160-million-year-old blue-stain fungi in China found to be harmful to trees
Source: Sci.News
In a groundbreaking discovery, researchers have uncovered 160-million-year-old
blue-stain fungi
fossils from the Jurassic Tiaojishan Formation in China. The new findings offer fresh insights into the ecological relationships between blue-stain fungi, plants, and insects during the Jurassic period. These fungi are generally nonfatal to their hosts but often accelerate tree mortality when associated with
wood-boring insects
.
According to ScienceDaily, a Chinese team of scientists highlights the discovery of well-preserved blue-stain fungal hyphae within Jurassic
fossil wood
from northeastern China, pushing back the earliest known fossil record of this fungal group by approximately 80 million years.
Know about the blue-stain fungi, deadly to trees
Blue-stain fungi are known for their ability to colonize wood, particularly in conifer trees, causing characteristic discoloration in the sapwood. While these fungi do not decompose wood, they often cause considerable damage when associated with wood-boring insects. Their role in accelerating tree mortality is significant, yet their evolutionary origins have long remained a mystery. Molecular phylogenetic analyses suggest that blue-stain fungi are an ancient fungal group, possibly originating during the Late Paleozoic or early Mesozoic.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
夢の農場を作り上げよう
アドベンチャーゲーム
ゲームをプレイ
Undo
This recent discovery in China revises our understanding of blue-stain fungi's history, suggesting their origins trace much further back into Earth's past.
Dr. Ning Tian, a paleontologist at Shenyang Normal University, explained the rarity of such findings: 'Not until 2022 was the first credible fossil record of blue-stain fungi reported from the Cretaceous in South Africa, with an age of approximately 80 million years.'
Discovery of the fossils of the blue-stain fungus
The fossils were found inside the petrified wood of Xenoxylon phyllocladoides, a type of conifer tree from the Jurassic period in western Liaoning province, China. Researchers discovered dark-colored fungal threads called hyphae, which are typical of blue-stain fungi. 'Under the microscope, the fossil hyphae appear dark, showing pigmentation that is a key feature of modern blue-stain fungi, which cause wood to change color,' the team explained. This shows that these fungi have existed for millions of years and are connected to fungi we see today.
The researchers also found a special structure the fungi use to enter the wood. 'When the fungi penetrate the wood's cell walls, the hyphae often form a structure called a penetration peg,' they said. This peg helps the fungi break through the tough wood cells by mechanical force, which is different from other fungi that use enzymes to break down wood.
A major leap in the fossil record of blue-stain fungi
The discovery of the blue-stain fungi found in China not only fills a gap in the fossil record but also provides critical evidence for understanding the early evolution of blue-stain fungi and their ecological interactions. The fact that these fungi were already established in the Jurassic period suggests that their relationship with wood-boring insects, which are likely the main agents for spore dispersal, was already in place long before the advent of modern insect species
The fossilized blue-stain fungi represent a significant milestone in paleontological research. 'The finding of Jurassic blue-stain fungi from China represents the second report of the blue-stain fungi and the earliest fossil record of this fungal group in the world, pushing back the earliest known fossil record of this fungal group by approximately 80 million years,' said Dr. Yongdong Wang, a paleontologist at the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Can heatwave lead to depression? Study reveals effect of climate change on mental health
The way we experience heatwaves may be more than just physical; it could be affecting our mental health too. A recent study published in the Journal of Affective Disorders found a stronger link between heatwaves and mental health issues among students living in rural areas. This research serves as a wake-up call, highlighting the growing impact of climate change not only on our physical well-being but also on our psychological health. Here's how heatwaves can affect mental health.(Shutterstock) To understand the link of climate change on psychological distress, the study authors analysed data from nearly 20,000 adolescents in China. Aged between 10 to 18 years, the students were selected based on variations of geographic regions, school types, and urban-rural settings. In the end, 19,852 participants were selected, with equal number of girls and boys. Also read | Is heatwave making you cranky? Impact of extreme heat on moods; how to deal with it The results were surprising. The study authors noticed a significant association of exposure to heatwaves to the psychological health of the study. More exposure to heatwaves resulted in greater risk of depression, anxiety, and the co-occurrence of both conditions. For each unit of increase in heatwave magnitude, there was a 13 percent increased risk of depression, and the odds of anxiety increased by 12 percent. Exposure to heatwaves can lead to depression.(Unsplash) Study author Yizhen Yu, a professor at the Tongji Medical College at Huazhong University of Science and Technology, told PsyPost, 'While the physical consequences of heatwaves are well-documented, their psychological effects on adolescents remain understudied. Given adolescents' unique developmental vulnerabilities and the growing threat of extreme heat events due to climate change, our study aimed to help bridge this important knowledge gap. Our findings suggest that exposure to heatwaves is associated with a higher risk of depression and anxiety symptoms among Chinese adolescents.' The study is a wake-up call: The study author further added that the study highlights the need of emphasising on mental health and how the changing climate can have effect on students and cause psychological distress. This can help schools, families, and policymakers understand the need of psychological wellbeing, amid growing climate concerns. Also read | Brain fog to mood swings: Expert shares 7 alarming ways the summer heat affects your mental health Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition. Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crick-it, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Quizzes, Polls & much more. Explore now!. Catch your daily dose of Fashion, Taylor Swift, Health, Festivals, Travel, Relationship, Recipe and all the other Latest Lifestyle News on Hindustan Times Website and APPs.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did you know that human beings are born with these two innate fears?
