City Council decides not to issue Pride Month proclamation

(COLORADO SPRINGS) — The Colorado Springs City Council is not issuing a formal proclamation for Pride Month.
While Pride Month proclamations had been issued in previous years, the City Council has decided not to issue a formal one for Pride Month in 2025. When asked why, the City Council gave various reasons.
>>Pikes Peak Pride returns to Downtown Colorado Springs
'As a non-partisan legislative body, we believe our role is not to engage in identity-based or political gestures, but to focus on governance that benefits all residents.
We want to be clear: we welcome everyone to Colorado Springs. We support the rights of every individual to live safely, freely, and with dignity. We extend our best wishes for a safe, respectful, and successful event, and we remain committed to ensuring our city is a place where all people feel valued and secure.
Our decision is rooted in a desire to avoid divisive or performative politics. Instead, we aim to serve every citizen equally, without favor or pandering, and focus on the issues that unite us—such as public safety, infrastructure, economic vitality, and quality of life.'
City Council Leadership
The City Council noted that although they are not issuing a proclamation, they supported Pikes Peak Pride with money from the LART fund.
'We are sad to learn of the City Council's decision not to proclaim for Pride Month this year, as they've done for the last several years,' Pikes Peak Pride said. 'We're thankful to Mayor Yemi and his office for coming to the Pride Festival and issuing a Mayoral Proclamation again this year. We believe that repeals to diversity, equity, and inclusion from the federal level down are hurting minority groups across the board. Pikes Peak Pride exists to represent and provide visibility for our LGBTQIA+ community, and we thank those who show up and speak up for Pride Week. We see you. We hear you.'
The Pride crosswalk will also not be installed.
'Due to accessibility and safety concerns, the City is not allowing crosswalks to be modified for any events,' said a City of Colorado Springs spokesperson. 'The City is providing outdoor space at the Pioneers Museum, where Pride is being held, for decoration by event organizers.'
Pikes Peak Pride will celebrate Pride Month, love, identity, and community in Downtown Colorado Springs on Saturday and Sunday, June 14 and 15. The Pride Parade is also set to occur on Sunday at 11 a.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Fourth-generation Puebloan announces run for Pueblo City Council District 3

Joseph Perko seeks to welcome progress while also preserving Pueblo's legacy if elected to Pueblo City Council's District 3 seat. The fourth-generation Pueblo resident and union member is running for council in 2025 with goals to clean up the city and champion labor, public outreach and urban improvement. As a candidate for District 3, Perko's bid for a council seat will be determined by residents of Aberdeen, the Mesa Junction, Regency, Sunset Park and other communities in the southwest quadrant of the city. Perko has a business degree and is an electrician by trade with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 12. "As a blue-collar union member, I am all too aware of the challenges our workers and unions face as well as the benefits they stand to gain if empowered," Perko said in a written campaign announcement. "There is growth, development and industry all over Pueblo and yet our workers continue to see wages be outpaced by the cost of living, watching laborers in our sister cities around Colorado enjoy far greater gains." Often an attendee of Pueblo City Council meetings, Perko told the Chieftain he's considered running for office for about six years. While he said he respects the current council's thoroughness in addressing and debating issues, he feels council members can be "needlessly contentious with one another." Perko said he does not fully understand why some current council members have disregarded community-led efforts to preserve the City Park Bathhouse and that there is no need to tear it down. He also opposed city government's funding cuts to nonprofits like the Mariposa Center for Safety, Pueblo Zoo and Sangre de Cristo Arts Center, which the city made before passing its 2025 city. "I strongly disagree with a lot of the ways that they are trying to get this new budget... just trying to cut everything that we view as essential," Perko said. "I think it takes away from a lot of the things that give people opportunities, which just furthers economic decline, reduces our tax base and makes it harder for people to want to stay here." In his campaign announcement, Perko advocated for training programs to grow the local labor pool, tidying up the city's most distressed areas to make Pueblo more welcoming, and work programs to employ unhoused and probationary individuals. "Give them a chance to work cutting overgrowth, picking up litter, simple things like that. In time, they could work their way up to full-time employment and obtain housing," Perko said in the announcement. "Investment could be made in networks of medical and mental health treatment so they can have the abilities to elevate themselves out of their situation with confidence, independence and compassion. Perko will host a mixer and formal campaign launch event at his brother Anthony Perko's law office, Perko Law, LLC, at 113 Broadway Ave., from 4 to 6 p.m. on June 28. Half-cent sales tax: Mayor proposes change to half-cent sales tax criteria. Could it bring a Costco to Pueblo? Pueblo Chieftain reporter James Bartolo can be reached at JBartolo@ Support local news, subscribe to The Pueblo Chieftain at This article originally appeared on The Pueblo Chieftain: Fourth-generation Puebloan announces 2025 bid for city council

