Closure of Strait of Hormuz will hit Iranians hardest: Ex-Pentagon official

Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil chokepoints located between Oman and Iran, connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea
ANI US
Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin has noted that Iran would "suffer the most" if it tried to close the Strait of Hormuz, adding that any disruption would not last more than few days. His remarks come in the wake of the US bombing of three nuclear installations in Iran.
The Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil chokepoints located between Oman and Iran, connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The strait is deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers
Rubin said that closing the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway and among the most crucial oil route of the world, might cause a short-term disruptions in the oil supply to several countries and to some degree in India.
"Forty-four per cent of the fuel that goes through the Strait of Hormuz ends up in Asia, most of that in China, but also to some degree in India, and so there might be a short disruption. However, there is an ability to have an alternate supply."
"The United States is a major supplier right now. Saudi Arabia can ship fuel across the Arabian Peninsula to Yanbu. The United Arab Emirates has a pipeline that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz and goes into the Gulf of Oman. Also, remember that Iran needs to import gasoline. So the Iranians might rhetorically talk about closing the Strait of Hormuz, but militarily, they cannot do that for more than a day," Rubin told ANI emphasising the alternatives to bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.
He stated that if Tehran tried to shut the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea, it would be "committing suicide."
"Beyond that, they would be committing suicide. Their own economy and their own military would wither away should they try to close the Strait of Hormuz... Iranians will be the ones who will suffer most. There might be a spike in oil prices but I don't suspect that it is going to last for three or four days given that so many countries have spare capacities," the former Pentagon official said.
US President Donald Trump in an address from the White House on Saturday (local time) announced that the US had bombed three nuclear facilities in Iran. This statement followed a possible threat by Iran to close the strategically vital trade route in response.
Jonathan Schanzer, a former US Treasury official and expert on terror financing, warned that any move to close the Strait of Hormuz at this time would met with "unbelievable" force from the United States.
"...Any attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz right now will be met with probably unbelievable force from the United States. Now that this has started, it's not that difficult to imagine the French or the Brits coming in to clear the lanes... I see the Iranians as being absolutely suicidal if they go down this route, and I do get a sense that we could be at a pivotal moment here. It doesn't mean that Iran won't try to attack, but I think asymmetrically is much more likely than through conventional means," the former US Treasury official told ANI.
On Saturday (local time) United States launched an attack on three nuclear sites in Iran amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. In his first public remarks since carrying out 'precision' strikes in Iran, Trump warned that he could order further action if Tehran does not agree to a satisfactory peace agreement.
As per a report in CNN which cited a US official, the US used six B-2 bombers to drop a dozen "bunker buster" bombs on the Fordow nuclear site. Navy submarines fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at two other sites, Natanz and Isfahan, and a B2 dropped two bunker busters on Natanz, the official said.
The underground site at Fordow and the larger Natanz plant were Iran's two primary uranium enrichment facilities, out of which Natanz had already been hit by Israel with smaller weapons earlier in the week, the New York Times reported.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

