HC pulls up Jharkhand govt for not submitting reports on biomedical waste management
Ranchi, The Jharkhand High Court on Thursday pulled up the state government for not being able to produce reports on biomedical waste management sought from deputy commissioners of all districts.
The court had, in February, ordered the deputy commissioners of all districts to inform about the status of biomedical waste disposal mechanisms in their respective areas.
A division bench of Chief Justice MS Ramachandra Rao and Justice Rajesh Shankar was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Jharkhand Human Rights Confederation on the alleged improper disposal of biomedical waste in the state.
The court, while hearing the petition, expressed its annoyance at the point that despite directions of the bench, the deputy commissioners of different districts have not paid heed to the previous order.
The bench granted another opportunity to the deputy commissioners to furnish the required report about the disposal of biomedical waste in their districts.
The case will again be heard on June 16.
Earlier, it was informed by the Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board that biomedical waste treatment plants have been set up in five districts- Lohardaga, Ramgarh, Pakur, Dhanbad and Seraikela Kharsawan.
A biomedical waste disposal plant is under construction in Deoghar and will be commissioned very soon, the board informed.
The organisation had filed the petition for compliance with the Environmental Protection Act, under which Biomedical Waste Disposal Management Rules have been formulated and ought to be implemented.
Biomedical waste generated from hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes is required to be disposed of in a manner which does not adversely affect the environment.
The petitioner had said that biomedical waste is littered in the open, which is rummaged by stray dogs.
However, with the high court monitoring the PIL, the condition has improved, and incinerators have been put to use to dispose of biomedical waste.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
28 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Giorgio Armani, convalescing, will absent from men's shows in Milan
Italian designer Giorgio Armani, "currently convalescing at home", will be absent from his two shows at Milan Fashion Week presenting the men's collections for spring-summer 2026, his fashion house announced on Friday. The 90-year-old designer will therefore not be present at the Emporio Armani show scheduled for Saturday and the Giorgio Armani show scheduled for Monday. "In his absence, Leo Dell 'Orco, head of design for the men's collections, will greet the public at the end of the shows," the house said in a statement. Even in his absence, Giorgio Armani, who "has worked with his usual commitment on the collections to be presented", "will closely follow every step of the shows", it stressed. An empire-builder in the luxury goods industry, "il re Giorgio" ("King Giorgio") is a visionary designer who has distinguished himself in haute couture, ready-to-wear, accessories, perfumes, jewelry, interior design and luxury hotels in cities such as Milan, Paris, New York, Tokyo, Seoul and Shanghai. Rome, June 20, 2025 (AFP)
Free Malaysia Today
29 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lower courts must follow apex court precedents, says CJ
Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat elaborated on the Federal Court's 40-page judgment which held that a fatwa could not be imposed on an organisation like Sisters in Islam as such entities cannot 'profess' a religion. PUTRAJAYA : Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat has reminded judges in the lower courts that they must adhere to legal precedents set by the Federal Court unless overruled by a subsequent decision from the same court. 'These precedents are binding, and failure to follow them is an affront to the administration of our justice system,' she said in a majority judgment delivered yesterday. The judgment held that a fatwa could not be imposed on an organisation like Sisters in Islam (SIS) as such entities cannot 'profess' a religion. Women's rights group SIS yesterday succeeded in its appeal to the Federal Court to quash a 2014 fatwa issued against it by the Selangor religious authorities. SIS had sought to quash a 2014 fatwa by the Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) that it had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. In allowing SIS's appeal, Tengku Maimun said, the majority accepted the appellants' argument that the Court of Appeal had failed to apply the principle of stare decisis by wrongly attempting to distinguish the case from an earlier decision in SIS Forum (1) without any sound legal basis. Three years ago, a nine-member Federal Court bench led by Tengku Maimun unanimously ruled that it was unconstitutional for the Selangor legislative assembly to grant judicial review powers to the state's shariah high court. In that ruling, the bench also reaffirmed a 1998 apex court decision (Kesultanan Pahang v Sathask Realty Sdn Bhd) which held that corporations cannot profess a religion. 'Consistent with our guidance to the lower courts, we are fully inclined to uphold stare decisis and to follow the precedent established in SIS Forum (1) and Kesultanan Pahang,' she said in the 40-page judgment. Two years ago, the Court of Appeal dismissed SIS's challenge to the fatwa, which claimed that the women's group espoused liberalism and religious pluralism and had deviated from Islamic teachings. In a 2-1 decision, the appellate court concluded that the legal principle established in SIS Forum (1) was merely obiter dicta – a passing judicial remark not binding as precedent. However, Tengku Maimun refuted this, saying that the Federal Court's reasoning in SIS Forum (1) was not obiter dicta, but formed a core part of the court's legal reasoning. The court had held that Section 66A of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 was unconstitutional. She further noted that the earlier nine-member bench had ruled that shariah courts cannot conceptually exercise judicial review over artificial persons, such as corporate entities, even if they identify with Islam. Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Justice Nallini Pathmanathan formed the majority in yesterday's ruling while Justice Abu Bakar Jais dissented. SIS, a company limited by guarantee and incorporated under the Companies Act 1965, argued that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be applied to a corporate entity governed by civil law.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Charter upgraded to Peer Perform from Underperform at Wolfe Research
Wolfe Research upgraded Charter (CHTR) to Peer Perform from Underperform without a price target President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' seems likely to reinstate 100% bonus depreciation, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Wolfe estimates the five major connectivity providers could cumulatively gain $10.5B of cash tax relief in 2025 alone . Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on CHTR: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Charter price target raised to $425 from $400 at UBS Nucor, Charter, Senseonics, Shake Shack, Altimmune: Trending by Analysts Boeing upgraded, PayPal initiated: Wall Street's top analyst calls Charter downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at Bernstein Charter Communications: Hold Rating Amidst Growth and Competitive Challenges Sign in to access your portfolio
