Donald Trump hints at possibility of ‘regime change' in Iran after US strikes
Hours after the United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran, President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of a regime change in Tehran.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA [Make Iran Great Again]!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform.
( @realDonaldTrump - Truth Social Post )
( Donald J. Trump - Jun 22, 2025, 4:55 PM ET )
It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!! pic.twitter.com/qFED0eTNzh
— Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 TRUTH POSTS (@TruthTrumpPosts) June 22, 2025
The US president's statement contradicted that of US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who earlier said that the strikes were not aimed at bringing out a ' regime change ' in Iran.
In the early hours of Sunday, the US joined Israel's war against Iran. Trump said that the country carried out a 'very successful attack' on the nuclear sites of Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan in Iran. 'A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, [Fordo],' Trump said.
The United States' decision to directly enter the conflict came over a week after the Israeli military struck what it claimed were nuclear targets, and also other sites, in Iran with the aim of stalling Tehran's nuclear programme. Iran retaliated with missile attacks on Israel.
Washington is an ally of Israel and acts as a guarantor of the country's security.
During a Pentagon briefing on the attacks on Sunday, Hegseth claimed that Iran's nuclear ambitions were ' obliterated ' after Trump ordered the strikes on the country's three nuclear sites, NPR reported. The attack did not affect Iranian troops or civilians, he claimed.
Stating that the strikes were not aimed at bringing out a ' regime change ' in Tehran, he added: 'The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme and the collective self-defence of our troops and our ally Israel.'
The defence secretary said that Trump was fully committed to the peace process. '[Trump] wanted a negotiated outcome…gave Iran every single opportunity and unfortunately was met by stonewalling.'
During the briefing, Hegseth also read out Trump's social media posts which warned that any retaliation from Iran would be met with force ' far greater '. Hegseth added: 'Iran would be smart to heed those words, he said it before and he means it.'
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday had called the US strikes a 'grave violation of the United Nations Charter, international law and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons'.
'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences,' he had said on social media. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior'.
The minister added that in accordance with the UN Charter, Iran 'reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest and people'.
Iran and Israel continued to trade volleys of missile attacks during the day.
Iran launched its twentieth wave of missile and drone strikes against Israeli military targets, CNBC reported, quoting Iran's state-owned media Fars. The Israeli Health Ministry said that 86 persons were injured in the latest round of Iranian missile strikes, The Times of Israel reported.
US strikes result of politically motivated actions: Iran to UNSC
At a United Nations Security Council emergency session convened after the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, Iran's Ambassador to the UN Ali Bahreini said that the action did not come about 'in a vacuum', Al Jazeera reported.
They were the result of 'politically motivated actions' of the US and its European partners, Bahreini added.
The ambassador stated that Israel decided to 'destroy diplomacy' when it struck Iran, two days ahead of nuclear talks that were set to take place between Iran and the US, Al Jazeera reported.
