Twins raised 7,000 miles apart meet 17 YEARS after violent kidnap as harrowing legacy of ‘child snatchers' is laid bare
AS Marsha Frederick put her adopted daughter to bed every night in Texas, she felt peace of mind that she had rescued the toddler from abandonment.
But little did she realise, more 7,000 miles and 13 time zones away in rural China, a small girl desperately wondered if her twin was ever coming home
7
7
Shuangjie Zeng had been cruelly separated from her twin Fangfang -renamed Esther - by China's loathed family planning bureaucracy that used inhumane methods to enforce the "one-child" policy.
Severe cases saw countless mothers forced to abort their babies, while millions were sterilised.
But in an almost unbelievable twist in the twins' story, they were eventually reunited thanks to journalist Barbara Demick, who outlines the extraordinary story in her new book: Daughters of The Bamboo Grove.
From 1979 to 2015, untold numbers of Chinese families had to give up their beloved babies - born or unborn - by ruthless enforces.
Some corrupt officials even claimed youngsters had been abandoned and sold them through orphanages to American parents - who were none the wiser.
One mother who fell victim to the process was Yuan Zanhua.
Terrified of the notorious family planners, Yuan - who already had two children - gave birth to identical twin girls with "plump cheeks and button noses" hidden in a bamboo grove in September 2000.
But at just 21 months, Esther was with her aunt when men stormed her home and snatched the toddler with no explanation.
Intruders held Esther's aunt back as others tore the youngster away as she desperately clung onto the hem of her skirt.
The toddler was taken to an orphanage, where she was later adopted by an unsuspecting American couple from Texass in exchange for a sizeable donation.
Shocking true story behind Netflix's Into the Fire as mom seeks missing daughter Aundria Bowman 35 years after adoption
Back in a poor village in Hunan province, Esther's family spent years wondering if she was even still alive.
Then in 2009, Demick interviewed Esther's biological parents and many others for a report for The Los Angeles Times.
Against all odds, the writer managed to track down their missing twin an ocean away in the US - but Esther's adoptive family did not want to talk.
Grappling with a moral dilemma, Demick decided to let Esther's birth family know she was alive and well - but concealed her exact whereabouts.
It wasn't until several years later that the author received a Facebook message that made her bolt upright - Esther's adoptive family were ready to speak.
After years of longing for her twin, Shuangjie was able to finally reconnect with Esther, first via message and later by video call.
Eventually, after years of sporadic messaging - the sisters were reunited in person in 2019 in an extraordinary twist to their story.
Demick told The Sun: "The trip to China was very gratifying. As a journalist and as a person.
"I'd first stumbled onto this story in 2009, a full decade before the reunion took place.
"Over the years, I'd felt bad that I hadn't been able to tell the Chinese families more about the whereabouts of their missing daughter.
"And I knew that my discovery of the kidnapping was initially very painful for Esther and her adoptive family.
"The book deals with some of the ethical questions raised by the situation."
7
7
Esther was taken in the midst of China's controversial 36-year "old child" policy - and after Beijing had opened international adoptions in 1992.
It fuelled an undercover black market for trafficked children - with Western families believing they were saving youngsters from desertion.
That was true in the case of Esther's adoptive parents, Marsha and Al Frederick, who were told the toddler had been found abandoned at the gate of a bamboo factory in Shaoyang City.
Demick fears there could be many more stories like Esther and Shuangjie's.
"With 160,000 adoptees around the world, statistically speaking, there must be hundreds of separated identical twins," she said.
"Usually both were adopted.
"I mention some funny stories in the book: a young woman at her freshman orientation for college was approached by a student who said she looked exactly like one of his high school friends.
"The friend dismissed it as racism. ("Oh, you know, all Asians look alike," she would remember thinking). They turned out to be identical twins.
"Esther and Shuangjie are intriguing because one is American, the other Chinese, and they offer a rare glimpse into the cultural influences that form our identity.
"A prominent psychologist once likened identical twins raised apart to the Rosetta Stone, the Egyptian stele that allowed linguists to decipher ancient languages-- though here, it is the eternal question of nature versus nurture.
"When I started this project, Esther and Shuangjie was the only case I knew of where one twin remained with the birth family in China and the other was adopted abroad, but recently two others have emerged.
China's one child policy
CHINA introduced the one-child policy in 1979 as a population control measure to try and slow down the growth of the country.