This one's especially for them, the ones who wear 'fearless' t-shirts a tad bit too proudly! Human beings, as it turns out, aren't entirely fearless. However, they are rather minimalist when it comes to innate fears. These aren't gamma‑ray phobias or existential dread—they're simpler, more down‑to‑earth. Believe it or not, we're born wired with just two primal fears —and those are the fear of falling and the fear of loud noises. Everything else? Learned through our interactions with the world. Intrigued? Let's take a quick ride through your first two fears and explore why the rest are mostly social souvenirs. The fear of falling (the 'visual cliff awakening) Picture this: you're six months old, crawling on a platform. Ahead of you—plummeting to the floor below—is nothing but clear plexiglass. A trusted figure is calling, 'Come on, sweetie!' But you hesitate. Most infants don't cross that transparent glass. Turns out, we detect the drop and recoil instinctively. That hesitation isn't learned—it's built-in. This experiment, known as the 'visual cliff' (1960) – where infants aged 6–14 months refused to crawl out over what looked like a sheer drop‑off – shows that newborns' fear of heights and drops emerges early. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo This innate caution isn't a cultural quirk—it's wired into our very genes to help us survive. Tiny humans without depth perception would likely bump their heads (and worse!) far too often. Neuroscientists call it an evolutionary safety net: the fear of heights and falling prevents young adventurers from testing the very limits of gravity before they're ready. The reflex is so built‑in that even some animals—kittens, chicks, puppies—display similar hesitancy. But hold on, here's the kicker: crawling actually triggers that fear to bloom. Babies who haven't yet learned to crawl often don't mind inching across the edge—but once they can crawl? A mix of experience, awareness, and motor coordination teaches them that gravity can be unforgiving. From there emerges caution—a primal, adaptive filter in the chip of our survival software. The fear of loud noises (the 'startle reflex') Did you ever jump at the sudden clang of a dropped pot or a car backfiring? That's your acoustic startle reflex in action. From day one, our nervous systems are tuned to flinch and duck at sharp, loud sounds. Newborns don't stroll through a carnival and casually shrug at fireworks—they flinch. That sudden jolt? It's our built‑in acoustic startle reflex, triggered by a noise loud enough to hint at danger: a thunderclap, a crash, a gunshot. Neuroscientist Seth Norrholm at Emory University explained to CNN that this startle response is hardwired as a danger signal—an instinctive 'something's wrong here!'—built into our primitive brain circuits, saying, 'If a sound is loud enough, you're going to duck… Loud noises typically mean startling. That circuitry is innate.' Even infants react: a pressure‑cooker whistle can reduce a newborn to tears and frantic alarm, while a blender whirr still makes toddlers flinch. This isn't just cute baby behavior or drama—it's survival code. What about the other fears? (Spiders, snakes, or public speaking?) Well, this is where it gets fun: none of these are inborn. They're learned. It's all nurture after nature's handshake. Take the classic Little Albert experiment: baby Albert was neutral around a white rat—but after pairing the rat with a loud noise, he started fearing it. The rat became a cue for fear. That's classical conditioning in action—wired reflex meets learned association. Spiders and snakes? Infants may show heightened attention to images of snakes or spiders, but they don't exhibit fear—just alertness. The leap to panic requires learning, and babies only have a predisposition to notice them faster—learning later fills in the rest. Darkness? A toddler afraid of the dark? It's likely tangled in imagination and stories—not wiring. Public speaking, social rejection, or the fear of failure? Purely human-made constructs—taught, absorbed, amplified through culture, life experience, and sometimes trauma. The modern aphorism, 'We are born with only two fears…' often pops up in self‑help, lifestyle, and pop smarty circles to empower people: if those big, paralyzing fears aren't innate, you can unlearn them. Nature vs nurture: The endless loop The two built-in fears fit our bodies like mission-critical apps. All others are downloadable: we install them throughout life based on experiences, culture, imagination, parental caution, news media… You name it! In fact, some experts emphasize it's not just that learned fear crops up—it's how easily we learn certain things. Babies are primed to quickly associate certain threats (like heights or loud noises), while other sounds—say, the blender or the pressure cooker—get conditioned slowly. A child might hate the sound of a blender, not because of wiring, but because mom took a decade to cook with it near her ears. As the saying goes, 'the only fear we're born with is the fear of falling. Everything else is learned…' and yes, many therapists encourage remembering that—because if we can learn fear, we can also unlearn it. That realization carries a sense of comfort. If those two fears are innate—and every other one isn't—then we shape our fears. We also reshape them, too. No wonder therapy, exposure techniques, and heartfelt conversations can melt the chill of fear over time. So next time you're jittery before a speech or tense over some unknown, remind yourself that fear wasn't in your genetic blueprint. You downloaded it somewhere—and you can delete it, one step at a time. Did you know Shah Rukh Khan rejected David Dhawan's two films for this reason?