The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty had been 'manipulated into a political weapon … exploited as a pretext for aggression and unlawful action', Bahreini added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘This is an outright war crime': Protests erupt in US and other countries after Trump's strikes on Iran
Anti-war protests broke out in multiple US cities, including San Francisco, New York, and Washington, DC, over the weekend following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Demonstrators criticised what they called an 'unconstitutional' escalation and warned of a wider Middle East conflict. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump and administration officials defended the attacks and warned of further action if Iran retaliates. Hundreds of demonstrators marched through San Francisco's Market Street, demanding an end to US military intervention in Iran. 'Trump has bombed Iran three times. This is an outright war crime,' said one protest speaker, according to ABC News. Similar protests unfolded in Washington, DC, New York, and Boston, with demonstrators holding placards and chanting slogans. Many rallies were organised by the ANSWER Coalition and the Party for Socialism and Liberation. It also posted on X: 'The people of the United States don't want another forever war. The people of the United States want money for people's needs!' 'We need to show face and come out in mass and show our administration we're not going to be fooled,' said Ramsey Robinson of the Party for Socialism and Liberation in San Francisco. 'We are anti-war. We support the Iranian people. We want to prevent more death, more destruction.' Activist Deliliah Shenk from Colma said she joined the protest after learning that the US used 'bunker buster' bombs in the attack. 'This is absolutely insane. It's totally unconstitutional. This guy needs to be given the boot. In a big way,' she told ABC News. Some groups also used the protests to voice support for regime change in Iran, holding separate demonstrations on the issue. The ANSWER Coalition has planned a national 'Stop the War on Iran' march for June 28 in Washington, DC, with more local demonstrations scheduled throughout the week. Protests also occurred globally, including in Japan and Iran. Trump defended the decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear facilities and warned of further action. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,' he said during a White House address. Vice President JD Vance also reinforced the administration's stance in an interview with ABC News, stating, 'If they decide they're going to attack our troops or build a nuclear weapon, we're going to respond to that with overwhelming force.' The strike drew mixed reactions from US Congress. While some Republican lawmakers praised the move, Democrats were sharp in their criticism. According to the World Socialist Web Site, a broader wave of anti-war protests has also erupted in elsewhere across the globe, including Europe and Asia. In Europe, tens of thousands have taken to the streets in cities like The Hague, London, and Brussels, condemning violence in Gaza and opposing their governments' support for US-Israeli policies. Large protests have also been reported in Morocco, South Africa, Somalia, and Portugal. Many of these demonstrations include calls for a ceasefire and critiques of imperialism and foreign intervention. Protests have also spread across Asia, including Japan and Iran, where citizens voiced opposition to war and regional escalation. Pakistan also witnessed demonstrations. In Karachi, thousands of people protested against the US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran, reported Reuters. Demonstrators symbolically walked over a large American flag with Trump's image, expressing strong opposition to the bombings authorised by Trump against Iranian nuclear sites. (With inputs from USA Today, ABC News, World Socialist Web Site, Reuters)
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Blood, bombs and a Nobel? Pakistan chokes on Trump nomination after US bombs Iran
What began as a bold diplomatic gesture, Pakistan recommending former US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, has quickly turned into a political embarrassment. The move, announced Friday and formalised through a letter signed by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, cited Trump's self-proclaimed efforts in preventing escalation during the recent India-Pakistan standoff. But within hours, the US bombed three of Iran's key nuclear facilities- Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz- in a joint operation with Israel. That single event has flipped the narrative and ignited widespread condemnation inside Pakistan. 'Afghan blood is on his hands' Critics point not just to Trump's recent actions but to his broader legacy of war and destabilization. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo 'How can a man with the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on his hands claim to be a peacemaker?' asked Maulana Fazlur Rehman , leader of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), at a party event in Murree. He demanded the government withdraw Trump's nomination immediately. Fazl slammed Trump's history of supporting Israeli military operations across Palestine, Syria, Lebanon—and now Iran. 'Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false,' he said, adding that the nomination appeared to be driven by Pakistani leaders' enthusiasm over Trump's lunch meeting with Chief of Army Staff, Field Marshal Asim Munir. Live Events Political outrage mounts Voices from across Pakistan's political spectrum have joined the backlash. Former senator Mushahid Hussain said on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has willfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!' He further accused Trump of being manipulated by 'Netanyahu and the Israeli war lobby,' and warned that the former US president had committed the 'biggest blunder of his presidency.' 