The gas lobby is weakening Southern California's boldest clean-air plan in decades
On a windy night in early January, second-grade teacher Barbara Ishida spotted the Eaton Fire glowing in the hills behind her home in Altadena, California. Her mind turned to the deadly wildfires in Lahaina and Paradise and she thought, 'Let's get out — now.'
Ishida and her husband evacuated safely, but the flames destroyed their home. An attribution study found that climate change, which is primarily caused by burning fossil fuels, made the January fires 35% more likely.
Selling their burned lot would not earn enough money to afford another home elsewhere, Ishida said. She thought the least they could do is rebuild in a way that wouldn't compound the climate crisis that raised the fire risk.
'Building back is our only option at this point,' Ishida said, 'so we're going to build back super environmentally-friendly.'
Her vision is to build a fire-resistant home with no gas appliances. That approach is backed by a University of California Berkeley study released in April that concluded all-electric construction is the fastest, most cost-effective and most climate-friendly strategy to rebuild after the fires.
But the gas industry is pushing back against this idea. Proposed rules that would have encouraged Ishida and other homeowners to buy furnaces and heaters that emit no nitrogen oxides (NOx) — a key pollutant from gas appliances — have been weakened and delayed by a coalition of groups that includes SoCalGas, the country's largest gas utility and a monopoly gas company in Southern California. After a fierce opposition campaign, the rules are going to a vote on Friday, June 6.
The rules are proposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the agency responsible for improving air quality in Los Angeles and nearby communities, one of the most polluted air basins in the United States.
If passed, the rules are designed to create cleaner air and reduce planet-heating emissions by setting future targets for sales of new zero-emission space and water heaters. The rules would apply to manufacturers, distributors, sellers and installers. They are expected to prevent 2,490 premature deaths and avoid 10,200 asthma cases.
'Consumers will continue to have a choice of purchasing either a gas or electric space/water heaters when replacing their existing units,' explained Nahal Mogharabi, a spokesperson for the air-quality district. 'Importantly, consumers can continue to operate their existing units until the consumer chooses to replace it or the unit breaks.'
SoCalGas defended its role in the opposition campaign. 'SoCalGas' stakeholder engagement and outreach efforts on this topic are a regular part of any rulemaking process where we share information that could affect Southern California customers,' SoCalGas spokesperson Erica Berardi wrote in an email.
BizFed, a business group that was also part of the opposition campaign, advocated for a delay in the rule-making process 'to allow for more transparency and sufficient public outreach to make Southern Californians aware of the significant costs associated with these changes,' Elizabeth Daubel, communications director for BizFed, wrote in an email.
At the same time that the opposition campaign ramped up, groups allied with the gas industry filed a lawsuit against the SCAQMD, aiming to undermine its authority to impose such regulations.
The opposition is far from unique; a February report by London-based think tank InfluenceMap found that fossil fuel companies in the United States, European Union and Australia are waging parallel campaigns against laws that restrict use of gas in buildings — pushback that has largely succeeded in preventing and weakening these laws.
Ishida signed a letter supporting the proposed SCAQMD rules because she believes they would encourage Altadena to build back in a sustainable way. When she heard about the organized opposition to the rules, Ishida felt angry.
'They're just putting profits over people. They're not thinking long term. They're thinking short term. And they're not thinking very well for the next generation,' she said. 'It's sad and it's selfish and it's not right.'
Although progressive states like California are leading the transition away from fossil fuels, gas appliances remain ubiquitous in California homes and across the western United States.
The SCAQMD is responsible for air quality in much of Los Angeles County, Orange County and the western portions of San Bernardino and Riverside counties — a highly populated corner of the state. Buildings account for one-quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in California but are subject to local control, meaning that local regulators like the SCAQMD have a big role to play in lowering emissions.
In 2023, recognizing the air pollution caused by gas appliances, the agency proposed amendments to two rules to encourage alternatives. Changes to Rules 1111 and 1121 would establish a zero-emission NOx standard for furnaces and water heaters.
As originally written, the new rules would have impacted more than 10 million gas-fired residential and commercial furnaces and residential water heaters. The rules would not affect gas stoves, a flashpoint in similar regulatory efforts.
