logo
Court ruling secures baggage screening units for passengers at OR Tambo and King Shaka

Court ruling secures baggage screening units for passengers at OR Tambo and King Shaka

IOL News05-06-2025

Airline passengers can thank the courts for the replacement of four critical Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports.
Image: Supplied
Airline passengers can thank the courts for the replacement of four critical Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports.
This is as a protracted legal dispute continues involving - the Aviation Co-ordination Services (ACS), Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (Sacaa) - over who holds the mandate to provide check-in hold baggage screening (HBS) services at South African airports.
The ACS said it had launched the legal action given the risk of service breakdown due to ageing screening infrastructure and manufacturer support withdrawal, which compelled it to seek urgent court relief in 2024 to allow it to replace four back-up Level 3 HBS units at OR Tambo and King Shaka.
ACS in November obtained an order barring Acsa from implementing its insourcing decision or awarding any contracts under its tender that directed Acsa to allow ACS to replace the equipment; and ordered Sacaa to approve the replacement within five days.
ACS CEO Duke Phahla said, 'We commend Sacaa's recognition of the urgency in replacing aged HBS equipment to ensure uninterrupted security operations at airports. We have always maintained that passenger safety and continuity must come first, and this step reflects that shared concern.'
The matter stems from May 2023 when Acsa announced its intention to terminate ACS's long-standing role as the provider of HBS services and to insource the function and subsequently issued a R3.15 billion tender for the procurement of new baggage screening equipment opening the floodgate of legal suits amongst the parties.
Following the Gauteng High Court granting for the replacement, Acsa said it contested the ACS's handling of baggage as it was in contravention of the Constitution (which states that all organs of state must engage in procurement that is fair and transparent), the ACSA Act, the Public Finance Management Act, which requires that all airport charges levied to passengers must be approved by a Regulating Committee.
Acsa's manager for Communications, Sisa Majola, said in response to enquiries, "The charges currently being levied by ACS are not regulated. The next development in the proceedings will be the hearing of the appeal against the court's order to interdict Acsa from implementing its insourcing of Hold Baggage Screening and the procurement of the screening."
Majola said it was crucial that the ACS has challenged Acsa's decision to insource/perform Hold Baggage Screening Services, and a court of law has not heard this matter, nor has ACS been confirmed as the entity entitled to render Hold Baggage Screening Services.
Acsa confirmed it would comply with the back-up replacement court order and continue with the appeal, as it was granted leave to appeal by the High Court and would continue to defend the review proceedings.
ACS's Phala said, 'While the legal process runs its course, our focus remains on ensuring uninterrupted, world-class baggage screening services for passengers and airlines. We remain committed to working co-operatively with Acsa, Sacaa and all stakeholders to safeguard operational integrity and uphold aviation security standards."
In its response, Sacaa said there are no ongoing discussions between the Sacaa and ACS and that further determinations would have to be from court pronouncements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ombud gets R328 million back for disgruntled financial consumers
Ombud gets R328 million back for disgruntled financial consumers