'National embarrassment' Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) was among the first to formally condemn the US strikes, labeling them 'unprovoked' and expressing 'total support' for Iran's sovereignty. Raoof Hasan, head of PTI's political think-tank, called the Trump nomination a 'cause of unmitigated shame and embarrassment' and blasted the government for what he described as a misstep that undermines national legitimacy. Diplomats and Activists Speak Out The backlash extended beyond politicians. Former ambassador Maleeha Lodhi termed the decision 'unfortunate,' saying it failed to reflect public sentiment. Veteran politician Afrasiab Khattak described it as 'sycophancy,' unfit for responsible diplomacy. Jamaat-i-Islami chief Naeemur Rehman said the move 'undermines our national dignity,' while author Fatima Bhutto posed a pointed question on X: 'Will Pakistan withdraw its nomination for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize?' A diplomatic blunder? The backlash highlights a deeper discomfort with aligning Pakistan's foreign policy narrative with a figure whose record includes drone strikes, Middle East escalation, and backing regimes accused of war crimes. As journalist Mariana Baabar noted, 'Today Pakistan does not look too good either,' sharing the official post announcing the nomination.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tulsi Gabbard snubbed by Trump after US spy chief defied her Iran advice? Pics from Situation room sparks buzz
Pictures showing President Donald Trump with his top national security officials in the Situation Room as US forces carried out precision strikes against the Iranian nuclear facilities have emerged. But one key is missing. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — who the president had publicly split with this week over assessments on Iran's nuclear program, was not seen in dramatic pictures. Amid the growing speculation that US spy chief was snubbed by the President over her 'anti-war'comments, the White House has set the straight on her presence in the Situation Room as President Trump ordered strikes on Iran. ALSO READ: Trump rebukes Tulsi Gabbard again as he makes bold claim on Iran's nuclear ambitions Was Tulsi Gabbard present in Situation Room? The White House's Response Team on Sunday released new pictures from the high-profile meeting that showed Tulsi Gabbard sitting in the Situation Room as the U.S. struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday night. 'President Trump's intelligence team in the White House Situation Room (June 21, 2025),' the White House captioned the photo, tagging Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who was seated next to her. — RapidResponse47 (@RapidResponse47) The photo was released following a night of rampant speculation over Gabbard's involvement in the unprecedented attack. Earlier, reports claimed that Gabbard was noticeably absent from a series of photos from the Situation Room released by the White House shortly after the strike. White House sources confirmed to CBS and Fox News that Gabbard was present at the meeting with multiple top-level officers who were not in the photos, including Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Live Events A White House official confirmed Gabbard was in the room Saturday and that she is a "key player" on President Donald Trump's national security team, reported Fox News. The photos showed Trump donning a MAGA hat as he was surrounded by Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, State Secretary Marco Rubio, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine. ALSO READ: 6 times in one post: Trump brings up Nobel Peace Prize again and again Trump vs Gabbard clash In March, Tulsi Gabbard had claimed to lawmakers that "Iran is not building a nuclear weapon". This was, however, contradicted by Trump recently, who said he didn't "care what she said". "You've always said that you don't believe Iran should be able to have a nuclear weapon," a reporter asked Trump while aboard Air Force One on June 16. "But how close do you personally think that they were to getting one?" "Very close," Trump responded. Then again Friday, Trump said Gabbard was "wrong" after she reported that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. "My intelligence community is wrong," Trump said when asked about the intelligence community previously reporting that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. ALSO READ: Amazon's one-month deadline to US employees amid mass layoff fear: Resign in 60 days or... As critics picked apart Gabbard's past comments, the White House stressed to Fox Digital that Gabbard and Trump were closely aligned on Iran. A White House official told Fox News Digital on Tuesday afternoon that Trump and Gabbard are closely aligned and that the distinction being raised between Gabbard's March testimony and Trump's remarks that Iran is "very close" to getting a nuclear weapon is one without a difference. Gabbard took to social media and blasted the media for "intentionally" taking her March testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee "out of context." "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," Gabbard said in a Friday post on X, accompanied by a video clip of her March testimony to Congress. ALSO READ: Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Intel and more: List of top US tech giants that have announced mass layoffs in 2025 "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly," she wrote. "President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Meanwhile, Iran's underground enrichment site at Fordo was hit again Monday while Iran fired a salvo of missiles and drones at Israel and warned the United States that its military now has a 'free hand' to attack American targets in the wake of the Trump administration's massive strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. The Fordo facility was one of those hit in Sunday's attack, and it was struck again on Monday, Iranian state television reported. There was no immediate word on damage nor who launched the attack, though Israel said earlier it was conducting airstrikes on Iran.