The way they were written in October 2024, the proposed rules would have required that all furnaces and water heaters installed become zero-emission by 2026 for new residential and commercial buildings. Existing buildings and mobile homes had a few more years to comply.
But in recent months, SCAQMD staff have softened the proposed rules. The current version now requires manufacturers to meet zero-emission sales targets for residential buildings, starting at 30% in 2027-28 and rising to 90% by 2036. The rule no longer requires that all new furnaces and water heaters be zero-emission by a certain date.
The original rules would have reduced NOx emissions by 10 tons per day, which would have been the largest emission reducing rule package adopted in over three decades by the SCAQMD. The revised rules would achieve a reduction of 6 tons per day of NOx emissions.
Kim Orbe, senior conservation program manager at Sierra Club, said pushing back the compliance date would allow manufacturers to continue building gas-powered equipment for years to come. She believes the weakened rules are not sending a strong enough signal to manufacturers to develop more heat pumps and other clean alternatives.
'(Lobbyists) have slowed down that transition where it was supposed to be a zero emission rule,' Orbe said. 'So now it's not a zero emission rule. Now it's been tremendously weakened.'
For the past two years, the draft rules have wound their way through a process to gather public feedback, including from impacted businesses like SoCalGas. The company sells methane, also known as natural gas, and has a history of lobbying hard against regulations that hurt its bottom line.
In late 2024, an opposition campaign sprung up to push back against the rule changes. SCAQMD's board had originally scheduled a hearing on the rules for Dec. 6, but opposition groups raised concerns about public outreach and awareness, so staff sought additional input. The final board hearing and vote on the rules was pushed back by six months, to June 6, 2025.
SoCalGas and groups aligned with the company helped delay the rulemaking process by encouraging public officials to oppose the rules, according to records obtained by the Energy and Policy Institute and shared with Floodlight.
Ahead of a major SCAQMD meeting on Dec. 20, SoCalGas employees sent 'urgent' requests to public officials, including mayors of cities in the South Coast area, asking them to send letters, testify and pass resolutions opposing the rules. BizFed joined in the opposition.
Their emails claimed — misleadingly — that the rules would prohibit the sale and installation of all gas furnaces and water heaters.
On Dec. 9, a SoCalGas employee emailed a member of the Ontario City Council to encourage her to testify at the meeting, sending along SoCalGas talking points. The council member attended the meeting and testified against the rules.
On Dec. 16, an official from the city of Lake Elsinore submitted a letter to the SCAQMD opposing the rules. The official then forwarded the letter to a SoCalGas employee who replied, 'Wow! Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!'
A day later, another SoCalGas employee emailed an official from the city of Norco, asking her to testify or submit a letter opposing the rules. He also sent her a sample letter. City officials replied with the opposition letter he had asked for.
Some of the letters that SCAQMD received from public officials were drafted by a consultant working for BizFed. Several city governments copied the consultant's draft letter onto their letterhead. Almost word-for-word letters were sent to the SCAQMD by the Orange County Council of Governments, the city of Lake Forest and the city of Loma Linda.
The consultant also sent elected officials a draft resolution that city councils could pass asking the SCAQMD to 'delay or cease' consideration of the rules. Loma Linda officials added the resolution to the City Council meeting agenda. At its Jan. 14 meeting, the city council passed the resolution opposing the rules.
The response to the rules was overwhelming, generating over 12,500 comments. But staff reported that many letters opposing the rules contained faulty information, including that the rules would mandate homeowners switch to all-electric appliances. In response, staff released a 'myths versus facts' explainer on what the rules would do.
The governing board delayed the vote and modified the rules to give more time for public outreach, and 'in response to concerns raised by stakeholders about cost, technology availability and consumer choice,' agency spokesperson Mogharabi wrote in an email.
'Even though the rule has been modified, as is typical during the rulemaking process, the current NOx reductions are significant,' she added.
She noted that this summer, the agency is launching a Go Zero rebate program that will provide more than $21 million to help residents and small businesses install zero-emission heating appliances.
Mogharabi said SCAQMD staff were not aware that BizFed, SoCalGas and others had emailed public officials to encourage them to submit letters, testify and pass resolutions opposing the rules.