Enforced by the Chinese government, it restricted most couples to having only one child.
But rural families and ethnic minorities were often given different rules - such as allowing a second child if the first was a girl.
Families that complied were entitled to benefits such as better housing, education, and healthcare - and those who didn't stick to the policy faced fines and job losses.
The enforcement of the policy varied across the country and sometimes involved forced abortions and sterilisation.
While the policy helped reduce China's population growth, it also led to significant challenges.
These included a rapidly ageing population, a shrinking workforce, and a skewed gender ratio due to a preference for boys - resulting in sex-selective abortions and killing of baby girls.
In response to the growing problems, the policy was relaxed in 2015, allowing couples to have two children.
By 2021, the government eased restrictions even further - allowing three children per family to address demographic imbalances and declining birth rates.
"Thanks to the rise of commercial DNA testing and social media, adoptees are finding genetic relatives at a rapid rate.
"I'm sure we will hear more about children who were snatched from their birth parents like Esther. As well as more stories of separated twins."
International adoptions were banned by China in 2024 - eight years after officially ending its one-child policy due to concerns over its ageing workforce and economic stagnation.
It was replaced by a two-child policy, which was then expanded to three-child in 2021.
But Demick believes it could be too late to undo the damage inflicted.
"Who would believe it? China is running out of people," she added.
"Once the most populous country in the world (a title it has recently ceded to India), its 1.4 billion population is expected to drop in half by the end of this century.
"There aren't enough of those cheap young workers who transformed China into an industrial powerhouse, staffing the assembly lines that produced our Christmas toys and smartphones.
"Apart from the economic fallout of the population drop, there are the social consequences. In some areas, seven boys were born for every five girls, which has created a pool of bachelors unable to find partners.
"Sexually frustrated young men are not conducive to social stability.
"Rural men, who are less desirable on the marriage market, have had to import brides from Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos and Nepal, which in turn has led to bride trafficking and kidnapping.
"The Chinese government lifted the one-child policy in 2015.
"Almost comically, the same cadres who used to force women to have abortions or get sterilised, are now offering rice cookers and water bottles and sometimes cash as incentives for having more children.
"But it's hard to reverse course. Those births that didn't take place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have left China without enough women of child-bearing age to replenish the population."
7
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Facing disgrace back in China, the brilliant student who stalked top Scots professor for over eight months
A brilliant Chinese student faces returning to China in 'disgrace' after she was found guilty of stalking a professor at St Andrews University. World leading expert Professor Thomas Kelsey was advised by police to sneak in and out of the university using fire exits to avoid obsessed Ruixue Zhang. Disgruntled Zhang, 29, tried to bribe him to let her continue studying at the university by lavishing unwanted gifts upon him, including a portrait she had drawn. She even had to be huckled off the university grounds by security staff on several occasions, with the stressed professor eventually being forced to spend more time working from home to avoid her. Dundee Sheriff Court heard Zhang 'wouldn't take no for an answer' and continued to turn up at Professor Kelsey's work, as well as bombarding him with emails begging to be given a PhD place. She continued the campaign of harassment for eight months despite admitting in one of her 'polite' emails that she was causing annoyance and may be breaking the law. Zhang, whose address was given as Dundee Backpackers hostel, was found guilty of stalking Professor Kelsey at the university from 1 March to 25 October last year. Her solicitor Billy Watt asked the court to grant an absolute discharge - meaning she would have no conviction on her record - to avoid 'disgrace' upon her return to China. Mr Watt said: 'She is someone with a potentially exceptionally bright future ahead of her in the field she operates in. The consequences of a conviction here would be disproportionately severe and irreversible. 'A conviction would jeopardise her immigration status and perhaps lead to her removal from the UK, and exclusion from employment in the field in which she studies. 'It would have a devastating effect after years of academic effort and expense and it could impact her future travel and education prospects. It would leave her with an incredible stigma. 'She travelled from China to Scotland, to some extent as a rising star, and she would return to China as a criminal following her time at St Andrews University. 'The impact of that would be absolutely devastating. This could have an impact on the entirety of this young lady's life. The impact of going back to China in disgrace would be devastating.' However, Sheriff Neil Kinnear turned down the request and fined Zhang £300 as well as banning her from approaching or contacting her victim for the next two years. He said: 'I understand why you make that submission and I agree it is a very unusual, unfortunate and rather sad case. But I take account of the persistence of it over a period of time and that it had a substantial effect on the university and Professor Kelsey. 