'People should die naturally' - mixed views on assisted dying debate
MPs agreed this week to back a bill that would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales for some terminally ill adults. The BBC visited the Spen Valley constituency of Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the bill, to hear what local people thought of the historic vote.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which was approved with a majority of 23 votes, would allow terminally ill adults with six months or less to live to get medical assistance to end their own lives - if eligible. It will now go to the Lords, where it is likely to face further scrutiny.Anne-Marie, 52, does not support the bill."People should be born and they should die naturally," she said."When you get to the end of your life and you're in so much pain, a bit like I am, you have days where you wish you weren't here and then you have days when you wish you were. "I don't think it's right that people should end their own lives."
Leadbeater told the BBC she was "over the moon" after the bill was backed by 314 votes to 291."I know what this means for terminally ill people and their loved ones," she said.This week also marks nine years since the murder of Leadbeater's sister, Batley and Spen MP Jo Cox, making it a "particularly emotional week" for her.She added: "Jo used to say if good people don't step forward and come into politics then what do we end up with?"And even though some of us feel quite out of place in this place at times, we are here to make a difference and we're here to make positive change that society has asked us to do."
Adam Bishop, 35, said he was "all for it"."I have an auntie at the moment who's got advanced Alzheimer's, so I'm seeing her steady decline and how week to week she's getting worse and worse," he said."I know she'll probably never be able to agree to that, but obviously it's a step in the right direction for others."Mr Bishop said people should not have to suffer."I do believe with your own life, you should be given the choice when you want to end it and in a dignified way," he added.
Critics have argued the bill risks people being coerced into seeking an assisted death, something Phoenix Grey is also concerned about.The 38-year-old from Batley said his support would depend on the rules and regulations put in place to protect people."It's going to have to be really strict," he said."It's to make sure they're 100% sure, then to give them time once they've made that decision to come back later down the line."If they still think it's the right decision only then can it go ahead."
Before the vote, the House of Commons spent more than three hours debating the general principles of the bill.Sandra Benita Althwaite, 68, said it felt "right" that people could decide to end their lives."It's making me cry because, you know, the thought that anybody's become so upset or in a position where they just want to be at peace," she said."It's everybody's right to do what they want with their body now or in the future."
MPs were allowed a free vote on the bill, meaning they did not have to follow a party policy.If approved by the House of Lords, ministers would have a maximum of four years to implement the measures, meaning it could be 2029 before assisted dying becomes available.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Could Angela Rayner's squeeze on landlords hurt the very people it's supposed to help?
On the face of it, Angela Rayner's Renters' Rights Bill has some benefits – not least that Section 21 no-fault eviction notices will be scrapped, giving tenants more security. But experts are now warning that, as part of Labour's reforms currently making their way through parliament, landlords would be prevented from re-listing their properties as rentals for a year if they try – and fail – to sell up. Which, therefore, also means they'll have to forgo rent for a year. Failed sales are not unusual – and with the latest Rightmove stats on the housing market, things are looking especially bleak for homeowners in London and the South East. If they are forced to hold onto their property under these new provisions, not only will they as landlords be out of pocket, we'll end up with even more empty properties gathering dust. Right away, you can see the problem: Britain already has too many of those and this may lead to an even bigger shortage of housing during what the National Rental Landlords Association (NRLA) describes as 'an unprecedented supply and demand crisis'. Indeed, the organisation puts the number of empty properties in the rental sector at roughly half a million in England alone, using data from the government's English Housing Survey. 'We are concerned that the government does not recognise the risk that the number of empty homes in the private rented sector may substantially increase if this proposal passes into law,' says Meera Chindooroy, the trade body's deputy director of campaigns, policy and public affairs. So, has the government lost the plot? Not quite. I can see the method in Rayner's apparent madness. Let me explain… The problem with the private rental market is that the balance between tenant and landlord has been out of whack for too long. The current system, which allows for tenants to be booted out with a couple months' notice at the end of a year's tenancy, can leave them in a horrible jam if the owner decides that it's time to book a quick profit when the property market gets hot. Rayner's policy aim with the bill is to create a situation where this doesn't happen because most landlords will be professional – in it for the long haul, rather than hobbyists who buy themselves a flat or two to fatten up their pensions. The re-listing ban is an explicit attempt to make landlords think very carefully before putting their properties on the market. It makes that option a risky move for them. Other provisions included in the Bill that the NRLA describes as 'the biggest change to renting in over 30 years' include a protected 12 months at the start of a tenancy, where a landlord