logo
Think Weed Is Harmless? This Study Might Change Your Mind

Think Weed Is Harmless? This Study Might Change Your Mind

Yahoo5 hours ago

A new international study just delivered a wake-up call to millions of cannabis users: marijuana may be doubling your risk of dying from heart disease.
Published in the journal Heart, CNN reported that the analysis pooled medical data from over 200 million people, most between the ages of 19 and 59. It found that marijuana users had a 29 percent higher risk of heart attacks and a 20 percent higher risk of strokes compared to nonusers.
The most concerning finding? These risks were seen in young, otherwise healthy individuals with no prior heart conditions.
"What was particularly striking was that the concerned patients hospitalized for these disorders were young," said senior study author Émilie Jouanjus, a pharmacology professor at the University of Toulouse.
That ruled out tobacco or existing cardiovascular problems as the primary cause.
This is one of the largest studies to date linking cannabis use with cardiovascular disease, and its timing is critical. As marijuana legalization expands, use has surged past that of tobacco in some demographics.
Many believe marijuana is a safer, more natural alternative to smoking. Experts say that perception needs to change—fast.
"Clinicians need to screen people for cannabis use and educate them about its harms, the same way we do for tobacco," said Dr. Lynn Silver of the University of California, San Francisco. Silver co-authored an editorial accompanying the study, calling for urgent updates to how marijuana is regulated and discussed publicly.
The risks don't stop at inhalation. One recent study found that THC-laced edibles can impair vascular function just as much—or more—than smoking. In that study, vascular function dropped 42 percent in marijuana smokers and 56 percent in edible users.
And the potency? It's not 1970 anymore. Today's cannabis is up to 510 times stronger than the joints of decades past, with some concentrates reaching 99 percent pure THC. That's raising alarms about addiction, psychosis, and now, potentially fatal heart problems.
"If I was a 60-year-old with cardiovascular risk, I'd be very cautious," Silver warned.
Think Weed Is Harmless? This Study Might Change Your Mind first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 18, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bloomberg's War on Harm Reduction Faces Consumer Backlash at Tobacco Conference
Bloomberg's War on Harm Reduction Faces Consumer Backlash at Tobacco Conference

Associated Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Bloomberg's War on Harm Reduction Faces Consumer Backlash at Tobacco Conference

DUBLIN, IRELAND / ACCESS Newswire / June 23, 2025 / On the eve of the World Conference on Tobacco Control (WCTC), a lightshow illuminated the conference centre in Dublin, sending a clear message: millions of consumers are being left out of the conversation on global tobacco and nicotine policy. The event, organised by the World Vapers' Alliance, launched the " Voices Unheard - Consumers Matter! " campaign to highlight the ongoing marginalisation of those most affected by tobacco control decisions. With COP11 in Geneva on the horizon, the campaign underscores the urgent need for consumer representation in policymaking. While hundreds of experts and officials discuss regulations behind closed doors, the light show symbolises the voices of countless adults who have successfully quit smoking with safer alternatives, yet remain unheard in critical policy debates. Michael Landl, Director of the World Vapers' Alliance, criticised the influence of powerful figures such as Michael Bloomberg, whose support for prohibitionist policies often sidelines consumer perspectives. 'Policymakers must listen to those whose lives are directly impacted by these decisions,' Landl said. 'Evidence, not ideology or the influence of wealthy donors, should guide regulations.' The campaign also addresses recent calls from the World Health Organization for bans on flavoured nicotine products, which advocates argue would deny adults access to life-saving alternatives. Alberto Gómez Hernández, Policy and Advocacy Manager for the WVA, emphasised, 'Banning flavours is not about protection-it's about denying adults the tools they need to quit smoking.' The World Vapers' Alliance continues to call for evidence-based harm reduction policies and genuine consumer inclusion as the world prepares for COP11. For media enquiries, please contact: Michael Landl [email protected] +436648412958 High-quality pictures can be found here. More information about flavour bans: More about the WVA's demands: SOURCE: World Vapers' Alliance press release