On Jan. 10, as unprecedented megafires burned out of control in Los Angeles — destroying thousands of homes and killing 30 people — SCAQMD officials held a public meeting to consider the proposed rules 1111 and 1121.
The tone of the meeting was somber. Officials began by acknowledging the wildfires and smoke cloaking the city, offering condolences to a board member who lost his home to the flames. Minutes later, lobbyists including a representative of SoCalGas asked for the rules to be delayed or retracted, citing an active lawsuit that challenged the SCAQMD's authority to make such rules.
Whitney Squire, CEO of the Plumbing, Heating, Cooling Contractors of California, said, 'We strongly urge the board to retract these additional proposed rules or at least postpone their implementation until the litigation reaches its conclusion.'
She added, 'These rules, which effectively ban gas appliances, would pose significant financial burdens and disrupt the lives of countless individuals.'
SoCalGas lobbyist Jessi Davis also spoke at the meeting. 'We think it would be prudent for the board to postpone this rulemaking until these issues are resolved by the courts,' she said.
In December, as staff were receiving pushback to rules 1111 and 1121, a coalition of groups filed a lawsuit against the SCAQMD, seeking to overturn a related rule that phases out large gas-fired furnaces and water heaters in commercial and industrial facilities.
The plaintiffs include the National Association of Home Builders, the Plumbing, Heating, Cooling Contractors of California and the California Restaurant Association. Other plaintiffs include Rinnai America Corp., which manufactures gas heaters, and unions representing pipefitters. SoCalGas is not a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The lawsuit aims to block enforcement of Rule 1146.2, which imposed a zero-emissions standard on large industrial boilers and water heaters. The lawsuit argues the rule is invalid under the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). That rule is different from the proposed rules, which are specific to smaller residential and commercial furnaces and water heaters.
The lawsuit cites a previous court ruling that favored the gas industry. In 2019, the California Restaurant Association sued the city of Berkeley, arguing that its ban on gas in new buildings violated EPCA. The case was appealed up to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which sided with the plaintiffs and barred Berkeley from imposing its gas ban.
In that case, the Reichman Jorgensen law firm represented the California Restaurant Association. As the firm fought the case, SoCalGas paid Reichman Jorgensen more than $4 million between 2020 and 2022, The Sacramento Bee reported. In the new lawsuit filed in December, one of the firms representing industry plaintiffs is Reichman Jorgensen. SoCalGas denied funding either the Berkeley lawsuit or the lawsuit related to Rule 1146.2.
The new lawsuit poses a threat to SCAQMD's authority, according to Adrian Martinez, an attorney at Earthjustice, an environmental nonprofit that is intervening in the case. He said the plaintiffs are attempting to apply the Berkeley decision to the South Coast air-quality agency.
'The legal theories they're trying to push would undermine the ability of the (agency) to protect its residents,' he said. 'They're attempting to strip local entities like SCAQMD of the ability to clean up pollution.'
Martinez, who attended the meeting, said the gas industry has the right to advocate for its position, but doing so during a climate emergency was 'morally reprehensible.' SCAQMD declined to comment on the pending litigation.
As she considered how to rebuild in an environmentally-friendly way, Ishida received an email from SoCalGas offering to reconnect her gas service. Ishida has no plans to do that. 'We need to make it more available and easy for people to build back all-electric,' she said.
With another wildfire season on the horizon, she is thinking about the future of Los Angeles. 'We're not going to be the only community that burns,' Ishida said. 'We're not going to be the last if we continue down this stretch.'
Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
3 days ago
- Time Magazine
Pasadena Mayor: Trump's Immigration Raids Hurt Communities Like Mine
Twice this year I have seen armored National Guard vehicles on the streets of Los Angeles County. The first time, we welcomed them with open arms. They were here in January to help us mobilize a rapid response to two enormous fires that devastated our city: the Eaton Fire here in my community and the Palisades Fire across town. They worked alongside all of us—police officers, firefighters, community leaders, day laborers, neighbors—to manage immediate needs for people who lost everything. It was a beautiful showing of solidarity and a demonstration of how a healthy democracy can respond to a crisis. What I see today is a stark and deeply troubling contrast to that time. While our city is still struggling to pick up the pieces and we begin to recover, President Donald Trump decided to turn the National Guard and other federal officers against the people of Los Angeles County, including people who live and work in Pasadena. The National Guard came to our region twice in six months. The circumstances couldn't have been more different. Every day that immigration raids continue and federal troops are brought in to police our community, we suffer tremendously. Already in Pasadena we've seen a huge drop in attendance at local community programs. The streets of our vibrant neighborhoods are eerily quiet. Business owners are calling me, concerned that their workers and customers alike are too afraid to show up, compounding the already hugely detrimental impacts of the fire. These business owners are simply sitting in brick-and-mortar shells of their once-bustling businesses mourning for their loyal employees and friends. My own father, who has been a citizen for decades now, is too afraid to make his weekly trip to Placita Olvera to listen to the Mariachis. Even I, the Mayor of Pasadena, am carrying my passport with me wherever I go in case I am racially profiled by ICE agents. My heart hurts for our city and all of our people. The cruelty and fear being inflicted by one man who did not even take the time to visit Pasadena and Altadena during, or after, the fires is palpable in our community. But at the same time, I don't know that I've ever been prouder of our leadership as a city and how we continue to prove that we are capable of banding together to weather any hardship. That is the spirit of Pasadena, and what I believe should be the spirit of our country. So even as we continue to face an onslaught of attacks from the federal government, I know that we have all the tools we need to care for each other and keep each other safe. I also empathize deeply with the immigrant community in Pasadena, the greater Los Angeles area, and across our great nation who are living in fear right now. I know how they are feeling because I once stood in their shoes. My family came to Pasadena when I was five years old from Zacatecas, Mexico. My parents and five siblings lived together in a two-car garage. My mother was a seamstress at a sweatshop and my father was a dishwasher and cook at a popular Mexican restaurant where he ended up working seven days a week for 50 years. I was sent to school. At first this was a terrifying experience for me. I didn't know the language and no one could communicate with me. I was teased and bullied for being Mexican. Even as I settled more into my life as an American teen, my family lived with a nagging fear in the back of my mind that it could all combust. Under my parents' bed in the middle of that two-car garage we called home was a large tin of Folgers coffee. I'm sure you can picture the kind I'm talking about. In that tin were all of our documents—birth certificates, phone numbers of friends and family, photos, identification cards—everything I would need in case my parents didn't come home one day. Starting at age five, I knew that if my parents didn't come home, I was to take that coffee tin and knock on my neighbor's door and ask for help. As I grew older, I worked multiple jobs to help my parents make ends meet. I sold flowers on the streets of Pasadena, delivered the local newspaper before school in the mornings, mowed lawns, helped out at the restaurant with my dad. And during that time I kept going to school, got involved in sports, and started listening to American music, immersing myself in the culture of the city. I became the San Gabriel Valley co-athlete of the year at Pasadena High School. I was living the American Dream. But even then, the fear that millions of immigrants and their loved ones live with every single day lingered with me and my family. But a key difference back then is that there was actually a process for citizenship. In the 1970s, Jimmy Carter enacted a common sense and humane policy that allowed for a pathway to citizenship if you were living without documentation in the U.S. So that's what my parents did. It took two years, but during the time when we awaited approval we were safe from the immigration raids that were rocking our city at the time. That was a process consistent with our democracy and our founding values as a nation. It was still a time when America cheered for the underdog, and when the spirit of our nation promised opportunity and a better life for all who sought freedom on our shores. Now, there are a decreasing number of pathways for people to seek lawful status—even if they've lived in the U.S. for decades and built their lives here and contributed positively to our community. In fact, Trump is actively stripping people of their legal