The Citizen

timean hour ago

  • The Citizen

Ombud gets R328 million back for disgruntled financial consumers

The National Financial Ombud Scheme handles complaints about banking, life and short-term insurance and credit. The National Financial Ombud Scheme managed to get a staggering R328,5 million back for disgruntled financial consumers in the first year of its existence after all four former financial ombud schemes were combined into a single, one-stop, dispute resolution service. According to its first annual report, the National Financial Ombud Scheme South Africa (NFO) handled an impressive 35 855 complaints through its four divisions, non-life (short-term) and life insurance, banking and credit between 1 March 2024 and 31 December 2024. Reana Steyn, head ombud and CEO of the NFO, says the sheer number of complaints received and the large sum of money recovered are testament to the NFO's effectiveness and commitment to fairness in dispute resolution and the power of independent mediation. 'This recovery of monies helped individuals and families regain lost financial stability, reinforcing the NFO's role as guardian of justice in financial services. The NFO has continued to solidify its role as a pillar in the South African landscape that ensures access for financial consumers to transparent and effective resolution of disputes.' The total amount of R328 550 212,58 that the NFO recovered on behalf of consumers is made up of R29 175 451,14 recovered by the banking division, R2 355 840,20 recovered by the credit division, R202 854 491,24 recovered by the life insurance division and R94 164 430,00 recovered by the short-term insurance division. The NFO resolves complaints on average within 115 days, while the banking division took on average only 52 days to close cases, the Credit division 79 days, the life insurance division 152 days and the short-term insurance division 177 days. ALSO READ: Banking Ombudsman puts R25 million back in consumers' pockets Banking division recouped R29 million for consumers Nerosha Maseti, the lead ombud for the banking division, says in the annual report that despite major internal changes, the banking division adapted seamlessly, handling and resolving complaints at a faster rate than the previous year, while maintaining a strong commitment to fair outcomes. The banking division opened a total of 15 412 cases and closed 11 535 successfully, recovering a total of R29 175 451,14 consumers. Most of the banking cases opened (20%) was against Capitec that had 1 203 complaints, as can be expected as it has the highest number of customers. The NFO founded in favour of consumers in 22% of these cases. FNB came in at a close second with 1 017 cases opened, representing 17% of all cases, with findings in favour of complainants totalling 16%. Standard Bank had 998 cases opened, representing 17% of all cases and 19% of findings in favour of complainants. Nedbank had 881 cases opened, representing 15% of all cases and 22% of findings in favour of complainants, while Absa had 812 cases opened, representing 14% of all cases and 13% of findings in favour of complainants. The top categories in the banking division were current accounts, personal loans, savings accounts, credit cards and home loans, while fraud remained the leading issue in consumer banking complaints, representing 30% of all cases. Complaints related to maladministration were the second highest category and debt-stressed consumers the third, reflecting the ongoing financial challenges consumers have to deal with. ALSO READ: FSCA finds banks do not handle consumer complaints properly Credit division recouped R2.3 million for consumers The NFO's credit division successfully closed 2 040 cases, achieving positive outcomes for complainants in 49% of cases and financial redress totalling approximately R2.4 million. The Retail Credit Solutions (RCS) Group had the highest number of cases opened, totalling 243, representing 17% of all cases opened. The division found in favour of complainants in 44% of the cases. OPCO 365 was in second place with 133 cases opened, representing 9% of all cases, while Edcon Limited had 126 cases (9%) and DMC Debt Management had 121 cases (9%) Howard Gabriels, lead ombud for the credit division, says two matters the division dealt with stood out for their systemic impact during the reporting period were about value-added services (VAS) and minimum payment calculations with a number of retailers. 'A serious concern emerged regarding the application of payments on credit accounts where VAS charges, such as airtime or insurance add-ons were not considered in determining the minimum monthly payments, leading to growing balances despite customers paying what they believed to be the full amount due. 'After we intervened, the affected credit provider agreed to write off inappropriate balances and amend its internal policy to ensure VAS charges are included in future minimum payment calculations.' ALSO READ: Here's what you can learn from Credit Ombud's case file Non-life division recouped R94 million for consumers The NFO's non-life insurance division closed 9 289 cases and recovered R94 164 430.00 on behalf of consumers. Edite Teixeira-Mckinon, lead ombud for the non-life insurance division, says complaints related to motor vehicle insurance accounted for 42% of all the complaints finalised/resolved. This was followed by homeowners' insurance complaints at 27%, commercial complaints at 14%, household contents complaints at 6% and other types of insurance and nonclaim-related complaints, combined at 11%. 'The highest number of complaints about motor vehicle insurance were about claims for accidents, at 62%, followed by warranty and mechanical breakdown claims at 18% and theft and hijack claims at 9%. 'The primary reason for complaints under this category of insurance was claims rejected on an exclusion in the policy. The leading exclusion was failure to prevent or minimise loss or damage, also known as a lack of due care, or recklessness.' Under homeowners' insurance, the highest number of complaints were about claims for loss or damage due to acts of nature at 40%, followed by bursting of water apparatus at 16% and theft and burglary at 8%. The primary cause for complaints was rejected claims based on gradual deterioration, lack of maintenance, or wear and tear, while disputes about the amount claimed were also a key issue. In this division, Santam Limited had the highest number of formal complaints at 684, followed by Standard Insurance Limited at 632, Old Mutual Insure Limited at 613, Absa Insurance Company Limited at 560 and Discovery Insure at 501. Life insurance division recouped R202 million for consumers The NFO's life division finalised 5 977 cases in 2024 and recovered a total amount of R202 854 491,24 for consumers. Denise Gabriels, lead ombud for the life division, says funeral benefits remained the product most consumers complained about, accounting for 45% of complaints. Declined claims were the most common cause for complaints at 56%, followed by complaints about poor service or administration at 34%. In the life division the most complaints were about Old Mutual at 628 formal cases, representing 18% of all complaints, followed by Liberty with 399 formal cases representing 11%, Hollard Life Insurance with 259 cases representing 7%, Metropolitan Life with 216 cases representing 6% and Sanlam Life Insurance Ltd with 188 cases representing 5%. Haroon Laher, chairperson of the NFO Board, says the establishment of the NFO was an act of bravery. 'Bravery in anything we do does not merely mean facing the loudest, or sometimes the most powerful, voices. It requires those involved to listen to the quietest whispers of those who have been wronged. 'It takes courage to confront an issue. It is this very courage, carried out through acts of bravery, that will define the NFO in what it does and achieves.' NOW READ: Funeral insurance tops complaints to ombudsman for long-term insurance

