Assisted dying Bill not now or never moment, says Cleverly ahead of crucial vote
The House of Commons is debating a Bill to change the law in England and Wales, ahead of a crunch afternoon vote.
The outcome would lead to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill either clearing the House of Commons and moving to the Lords, or falling completely – with a warning the latter could mean the issue might not return to Westminster for a decade.
The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday.
Some MPs have already confirmed they will switch sides to oppose a Bill they describe as 'drastically weakened', after a High Court judge safeguard was scrapped and replaced with expert panels.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the multidisciplinary panels represent a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications.
Opening her debate, Ms Leadbeater said her Bill is 'cogent' and 'workable', with 'one simple thread running through it – the need to correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'.
She pushed back on concerns raised about the Bill by some doctors and medical bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), noting: 'We have different views in this House and different people in different professions have different views.'
She noted that all the royal colleges have a neutral position on assisted dying. Some members of RCPsych also wrote recently to distance themselves from the college's criticism of the Bill and pledge their support for it.
MPs have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines – although voting is not mandatory and others present on Friday could formally abstain.
Ms Leadbeater warned that choosing not to support the assisted dying Bill is 'not a neutral act', but rather 'a vote for the status quo'.
Repeating her warning that the issue is unlikely to be broached again for a decade if her Bill fails, she told the Commons: 'It fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories.'
But, leading opposition to the Bill, Conservative former minister Sir James said while this is 'an important moment', there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future for the issue to be discussed.
Sir James said: 'I disagree with her (Ms Leadbeater's) assessment that it is now or never, and it is this Bill or no Bill, and that to vote against this at third reading is a vote to maintain the status quo.
'None of those things are true. There will be plenty of opportunities.'
The Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted the same way as in November, including those who abstained.
Ms Leadbeater this week appeared to remain confident her Bill will pass, acknowledging that while she expected 'some small movement in the middle', she did not 'anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded'.
All eyes will be on whether Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and senior colleagues continue their support for the Bill.
Sir Keir indicated earlier this week that he had not changed his mind since voting yes last year, saying his 'position is long-standing and well-known'.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting described Ms Leadbeater's work on the proposed legislation as 'extremely helpful', but confirmed in April that he still intended to vote against it.
Ahead of the debate, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'.
A vote must be called before 2.30pm, as per parliamentary procedure.
Friday's session began with considerations of outstanding amendments to the Bill, including one to prevent a person meeting the requirements for an assisted death 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking'.
The amendment – accepted without the need for a vote – combined with existing safeguards in the Bill, would rule out people with eating disorders falling into its scope, Ms Leadbeater has said.
Another amendment, requiring ministers to report within a year of the Bill passing on how assisted dying could affect palliative care, was also approved by MPs.
Marie Curie welcomed the amendment, but warned that 'this will not on its own make the improvements needed to guarantee everyone is able to access the palliative care they need' and urged a palliative care strategy for England 'supported by a sustainable funding settlement – which puts palliative and end of life care at the heart of NHS priorities for the coming years'.
Supporters and opponents of a change in the law gathered at Westminster early on Friday, holding placards saying 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'.
Among the high-profile supporters were Dame Prue Leith, who said she is 'quietly confident' about the outcome of the vote, and Dame Esther Rantzen's daughter Rebecca Wilcox.
Opposition campaigner and disability advocate George Fielding turned out to urge parliamentarians to vote no, saying: 'What MPs are deciding on is whether they want to give people assistance to die before they have assistance to live.'
A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains at 73% – unchanged from November.
The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'People should die naturally' - mixed views on assisted dying debate
MPs agreed this week to back a bill that would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales for some terminally ill adults. The BBC visited the Spen Valley constituency of Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the bill, to hear what local people thought of the historic vote. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which was approved with a majority of 23 votes, would allow terminally ill adults with six months or less to live to get medical assistance to end their own lives - if eligible. It will now go to the Lords, where it is likely to face further 52, does not support the bill."People should be born and they should die naturally," she said."When you get to the end of your life and you're in so much pain, a bit like I am, you have days where you wish you weren't here and then you have days when you wish you were. "I don't think it's right that people should end their own lives." Leadbeater told the BBC she was "over the moon" after the bill was backed by 314 votes to 291."I know what this means for terminally ill people and their loved ones," she week also marks nine years since the murder of Leadbeater's sister, Batley and Spen MP Jo Cox, making it a "particularly emotional week" for added: "Jo used to say if good people don't step forward and come into politics then what do we end up with?"And even though some of us feel quite out of place in this place at times, we are here to make a difference and we're here to make positive change that society has asked us to do." Adam Bishop, 35, said he was "all for it"."I have an auntie at the moment who's got advanced Alzheimer's, so I'm seeing her steady decline and how week to week she's getting worse and worse," he said."I know she'll probably never be able to agree to that, but obviously it's a step in the right direction for others."Mr Bishop said people should not have to suffer."I do believe with your own life, you should be given the choice when you want to end it and in a dignified way," he added. Critics have argued the bill risks people being coerced into seeking an assisted death, something Phoenix Grey is also concerned 38-year-old from Batley said his support would depend on the rules and regulations put in place to protect people."It's going to have to be really strict," he said."It's to make sure they're 100% sure, then to give them time once they've made that decision to come back later down the line."If they still think it's the right decision only then can it go ahead." Before the vote, the House of Commons spent more than three hours debating the general principles of the Benita Althwaite, 68, said it felt "right" that people could decide to end their lives."It's making me cry because, you know, the thought that anybody's become so upset or in a position where they just want to be at peace," she said."It's everybody's right to do what they want with their body now or in the future." MPs were allowed a free vote on the bill, meaning they did not have to follow a party approved by the House of Lords, ministers would have a maximum of four years to implement the measures, meaning it could be 2029 before assisted dying becomes available. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE England's most depressed streets revealed - so how high are rates in YOUR neighbourhood?
