes public interest.
'He fits the definition of a serial killer but there was no morbid fascination,' Easton said.
'That tells us something, we care about who the victim is. Prostituted women are seen as vulnerable and society often blames them for their victimisation.'
This phenomenon also extends to how justice is pursued. Serial killers, who often lack social or political power, are easier targets for legal accountability. War criminals, on the other hand, are frequently shielded by political and economic interests.
'Serial killers tend not to be powerful people,' Easton explains.
'War criminals often are, and that structural power protects them. While a serial killer may have power over their victims, they don't have power in the broader sociopolitical system.'
Psychological fatigue is also something to consider, Easton says. The scale and horror of genocide and war can be emotionally overwhelming, causing many people to disengage. In contrast, serial killers offer narratives that are both terrifying and digestible — and sometimes hit close to home.
'We get fatigued hearing about war and genocide, it's so horrific that I think that we can't grasp it,' Easton said.
'Serial killers are close to us, they're culturally similar to us, physically, perhaps in the same countries, but they're also distant enough from us for us to be interested in them. The chance of being killed by a serial killer is very low.'
Despite the disturbing nature of serial killings, many reports on them are packaged for entertainment — from bingeable documentaries to Halloween costumes.
Meanwhile, ongoing conflicts involving mass suffering are frequently reduced to headlines or statistics or buried in global news cycles.
These media trends reveal deeper truths about our collective empathy and its limitations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to stream this week: Taron Egerton's fiery thriller and five more shows to catch
What to stream this week: Taron Egerton's fiery thriller and five more shows to catch

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

What to stream this week: Taron Egerton's fiery thriller and five more shows to catch

