India to defer world's longest river cruise via Bangladesh amid political unrest
India has decided to defer the world's longest river cruise from Varanasi to Dibrugarh via Dhaka due to political instability in Bangladesh. The cruise, which operates along the 3,200-km India-Bangladesh Protocol (IBP) route, has seen reduced interest from foreign tourists following adverse travel advisories after the ouster of the Sheikh Hasina government.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
India will defer running the world's longest river cruise-from Varanasi to Dibrugarh via Dhaka-till the political situation improves in strife-stricken Bangladesh.Officials aware of developments said adverse travel advisories against Bangladesh amid sustained unrest since the ouster of the Sheikh Hasina government last August has dampened interest in foreign tourists-the key target audience for the cruise. The cruise runs on the India-Bangladesh Protocol (IBP) route stretching 3,200 kilometres over a span of 50 days.Started in January 2023, the cruise ferried about 60 passengers till date. The maiden voyage ferried 36 tourists from Switzerland over 27 river systems across the two nations. The cruise connected Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Assam via Bangladesh. It is currently accepting bookings only for domestic voyages between Varanasi and Kolkata. "Cruise will resume only after elections and political stability in Bangladesh," said an official aware of the plans."Cargo movement on the Indo-Bangladesh Protocol (IBP) route is happening continuously," a senior official told ET adding that no issue has been faced so far.Over 4.88 lakh metric tonne cargo moved along the IBP route in April 2025, up from 4.28 lakh metric tonne in March this year. But passenger movement is restricted. While passenger services through Bangladesh are at a standstill, cargo operations are operational albeit at reduced volume."Cargo movement on the IBP route is happening continuously," a senior official said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Granules India shares in focus after US FDA flags observation at Telangana API facility
Live Events Granules India share price target (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Shares of Granules India will be in focus on Monday after the company announced that its active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) facility in Telangana has received an observation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under Form a stock exchange filing, Granules India said the FDA completed an inspection at its API Unit-1 facility in Bonthapally, Sangareddy district, last to the FDA, Form 483 observations are issued when investigators observe practices or conditions that may potentially violate the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. However, a Form 483 does not constitute a final determination of non-compliance by the India said it will respond to the observation within the stipulated Bonthapally site is Granules India's largest API manufacturing facility for paracetamol. It also houses production units for Metformin and Guaifenesin APIs, the company to Trendlyne, the average analyst target price for Granules India is Rs 622, indicating an upside potential of about 28% from current levels. Of the 8 analysts tracking the stock, the consensus rating is 'Strong Buy'.On the technical front, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 40.4, suggesting neutral to slightly bearish momentum. The stock continues to trade below its 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs), indicating continued India shares have declined around 19% year-to-date, but the stock has delivered a 66% return over the past two years. The company's market capitalisation currently stands at approximately Rs 11,808 crore.: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Donald Trump hints at possibility of ‘regime change' in Iran after US strikes
Hours after the United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran, President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of a regime change in Tehran. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA [Make Iran Great Again]!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform. ( @realDonaldTrump - Truth Social Post ) ( Donald J. Trump - Jun 22, 2025, 4:55 PM ET ) It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!! — Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 TRUTH POSTS (@TruthTrumpPosts) June 22, 2025 The US president's statement contradicted that of US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who earlier said that the strikes were not aimed at bringing out a ' regime change ' in Iran. In the early hours of Sunday, the US joined Israel's war against Iran. Trump said that the country carried out a 'very successful attack' on the nuclear sites of Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan in Iran. 