England's depression capitals are today revealed in MailOnline's interactive map of every neighbourhood in the country. Topping the table of 34,000 districts, according to the House of Commons Library's (HoC) figures, comes a suburb of Stockport in Greater Manchester. Nearly one in three GP patients in that particular enclave of Brinnington, located just off the M60, have been diagnosed with depression. At the other end of the scale, just 3.5 per cent of people living in an affluent zone of Knightsbridge, central London, are thought to suffer with the mental illness. Five-story Edwardian homes which sell for north of £1.5million are commonplace in that precinct, just a ten-minute walk from Harrods. Our map, which allows you to zoom into street level, plots the depression prevalence estimates for all 34,000 lower super output areas (LSOA) in England – tiny pockets of the country made up of around 1,000 and 3,000 people. Each LSOA is coloured by how many GP patients aged over 18 have been diagnosed with depression. The darker the shade of red, the higher the rate of sufferers. The figure for the entirety of England stood at around 13 per cent, slightly higher than official estimates. Depression is 'more than simply feeling unhappy or fed up for a few days' and is 'not something you can snap out of', the advice page from the NHS states. Of the ten LSOAs with the highest rates of depression, eight were located in the north of England, specifically in Stockport and the Wirral. The other two were in Plymouth's deprived Budshead community, where locals have bemoaned a rise in anti-social behaviour from children who have 'nothing to do'. Eight of the ten places with the lowest rates of depression were in the local authority of Westminster. Dr Dalia Tsimpida, lecturer in gerontology at the University of Southampton, has been investigating what makes some neighbourhoods mental health hotspots while others remain relatively protected. She said: 'Our research reveals a complex web of environmental and socioeconomic factors that contribute to higher depression rates in certain areas. 'Deprivation is a key driver, accounting for up to 39 per cent of recorded depression levels across England, although this varies dramatically by location.' Her research has identified a previously overlooked factor: noise pollution. Areas with transportation noise exceeding 55 decibels on average in a 24-hour basis show much stronger links between health deprivation, disability, and depression. 'Environmental stressors play a crucial but underappreciated role,' she said. 'While transportation noise doesn't directly cause depression, it significantly amplifies the impact of other risk factors.' Dr Tsimpida added: 'Living in a depression hotspot exposes people to what may be "contagion effects" - both social and environmental. 'We observed that mental health challenges may spread through communities through mechanisms like social isolation, reduced community resources, environmental degradation, and normalised hopelessness.' Studies suggest depression rates can be linked to other factors, such as low income or living alone, according to the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. The survey, carried out for the NHS, also showed a link between poor physical health and mental knock-on effects. Dr Tsimpida added: 'Areas with lower depression rates – particularly in London and the South East – benefit from multiple protective factors working together. 'These include better economic opportunities, higher-quality housing, more green spaces, lower environmental stressors, and stronger social infrastructure.' What is depression? While it is normal to feel down from time to time, people with depression may feel persistently unhappy for weeks or months on end. Depression can affect anyone at any age and is fairly common - approximately one in ten people are likely to experience it at some point in their life. Depression is a genuine health condition which people cannot just ignore or 'snap out of it'. Symptoms and effects vary, but can include constantly feeling upset or hopeless, or losing interest in things you used to enjoy. It can also cause physical symptoms such as problems sleeping, tiredness, having a low appetite or sex drive, and even feeling physical pain. In extreme cases it can lead to suicidal thoughts. Traumatic events can trigger it, and people with a family history may be more at risk. It is important to see a doctor if you think you or someone you know has depression, as it can be managed with lifestyle changes, therapy or medication. Source: NHS Choices A House of Commons report last year estimated that one in six adults experienced a 'common mental disorder' like depression or anxiety in the previous week. But when it comes to treatment, there is a postcode lottery as waiting times for NHS talking therapies (TTAD). Sufferers in Gloucestershire can be seen in just four days, while others in Southport and Formby have to wait at least 10 weeks. Two-thirds of people experience improvement after TTAD, but this varies in different parts of England and between social groups. Health service figures show a record 8.7million people in England, about 15 per cent of the total population, are now on antidepressants, which can also be given to fight OCD, anxiety and PTSD. Some experts have been concerned about the 'one size fits all' approach to patients suffering from depression. The concerns have mainly focused on the use of a type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and its libido crushing side-effects. Some users have reported being transformed into 'sexless' zombies even years after they stopped taking the mind-altering pills. Uptake of the pills has soared in recent years despite growing unease among experts about the effectiveness of the drugs in treating depression. Plenty of patients insist they