Lock in the Cheaper Game Pass Price Before It's Too Late
The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Lock in the Cheaper Game Pass Price Before It's Too Late originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
Rumors are circulating that Microsoft is about to increase the cost of Game Pass. If you want to keep the cheaper price as long as possible, you'll want to lock it in now.
Xbox Game Pass Core - 12 Month Membership is $75 on Amazon. By purchasing this option, you can lock in a cheaper price for a full year, even if Microsoft increases the price later.
The Amazon link lets you purchase a digital code for a 12 month license to Xbox Game Pass Core. The listing also has options for shorter six month, three month and one month codes.
Xbox Game Pass Core was formerly known as Xbox Live Gold, according to the description. It gives you all the benefits of online console multiplayer from Xbox Live Gold, plus access to a library of more than 25 high-quality console games. You may also get access to Game Pass promotions, with member deals and discounts of up to 50% off.
Amazon writes about Xbox Game Pass Core, "Featuring online console multiplayer, a catalog of over 25 high-quality games, member deals, and more. Includes online console multiplayer to quickly find the people you want to play with—whether it's friends, family, or the greater Xbox community. Plus, enjoy a catalog of over 25 high-quality games including Grounded, Among Us, Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice, and more on console. Dive into select titles from iconic franchises like Halo, Forza, Psychonauts, Fallout, and others that you've always wanted to try. Get member deals of up to 50% off select titles with Game Pass promotions."
The Game Pass has a 4.4 out of 5 star rating on Amazon.
"Very easy to use and fast delivery I received the code within 10 minutes of ordering," one person writes.
Another person shares, "Great deal for anyone that needs XBOX Live with perks. I would purchase again."Lock in the Cheaper Game Pass Price Before It's Too Late first appeared on Athlon Sports on Jun 16, 2025
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 16, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Debunking Three Cliches Entrenched In The Cybersecurity Industry
JC Gaillard, Founder & CEO, Corix Partners | Board Advisor | Non-Exec Director | Author "The Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure" getty I have been writing about cybersecurity leadership, management and governance issues since 2015. What drove me to writing was primarily the low level of cybersecurity maturity I was coming across in many large firms as part of my day-to-day field work as a consultant. For me, it was difficult to understand why corporations that would have had cybersecurity practices—and budgets—for decades were still struggling with fundamental pillars of good practice, such as identity management or patch deployment. Analyzing and highlighting the dynamics of what I ended up calling the 'cybersecurity spiral of failure' has been at the heart of my work throughout the last 10 years. Another aspect that has been fascinating for me over the past decade is the number of topics that keep coming up cyclically in cybersecurity articles, and how a similar analysis keeps appearing in what has effectively become a typical echo chamber (and it started before generative AI started writing those pieces). In this article, I would like to deconstruct three of these ideas, which in my view embody the problems still facing the cybersecurity narrative and highlight why it is key to avoid shallow and outdated positions on those matters. This is typical of a mindset that goes back to the first decade of this century, in what was still the early days of cybersecurity practices (the first CISO jobs appeared in the late '90s). Many senior executives used to see cyberattacks as low-probability/low-impact events that would be dealt with if and when they occurred, and they often saw compliance requirements as an arbitrary regulatory imposition. CISOs and their consultants built the 'cybersecurity as an enabler' narrative to try to break those deadlocks, in an attempt to reach into some form of business logic. But by doing so, I noticed they were ignoring endemic short-termism and deep-rooted cognitive biases at the heart of the business attitude on the matter, and there is no evidence that the 'enablement' narrative ever worked, beyond generating headlines across the industry. As my organization showed in 2019 when analyzing the cybersecurity evolution across the first two decades of the century, it is the advent of the cloud and the acceleration of cyberattacks it triggered after 2010 that led to a change in perception, with the dominant center of interests for executives shifting from risk and