status, creating a larger class of our neighbors who are vulnerable to deportation. My family—and millions of immigrant families across the country—remain committed to building a better future for ourselves and all in our communities. Today, I am tremendously proud to serve as Mayor of Pasadena, the city I have called home for most of my life. I am proud of the contributions my family and my neighbors have made to the city. We are an example of what makes this country great. And I am proud of Pasadena for sending a clear message that we stand by our immigrant neighbors in the face of these unjust attacks, but doing so respectfully and peacefully. We do not want the federal government to circumvent city leaders and tear families apart, and tens of thousands of us across the city have come together to peacefully protest the cruelty we're seeing in our community, especially as we continue to come together to help each other recover from the fires. I would hope that our president would share that compassion for a community that has suffered so much, a community he is supposed to serve as our nation's leader. I feel for the National Guard troops and our law enforcement community in general, many of whom share my same experience and have now been forced into a tense and completely unnecessary situation. I believe that at their core, they too think this is wrong. Back in January, I spent a lot of time with these troops and officers. I spoke with them every day, I saw firsthand their drive to serve and aid our community in a time of great need. I saw the real humanity of them. That's what the National Guard and law enforcement is for—not to be directed to come in and work against the very people they signed up to serve and protect—and against the will of our state and city leaders. Pasadena and our great nation must remain united and resolute in our view that children, families, and people from every walk of life are welcome and make our community great. And we should continue to make that view known in a peaceful but resolute manner as we have been every day since these raids began. I hope that Pasadena's leadership can be a model for how cities can respond to a government that is increasingly infringing upon our individual rights and sovereignty as a city and state. Because this overreach will not stop with us, and it will take all of us to defend the core principles of our democracy. We know what a peaceful, thriving, diverse, democratic city looks like—and we will not let anyone take that away from us.
Business Wire
3 days ago
- Business Wire
TME Pharma Announces Successful Next Step in Its NOX-E36 Ophthalmology Strategy With Signature of Option Framework Agreement With Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI)
TME Pharma N.V. (Euronext Growth Paris: ALTME), a clinical-stage biotechnology company and the Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), a leading ophthalmology research institution, today announced the continuation of their collaboration through the signing of an option framework agreement. The agreement aims to advance the development of TME Pharma's NOX-E36 anti-CCL2 RNA aptamer for ophthalmic indications, including glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) and also conditions involving fibrosis and inflammation in the back of the eye. The agreement establishes a strategic collaboration framework for NOX-E36, with TME Pharma securing an exclusive two-year option to out-license all rights related to NOX-E36 to either a newly created company or a third-party licensee. The framework reflects TME Pharma's foundational investment and ownership of the underlying asset, while duly recognizing SERI's pivotal contributions in early-stage ophthalmic research. Taking these respective contributions into account, the parties agreed to a fixed revenue-sharing model, with TME Pharma receiving a larger share of future licensing consideration. TME Pharma will lead the commercial discussions, streamlining engagement with potential investors and licensing partners interested in advancing NOX-E36's development in ophthalmology. Through this collaboration, TME Pharma and SERI aim to progress NOX-E36 from preclinical research into clinical studies, leveraging their combined expertise to accelerate development. The near-term financial commitments include TME Pharma funding preclinical local ocular tolerance studies, while SERI will seek grants to fund and conduct the Phase 1b clinical study. Moreover, SERI will provide its deep expertise in ophthalmology research, pharmacological testing in animal models, and clinical evaluation, while TME Pharma will bring its prior clinical, regulatory and manufacturing experience and documentation as well as drug supply for both preclinical and clinical studies and will manage new intellectual property (IP). TME Pharma and SERI have already filed patent applications covering use of NOX-E36 in glaucoma filtration surgery and other ophthalmic diseases 1 and will continue working together to secure joint IP protection for any patentable innovations arising from this research. "We are excited to deepen our collaboration with SERI as we work towards advancing NOX-E36 as a potential treatment for significant unmet needs in ophthalmology including diseases affecting both the front and the back of the eye. This agreement provides the framework to bring all relevant intellectual property of both TME Pharma and SERI to an ophthalmology company dedicated to advancing NOX-E36 towards commercialization. We look forward to combining our expertise and resources to accelerate the development of this promising