California judge approves landmark settlement for discharged LGBTQ+ veterans' discharge upgrades
A federal judge in California gave final approval earlier this month to the settlement of a class action lawsuit brought against the Department of Defense by former service members discharged because they were queer. The settlement will allow an estimated 35,000 service members to more easily upgrade their discharges, remove sexual orientation markers from their service records, and potentially obtain currently denied benefits.
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
The settlement expedites multiple processes of importance to former LGBTQ+ service members. The Pentagon agreed to provide 'an expedited group Board review process for considering discharge upgrades for veterans given discharge characterizations of General Under Honorable Conditions or Other Than Honorable,' the settlement states. The settlement also calls for streamlining the removal process for 'markers of perceived or actual sexual orientation.' from a member's service record.
'This expedited process removes the considerable burden on veterans to first obtain their military records – a process that can take years – and then submit full petitions supported by evidence to the Board – another process that can take years,' the settlement noted.
The suit was filed in August of 2023 by former service members Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Julianne ('Jules') Sohn, and Lilly Steffanides with the help of the Impact Fund, Legal Aid at Work, and King & Spaulding LLP.
'I believe that part of service is standing up for what is right. That is why I publicly spoke out against Don't Ask, Don't Tell, even though it led to my discharge from the Marine Corps,' Sohn said in a statement when the suit was first filed. 'And that is what I hope to do today by filing this lawsuit – standing up so that other LGBTQ+ veterans are afforded the full dignity and honor for their service and sacrifices for this country.'
The suit moved slowly until the parties began to engage in 'contested arm's length settlement negotiations' in July of 2024. The weekly or bi-weekly videoconferences were described as 'productive but adversarial in nature.'
The negotiations were given a boost after an 'all-day in-person settlement negotiation meeting' in Washington, D.C., in September of 2024 that was attended by counsel and subject matter experts.
The following month, the parties reached an agreement on the general scope and key terms of the settlement and notified the court they anticipated a full agreement in December. The final agreement was signed and fully executed on January 3, 2025, just weeks before the incoming administration of Pres. Donald Trump took control of the Pentagon and its negotiations.
In addition to the new policies, the Pentagon committed to a timeline that will implement the policies within four months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia's former president says countries are lining up to give Iran their nukes. Analysts are calling his bluff.
A top Putin aide and Russia's former president slammed the US for its strikes on Iran's nuclear site. Among other claims, Dmitry Medvedev said other countries are ready to give their nukes to Iran. Nuclear analysts told BI that Medvedev's claim is logistically and politically ridiculous. Analysts are casting doubt on Russia's former president's claim that "a number of countries" were considering supplying nuclear warheads to Iran after the Pentagon's salvo of bunker-buster strikes there. Dmitry Medvedev, who was president from 2008 to 2012 and is a top aide to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, didn't specify which countries he was referring to in his Telegram post on Sunday. In his post, he downplayed the damage dealt to Iran's vital nuclear sites. As news of the strikes broke on Saturday, the Pentagon was careful to say that it was still assessing the destruction caused by the 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs and multiple Tomahawk missiles it fired at Iran's nuclear sites. Medvedev wrote that the strikes had "entangled" the US in a new conflict. "A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads," he added. Nuclear weapons analysts speaking to Business Insider said they doubted that Medvedev's statement on such transfers is credible. "It's impossible in practice because nuclear weapons are not like a bomb or just something you can carry in a suitcase," said Pavel Podvig, a senior researcher in the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research's weapons of mass destruction program. Nuclear warheads come as an entire system, with people who need to be trained to keep and service them safely, as well as maintenance facilities and equipment. Even tactical nukes, which are more portable and produce a smaller blast, need high-level storage, Podvig added. "Unless you create a nuclear program or almost a nuclear program in the country, there is no way to just give your nuclear weapons to them," he said. Simply giving such a warhead to another country would break the first article of the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Russia and China have signed. Podvig said that in Europe, where the US stations nuclear weapons, the warheads are in American custody. The same can be said of Russia's nuclear weapons in Belarus. "I don't see this being done technically," Podvig said. Politically, Medvedev could likely only be referring to three countries, said Adam Lowther, a cofounder and the vice president of research at the Ohio-registered think tank National Institute for Deterrence Studies. North Korea, China, and Russia are the only nuclear-armed states considered adversaries or rivals to the US. And Lowther said all three know that supplying Iran with nuclear weapons, even just as a deterrent, would risk intense escalation from the US and Israel. "When you give somebody a nuclear weapon, and they can use it, you can't guarantee how they're going to use