compliance to incidents and breaches. The second decade of the century became truly a 'realization decade,' during which cybersecurity gradually started to be seen as a necessary barrier in the face of real threats: not something that needs to be justified to 'enable' the business to function, but something that needs to be in place to 'protect' the business, its customers, its brand and shareholder value. This is also typical of the same outdated mindset and is often heard, even nowadays, in relation to the CISO reporting line. This is one of the first topics I wrote about in 2015, and at the time, it was already one of the oldest fixations in the cybersecurity industry. It is conceivable that 20 years ago, some CIOs might have followed their business bosses in their low-probability/low-impact assessment of cyber threats and denied CISOs the resources they were asking for. Every CIO has the right to choose the battles they want to fight, and this one was often seen as too difficult. Given the avalanche of cyberattacks we have been seeing over the past 15 years, I don't think this type of attitude is common today, or even sustainable. As a matter of fact, business leaders—most of them—are well aware of the inevitability of cyberattacks, and 'Are we spending enough on cyber?' has become a more common question for CIOs than 'Why do we need to spend on that?' Organizations where this mindset persists often have a deep-rooted problem and may be in denial about the state of their cyber exposure. Wherever you place the reporting line of the CISO in those organizations, the problems will likely remain. This is a more recent line of thought that has emerged throughout the last decade in the face of the sophistication of cyber threats, and this view tends to see security training and awareness development as the central pillar of any cyber strategy. To me, this is short-sighted, even if there is no denying that cybercrime targets people and that social engineering is key in many attack patterns. What is misguided here is to believe that you can change people's attitude at this level by explaining to them what to do or not to do, and broadly speaking, get them to change their attitudes through logic and reasoning. Many unsafe attitudes in the office are rooted in unsafe social practices and cognitive biases, and changing requires a cultural shift, not just training. Fundamentally, you protect what you care about, and it is only a sense of care for the firm, its values and its people that can lead to an embedded desire to protect the firm's data and information assets. That has to start with the leadership team embodying the right example and needs to cascade down from the very top of the organization. So there is indeed a 'human firewall,' but it is a cultural one driven from the top, not one driven bottom-up or sideways by CISOs through tools and leaflets. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Gizmodo
20 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Roborock Q5 Max+ Robot Vacuum Hits Its Lowest Price, 53% Off Deal Live Now as an Early Prime Day Offer
Amazon Prime members get all the best deals right now, with a massive 53% off of this incredible robot vacuum. You've had enough with vacuuming, and you should say it. In an ideal world, none of us would have to vacuum at all, but we're not there yet. The good news though, is that those of us who can afford it can escape the slog of vacuuming daily, and instead palm it off on an adorable disc-shaped friend in the form of a robot vacuum. They can be pricey though, so you'll generally want to make the most of deals when you can find them. See at Amazon Speaking of which, if you're an Amazon Prime member, you can currently get your hands on the exceptional Roborock Q5 Max+ robot vacuum and dock for just $280. That's a massive 53% off the normal price, and that's one heck of an early Prime Day deal. If you're not an Amazon Prime member, you can still save $100 on it right now too, but the difference in price is notable. Suck It Up There's a lot to love about this robot vacuum. The most obvious thing is the pure power of it. It has a 5500 Pa suction rating, which means it can not only handle all manner of floors, but also do so with aplomb, even managing to get out pet hair and other tough bits of small debris. It's just nice to know it can get the job done. It also uses LiDAR navigation to create a full 3D map of your home and then learn where it needs to go the most often to be as efficient as possible. The dock means it can self-empty too, which means you don't even need to do maintenance all that often, making it feel like an even bigger help compared to many other robot vacuums. That's the kind of off-hand greatness you need in a good robot vacuum. The battery life is impressive as well, lasting up to 240 minutes at once. You can even control it with your voice if you need to, or use the app if you'd rather. It just does everything you could want from a high-end robot vacuum, but for just $280. The discount is one of the big draws here, because saving yourself $320 (-53%) on a vacuum of this quality is a chance you shouldn't miss out on. Make sure you're quick if you do want it though, because there's no way of knowing how long the deal will last, and you'll be annoyed if you miss it. See at Amazon