'A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, [Fordo],' Trump said. The United States' decision to directly enter the conflict came over a week after the Israeli military struck what it claimed were nuclear targets, and also other sites, in Iran with the aim of stalling Tehran's nuclear programme. Iran retaliated with missile attacks on Israel. Washington is an ally of Israel and acts as a guarantor of the country's security. During a Pentagon briefing on the attacks on Sunday, Hegseth claimed that Iran's nuclear ambitions were ' obliterated ' after Trump ordered the strikes on the country's three nuclear sites, NPR reported. The attack did not affect Iranian troops or civilians, he claimed. Stating that the strikes were not aimed at bringing out a ' regime change ' in Tehran, he added: 'The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme and the collective self-defence of our troops and our ally Israel.' The defence secretary said that Trump was fully committed to the peace process. '[Trump] wanted a negotiated outcome…gave Iran every single opportunity and unfortunately was met by stonewalling.' During the briefing, Hegseth also read out Trump's social media posts which warned that any retaliation from Iran would be met with force ' far greater '. Hegseth added: 'Iran would be smart to heed those words, he said it before and he means it.' Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday had called the US strikes a 'grave violation of the United Nations Charter, international law and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons'. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences,' he had said on social media. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior'. The minister added that in accordance with the UN Charter, Iran 'reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest and people'. Iran and Israel continued to trade volleys of missile attacks during the day. Iran launched its twentieth wave of missile and drone strikes against Israeli military targets, CNBC reported, quoting Iran's state-owned media Fars. The Israeli Health Ministry said that 86 persons were injured in the latest round of Iranian missile strikes, The Times of Israel reported. US strikes result of politically motivated actions: Iran to UNSC At a United Nations Security Council emergency session convened after the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, Iran's Ambassador to the UN Ali Bahreini said that the action did not come about 'in a vacuum', Al Jazeera reported. They were the result of 'politically motivated actions' of the US and its European partners, Bahreini added. The ambassador stated that Israel decided to 'destroy diplomacy' when it struck Iran, two days ahead of nuclear talks that were set to take place between Iran and the US, Al Jazeera reported. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty had been 'manipulated into a political weapon … exploited as a pretext for aggression and unlawful action', Bahreini added.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why these two agri industries are wary about India-US trade deal
Even as India and the United States work towards finalising a bilateral trade deal – ahead of a looming July 9 deadline for the reimposition of President Donald Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs – at least two major domestic agricultural-based industries are worried about the possible concessions that a deal might entail. The sugar industry, for one, is against allowing imports of ethanol for use in blending with petrol. The mills aren't also very keen on import of genetically modified (GM) maize/corn as a feedstock for fuel ethanol. The US is the world's top producer as well as exporter of both maize and fuel ethanol. The second is the soyabean processing industry. The Indore-based Soybean Processors Association of India (SOPA) has vehemently opposed imports of soyabean. The US is the second biggest producer and exporter of this leguminous oilseed after Brazil. Both countries mostly grow GM soyabean. Given the US' high stakes in these commodities – and the geopolitical imperative to find a sizeable alternative market to China – there's significant pressure on India to remove restrictions on their imports. But any such opening up in the India-US trade deal could encounter resistance from the two well-established agro-processing industries. What sugar millers fear The ethanol-blended petrol programme has been a success story of the Narendra Modi-led government. Chart 1 shows that the average blending of ethanol in petrol sold by oil marketing companies (OMC) has risen from just 1.5% in 2013-14 to 14.6% in 2023-24. In the current supply year, from November 2024 till May 2025, the cumulative all-India average blending ratio was 18.8%, close to the target of 20% by 2025-26. But the industry's concerns are over the feedstock used for ethanol production. Till 2017-18, the entire ethanol for blending in petrol came from molasses, the leftover dark syrup after extraction of sugar crystals from cane juice. From 2018-19, the mills-cum-distilleries also began using cereal grains (mainly broken or old rice unfit for human consumption) as feedstock. Since 2023-24, the ethanol supplies from grain-based feedstock, particularly maize, has overtaken that from sugarcane molasses and whole juice (Chart 2). For the 2024-25 supply year, a total 1,047.9 crore litres of ethanol have been contracted or made available to OMCs. Out of that, 710.4 crore litres or nearly 68% is from grain-based feedstock, including 483.9 crore litres from maize, 119 crore litres from the Food Corporation of India's surplus rice and 107.5 crore litres from damaged/broken grains. Only the balance 337.5 crore litres are from molasses (144.7 crore litres) and sugarcane juice (192.8 crore litres). 