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Data scientist vs biomedical scientist: Which science career suits you best?
Data scientist vs biomedical scientist: Which career is better for you? Choosing a science career today is more exciting—and more confusing—than ever. With so many options, students around the world often find themselves deciding between two fast-growing paths: data science and biomedical science. One deals with numbers and algorithms that power everything from Netflix recommendations to climate models. The other works at the frontlines of healthcare and disease research, shaping the future of medicine. Both are deeply impactful, but they lead to very different kinds of work. So, how do you know which one is right for you? Let's explore what each career really involves, how they compare, and which might be a better fit for your interests and goals. What do they really do? Data Scientists are digital detectives. They collect, process, and analyze huge amounts of data to uncover patterns, make predictions, and guide business or scientific decisions. From tech companies to healthcare systems and financial services, their work is shaping how the world functions. Biomedical Scientists, on the other hand, are the backbone of medical research. They examine cells, tissues, and bodily fluids to diagnose diseases, develop treatments, and contribute to advances in healthcare. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Average Price of a 6-Hour Gutter Guards Upgrade Read More Undo Whether it's understanding cancer or developing vaccines, their role is essential in saving lives. Required education and skills To become a Data Scientist, students typically pursue a degree in computer science, statistics, or mathematics. Advanced roles often demand a master's or PhD, especially in machine learning or AI. Skills in coding (Python, R), databases, and data visualization tools are a must. Biomedical Scientists usually hold degrees in biology, biochemistry, or biomedical sciences. A master's or doctorate is common for research roles. Core skills include laboratory techniques, attention to detail, and strong knowledge of human biology and disease. Work environment and daily life Data scientists often work in corporate offices, research labs, or remotely. Their workday revolves around datasets, algorithms, and dashboards. It's fast-paced but usually predictable and project-based. Biomedical scientists usually work in hospitals, diagnostic labs, or research institutions. Their day might involve handling biological samples, running experiments, and interpreting lab results. The work can be more hands-on and rigid due to safety and accuracy protocols. Job demand around the world Both careers are in demand globally, but in different ways. Data science is growing rapidly across industries like tech, finance, healthcare, and climate research. Countries such as the US, Germany, India, and Australia are investing heavily in AI and analytics, creating strong job growth. The field is also highly flexible, with opportunities for remote and cross-sector work. Biomedical science is essential to healthcare and medical research. Demand is high in countries with strong public health systems like the UK, Sweden, and Singapore, and it's rising in developing regions as healthcare expands. However, job availability often depends on government or research funding. Global opportunities and mobility Data science has a universal language: code. That means it's easier to find jobs across borders, especially in tech hubs like Silicon Valley, London, Bangalore, or Berlin. Plus, remote work is a real option. Biomedical science, while vital, may require local certifications or licensing (especially for clinical roles). However, global research collaborations and healthcare demand do open doors for those with advanced degrees and experience. Which career is better for you? If you love numbers, logic, and building solutions that can be applied across sectors, data science offers flexibility, high income, and strong growth. If your passion lies in human health, lab work, and contributing to the fight against diseases, biomedical science brings fulfillment and real-world impact. Both are deeply scientific, equally valuable, and intellectually rewarding—but the 'better' career depends on what inspires you more: solving data puzzles or decoding life itself. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