SIXTY more ways to spend your money at GrandWest
SIXTY more ways to spend your money at GrandWest

The South African

time2 hours ago

  • The South African

SIXTY more ways to spend your money at GrandWest

GrandWest Casino and Entertainment World is set to expand its footprint with the introduction of the R600 million GrandWest Mall, a premium retail centre that will add 60 new stores to the area. Construction of the 22 000m² shopping centre is scheduled to begin in September 2025 with the official opening planned for March 2027. The GrandWest Mall will be directly connected to the GrandWest Casino complex, combining retail convenience with the precinct's entertainment offering. Key features of the mall include: Two major supermarket anchors Two pharmacies A variety of fashion and athleisure boutiques Health and beauty services Banking facilities A new range of dining options GrandWest General Manager Mervyn Naidoo confirmed that the group has already invested in local infrastructure, including contributions to the Jakes Gerwel Drive upgrade, but pointed out that a dedicated retail centre has long been missing. 'With GrandWest attracting over 16 000 daily visitors, a full-scale mall is a logical next step,' said Naidoo. Once completed, GrandWest Mall is expected to become a community-focused retail anchor, complementing the precinct's round-the-clock entertainment and providing new employment and commercial opportunities in Cape Town's northern suburbs. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Run on numbers: understanding the financial burden of raising a child in South Africa
Run on numbers: understanding the financial burden of raising a child in South Africa

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Run on numbers: understanding the financial burden of raising a child in South Africa

A large portion of the expenses of personal income goes towards education, for those people lucky enough to have an income. 1. Momentum Investo did extensive research into what it costs to raise a child. 'At inflation-related sums, it can cost R550 000 for the first six years, between R640 000 and R880 000 for primary school, and up to R1 million for high school. A three-year degree at a South African university may cost R660,000. These numbers add up to R3 million.' Standard Bank's estimate is much the same. 'Conservative estimates indicate that it can cost around R10,000 per month in today's economy to raise a child, which means that over an 18-year period, factoring price increases, you can expect to spend over R2.5 million.' That is without considering sending the child to university. 2. In 2023, the average annual household income in South Africa was R204,359. This is based on data from Statistics South Africa's Income and Expenditure Survey (IES). It is obvious that the average household cannot afford a child. According to Statsa, 'South African households allocated the majority of their consumption expenditure to four main areas in 2023: housing and utilities, food and non-alcoholic beverages, transport, and insurance and financial services. These categories accounted for 75,6% of total household spending, meaning that three out of every four rand were directed toward these essentials.' These numbers indicate that there is very little left to spend on a child.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store