The Hill

2 hours ago

• The Hill

Cuomo, Mamdani neck and neck in final NYC mayoral poll

New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has effectively drawn even with former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor and surpasses him in the final round of a ranked-choice simulation, according to a new poll released Monday. In a final survey of the race from Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill, Cuomo led Mamdani 35 percent to 32 percent overall, which is within the poll's margin of error. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander came in at 13 percent, followed by City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams at 8% and former Comptroller Scott Stringer at 3 percent. Four percent of voters were undecided. But the survey also allowed respondents to rank their top choices. In the first round of voting, Cuomo led Mamdani 36 percent to 34 percent. In the eighth round of voting, once all the other candidates were eliminated, Mamdani came out on top, beating Cuomo 52 percent to 48 percent. New York City uses a ranked-choice voting system for its mayoral primary, meaning voters are able to select their top five candidates in order of preference. If no candidate surpasses 50 percent in the first round of voting, the candidate who's last is eliminated and their votes are redistributed to the other candidates according to how they ranked their other choices. The latest findings point to continued momentum for Mamdani, a democratic socialist who has emerged as the leading progressive choice in the Democratic race to succeed Mayor Eric Adams (D), who is running as an independent. In the last Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey, taken in May, Cuomo led Mamdani 35 percent to 23 percent. 'Over five months, Mamdani's support has surged from 1% to 32%, while Cuomo finishes near where he began,' said Spencer Kimball, Emerson College Polling's executive director. 'In the ranked-choice simulation, Mamdani gains 18 points compared to Cuomo's 12, putting him ahead in the final round for the first time in an Emerson poll.' The survey is the latest to point to a close race as voters head to the polls on Tuesday. A Marist poll released last week found Cuomo leading Mamdani in the seventh round of voting, 55 percent to 45 percent. Cuomo has been the clear favorite as Democrats look to oust Adams, who was the subject of a federal corruption case that was eventually dropped by the Justice Department, drawing accusations that the mayor had sought to curry favor with President Trump. A win by Cuomo this week would represent a stunning resurgence for the former governor, who resigned from his job as the Empire State's top executive in 2021 amid sexual harassment allegations and a brewing scandal involving accusations that his administration concealed nursing home deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even with his baggage, Cuomo has earned the backing of many notable figures in the Democratic Party, most recently Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), the influential Black Congressional Caucus member. And while Mamdani has emerged as the clear progressive favorite, scoring the endorsement of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), he has also drawn criticism from the establishment. Last week, The New York Times editorial board urged voters not to support Mamdani despite pledging not to endorse in local elections. The Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey was conducted from June 18 to June 20 with a sample size of 833 likely voters and a margin of error of plus or minus 3.3 percent. The first round of ranked-choice voting was conducted with a sample size of 800 likely voters and a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percent. The final round was conducted with 729 voters and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percent.

USA Today

3 hours ago

• USA Today

Because of Trump, this Pride Month feels different. Hateful. But we will win.

Republicans aren't going to stop until we're all back in the closet. We must continue to fight for progress, for the benefit of all. In the end, history will remember who was on the wrong side. For those of us in the LGBTQ+ community, this Pride Month feels different. Hateful, even. To President Donald Trump and those in his administration, that's the point. On June 18, it was announced that the 988 National Suicide & Crisis Lifeline would no longer be partnering with The Trevor Project and other groups to provide specialized support services for LGBTQ+ youth and young adults in crisis. According to the Trump administration, this is 'to focus on serving all help seekers.' To LGBTQ+ people and our allies, it's clearly a move to show that our mental health is not a priority to the Republican Party. And how does removing something help anybody? This isn't the only instance of Trump and Republicans trying to destroy the progress made by LGBTQ+ people in the decades since Pride Month celebrations began. Here are some of the other ways the LGBTQ+ community has been targeted this June. Remember, the point from Republican leaders is to inflict pain for political points. It's not to help children. Unforgivable: It will cost LGBTQ+ lives if Trump shuts down 988 suicide hotline | Opinion Supreme Court rules against trans youth In the months following Trump's second inauguration, the transgender community has borne the brunt of Republican ire. Another blow to the community was handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, when the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors. The court ruled that the law, which prevents young people from using puberty blockers or hormone therapy, doesn't violate the 14th Amendment. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court 'abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.' Chase Strangio, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union and the first openly transgender person to argue in front of the Supreme Court, called the decision a 'painful setback' but stressed the need to continue the fight for trans rights. The children who do seek this type of gender-affirming care know who they are. Hormones and puberty blockers aren't prescribed unless these children can prove that they are suffering from distress that would be eased by treatment. This ban, and the Supreme Court's decision to uphold it, show that the 'debate' over trans people's identity isn't about keeping kids safe. It's about controlling people who are different. It's not about protecting kids; it's about hurting them to make Republican leaders feel good about themselves. Opinion: As a gay man, I'm finally flying a pride flag. I don't know what took so long. Navy may no longer honor Harvey Milk with vessel It's not just the present that is being affected by the Trump administration. It's also how we remember the past. On June 3, U.S. officials confirmed that the USNS Harvey Milk, a naval oil tanker named for the late LGBTQ+ rights activist. Milk, who served as a U.S. Navy operations officer on rescue submarines during the Korean War then went on to become the first openly gay man elected to public office in California, was assassinated in 1978. While it's unclear when the renaming will occur, it's clearly part of the Trump administration's efforts to scrub anything related to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives from the public record. Opinion: I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point. It's disgraceful that Trump wants to rid the government of as much LGBTQ+ history as possible. It is shameful that something as simple as a dedication is being questioned. It may not seem like a big deal to some people, but it shows that the primary goal of the Trump administration is to make people feel like their lives and their history don't matter. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. All of this started well before this Pride Month. One of the first things Trump did upon his second inauguration was declare that the country would only recognize two genders. In February, his administration removed references to transgender people from the Stonewall National Monument's website. Bills have been introduced in several state legislatures that attempt to overturn the Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized same-sex marriage. The LGBTQ+ community is strong. We have remained defiant for decades, and we'll continue to speak out as Trump and Republican lamakers try to silence us. It's just heartbreaking that this is happening during a month that we are supposed to be celebrating. Republicans aren't going to stop until we're all back in the closet. We must continue to fight for progress, for the benefit of all. In the end, history will remember who was on the wrong side of history – and it certainly won't be those of us fighting to keep our rights. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.