Crash dummies used in car safety tests are still modeled after men despite higher risks for women
Crash dummies used in car safety tests are still modeled after men despite higher risks for women

Associated Press

time22 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Crash dummies used in car safety tests are still modeled after men despite higher risks for women

Maria Weston Kuhn had one lingering question about the car crash that forced her to have emergency surgery during a vacation in Ireland: Why did she and her mother sustain serious injuries while her father and brother, who sat in the front, emerge unscathed? 'It was a head-on crash and they were closest to the point of contact,' said Kuhn, now 25, who missed a semester of college to recover from the 2019 collision that caused her seat belt to slide off her hips and rupture her intestines by pinning them against her spine. 'That was an early clue that something else was going on.' When Kuhn returned home to Maine, she found an article her grandma had clipped from Consumer Reports and left on her bed. Women are 73% more likely to be injured in a frontal crash, she learned, yet the dummy used in vehicle tests by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration dates back to the 1970s and is still modeled almost entirely off the body of a man. A survivor becomes an activist Kuhn, who is starting law school at New York University this fall, took action and founded the nonprofit Drive US Forward. Its aim was to raise public awareness and eventually encourage members of Congress to sign onto a bill that would require NHTSA to incorporate a more advanced female dummy into its testing. The agency has the final word on whether cars get pulled from the market, and the kind of dummy used in its safety tests could impact which ones receive coveted five-star ratings. 'It seems like we have an easy solution here where we can have crash test dummies that reflect an average woman as well as a man,' Sen. Deb Fischer, a Nebraska Republican who has introduced the legislation the past two sessions, told The Associated Press. Senators from both parties have signed onto Fischer's 'She Drives Act,' and the transportation secretaries from the past two presidential administrations have expressed support for updating the rules. But for various reasons, the push for new safety requirements has been moving at a sluggish pace. That's particularly true in the U.S., where much of the research is happening and where around 40,000 people are killed each year in car crashes. Evolution of a crash test dummy The crash test dummy currently used in NHTSA five-star testing is called the Hybrid III, which was developed in 1978 and modeled after a 5-foot-9, 171-pound man (the average size in the 1970s but about 29 pounds lighter than today's average). What's known as the female dummy is essentially a much smaller version of the male model with a rubber jacket to represent breasts. It's routinely tested in the passenger seat or the back seat but seldom in the driver's seat, even though the majority of licensed drivers are women. 'What they didn't do is design a crash test dummy that has all the sensors in the areas where a woman would be injured differently than a man,' said Christopher O'Connor, president and CEO of the Farmington Hills, Michigan-based Humanetics Group, which has spent more than a decade developing and refining one. A female dummy from Humanetics equipped with all of the available sensors costs around $1 million, about twice the cost of the Hybrid used now. But, O'Connor says, the more expensive dummy far more accurately reflects the anatomical differences between the sexes — including in the shape of the neck, collarbone, pelvis, and legs, which one NHTSA study found account for about 80% more injuries by women in a car crash compared to men. Such physical dummies will always be needed for vehicle safety tests, and to verify the accuracy of virtual tests, O'Connor said. Europe incorporated the more advanced male dummy developed by Humanetics' engineers, the THOR 50M (based on a 50th percentile man), into its testing procedures soon after Kuhn's 2019 crash in Ireland. Several other countries, including China and Japan, have adopted it as well. But that model and the female version the company uses for comparison, the THOR 5F (based on a 5th percentile woman), have been met with skepticism from some American automakers who argue the more sophisticated devices may exaggerate injury risks and undercut the value of some safety features such as seat belts and airbags. A debate over whether more sensors mean more safety Bridget Walchesky, 19, had to be flown to a hospital, where she required eight surgeries over a month, after a 2022 crash near her home in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, that killed her friend, who was driving. While acknowledging the seat belt likely saved her life, Walchesky said some of the injuries — including her broken collarbone — were the result of it pinning her too tightly, which she views as something better safety testing focused on women could improve. 'Seat belts aren't really built for bodies on females,' Walchesky said. 'Some of my injuries, the way the force hit me, they were probably worsened.' The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry trade group, said in a statement to the AP that the better way to ensure safety — which it called its top priority — is through upgrades to the existing Hybrid dummy rather than mandating a new one. 'This can happen on a faster timeline and lead to quicker safety improvements than requiring NHTSA to adopt unproven crash test dummy technology,' the alliance said. Humanetics' THOR dummies received high marks in the vehicle safety agency's early tests. Using cadavers from actual crashes to compare the results, NHTSA found they outperformed the existing Hybrid in predicting almost all injuries — including to the head, neck, shoulders, abdomen and legs. A separate review by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research arm funded by auto insurers, was far more critical of the dummy's ability to predict chest injuries in a frontal crash. Despite the vast expansion in the number of sensors, the insurance institute's testing found, the male THOR dummy was less accurate than the current Hybrid dummies, which also had limitations. 'More isn't necessarily better,' said Jessica Jermakian, senior vice president for vehicle research at IIHS. 'You also have to be confident that the data is telling you the right things about how a real person would fare in that crash.' The slow pace of changing the rules NHTSA's budget plan commits to developing the female THOR 5F version with the ultimate goal of incorporating it into the testing. But there could be a long wait considering the THOR's male version adopted by other countries is still awaiting final approval in the U.S. A 2023 report by the Government Accountability Office, which conducts research for Congress, cited numerous 'missed milestones' in NHTSA's development of various crash dummy enhancements — including in the THOR models. Kuhn acknowledges being frustrated by the slow process of trying to change the regulations. She says she understands why there's reluctance from auto companies if they fear being forced to make widespread design changes with more consideration for women's safety. 'Fortunately, they have very skilled engineers and they'll figure it out,' she said.