it," Lowther said. He added that with Tel Aviv and Washington so focused on preventing Iran from fielding nuclear weapons, Tehran would likely only have two choices if it does receive a warhead: Use the bomb or lose it. And if Iran detonates a gifted nuke, Lowther added, American forensics would easily be able to trace the fissile material and bomb design to identify where the weapon originated. "Then that country would be on the US' hit list," Lowther said. Medvedev is known to make bold, hawkish statements toward Ukraine and the US since the outset of the full-scale Russian invasion. He serves as the deputy chairman — second in rank to Putin — of the Kremlin's security council. His rhetoric has often run parallel to the Kremlin's nuclear threats, repeatedly issued as warnings to the West over military aid to Ukraine. Moscow, however, has consistently not followed through with those threats, even when the US escalated its level of assistance to Kyiv. Lowther said he believes Medvedev's statement was a play against Ukraine, a bid to reduce the West's willingness to help Kyiv. "The Russians say: 'You know what? You give the Ukrainians these weapons? Well, we can give the Iranians weapons as well,'" he said. The Israel Defense Forces declined to comment on Medvedev's remarks. The White House and US State Department did not respond to requests for comment sent outside regular business hours by BI. Read the original article on Business Insider
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Midnight Hammer is 'mission accomplished' but there's one big red flag
The Middle East was teetering on the verge of nuclear catastrophe courtesy of Iran. Seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers brought the region back from the edge this weekend. President Donald Trump's powerful strike in Operation Midnight Hammer on Saturday was a street-smart move that pulled the knife out of Iran's hand. "We retained the element of surprise," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine said at a Pentagon briefing on Sunday. Yes, that's the understatement of the year. Caine, an F-16 fighter pilot who flew combat in Iraq, was the right choice to be Trump's top military adviser as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For now, it's mission accomplished. Iran's most advanced nuclear facilities are entombed in rubble. The first U.S. strike to prevent an emergent nuclear power has succeeded. And if the special smart fuses on the Massive Ordnance Penetrators did their job, a lot of expensive, complex machinery underground has been smashed to bits. Reviewing 40 years of Iran's mayhem and attacks on U.S. servicemembers, it's clear to see why Iran could not ever be allowed to complete a nuclear weapon. Iran does not believe in deterrence as we know it. The Iranian possession of a nuclear bomb would have forced Israel to prepare options to use its own nuclear weapons. Midnight Hammer came just in time. Absolutely the B-2s can strike again if need be. As President Trump said, there are plenty of targets. The B-2s will be back at Whiteman AFB having their stealth buffed up, while the crews debrief. Here's the bad news. The U.S. may not have enough planes to carry out that kind of mission with China. With only 21 B-2s ever built and 19 still flying, the U.S. margin is thin. The B-2 strikes came after hundreds of strikes on Iran's air defenses and command and control military targets by the Israeli air force in October 2024, and over the past ten days. It still took 125 aircraft for Operation Midnight Hammer. That's including F-22 and F-35 fighter sweeps, Navy carrier F/A-18EF strike fighters and F/A-18G electronic warfare planes, and more, with KC-135 and KC-46 aerial refueling tankers providing post-strike gas for everybody. Operation Midnight Hammer proved the need for 6th Generation aircraft – the next wave of stealth, designed to work with drones. Trump greenlighted the Air Force F-47 in March. Now he needs to do more, and fast. First, and it's obvious, speed up the new B-21 Raider stealth bomber, the replacement for the B-2. The B-21 first flew almost three years ago and is in low-rate production. How about setting up a second manufacturing site and cranking out some new stealth bombers ASAP. Next, the Navy has a secret, 6th Generation stealth plane for the aircraft carrier ready to go. But a food fight in the Pentagon over budget analysis is holding up the production decision, even though the Navy has worked on this plane for over 10 years and needs it to replace aging Superhornets when the line shuts down. Admiral after admiral has told Congress the Navy is ready to buy this plane now. Believe me, they will need it to deter China. (And yes, aircraft carriers most definitely can ride out Chinese missile attacks and keep fighting. Do you have any idea how hard it is to find, let alone hit, a moving target at sea that is spitting out electronic deception?) Third, better restock the missile defenses carried by U.S. Navy destroyers, including the whole Standard Missile family. Fourth, the U.S. Space Force operates the satellites that provide precision attack and picks up all the missile launches from Iran. Fund whatever they need for on-orbit resilience so the Chinese and Russians can't mess with space. Why would U.S. forces ever want to strike China? They don't, I can assure you, but the Chinese may have other plans. Part of the mission of the B-2 is to hold critical targets at risk. In China, that may include ground-based laser weapons designed to zap satellites; their growing nuclear arsenal; or mobile missiles pounding U.S. bases, or China's aggressive air force and navy. You get the picture. Deterrence is on the line. The B-2 over Iran just proved again that the phrase "hold critical target sets at risk" is an essential – and unique – U.S. military mission. Against any adversary.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Russia's former president says countries are lining up to give Iran their nukes. Analysts are calling his bluff.