will be barred from evicting a tenant for the purposes of selling. As also mentioned, there will be the abolition of Section 21 notices, better known as 'no-fault' evictions. A national database for the private rented sector will be created, and there will be an ombudsman to handle disputes. Landlords will no longer be able to discriminate against families or benefit recipients – nor will they be able to create bidding wars. Some of these policies were first mooted by Michael Gove, when housing was part of his portfolio. And while the current chancellor Rachel Reeves introduced a 5 per cent 'second home' stamp duty surcharge, the drive to professionalise the sector began with former Tory chancellor George Osborne. He restricted the tax relief residential landlords could claim on mortgage interest payments to the basic rate of 20 per cent. These measures ramped up costs for the small fry and many left the market as a result. As you can see, there has been a degree of cross-party consensus on the need for reforms aimed at improving life for private sector tenants, who are often left feeling as if they're lost in a swamp with no map and no mobile phone reception. As a package, the reforms should, in theory, improve life for them. If an owner is in it for the long term, the renter can make a home of their tenancy, as often happens on the continent. Needless to say, a long term tenant could also improve life for the landlord, because they will likely be more inclined to look after the place (if you've ever been house-hunting, the ex-rentals stand out – and not in a good way). However, at this point I feel obliged to trot out one of those old sayings: 'The road to hell is paved with good intentions.' You don't help renters if you end up with fewer properties on the market. Constricting supply will inevitably add rocket fuel to rental prices, which are already too high. According to the quarterly tracker by Rightmove, the average advertised rent of homes outside of London rose to a record £1,349 in the first three months of the year. London, meanwhile, recorded its 14th consecutive record, with monthly rents increasing to £2,698. It is true that Rightmove noted a (welcome) increase in supply, but that doesn't mean there isn't still a shortage overall. There are some good things in Rayner's reform package. But facts are facts and markets are markets – and if she squeezes landlords too hard, she will hurt the market and end up squeezing tenants – the last thing anyone wants, least of all her. Banning rents for a year after a failed attempt to sell is a measure that demands a rethink, however well-intentioned.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Esther Rantzen hails Commons passage of ‘rigorous and safe' assisted dying bill
The assisted dying bill, if it becomes law, would remove the burden of seeing a loved one die in pain, the campaigner Esther Rantzen has said, insisting its backers have got right the balance between giving help to those who ask for it and protecting vulnerable people. The terminally ill adults (end of life) bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but must yet be debated by the Lords before returning to the Commons for consideration of any amendments they may make. 'I think people misunderstand when somebody says 'one of the reasons I wanted assisted dying was I didn't want to be a burden'. Well, that's how I feel in the sense that, if I die in agony, that memory will be a burden for my family. Not because I'm awkward or inconvenient, I may be both those things, but because nobody wants to see a loved one die in pain. Nobody wants that,' Rantzen told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday. Asked if she had any doubts about the detail of the bill, she added: 'I think we have got this right. Having the committee stage [in parliament], with that committee rigorously looking at every clause and deciding to set up a multidisciplinary panel of social workers, someone versed in psychology, someone legal, so that they could examine it in each case.' She added this 'makes it so rigorous and so safe. And, in other countries around the world which we've looked at because they've had assisted dying legalised for some time, it has not produced coercion.' The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the bill. And it was suggested to Rantzen that peers could also choose to debate it for so long that it simply runs out of parliamentary time. 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose.' Rantzen, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. The Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and, from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger … I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' And the Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the bill through the Commons, said she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Esther Rantzen urges Lords not to block assisted dying bill
Dame Esther Rantzen has urged the House of Lords not to block assisted dying legislation. The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but critics have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with opponents poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther, an assisted dying campaigner, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, the Paralympian and crossbench peer, told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Lord Shinkwin, the Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner, said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He thinks the House of Lords 'has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but he doesn't think 'it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords, it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Danny Kruger, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, said: 'These are apocalyptic times'. In a series of posts on X on Friday night, the Conservative MP who is at odds with his mother Dame Prue Leith over the legalisation, accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