25 minutes ago

• News18

Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In

Last Updated: While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. After airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, the Trump administration on Sunday signalled openness to renewed diplomacy while maintaining that the US does not seek a wider war. While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly on Sunday after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. Trump's top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shared their views on the Iran conflict. Their unified message highlighted that the US aims to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions, not pursue regime change. At a Pentagon briefing, Hegseth stated, 'America does not seek war," while Vice President Vance told reporters the strikes offered Iran an opportunity to return to negotiations. 'Operation Midnight Hammer," he said, used 'decoys and deception," and encountered no Iranian military resistance, according to Hegseth and Gen. Caine. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth emphasised. Caine confirmed that the US had struck Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, and that all three sites sustained significant damage. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," he said. In a TV interview, Vance refrained from discussing classified intelligence but said he was confident the operation had 'substantially delayed" Iran's nuclear weapons program. 'I think it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon," he added. Vance also noted that the US had negotiated seriously with Iran before resorting to military action. 'I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship… and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears." Secretary of State Rubio told Face the Nation that while there are 'no planned military operations right now against Iran," the US would respond if attacked. 'Unless they mess around and they attack US interests," he warned. Despite President Trump's past promises to avoid extended conflicts, it's uncertain whether Iran views avoiding escalation as in its own best interest. Meanwhile, global reaction has been mixed, with some nations fearing the strikes could further destabilise the Middle East, particularly amid an ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Earlier this month, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure and military leadership, prompting Iranian retaliation and ultimately leading to the US intervention. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US strikes, calling them a violation of sovereignty and international law. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia both condemned the attacks, urging a return to political dialogue. Russia called the strikes 'a gross violation of international law," while Turkey warned of the risk of escalation to a 'global level." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the UK was relocating military assets to safeguard its interests, while leaders of Canada, Germany, Italy, and France all supported a swift return to diplomacy. The attacks have also raised concerns about potential disruptions to the global oil supply, with Iran hinting at closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key channel for global energy trade. Oil prices have surged over 20 per cent in the past month as tensions in the region escalated. The Pentagon did not provide new details on Iran's current nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the operation followed a 60-day window Trump gave Iran to engage in talks. 'Iran found out that when Trump says 60 days… he means it," Hegseth said. 'Otherwise, that nuclear program… will not exist." Caine and Hegseth added that B-2 bombers launched from Missouri, supported by a deception plan involving decoy aircraft, executed the strikes using 14 bunker-buster bombs. The mission ran from 6:40 p.m. to 7:05 p.m. ET on Saturday — approximately 2:10 a.m. in Iran on Sunday. tags : donald trump iran us Location : United States of America (USA) First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:30 IST News world Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In

Economic Times

26 minutes ago

• Economic Times

The regime must go: Iranians hope for a new dawn

Let us first be clear: for most Iranians, this is not our war. This is a war between Israel and the Islamic Republic, which has held Iranians hostage for more than four decades, and which has put them in harm's way with its reckless ambition. The regime has always declared its determination to destroy Israel, and it was drawing perilously close to carrying out that aim. Anyone who has passed through the Islamic Republic's education system, anyone who has witnessed its relentless destabilising of Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, knows just how sincerely the regime is committed to destruction, and exactly why it has continued to push its uranium enrichment programme. Like other Iranians, my heart breaks at the spectacle of bombs falling on my country. But the principal threat to our safety and well-being remains the regime itself. Over the past week, with the internet shut down, large numbers of citizens in Tehran and other cities have been arrested by the regime's security forces-supposedly for collaborating with Israel. Leading clerics have called for waves of killings as a solution to the state's military humiliation: 'I request the head of the judiciary to try these traitors in a field court,' said one last Friday, 'and execute them in public'. Declaring that executions had already begun, Amnesty International the same day condemned 'official calls for expedited trials and executions' designed to 'assert control and instil fear among the people of Iran.' The Islamic Republic is not a 'normal' government, which acts to protect the nation and its people in times of trouble. It is more like a hostile occupying force, from which most Iranians dream of liberation. That is why, for many millions, the present moment, terrifying as it is, feels like a historic opportunity. We know by now that peaceful protest is not sufficient to bring down one of the most violent and entrenched regimes in modern history. The Israeli strikes have accomplished what years of protest could not-the dismantling of key pillars of the regime's machinery of oppression. But as if the Islamic Republic were not enough, we Iranians have to deal with another obstacle, potentially mightier still: the immense cynicism of international opinion. Foreign leaders and newspapers pour scorn on our democratic hopes, telling us that we should make peace with our brutal government for fear it be replaced by something worse. I want to correct this twisted and heartless who wish to preserve the current regime usually offer Iraq as a cautionary tale-look what happened there, they warn, as a result of 'regime change'. Thanks to Iran's ancient civilisation and deep political tradition, it enjoys a unified national identity and deep internal cohesion. Not only that, but Iranians have already spent years anticipating just this moment: designing the post-regime reality and planning the political and social is an alternative in place. This explains the overwhelming popularity of Iran's crown prince Reza Pahlavi, who has become the symbol of that transition. He offers himself as a unifying figure during Iran's shift from totalitarian rule to secular democracy. As the heir to Iran's oldest political institution, the monarchy, he remains the most trusted and recognisable figure among Iranians both inside and outside the country. Many of those who do not desire a monarchy for the future Iran, also recognise him as a stabilising figure capable of leading the country through this pivotal moment, and safeguarding Iran's territorial integrity. Beyond Iran, Pahlavi has also advanced a regional vision for peace. His proposed Cyrus Accords-grounded in secular governance, mutual recognition and non-intervention-draw on Iran's venerable tradition of political tolerance. With the Islamic Republic removed, it is far easier to imagine a stable, peaceful and mutually cooperative West Asia. The best option for the international community is to give its full support to this vision, which is the democratic hope of the Iranian people, and which will bring immense advantages to millions outside Iran. The best way to avoid Iran falling into chaos is to back a figure who is able to command trust across political lines. Iran's crown prince is the only figure capable, for instance, of securing the loyalty of those who are defecting from the Islamic Republic is at its weakest. Having lost control of Iranian airspace, it is unable to protect itself, let alone the Iranian people. Its leader is hiding in a bunker. And Iranians are ready to take over where Israel's military assault finishes, to expel the regime, and to implement their plans. That is what the international community should support. This is what will ensure the end of this out of fear or complacency, however, many foreign leaders wish to preserve the present regime, albeit in chastened form. If such cowardice prevails, and the Islamic Republic endures, the consequences for Iranians will be catastrophic. As in the past, humiliation abroad is compensated by brutality at home. The regime now has the perfect pretext for a new wave of repression under the guise of 'national security'.But the danger is not only internal. The wounded regime will not retreat -it will retaliate. It will double down on regional aggression and accelerate its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Its obsession with Israel's destruction will intensify. If the regime survives, in other words, it will be emboldened to new levels of aggression, internal and external. Whether rightly or wrongly, foreign military action has brought about an important opportunity. But this opportunity will vanish if the West repeats the mistakes of the past. The most dangerous course now would be to throw the regime a lifeline-through quiet diplomacy, sanctions relief, or rhetorical 'balance' that legitimises the illegitimate. Iranians are not asking to be rescued. They are asking to be recognised. What they need is space to determine their own destiny-and acknowledgement of the leadership they have already chosen. Other countries should realise the folly of imposing frameworks of their own or manipulating Iran's hope on the horizon is not just the collapse of a regime. It is the end of an occupation. And with the right support, it can mark the rebirth of a sovereign, secular, democratic and peaceful Iran. And an end to the nightmare the Islamic Republic has caused to all around it. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%