Analysts are casting doubt on Russia's former president's claim that "a number of countries" were considering supplying nuclear warheads to Iran after the Pentagon's salvo of bunker-buster strikes there. Dmitry Medvedev, who was president from 2008 to 2012 and is a top aide to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, didn't specify which countries he was referring to in his Telegram post on Sunday. In his post, he downplayed the damage dealt to Iran's vital nuclear sites. As news of the strikes broke on Saturday, the Pentagon was careful to say that it was still assessing the destruction caused by the 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs and multiple Tomahawk missiles it fired at Iran's nuclear sites. Medvedev wrote that the strikes had "entangled" the US in a new conflict. "A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads," he added. Nuclear weapons analysts speaking to Business Insider said they doubted that Medvedev's statement on such transfers is credible. "It's impossible in practice because nuclear weapons are not like a bomb or just something you can carry in a suitcase," said Pavel Podvig, a senior researcher in the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research's weapons of mass destruction program. Nuclear warheads come as an entire system, with people who need to be trained to keep and service them safely, as well as maintenance facilities and equipment. Even tactical nukes, which are more portable and produce a smaller blast, need high-level storage, Podvig added. "Unless you create a nuclear program or almost a nuclear program in the country, there is no way to just give your nuclear weapons to them," he said. Simply giving such a warhead to another country would break the first article of the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Russia and China have signed. Podvig said that in Europe, where the US stations nuclear weapons, the warheads are in American custody. The same can be said of Russia's nuclear weapons in Belarus. "I don't see this being done technically," Podvig said. Politically, Medvedev could likely only be referring to three countries, said Adam Lowther, a cofounder and the vice president of research at the Ohio-registered think tank National Institute for Deterrence Studies. North Korea, China, and Russia are the only nuclear-armed states considered adversaries or rivals to the US. And Lowther said all three know that supplying Iran with nuclear weapons, even just as a deterrent, would risk intense escalation from the US and Israel. "When you give somebody a nuclear weapon, and they can use it, you can't guarantee how they're going to use it," Lowther said. He added that with Tel Aviv and Washington so focused on preventing Iran from fielding nuclear weapons, Tehran would likely only have two choices if it does receive a warhead: Use the bomb or lose it. And if Iran detonates a gifted nuke, Lowther added, American forensics would easily be able to trace the fissile material and bomb design to identify where the weapon originated. "Then that country would be on the US' hit list," Lowther said. Medvedev is known to make bold, hawkish statements toward Ukraine and the US since the outset of the full-scale Russian invasion. He serves as the deputy chairman — second in rank to Putin — of the Kremlin's security council. His rhetoric has often run parallel to the Kremlin's nuclear threats, repeatedly issued as warnings to the West over military aid to Ukraine. Moscow, however, has consistently not followed through with those threats, even when the US escalated its level of assistance to Kyiv. Lowther said he believes Medvedev's statement was a play against Ukraine, a bid to reduce the West's willingness to help Kyiv. "The Russians say: 'You know what? You give the Ukrainians these weapons? Well, we can give the Iranians weapons as well,'" he said. The Israel Defense Forces declined to comment on Medvedev's remarks.
