Senate Armed Services leader pans Trump's Qatar jet plan
Sen. Roger Wicker, the powerful leader of the Armed Services Committee, disparaged President Donald Trump's plan to accept a Boeing aircraft from Qatar — adding to a bipartisan chorus of lawmakers criticizing the potential gift.
Wicker disputed the central rationale for the swap — which Trump is touting as a no-cost solution for a new Air Force One — noting that officials would need to scrub the aircraft for any surveillance equipment and install numerous security upgrades.
'It would be like the United States moving into the Qatari embassy,' he said in an interview. 'I'm not sure how quickly the Qatari aircraft can be retooled.'
His comments underscore the rising Republican unease with the idea, a move that experts say could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and take years to complete.
Trump has argued that the Qatari jet is a patriotic gift that could come sooner than Boeing's delayed replacements for the aging Air Force One aircraft he currently uses. But retrofitting the Qatari jet would prove a costly and complex process, Wicker said.
The senator called for Boeing to instead 'redouble their efforts,' rather than have Trump accept a gift that would require nearly as much work. 'Clearly, the listening devices, the communication devices, things like that, the safety features all have to be factored in and have to be done to our American standards,' he said.
Trump has said he would transfer the jet to his presidential library as a museum piece after he leaves office, an idea that has also raised bipartisan objections.
'If the Qataris want to make a gift to the United States, then it would be a lot more proper for that gift to be made to the government of the United States — to be used by Mr. Trump and his successor — and not given to the library,' Wicker said.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune and several other Republican lawmakers have expressed apprehension over the ethical implications and security risks of accepting a lavish gift from a foreign government. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have all voiced unease.
Democrats are going even further. A group of Senate Democrats, which includes Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, is urging the Department of Defense Inspector General to investigate what they describe as an unconstitutional foreign gift to Trump. The group, which includes Senate Armed Services ranking member Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), argued the plane wouldn't be ready for Trump's use until nearly the end of his term.
'If the Qataris want to make a gift, it should be a gift to the United States — not to one individual, and certainly not something routed through the Pentagon for personal use,' Reed told reporters.
Reed said Democrats aren't ruling out a legislative response if the administration proceeds with the Qatar jet plan. He indicated that he would look to Republicans, the majority party, for support. 'We have options,' he said.
While no one mentioned the jet during the president's visit to Qatar on Wednesday, there was still a bit of diplomatic theater. The Trump administration announced several defense sales deals that were already in the works, including one that was agreed to under the Biden administration.
The White House on Wednesday touted a $1 billion agreement between Raytheon and Qatar for the company's anti-drone system. The agreement was first announced in December during the Biden administration. A $2 billion March agreement between General Atomics and Qatar for surveillance drones was also celebrated in the White House note.
The Trump administration announced another $142 billion in potential arms deals with Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to buy U.S. weapons and military equipment. The administration did not provide details as most of the package remains aspirational, said one administration official, who was granted anonymity to discuss potential negotiations.
The announcements were reminiscent of Trump's much-touted $100 billion worth of defense deals during his first visit to Saudi Arabia in 2017. That involved tens of billions of dollars in projects already put in motion by the Obama administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Botches His Own Name In The Most Awkward Typo You'll Ever See
President Donald Trump on Sunday posted a message on his Truth Social website thanking the B-2 pilots who took part in this weekend's attack on Iran. But the president's message had one key flaw: He misspelled his own name. 'The GREAT B-2 pilots have just landed, safely, in Missouri. Thank you for a job well done!!!' Trump wrote, then signed his message in all caps: 'DONAKD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!' Trump deleted the message and replaced it with a corrected version, but a website that archives his posts shows the typo. Trump has a long and colorful history of typo-ridden social media posts, including the infamous 'covfefe' message of 2017, along with his references to a 'stollen' election, 'Wirch Hunt,' and 'hamberders.' He's bungled his own name before, referring to himself in 2019 as 'Donald Ttump,' and that of his wife, whom he called 'Melanie' Trump in 2018. It's not clear if Trump typed the message himself. A former aide, Madeleine Westerhout, testified during his criminal trial last year that when Trump was on Twitter, he preferred to dictate his messages, down to his trademark use of capitalizations and exclamation points. Footage released last year also showed him dictating and supervising his social media posts. Trump's critics called him out over the awkward typo: This is the man calling for regime change and with his hand on the nuclear codes, marching us into war: DONAKD J. TRUMP. To my Republican colleagues with the power and numbers to stop this, what say you? — Rep. Melanie Stansbury (@Rep_Stansbury) June 22, 2025 If Joe Biden has misspelled his own name in a tweet, Fox would be calling for his removal and running it on a loop 24/7. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) June 22, 2025 Hmmm beginning to worry that the guy who cannot even bother to spell check whether he got his own name correct is not doing the most rigorous research before he decides to get us in to a war. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) June 22, 2025 New coffeve just dropped — Tamoor Hussain (@tamoorh) June 22, 2025 While thanking the B-2 pilots for their service, Trump misspelled his own name while signing off in a new statement 'DONAKD J. TRUMP.' He can't even spell his own name. — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) June 22, 2025 Donakd? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) June 22, 2025 Bring back covfefe — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) June 22, 2025 Donakd strikes again. — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) June 22, 2025 Even my phone tries to autocorrect Donakd… And this is the president of the United States. Sad. — Jesus Freakin Congress (@TheJFreakinC) June 22, 2025 The incompetence of this administration is like a renewable energy source—it's inexhaustible. — greg cantwell (@gregmcantwell) June 22, 2025 Hey everyone!! Let's call him DONAKD J. TRUMP. — Lucas Sanders 💙🗳️🌊💪🌈🚺🟧 (@LucasSa56947288) June 22, 2025
Boston Globe
40 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Will Iran again sip the ‘poison' of a forced peace, or escalate?