work, however. Psychiatrists urge patients concerned about side effects, or potential consequences, of antidepressants to talk to their medical professional about their options. Earlier this year, one of the UK's most eminent GPs warned thousands of Brits were mistaking the 'normal stresses of life' for mental health problems — and incorrectly diagnosing themselves with psychiatric conditions. Dame Clare Gerada, former president of the Royal College of General Practitioners, told MailOnline in January that Britain has a 'problem' with people 'seeking labels to explain their worries'. Professor Gerada's concerns echo that of former Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair's, who has warned against over-medicalising the 'ups and downs of life'. Sir Tony, who served as PM from 1997 to 2007, said there was a danger of telling too many people going through life's normal challenges that they are suffering a mental health condition. Dr Tsimpida argues that current approaches to tackling depression may be fundamentally flawed because they focus on treating individuals rather than transforming places. She said: 'We need place-based interventions, not just individual treatments. 'Our findings show that traditional randomised controlled trials may miss crucial spatial influences on mental health outcomes.' Based on her research findings, she suggests several priority actions which include noise mitigation strategies, sustained investment in hotspots and integrated approaches to treat all root causes at the same time. She added: 'The key insight from our research is that treating depression effectively requires changing places, not just treating people. Jen Dykxhoorn, a research fellow at University College London's Division of Psychiatry Neighbourhood believes regeneration programmes may be helpful. She said: 'There is some evidence that initiatives like planting trees, removing litter, and improving the physical quality of neighbourhoods can reduce rates of depression.' MailOnline's investigation into the country's depression hotspots was calculated from House of Commons Library data which was compiled from GP practice registers in England as published by NHS Digital. Some apparent variation between areas may be explained by differences in how GPs operate and measure, rather than genuine differences in the prevalence of disease and health conditions. HoC Library's most up to date figures use the 2011 LSOA boundaries which were updated in 2021.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Abergavenny library mosque proposal decision date named
A decision to grant a 30-year lease on the former Abergavenny library was approved in May before being put on hold pending review by a council scrutiny committee, which met last week, and said the decision had to go back to the cabinet within 10 working days. Just days before the scrutiny committee took place the words 'No Masjid' and crosses were spray painted on to the grade II listed building with police investigating the criminal damage as a hate crime. Masjid is Arabic for place of worship or mosque. Monmouthshire council's Labour-led cabinet will now consider the arguments made at the place scrutiny committee when it meets for its regular meeting on Wednesday, June 25 and must decide whether to stand by its original decision or reconsider it. The scrutiny committee heard from Abergavenny mayor Philip Bowyer and town council colleague Gareth Wild, a Baptist minister, who both spoke in favour of the cabinet's decision to grant the lease to the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association. READ MORE: Banner of support draped over Abergavenny mosque graffiti Four public speakers, including Sarah Chicken the warden of the alms houses next door to the former library, a resident, and Andrew Powell landlord of the nearby Groefield pub objected to the decision, citing reasons such as parking and potential for noise as to why a mosque and community centre would be unsuitable. Cabinet member Ben Callard, who lives near the proposed mosque and represents the area on the town council though he is the county councillor for Llanfoist and Govilon, explained no planning permission is required. Community centres and places of worship fall under the same planning use as a library. But he said the community association had promised to hold a public consultation on its plans, but that was criticised by councillors who called the decision in for review, as it was 'consultation after the decision'. The review was instigated by Conservative councillors Rachel Buckler and Louise Brown, who represent Devauden and Shirenewton, and Llanelly Hill independent Simon Howarth who questioned how the decision was made. They faced criticism as Abergavenny councillors and the town council backed the original decision. The former Abergavenny Library. The three questioned the council's process and complained there had been no scrutiny of the decision. Cllr Callard said the community association's bid was the highest scoring tender, and the £6,000 a year rent similar to one of the other bids, and rejected the idea it would be practical for the council to operate as a landlord if every lease had to go through a full scrutiny process. Cllr Callard also said if councillors disagreed with it offering the building for new uses, as it was no longer used as a pupil referral unit with the library having transferred to the town hall in 2015, the decision made last November to declare it 'surplus to requirements' should have been called in for review. The cabinet will consider the scrutiny committee's suggestions a re-tender should be run with specifications including an independent valuation, a survey of the building, consideration of the building's history and importance, a public consultation and the possibility of selling the building. It meets at County Hall in Usk at 4.30pm.
