Guernsey States agrees sexual violence law update
Guernsey politicians have agreed to draw up new, stronger sexual violence laws.
The Committee for Home Affairs proposed creating new specific offences for spiking, stalking, suffocation or strangulation, female genital mutilation and sexual harassment in a public place.
Deputy Rob Prow, President of the committee, said: "There's still a lot of work to be done but it just shows that domestic abuse and violence against women and girls will not be tolerated. And I think this sends out a powerful message."
Once the new legislation has been drafted it will come back to the Assembly for approval.
Prior to this being debated, Deputy Prow had given an update to States Members about the work done to tackle sexual violence.
Prow said: "Our third sector partners are absolutely crucial to this. Safer, Victim and Witness Support and Safety Net. We worked very closely with them. It's about listening to stakeholders and working with them and engaging with them.
"Also our partnerships with other committees. Of course the police played a major role in advising us and the law officers of the crown. So it's been a huge effort this term but now we're in a much better place but I must stress there is still work to be done."
The Domestic Abuse Law was last updated in October.
When asked about how the committee ensures the success of legislation, Prow said key performance indicators would be used.
He said this was to ensure "the legislation we have brought forward is being used, that we are increasing convictions in the areas we need to and also that we are providing the support that these services are supposed to be delivering."
Follow BBC Guernsey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
Stalking could become specific offence in Guernsey
Call for action for catcalling to be challenged
Campaigner calls for new sexual harassment laws
States of Guernsey
Guernsey Police

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
14 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Trump-Era Rollback of Transgender Rights Is Gaining Steam
Voters in at least 10 states have elected a transgender person to their legislature. A transgender man has argued a case before the Supreme Court. Last year, the first transgender woman was elected to Congress. Transgender people have become visible in ways that were unthinkable five years ago, a development that advocates thought would generate more societal acceptance. And yet, the political and legal tides are shifting in a different direction.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration makes sweeping changes to ObamaCare, ends ‘Dreamer' coverage
The Trump administration is shortening ObamaCare's annual open enrollment period and ending the law's coverage of immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally as children, according to a final rule announced Friday. The Biden administration made it easier and more affordable to sign up for Affordable Care Act plans, causing enrollment to swell to an all-time high. The Trump administration claims those moves opened a wave of fraudulent enrollment that's costing taxpayers billions of dollars. According to the rule, the federal open enrollment period will run from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31. Currently, federal open enrollment ends Jan. 15. States operating their own health insurance exchanges will have the flexibility to set their open enrollments, so long as they run no longer than nine weeks between the November and December dates. In addition to the shortened enrollment period, the administration said it is ending ObamaCare coverage for immigrants who came into the U.S. illegally as children, also known as 'Dreamers.' The provision will undo a Biden-era rule that was estimated to allow 147,000 immigrants to enroll in coverage. A federal judge blocked the rule from being enforced in 19 states, and it is still being litigated. The administration also banned plans from covering 'sex-trait modification' as an essential health benefit beginning in plan year 2026. The policy will apply to the five states that currently include coverage for gender-affirming care, as well as in states that do not have such coverage expressly mentioned. But many of the other changes announced Friday, like requiring more income verifications for people to enroll in coverage on federal exchange plans, will last only a year. The one-year sunset is a change from when the rule was proposed in March. It's designed to give Republicans on Capitol Hill an opportunity to codify the provisions into law for the long-term and use the savings to fund their massive party-line tax and spending bill. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the rule is projected to save up to $12 billion in 2026 by 'reining in wasteful federal spending, and refocusing on making health insurance markets more affordable and sustainable for hardworking American families.' For instance, the rule requires federal exchange plans to check consumers' eligibility for special enrollment periods and raise the burden of verification for people who are automatically re-enrolled in subsidized plans. The rule also requires plans to charge those people a $5 monthly premium until they confirm or update their eligibility information. The rule also ends a monthly special enrollment period for people with income below 150 percent of the federal poverty line, which CMS said 'has been exploited to enroll consumers or change their plans without their knowledge.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
Judge Blocks Trump's Tying of Transportation Funds to Immigration Enforcement
A federal judge has temporarily blocked the U.S. Department of Transportation from withholding billions of dollars in funding to states unless they complied with the Trump administration's demands on immigration enforcement. A coalition of 20 states, most led by Democrats, filed a lawsuit last month arguing that the administration was usurping Congress's authority over spending and using that power of the purse to to force states to adopt its policies. Judge John J. McConnell Jr., the chief judge of the United States District Court for Rhode Island, agreed with the states. In a preliminary injunction issued Thursday, the judge said that their claims 'are likely to succeed because the Defendants' actions here violate the Constitution and statutes of the United States.' He also said that the states 'face losing billions of dollars in federal funding, are being put in a position of relinquishing their sovereign right to decide how to use their own police officers, are at risk of losing the trust built between local law enforcement and immigrant communities, and will have to scale back, reconsider, or cancel ongoing transportation projects.' Rob Bonta, the attorney general of California, who is spearheading the litigation, said in a statement that President Trump was acting in an 'immoral — and more importantly, illegal' way by treating crucial funding as a 'bargaining chip.' 'I'm glad to see the District Court agrees,' he added, 'while we continue to make our case in court.' In a statement posted on X, Sean Duffy, the secretary of transportation, said: 'I directed states who want federal DOT money to comply with federal immigration laws. But, no surprise, an Obama-appointed judge has ruled that states can openly defy our federal immigration laws. This is judicial activism pure and simple and I will continue to fight in the courts.' Immigration law is enacted by Congress and enforced by the federal government. States rebuffing the Trump administration have said that they are limiting state or local cooperation with federal agents enforcing those laws. The lawsuit over transportation funding is one of several that states have filed seeking to block, or at least slow down, the Trump administration's initiatives on everything from emergency preparedness to diversity programs in public schools. Other areas include tariffs and mass firings at agencies such as the Education and Health and Human Services Departments. California, Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Maryland are leading the transportation lawsuit. Joining them are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. All of the states have Democratic attorneys general and governors, except for Nevada and Vermont, which have Republican governors.