compound," said Aram Mangasarian, CEO of TME Pharma. "Our work with NOX-E36 in preclinical models of ocular fibrosis has shown promising results that challenge the current standard of care treatment. This partnership with TME Pharma allows us to take the crucial next steps in translating these findings into clinical benefits for patients with difficult to treat ocular scarring," said Professor Tina Wong, Co-Head Ocular Therapeutics and Drug Delivery Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, and Senior Consultant, Glaucoma Service, Singapore National Eye Centre. Fibrosis is a major contributor to treatment failure and increased severity in several clinically important eye diseases 2 with significant unmet needs, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Collectively, these conditions affect approximately 30 million people in the US alone, with millions at risk of vision-threatening complications 3,4. This underscores the substantial market potential for innovative anti-fibrotic therapies like NOX-E36. SERI has long been at the forefront of research on the CCL2 target in ophthalmology, with significant contributions to the field. 5 Over the past several years, SERI has been evaluating NOX-E36 in preclinical models, generating promising data that suggest NOX-E36 may provide meaningful clinical benefits by enabling sustained success of GFS, also known as trabeculectomy. This procedure to treat glaucoma creates an opening through the white part of the eye, the sclera, to release intraocular pressure. While effective, the surgery often fails over time despite the use of toxic substances such as mitomycin C to prevent scarring (fibrosis), which can obstruct the newly created drainage channel compromising pressure reduction. In mouse experiments, TME Pharma's CCL2 inhibitor has been shown to be as effective as mitomycin C in preventing fibrosis while having a more favorable safety profile, thus improving long-term control of intraocular pressure. About TME Pharma TME Pharma is a clinical-stage company focused on developing novel therapies for treatment of the most aggressive cancers. The company's oncology-focused pipeline is designed to act on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the cancer immunity cycle by breaking tumor protection barriers against the immune system and blocking tumor repair. By neutralizing chemokines in the TME, TME Pharma's approach works in combination with other forms of treatment to weaken tumor defenses and enable greater therapeutic impact. In the GLORIA Phase 1/2 clinical trial, TME Pharma is studying its lead drug candidate NOX-A12 (olaptesed pegol, an anti-CXCL12 L-RNA aptamer) in newly diagnosed brain cancer patients who will not benefit clinically from standard chemotherapy. TME Pharma has delivered top-line data from the NOX-A12 three dose-escalation cohorts combined with radiotherapy of the GLORIA clinical trial, observing consistent tumor reductions and objective tumor responses. Additionally, GLORIA expansion arms evaluate safety and efficacy of NOX-A12 in other combinations where the interim results from the triple combination of NOX-A12, radiotherapy and bevacizumab suggest even deeper and more durable responses, and improved survival. US FDA has approved the design of a randomized Phase 2 trial in glioblastoma and TME Pharma was awarded fast track designation by the FDA for NOX-A12 in combination with radiotherapy and bevacizumab for use in the treatment of the aggressive adult brain cancer, glioblastoma. NOX-A12 in combination with radiotherapy had also previously received orphan drug designation (ODD) for glioblastoma in the United States and glioma in Europe. TME Pharma has delivered final top-line data with encouraging overall survival and safety profile from its NOX-A12 combination trial with Keytruda ® in metastatic colorectal and pancreatic cancer patients, which was published in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer in October 2021. The company has entered in its second collaboration with MSD/Merck for its Phase 2 study, OPTIMUS, to further evaluate safety and efficacy of NOX-A12 in combination with Merck's Keytruda ® and two different chemotherapy regimens as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The design of the trial has been approved in the United States. The company's second clinical-stage drug candidate, NOX-E36 (emapticap pegol, L-RNA aptamer inhibiting CCL2 and related chemokines), showing potential to address fibrosis and inflammation is evaluated in ophthalmic diseases with a high need for well-tolerated therapies with anti-fibrotic effect. Further information can be found at: TME Pharma ® and the TME Pharma logo are registered trademarks. Keytruda ® is a registered trademark of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Visit TME Pharma on LinkedIn and X. About Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI) Established in 1997, SERI is Singapore's national research institute for ophthalmic and vision research. SERI's mission is to conduct high-impact eye research that prevents blindness, low vision and major eye diseases common to Singaporeans and Asians. Over the last decade, SERI has conducted landmark research projects that have led to tangible outcomes, patient benefits, and success stories. It has paved the way for significant improvements in how eye diseases are treated and prevented, not just for Singaporeans or Asians, but on a global scale. At its inception, SERI saw a national remit in ophthalmic and vision research, and till today, SERI ensures that its facilities and resources are open to researchers across