India Today

30 minutes ago

• India Today

Iran's president says US must receive response as world awaits Tehran's response

Iran's President, Masoud Pezeshkian, said the US must "receive a response" for serious act of aggression. He condemned the United States for carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. These attacks were the most serious Western military action against Iran since the country's 1979 Islamic damage caused by the strikes was so severe that it could be seen from space. One of the key targets was the Fordow nuclear facility, located inside a mountain. US aircraft used 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to attack the Americans must receive a response to their aggression," Pezeshkian said during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, as reported by Iran's official IRNA news agency. The statement came after a large protest took place in Tehran, where many Iranians gathered in anger over the attacks. President Pezeshkian joined the protesters, showing his support and walking with them in a public square in central Tehran. Crowds were seen raising their fists and shouting, "Revenge, revenge!" Pezeshkian also posted a message on social media platform X, saying, "We will walk this path together. We will preserve Iran together. And we will show the world that this great nation is invincible. Our unity is our victory."WORLD ON EDGE AFTER US AND ISRAEL LAUNCH STRIKESadvertisementThis comes amid speculation that Iran is preparing for a stern response. The world is now watching closely as Iran considers how it will respond. After the attack, Iran fired another round of missiles at Israel. These missiles hit several buildings in Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, the US government warned its citizens in the region to be careful. The State Department told the families of American workers in Lebanon to leave the country and urged others to limit US Department of Homeland Security also issued a warning about possible threats within the country. So far, Iran hasn't carried out any direct attacks on US bases or attempted to stop the global oil supply. But officials say that could still SAYS RETALIATION WILL COME BEFORE ANY TALKSIn Istanbul, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Iran is considering every possible option to respond to the US attacks. He said there would be no talks or return to diplomacy until Iran had taken its revenge."The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," Araqchi said during a press leadership is under pressure to respond firmly to the attacks. According to reports, if Iran does not strike back, it could lose credibility both at home and in the region. However, any big move by Iran risks escalating the conflict with the United States and its Watch