'He was quite candid that he never felt there was any physical threat and the contact had always been polite and respectful, but it was the persistence over a prolonged period which caused him - after consulting with security and police - to work from home.' The court heard Zhang completed a Masters in Computer Science and was desperate to remain under the tutelage of Professor Kelsey, who is recognised as a leading authority on computer modelling of human fertility, both for the healthy population and for survivors of childhood cancer. She regularly turned up uninvited for weekly PhD student meetings after being told that her application had been refused as there was no space for more students. On at least three occasions, she had to be told to leave the university campus by security as she was no longer a student and had no right to be there. In one email, frustrated Professor Kelsey told Zhang not to contact him again in what the court heard was an unusually blunt tone from him, as he didn't know what else to do by that point. The professor told the court the stalking campaign had affected his work life and also his personal life. In a July email, Zhang wrote: 'I regret my behaviour has disturbed you and had an impact on your work. In the UK this can be seen as impolite and in serious cases may even violate the law.' In her evidence, Zhang claimed she had been offered a PhD place but returned from a trip to China to find it had been withdrawn. University staff told the court her PhD application was rejected in February 2024. Zhang, runner-up at the Chinese national Maths Olympiad in 2015, was found guilty of causing fear or alarm by stalking Professor Kelsey. She presented him with unwanted gifts, tried to induce him to supervise her studies, tried to induce other people to approach and contact him on her behalf, and repeatedly approach him in person and by email after being told not to. Sheriff Kinnear told her: 'Your whole conduct was such that a reasonable person might expect it would cause them fear or alarm. I am satisfied it caused him alarm.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
New insight into Texas family detention reveals adults fighting kids for clean water
Adults fighting kids for clean water, despondent toddlers and a child with swollen feet denied a medical exam — these first-hand accounts from immigrant families at detention centers included in a motion filed by advocates Friday night are offering a glimpse of conditions at Texas facilities. Families shared their testimonies with immigrant advocates filing a lawsuit to prevent the Trump administration from terminating the Flores Settlement Agreement, a '90s-era policy that requires immigrant children detained in federal custody be held in safe and sanitary conditions. The agreement could challenge President Donald Trump's family detention provisions in his 'big, beautiful' bill of tax breaks and spending cuts, which also seeks to made the detention time indefinite and comes as the administration ramps up arrests. 'At a time when Congress is considering funding the indefinite detention of children and families, defending the Flores Settlement is more urgent than ever,' Mishan Wroe, a senior immigration attorney at the National Center for Youth Law, said in a statement Friday. Advocates with the center, as well as the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, RAICES and Children 's Rights contacted or visited children and their families held in two Texas family detention centers in Dilley and Karnes, which reopened earlier this year. The conditions of the family detention facilities were undisclosed until immigration attorneys filed an opposing motion Friday night before a California federal court. The oversight of the detention facilities was possible because of the settlement, and the visits help ensure standards compliance and transparency, said Sergio Perez, the executive director of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law. Without the settlement, those overseeing the facilities would lose access to them and could not document what is happening inside. Out of 90 families who spoke to RAICES since March, 40 expressed medical concerns, according to the court documents. Several testimonies expressed concern over water quantity and quality. Emails seeking comment were sent to the Office of Attorney General Pam Bondi and to CoreCivic and Geo Group, which operate the detention facilities in Dilley and Karnes, Texas, respectively. There was no response from either Bondi's office or the operators of the facilities by midday Saturday. One mother was told she would have to use tap water for formula for her 9-month-old, who had diarrhea for three days after, and a 16-year-old girl described people scrambling over each other for water. 'We don't get enough water. They put out a little case of water, and everyone has to run for it," said the declaration from the girl held with her mother and two younger siblings at the Karnes County Immigration Processing Center. 'An adult here even pushed my little sister out of the way to get to the water first.' Faisal Al-Juburi, chief external affairs officer for RAICES, said Friday in a statement that the conditions 'only serve to reinforce the vital need for transparent and enforceable standards and accountability measures," citing an 'unconscionable obstruction of medical care for those with acute, chronic, and terminal illnesses.' One family with a young boy with cancer said he missed his doctor's appointment after the family was arrested following their attendance to an immigration court hearing. He is now experiencing relapse symptoms, according to the motion. Another family said their 9-month old lost over 8 pounds (3.6 kilograms) while in detention for a month. Children spoke openly about their trauma during visits with legal monitors, including a 12-year-old boy with a blood condition. He reported his feet became too inflamed to walk, and even though he saw a doctor, he was denied further testing. Now, he stays mostly off his feet. 