Fast Company
21 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Tyler, the Creator modernizes 2 shoes from the Converse archives
Today, Tyler, the Creator drops two new styles in his ongoing collaboration with Converse: a yacht shoe and a jogger, both of which are 1970s silhouettes pulled from the brand's archives. Tyler knows you're probably going to wear these sneakers with jeans and a T-shirt. But that's the wrong move, he insists. When I speak with him, he's wearing the jogger with a button up, a cropped rain jacket, and trousers. He'd prefer if you wore these kicks with a more polished look. 'Nah, bruh,' he says. 'Wear them with the ill slacks and the ill sweater.' As his stage name implies, Tyler is involved in too many different creative ventures to count. He's a rapper and producer, who also writes for an adult cartoon show called The Jellies, and creator of a music festival called Camp Flog Gnaw Carnival. But like his friend and mentor, Pharrell Williams, he's become increasingly well-known for his personal aesthetic and his contributions to the world of fashion. In 2011, he launched his streetwear label, Golf Wang, and in 2017, he began collaborating with Converse, a subsidiary of Nike, which generated $2.1 billion in 2024. (This was a 14% decline from 2023.) Over the years, his partnership with Converse has evolved into a separate, stand-alone brand called Le Fleur, a nod to his 2017 Grammy-nominated album, Flower Boy. The line is known for its pastel color palette; bold daisy icon, which encapsulates the Converse star; and the way in which it plays with traditional gender norms. Tyler isn't interested in a total redesign of the Converse silhouettes. For this collection, he worked with Lindsay Almeida, Converse's director of entertainment and sports marketing, to explore the archives. He was drawn to the Naut-1, a yacht shoe first released in 1971, and the Coach Jogger, an Olympic running shoe from 1976. He liked these models because they seemed fresh and relevant. 'I honestly hate the idea of nostalgia,' he says. 'I didn't want to reinvent the wheel because I think these shoes were perfect. I just wanted to do them in new colors.' And indeed, Tyler designs the shoes in interesting colors. The joggers, which cost $100, come in a teal and yellow, a dark and light green, and a brown and mustard. The yacht shoes, which cost $90, come in a cream with delicate embroidered flowers, a dark brown, and a teal. While some critics on social media argue that he hasn't done much to bring his own point of view to these designs, Tyler believes that small changes can be impactful. It echoes fashion designer Virgil Abloh, who argued that you only need to change an idea by 3% to create something new. And ultimately, Tyler believes that his strength lies in curating pieces and bringing them together in interesting ways. 'It's in the styling, the way they're worn, the color palettes,' he says. 'I really love wearing a sporty shoe with an outfit that makes folks glitch and say, I didn't know you could wear them like that.' Tyler still designs for Golf Wang, which is grounded in streetwear, with hoodies and jeans. But he says that Le Fleur's aesthetic is more reflective of his personal style these days. 'I didn't want to have to change Golf Wang because it would alienate folks,' he says. 'But Le Fleur is a mirror to where I'm at in life, with unique styles and colorways.' Converse has been struggling over the past decade; last year, its revenues declined 14% from the year before and in May, it laid off 2% of its workforce. A decade ago, it relaunched it's most famous shoe, the Chuck Taylor, with new technology, but consumers did not take to the new version and sales dropped. Part of the company's strategy to grow sales was to bring on new collaborators; Tyler was among them. Since the first release, in 2017, products from the collaboration have been popular and allow Converse to stay in the cultural conversation (not to mention connect with Tyler's nearly 17 million Instagram followers). Still, it's a hard moment for Converse and its parent company, Nike. In an earnings call last December, Nike CFO Matt Friend said that consumers were pulling back on spending. He argued that newness is what would cause consumers to shop. Converse is counting on this new collab to get sneakerheads to pay attention.