Singapore so that the greatest benefit may be obtained from what is a relatively small clinical ophthalmology catchment area in Singapore. SERI has grown from a founding team of five in 1997 to a faculty of more than 253 staff, encompassing clinician scientists, scientists, research fellows, PhD students and support staff. This makes SERI one of the largest research institutes in Singapore, as well as the largest eye research institute in the Asia Pacific region. SERI has also over 255 adjunct faculties from various eye departments, biomedical institutes and tertiary centres in Singapore. SERI has published an impressive array of 5,942 scientific papers, and has secured external peer-reviewed competitive grants worth more than $473 million. As of December 2024, SERI's faculty has been awarded with more than 1,425 national and international prizes and filed 188 patents. As the research institute of the SNEC, and directly affiliated to the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, as well the Duke-NUS Medical School, SERI undertakes vision research in collaboration with local clinical ophthalmic centres and biomedical research institutions, as well as major eye centres and research institutes throughout the world. SERI ranks first globally in terms of eye publications per capita, far ahead of the US, UK and Japan. With its impressive publication track record, SERI is comparable to renowned eye institutes, both regionally and internationally. Please see About the GLORIA Study GLORIA (NCT04121455) is TME Pharma's dose-escalation, Phase 1/2 study of NOX-A12 in combination with radiotherapy in first-line partially resected or unresected glioblastoma (brain cancer) patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter (resistant to standard chemotherapy). GLORIA further evaluates safety and efficacy of NOX-A12 in the expansion arm in which NOX-A12 is combined with radiotherapy and bevacizumab. About the OPTIMUS Study OPTIMUS (NCT04901741) is TME Pharma's planned open-label two-arm Phase 2 study of NOX-A12 combined with pembrolizumab and nanoliposomal irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in microsatellite-stable metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Disclaimer Translations of any press release into languages other than English are intended solely as a convenience to the non-English-reading audience. The company has attempted to provide an accurate translation of the original text in English, but due to the nuances in translating into another language, slight differences may exist. This press release includes certain disclosures that contain "forward-looking statements.' Forward-looking statements are based on TME Pharma's current expectations and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, the risks inherent in oncology drug development, including clinical trials and the timing of and TME Pharma's ability to obtain regulatory approvals for NOX-A12 as well as any other drug candidates. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are made as of this date, and TME Pharma undertakes no duty to update such information except as required under applicable law.
Politico
4 days ago
- Politico
NAACP launches lawsuit over pollution from Musk's xAI
The NAACP intends to sue Elon Musk over the pollution caused by artificial intelligence company xAI's turbines in South Memphis. The group filed an intent to sue letter Tuesday against Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI, citing the public health risks posed by 35 unpermitted turbines and their pollution to nearby Black and minority communities. The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) is representing the NAACP in raising their concerns to the Shelby County Health Department. The group's attorneys said that xAI is in violation of numerous prongs of the Clean Air Act and the Shelby County Local Implementation Plan, including constructing and operating a major energy source without acquiring permits, not using best available control technology and failing to comply with regulatory limits on hazardous air pollution. The turbines, in operation since last year, are located at xAI's Colossus site and help to power their supercomputer and data center. Their permit application takes into account only 15 of the 35 turbines the SELC and NAACP said are located at the facility, citing a flyover they did of the facility with environmental pilots from Southwings. The company recently sought to acquire a permit from EPA as officials met with xAI at the end of May, but no development has since been made on their status. The turbines 'have the potential to emit more than 2,000 tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxides ('NOx') per year and numerous other harmful pollutants, worsening Memphis' already poor air quality,' SELC said in its letter. Memphis was ranked as an asthma capital of the nation by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America as it performed a worst than average rate of asthma prevalence and crude death rate. Although Zeldin said in February that he intends to promote industry at the EPA, advocates have held rallies in Boxtown against the presence of the billionaire's company, the exhaustion of the power grid, and the threat they say it poses to public health. 'We're going to fight and we're going to do everything we can to stop this from polluting in our area,' said Barbara Britton, president of the Boxtown Neighborhood Association, in a press release from the SELC. A decision on xAI's air permit is set to be reached in 'several weeks,' according to the Shelby County Health Department.