'It hurts when I walk,' he said in a court declaration. Arrests have left psychological trauma. A mother of a 3-year-old boy who saw agents go inside his babysitter's home with guns started acting differently after detention. She said he now throws himself on the ground, bruises himself and refuses to eat most days. Growing concerns as ICE ramps up operations Many of the the families in detention were already living in the U.S. which reflects the recent shift from immigration arrests at the border to internal operations. Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and main architect of Trump's immigration policies, said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers would target at least 3,000 arrests a day, up from about 650 a day during the first five months of Trump's second term. Leecia Welch, the deputy legal director at Children's Rights said that as bad as facility conditions are, they will only get worse as more immigrants are brought in. 'As of early June, the census at Dilley was around 300 and only two of its five areas were open," Welch said of her visits. "With a capacity of around 2,400 – it's hard to imagine what it would be like with 2,000 more people.' Pediatricians like Dr. Marsha Griffin with the American Academy of Pediatrics Council said they are concerned and are advocating across the country to allow pediatric monitors with child welfare experts inside the facilities. Future of detention without Flores agreement The Flores agreement is poised to become more relevant if Trump's legislation called the ' One Big Beautiful Bill Act ' passes with the current language allowing the indefinite detention of immigrant families, which is not allowed under the Flores agreement. Trump's legislation approved by the House also proposes setting aside $45 billion in funding, a threefold spending increase, over the next four years to expand ICE detention of adults and families. The Senate is now considering that legislation. Under these increased efforts to add more detention space, GeoGroup, the same corporation operating the detention facility in Karnes, will soon be opening an infamous prison — which housed gangsters Al Capone and Machine Gun Kelly — for migrant detention in Leavenworth, Kansas. Immigration advocates argue that if the settlement were terminated, the government would need to create regulations that conform to the agreement's terms. 'Plaintiffs did not settle for policy making— they settled for rulemaking," the motion read. The federal government will have a chance to submit a reply brief. A court hearing is later scheduled for mid-July.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Serial rapist Zhenhao Zou facing second trial as more women come forward
Serial rapist Zhenhao Zou is facing a second trial with police and prosecutors preparing to charge the Chinese student with a second round of offences. Zou, 28, is already serving a minimum 24 years for attacking 10 young women in London and China. Sources say there have been discussions between detectives and lawyers for the Crown Prosecution Service about at least one more trial for the Chinese student. Zou was sentenced on Thursday to life imprisonment, even offering to be chemically castrated in hopes of getting a lighter sentence. Since his conviction in March at least 24 women have come forward to British police, several of whom have made formal statements which could be admissible in a new trial. Zou came to Britain as a student, first in Belfast in 2017 and then in London. While a PhD student in mechanical engineering at University College London he was arrested in January 2024. He drugged and attacked women, videoing most of his crimes for his own sexual gratification which turned into the compelling evidence that saw him convicted. One source said: 'We expect more charges; we expect a second trial.' Detectives at the Metropolitan police fear the effects of the drugs used in the attacks could leave victims with no memory of the assaults. Officers suspect he could be one of the worst sexual offenders in British history after recovering videos of him attacking a further 50 victims. In total, there were 1,270 videos, 1,660 hours of footage, and 58 videos of Zou raping women, most of whom are still to be identified. There were also drugs, including those used to stupefy his victims. In court, he bragged of having sex with several women a month. The videos show a male, believed to be Zou, attacking a series of women. Some of the videos do not show the victims' faces, and about half are believed to have taken place in the UK, with detectives identifying which country attacks took place in by scouring videos for clues, such as the style of plug socket visible in the room. The drugs can render a victim motionless or barely able to speak, but they can also lead to bouts of euphoria. Despite the convictions against Zou for attacking 10 women, prosecutors want to be able to counter any defence in any new trial that the women were consenting. Sentencing Zou the judge, Rosina Cottage KC, said he would 'groom' victims over social media, and added: 'These women you treated callously as sex toys for your pleasure.' Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available from the following organisations. In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support on 0808 500 2222 in England and Wales, 0808 801 0302 in Scotland, or 0800 0246 991 in Northern Ireland. In the US, Rainn offers support on 800-656-4673. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). Other international helplines can be found at