'As it is, sugarcane is being marginalised as a feedstock. It would be worse with imports of maize or even ethanol itself,' says a miller from Uttar Pradesh. According to him, the industry was already facing the prospect of stagnant, if not declining, domestic sugar consumption: 'Our future isn't sugar, but energy. Today, it is 20% ethanol-blended petrol. Tomorrow, it may be 5% blending in diesel or ethanol being converted through additional processing into sustainable aviation fuel producing lower carbon emissions compared to petroleum jet fuel'. Ethanol from sugarcane, the miller claims, will not create any major 'fuel versus food and feed' dilemma. 'Sugar consumption won't increase much in India, unlike milk, egg and chicken that need maize as the key feed ingredient. The diversion of maize for biofuel will cause huge demand-supply imbalances and shortage of grain for livestock and poultry,' he adds. The US exported a record 1,914 million gallons (724.5 crore litres) of ethanol, valued at $4.3 billion, in 2024. India was its third largest market (after Canada and the United Kingdom), at 187 million gallons (70.8 crore litres) worth $441.3 million. India permits import of ethanol only under licence for industrial (non-fuel) purposes and restricted to 'actual users': Imports can be for manufacture of alcohol-based chemicals, but not for blending in petrol or diesel. A recent NITI Aayog working paper has suggested that India import GM maize as a feedstock for ethanol production. The protein-rich byproduct from it – DDGS or distiller's dried grains with solubles – may be entirely exported without getting consumed as a GM feed ingredient within the country. 'US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' the paper – authored by NITI Aayog member, Ramesh Chand, and senior adviser, Raka Saxena – has stated. The NITI Aayog paper has also called for exploring the option of importing soyabean, with the oil extracted from it being sold in the domestic market and the residual de-oiled cake or meal (which contains GM protein matter) exported to other countries. SOPA's executive director, DN Pathak, counters this proposal. 'Most of our solvent extraction plants are in the interiors (especially Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra) where the crop is grown. It's not feasible for them to bring imported soyabean from the ports, process it and then take back the meal for exports. The freight cost economics will simply not work. And what will happen to the 7 million-odd farmers cultivating soyabean here?,' he asks. Indian processors crush 11-12 million tonnes (mt) of soyabean annually to produce 9-9.5 mt of meal. Out of that, 7-7.5 mt is domestically consumed as feed and food ingredient and the rest 2 mt or so exported. This is way below the 105-110 mt that China crushes every year. Much of that soyabean is imported to meet the feed requirement of its humungous swine herd and poultry flock: China is home to roughly half of the world's pig population and a fifth of its chickens. 'We don't have this kind of domestic market for soyabean meal. Also, if the GM meal cannot be sold within the country, the processing plants will have to be nearer to the ports for exports. The ones more likely to put up these are the international commodity trading giants such as AWL Agri Business (formerly Adani Wilmar), Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus,' explained Pathak. SOPA has also voiced concern at the Centre's decision, on May 30, to slash the effective import tariff on crude soyabean, palm and sunflower oil from 27.5% to 16.5%. That will further squeeze the margins of domestic processors, 'as they will have to compete with lower-priced imported oils, forcing them to operate below break-even capacity or shut down altogether'. Soyabean is now trading in MP and Maharashtra's mandis at Rs 4,300-4,350 per quintal, as against its official minimum support price of Rs 5,328. A surge in imports, whether of oil or seed, can lead to farmers switching acreage to other crops. These worries may to come to the fore, as the ongoing trade talks between India and US edge closer to fruition. Harish Damodaran is National Rural Affairs & Agriculture Editor of The Indian Express. A journalist with over 33 years of experience in agri-business and macroeconomic policy reporting and analysis, he has previously worked with the Press Trust of India (1991-94) and The Hindu Business Line (1994-2014). ... Read More