At 86, with much of his life's work in ruins around him, he may prefer martyrdom to the surrender that President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel are demanding of him. Advertisement Iran's first response was defiant. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression,' the foreign ministry said in a statement. Iran has launched a serious barrage of missiles on Israel. It may, as it has warned, attack some of the 40,000 US soldiers in the region. What will be crucial is whether Iran's retaliation is prolonged. If it does enough to convince the Iranian people that it has not capitulated, Khamenei may then decide to enter talks with the United States about a settlement of the war. After all, in January 2020, when Trump ordered the assassination of a key Iranian figure in his first term, General Qassem Soleimani, with a drone strike in Iraq, Iran responded with a punishing wave of missile attacks against US troops in Iraq. It then stopped, fearing a wider war that could threaten the regime. Advertisement Iran has a variety of responses if it chooses, that show both resistance and restraint, said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank. Khamenei could approve leaving the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and expelling the nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency who have been monitoring Iran's nuclear facilities. He could target those US bases in the region that have largely been evacuated and activate the Houthis in Yemen to resume their attacks on American ships in the Red Sea. 'This would be actually a cautious mix of options designed to show that Iran has the ability and the daring to stand up to Trump, but is still trying to avoid full-scale regional escalation,' Vakil said. 'If Khamenei sidesteps strikes on the US, this lays the pathway for diplomacy and will signal to Trump his intention to de-escalate,' she said. Trump, too, by warning Iran of the strikes in advance and limiting them, at least so far, to the three main Iranian nuclear sites, also showed restraint, she said. The US attacks, for instance, spared political targets and military bases. But Khamenei hardly trusts Trump after he unilaterally pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal that Iran agreed to with the Obama administration and other governments in 2018. Even if there were a new pact agreed upon now, Vakil asked, 'could he trust Trump to provide sanctions relief and ensure Israel is on board?' Iran could do much more, of course. It could try to close the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, a move that could drive up oil prices by blocking oil tankers from leaving or entering the Persian Gulf. It could attack the energy infrastructure of Gulf states, as it did in 2019. It has a sophisticated cyberwarfare program that it could activate. And it could work with Al Qaeda to hit Israeli and US interests in the region and abroad, from bases to embassies. Advertisement Iran will do more, and aggressively, said Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran specialist at the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank. 'Iran knew this was coming and will have prepared a chain of responses,' she said, with an immediate escalation of attacks against Israel. But Trump's efforts to draw a line now will fail, she said. Attacks against the United States 'are now inevitable and will be swift and multilayered,' Geranmayeh said. 'Iran knows it cannot win this war — but wants to ensure that the US and Israel also lose.' A lot will depend on the assessment of the damage done, which is still unclear. It is also unclear where Iran's large stock of highly enriched uranium is. Iran has enough to make up to 10 nuclear warheads with a bit more enrichment, according to the US military. Many analysts assume that Iran has dispersed it, perhaps where IAEA inspectors cannot access it. The IAEA said Sunday that there had been no indication of radioactive leakage, which would be the case if the uranium stockpiles had been hit, said Vali Nasr, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of 'Iran's Grand Strategy: A Political History.' That is one reason the United States and Europe should do all they can to keep Iran in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the IAEA, he said, so the world does not lose its eyes and ears on Iran's nuclear program. Advertisement For Nasr, the conflict is just beginning, not ending. For Iran, he said, 'it will be live to fight again.' There is 'no one grand gesture after which everything will change,' he added. Most important, he said, 'the larger lesson for Iran is that it needs serious deterrence, and a bomb is the only one that will work.' Iran's missiles and proxies did not protect it, Nasr said. Even if Khamenei dies, the country has been shown to be vulnerable, he said, and nuclear deterrence is the most likely response. Geranmayeh agrees. 'This is the great irony,' she said. 'Although Trump has sought to eliminate the nuclear threat from Iran, he has now made it far more likely that Iran becomes a nuclear state.' And that could mean a future of continued bombing campaigns and Iranian counterstrikes, she said. Still, Geranmayeh believes that diplomacy is the best way out for all parties. After a week of violence in the region, she said, 'there could be a window for Tehran and Washington to come to their senses.' Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council, a think tank, is skeptical. With so much damage to their expensive nuclear program, he said in an email, 'they probably won't rebuild.' Iran has 'spent billions of dollars and decades only to invite sanctions and a devastating war with the most powerful country in the world. Why hit replay on that tape?' Advertisement If Iran does rebuild, he said, the United States 'can hit them again.' This article originally appeared in
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump: U.S. Strikes on Iran a 'Spectacular Military Success' - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Audio
Trump: U.S. Strikes on Iran a 'Spectacular Military Success' CNN Inside Politics 43 mins CNN's Wolf Blitzer joins Manu Raju to discuss the United States' attack on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
