UK moves closer to legalising assisted dying after vote
LONDON, U.K.: In a landmark moment for Britain, lawmakers in the House of Commons have voted in favour of legalising assisted dying, setting the stage for one of the country's most profound social changes in decades.
The "Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)" bill passed by a narrow margin of 314 to 291 on June 20, clearing its biggest legislative hurdle and moving to the House of Lords for further scrutiny. If passed, the law would allow mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less to live the right to end their lives with medical help.
The legislation puts Britain on the path taken by Canada, Australia, and a number of U.S. states, where assisted dying is already legal under strict conditions.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government maintained a neutral stance on the bill, allowing members to vote based on conscience rather than party lines. Starmer himself voted in favour.
Supporters say the law would provide dignity and compassion to those facing unbearable suffering. But critics fear it could lead to vulnerable individuals feeling pressured to end their lives prematurely.
Outside Parliament, hundreds gathered awaiting the result. When the outcome was announced, campaigners in favour of the bill hugged, cheered, and waved placards. Opponents stood silently.
Emma Bray, a 42-year-old mother of two with motor neurone disease, said the vote gave her hope that others like her would be spared needless pain. "This result will mean that people will not have to go through the same suffering I have faced," she told Reuters. Bray has been told she has six months to live and plans to starve herself to avoid pain.
Public opinion has largely backed the change, with polls showing widespread support for assisted dying. The vote followed emotional parliamentary debate and a prior vote in November, when the bill was first approved in principle.
Still, Friday's vote reflected waning support, with the margin narrowing from 330-275 in November. Some lawmakers withdrew support, saying safeguards had been weakened.
Initially, an assisted death would have required court approval, but the revised bill replaces that with a panel of a psychiatrist, a senior legal figure, and a social worker.
Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who proposed the bill, defended the changes. "The safeguards are extremely thorough, extremely robust," she said.
Groups like Care Not Killing have strongly opposed the legislation. CEO Gordon Macdonald said MPs had too little time to review over 130 proposed amendments: "Does anyone think this is enough time to consider changes to a draft law that quite literally is a matter of life and death?"
Though still several steps from becoming law, the vote marks a dramatic shift in British policy on end-of-life choices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
5 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
UK moves closer to legalising assisted dying after vote
LONDON, U.K.: In a landmark moment for Britain, lawmakers in the House of Commons have voted in favour of legalising assisted dying, setting the stage for one of the country's most profound social changes in decades. The "Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)" bill passed by a narrow margin of 314 to 291 on June 20, clearing its biggest legislative hurdle and moving to the House of Lords for further scrutiny. If passed, the law would allow mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less to live the right to end their lives with medical help. The legislation puts Britain on the path taken by Canada, Australia, and a number of U.S. states, where assisted dying is already legal under strict conditions. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government maintained a neutral stance on the bill, allowing members to vote based on conscience rather than party lines. Starmer himself voted in favour. Supporters say the law would provide dignity and compassion to those facing unbearable suffering. But critics fear it could lead to vulnerable individuals feeling pressured to end their lives prematurely. Outside Parliament, hundreds gathered awaiting the result. When the outcome was announced, campaigners in favour of the bill hugged, cheered, and waved placards. Opponents stood silently. Emma Bray, a 42-year-old mother of two with motor neurone disease, said the vote gave her hope that others like her would be spared needless pain. "This result will mean that people will not have to go through the same suffering I have faced," she told Reuters. Bray has been told she has six months to live and plans to starve herself to avoid pain. Public opinion has largely backed the change, with polls showing widespread support for assisted dying. The vote followed emotional parliamentary debate and a prior vote in November, when the bill was first approved in principle. Still, Friday's vote reflected waning support, with the margin narrowing from 330-275 in November. Some lawmakers withdrew support, saying safeguards had been weakened. Initially, an assisted death would have required court approval, but the revised bill replaces that with a panel of a psychiatrist, a senior legal figure, and a social worker. Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who proposed the bill, defended the changes. "The safeguards are extremely thorough, extremely robust," she said. Groups like Care Not Killing have strongly opposed the legislation. CEO Gordon Macdonald said MPs had too little time to review over 130 proposed amendments: "Does anyone think this is enough time to consider changes to a draft law that quite literally is a matter of life and death?" Though still several steps from becoming law, the vote marks a dramatic shift in British policy on end-of-life choices.
Toronto Star
7 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Pierre Poilievre has dropped out of the spotlight. What happens when he comes back?
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre speaks with reporters in the foyer of the House of Commons on June 9, 2025. Adrian Wyld/ The Canadian Press Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
Calgary Herald
18 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
UK says not involved in strikes on Iran, but supports outcome
Article content British military assets, including the key Indian Ocean airbase on Diego Garcia, have so far not played a role in President Donald Trump's attacks on key Iranian nuclear facilities, ministers said on Sunday. Still, UK officials said they received advance warning from Washington and Prime Minister Keir Starmer gave his tacit support, saying that Trump had 'taken action to alleviate' the threat of Tehran's weapons program. Article content Article content Article content Pressed during an appearance on the BBC whether the UK government thought the attacks were good, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, said their 'outcome' was. 'I wanted a different way to obtain this, but I cannot pretend to you that the prevention of Iran having a nuclear weapon is anything other than in the interests of this country,' said Reynolds, who was speaking for the government. Article content Article content Trump's strikes have put Starmer and other key US allies in a difficult position. While the British prime minister had urged to Trump to stick to the diplomatic path, he can little afford a public break with the UK's most important ally, especially while pursuing Washington's cooperation on trade and Ukrainian efforts to resist Russia's full-scale invasion. Article content Besides the immediate concerns about the showdown with Iran and its proxies engulfing more of the Middle East and disrupting energy markets, Starmer's Labour Party wants to avoid a repeat of the mistakes of his predecessor Tony Blair's support of the US invasion of Iraq more than two decades ago. Many in Labour blame that conflict with splitting the party and helping to usher in 14 years of Conservative government that only ended with Starmer's election last year. Article content Article content Participation in any further US strikes, such as allowing the Pentagon to launch bombers from British military facilities on Diego Garcia, would raise issues with echoes of the debate around Iraq. Such questions include whether the British government believed the threat posed by Iran's weapons of mass destruction poses a sufficient enough threat to allow an attack on under international law. Article content Although foreign ministers from Britain, France and Germany held talks with their Iranian counterpart on Friday, they were unable to persuade Tehran to make enough concessions to convince Trump not to go ahead. British officials including Starmer put the responsibility for the failure of diplomacy on Iran and urged Tehran to change tact. Article content 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,' Starmer said in a statement. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.'