Why nightmares could make you age faster and die sooner
Why nightmares could make you age faster and die sooner

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why nightmares could make you age faster and die sooner

Frequent nightmares are linked to premature ageing and increase the risk of an early death, according to a new study. Adults who report weekly nightmares are more than three times likely to die before the age of 70 compared to those who rarely or never experience them, researchers found. The study found nightmares to be a 'stronger predictor of premature death' than smoking, obesity, poor diet, and low physical activity. The scientists warned the findings should be treated as a 'public health concern', but said people can reduce nightmares by managing stress. The team, led by Dr Abidemi Otaiku of the UK Dementia Research Institute, and Imperial College London, analysed data from 2,429 children aged eight to 10 and 183,012 adults aged 26 to 86 over a period of 19 years. The research, presented at the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Congress this month, found that nightmares disrupt both sleep quality and duration, which impairs the body's overnight cellular restoration and repair ability. The combined impacts of chronic stress and disrupted sleep are likely to contribute to the accelerated ageing of our cells and bodies. Dr Otaiku said, 'Our sleeping brains cannot distinguish dreams from reality. That's why nightmares often wake us up sweating, gasping for breath, and with our hearts pounding – because our fight-or-flight response has been triggered. This stress reaction can be even more intense than anything we experience while awake.' He said: 'Nightmares lead to prolonged elevations of cortisol, a stress hormone closely linked to faster cellular ageing. For those who frequently experience nightmares, this cumulative stress may significantly impact the ageing process.' He added: 'Given how common and modifiable nightmares are, they should be taken far more seriously as a public health concern.' Researchers found that children and adults who had frequent nightmares also exhibited faster ageing. This accounted for approximately 40 per cent of those who had a higher risk of early death. Dr Otaiku said this was the first study to show nightmares can predict faster biological ageing and earlier mortality, even after accounting for other health issues. Even monthly nightmares were linked to faster ageing and increased mortality compared to those who had no nightmares. and the links were consistent across all ages, sexes, ethnicities, and mental health statuses. 'The good news is that nightmares can be prevented and treated,' said Dr Otaiku. Simple measures, such as maintaining good sleep hygiene, managing stress, seeking treatment for anxiety or depression and not watching scary films can be effective in reducing nightmares, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store