This week's picks include an arson thriller, an investigation of the OceanGate submersible disaster, season two of British crime drama The Gold and a revisit of Hannibal Lector. Smoke ★★★★ (Apple TV+) Few movie stars have come to streaming with more subversive purpose than Taron Egerton. The British actor, empowered by the Kingsman action-comedies and the Elton John biopic Rocketman, has used the 2022 Apple TV+ crime drama Black Bird and now this twisty, unconventional investigative thriller to play flawed men who want to believe they're the hero of their story. Egerton has become the great pretender of leading men, undercutting viewer expectations – especially here – and serving as a skeleton key for harsh revelations. The story of a hunt for a pair of serial arsonists in America's Pacific Northwest, Smoke starts giving off uneasy but intriguing vibes within the first episode. The dynamic between arson investigator Dave Gudsen (Egerton) and his new partner, police detective Michelle Calderon (Jurnee Smollett) is askew. The familiar, hard-nosed procedural stances feel forced – he's playing some kind of self-ordained role, she's carrying too much trauma. Dave and Michelle tell themselves truths that the story casts doubt on. And they don't trust each other. Like Black Bird, Smoke was created by the American crime novelist Dennis Lehane, whose books have become Clint Eastwood's Mystic River and Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island. Lehane isn't doubling down on the grim realities, he's looking at them anew. Early on, Dave explains arsonists often act from a place of powerlessness, and the show digs into how that creates a hidden fury that must be satisfied. The story gives time, and explanatory scenes, not just to cops but also criminals. The nine-part series stages several fires, whether as an apocalyptic conflagration or a sudden nightmare that leaves skin literally peeling off a victim, but flames are seen as a kind of abyss. There's nothing there. It's interested in the people drawn to the abyss. Loading The tone is always sharp, the stakes genuine, but the mechanics hint at the absurd. Dave, who is writing a novel about an arson investigator, imagines himself playing the tough guy hero in his everyday life, and you see this. Delusions can become dominant. It's as if Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman, circa Adaptation, have snuck into the writers' room. Smoke suggests that wrenching outcomes can have absurd seeds, and then it contrasts that with brutal bursts of corrupted reality. The show has hints of brilliance that can only appear with an idiosyncratic mindset, but it's also smart enough to staff the supporting cast with impressive actors, including Rafe Spall and Greg Kinnear, who can catch you out. Every episode from the second onwards ends with an unforeseen turn. That should be valued. From June 27. Titan: The OceanGate Submersible Disaster ★★★★ (Netflix) Sadly, but not unexpectedly, the explicit causes and systemic failings that led to the June 2023 implosion of the tourist submersible Titan, killing all five people on board during a dive to the wreck of the Titanic, are familiar and predictable: OceanGate co-founder and CEO, Stockton Rush, who was piloting the undersea vehicle, was a narcissist who disdained safety regulations. He believed, like the Titanic, that the Titan was 'invulnerable'. The immense pressure at 3000 metres depth in the Atlantic Ocean proved otherwise. Loading What this feature-length documentary from director Mark Monroe provides is a level of detail and testimony that is damning. The narrative's thoroughness stands in contrast to Rush, who was obsessed with using an experimental carbon fibre hull to mark himself as a visionary. Rush had Bezos envy. He wanted to be acclaimed as a pioneer and brought start-up shortcuts to a technically demanding industry. Cutting between former employees, including one who was fired within 24 hours for raising serious safety concerns, and official investigators, the documentary makes clear it was only a matter of time before the hull of the Titan gave way. Monroe is circumspect with the four paying passengers, who lost their lives to Rush's hubris, but there's no deference to the latest instance of the CEO psychopath. 'He wanted fame,' a former staffer notes. 'And he's got it.' The Gold (season 2) ★★★½ (Stan) The first season of this British crime drama, which uses the real-life robbery in 1983 of a fortune in gold bullion as the starting point for an incisive and deeply entertaining take on ambition and order, was one of 2023's best shows. Creator Neil Forsyth returns for the new instalment, but it takes an episode or two to acquire a genuine rhythm, while the plot requires a lot more speculation. Nonetheless, with Hugh Bonneville exemplary as the chief investigator, there's still a muscular desperation and some mighty monologues. Mr Loverman ★★★½ (Binge and Foxtel) British actor Lennie James (Line of Duty) rightfully won the best actor category at the recent British Academy Television Awards for his portrayal of Barrington 'Barry' Walker, a London charmer of Antiguan birth whose ebullient life spans dual marriages: officially to his wife Carmel (Sharon D Clarke), and unofficially to his boyhood friend and soul mate, Morris De La Roux (Ariyon Bakare). This painfully nuanced series, adapted from Bernardine Evaristo's novel of the same name, captures Barry's belated attempt to finally deal with his deception after a lifetime of cultural exclusion and unacknowledged selfishness. Call Her Alex ★★½ (Disney+) This two-part documentary, directed by filmmaker Ry Russo-Young (Before I Fall), offers powerhouse podcaster Alex Cooper, who has taken Call Her Daddy from raunchy confession to chart-topping celebrity hub, the ultimate 21st century media compliment: an authorised portrait that celebrates her ascendance to mogul status. Framed around a live tour, Call Her Alex finds plenty to recount from Cooper's narrative, including a university sports career marked by sexual harassment and business difficulties when Call Her Daddy blew up, but it doesn't want to ask questions about who she is now, even as adulation furthers her ambition. Hannibal ★★★★ (Binge, Foxtel and Stan) Rewatch alert. It's 10 years since the third and final season of Bryan Fuller's exquisitely twisted reappraisal of author Thomas Harris's Silence of the Lambs characters concluded. Few shows since have come close to matching its vivid mix of baroque tableaus and psychological horror. With Hugh Dancy as FBI profiler Will Graham and Mads Mikkelsen as then leading psychiatrist (and surreptitious serial killer) Hannibal Lecter, this is a truly twisted take on the buddy (bloody) cop procedural. It's a show about empathy's cost and the need for transformation, told with an ambition that would worry today's streaming giants.

Jury finds Karen Read not guilty in the death of her police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe
Jury finds Karen Read not guilty in the death of her police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

Jury finds Karen Read not guilty in the death of her police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe

A jury has found Karen Read not guilty of second-degree murder in the death of her police officer boyfriend, following a closely watched trial that drew international attention. The Massachusetts jury also acquitted her of manslaughter while driving under the influence and leaving the scene of a collision. Read, 45, had been accused of hitting John O'Keefe, 46, with her car and leaving him to die in the snow outside a police colleague's home after a night of drinking with friends. But she claimed she was the target of a cover-up, arguing that off-duty officers at the home were responsible for Mr O'Keefe's death and conspired to frame her. The case attracted legions of true crime followers and inspired a Hulu series and an upcoming Netflix documentary. Her defence said the police investigation was biased after the lead investigator in the case, former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, was fired after sharing offensive and sexist texts about Read with friends, family and co-workers. They also said Mr O'Keefe was beaten, bitten by a dog and left outside a home in the Boston suburb of Canton, in a conspiracy orchestrated by police that included planting evidence. Prosecutors described Read as a scorned lover who chose to leave Mr O'Keefe dying in the snow after striking him with her SUV. Describing Mr O'Keefe as a "good man" who "helped people," prosecutor Hank Brennan told jurors during closing arguments that: "She [Read] was drunk. She hit him and she left him to die." The defence rejected the idea that there was ever a collision at all and called expert witnesses who agreed. "There is no evidence that John was hit by a car. None. This case should be over right now, done, because there was no collision," lawyer Alan Jackson said during closing. No-one else has been charged in Mr O'Keefe's death. The verdict came nearly a year after a separate jury deadlocked over Read's involvement in the January 2022 death of Mr O'Keefe and resulted in a mistrial. A second-degree murder conviction would have carried a life sentence. Read was convicted only of drunk driving and sentenced to one year of probation — a penalty typical for first-time offenders. Supporters erupted in cheers outside the courthouse as Read exited, tearfully thanking them for standing by her through what she called a four-year fight for justice. "No-one has fought harder for justice for John O'Keefe than I have," Read said. But some witnesses see a miscarriage of justice. "While we may have more to say in the future, today we mourn with John's family and lament the cruel reality that this prosecution was infected by lies and conspiracy theories spread by Karen Read, her defense team, and some in the media. The result is a devastating miscarriage of justice," the statement said. Several witnesses who signed the statement included Jennifer McCabe, who was with Read and Mr O'Keefe the night of his death, and Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place. Shira Diner, a lecturer at the Boston University Law School, said the verdict "gives us an opportunity to reflect how this case would have been different if Karen Read was not a white woman of privilege and means". "The criminal legal system is full of inequities, and the fact the defendant in this case was able to post bail and wasn't held in custody while the case was pending made a huge difference," Ms Diner said. "She was able to work directly with her lawyers in a way that people can't from behind bars. She was able to give interviews and craft a public narrative that a person without means would be unable to do. "All of that work helped contribute to the verdict, and that is a privilege that most people charged with second-degree murder do not have." ABC with wires

Celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright's NT Supreme Court trial delayed
Celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright's NT Supreme Court trial delayed

ABC News

time3 days ago

  • ABC News

Celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright's NT Supreme Court trial delayed

The highly anticipated Supreme Court trial of celebrity crocodile wrangler Matt Wright has been delayed by three weeks and is now set to start on July 28. The star of Netflix's Wild Croc Territory and National Geographic's Outback Wrangler was due to face an eight-week trial in the Northern Territory Supreme Court from July 7, for allegedly attempting to pervert the course of justice. The allegations relate to Mr Wright's alleged behaviour following a 2022 fatal helicopter crash during a crocodile egg-collecting mission in West Arnhem Land, which killed his friend and co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson. Helicopter pilot Sebastian Robinson survived the crash with serious injuries. At a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday, Acting Justice Alan Blow set a new trial start date at the request of the defence. The judge issued a suppression order on the reason for the decision. Mr Wright was previously facing one count of attempting to pervert the course of justice, but the court heard the Department of Public Prosecutions had now split that single count into three. It heard the three counts related to allegations Mr Wright lied to police, pressured Mr Robinson to fabricate helicopter flight records so they met service requirements, and destroyed or attempted to destroy evidence. Mr Wright has previously indicated he intends to plead not guilty. During the hearing, defence lawyer Luke Officer told the court Mr Wright was seeking to access more than 100,000 pages of mobile phone records belonging to Mr Robinson's mother, Noelene Chellingworth. The court heard Ms Chellingworth was with Mr Robinson at a Brisbane hospital when it is alleged Mr Wright visited twice to pressure Mr Robinson to falsify helicopter maintenance records. Mr Officer told the court the defence was concerned Ms Chellingworth had been present in all but one of Mr Robinson's interviews with investigators from the police force and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. "It's not only concerning she was allowed to sit in on those interviews, but it's deeply disturbing she was permitted to answer questions on behalf of her son," he said. Mr Officer told the court Ms Chellingworth had a motive to protect her son, given the aircraft safety regulator found evidence of cocaine in Mr Robinson's system and that the helicopter likely crashed due to fuel exhaustion. "Mr Robinson, in large measure, was at fault in some respects, be it refuelling or being under the influence of substances," he said. "We've got cocaine. We've got fuel exhaustion. "[Ms Chellingworth] knows everything about aviation, she's an employee of her son, she's got motive to lie." The lawyer representing the NT police commissioner, Trevor Moses, said the defence had already been given Ms Chellingworth's text messages with Mr Wright, and suggested they wanted to use her phone records to "attack her credibility". "It was not submitted … there was any proper basis to think there was anything on Ms Chellingworth's phone that would be relevant to either way the Crown puts its case … other than a desire to cross-examine or discredit," Mr Moses said. "Ms Chellingworth is, on the Crown case, a relatively minor witness. "Her phone records were chiefly obtained in order to obtain text messages which were quite innocuous between her and Mr Wright arranging visits to hospital." Acting Justice Blow did not make a final decision about Ms Chellingworth's phone records.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store