Health system suffers as cigarette tax left untouched
The federal budget for 2025-26, announced amidst a backdrop of fragile economic recovery, signals a continuation of fiscal restraint.
While the government has rightly focused on maintaining macroeconomic stability and ensuring essential current expenditures, the significant reduction in the health sector's development allocation raises serious concerns about the country's long-term human development and economic resilience.
According to the budget documents released by the Ministry of Finance, the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) allocation for health has been reduced by 16 percent, from approximately Rs 54.7 billion in the previous year to Rs 46.1 billion in the current fiscal cycle. This is not just a numerical adjustment; it has real and immediate implications.
Development allocations typically fund the expansion of healthcare infrastructure, procurement of new equipment, training programmes, and the rollout of disease prevention and surveillance systems. A cut of this magnitude effectively means that many of these critical initiatives will be scaled back or shelved.
From an economic standpoint, this trend is deeply concerning, because health is not just a social good, it is a foundational pillar of economic productivity. A healthy population is more capable, more employable, and less financially burdened.
Countries that underinvest in health eventually pay the price in terms of lost productivity, increased poverty, and heightened vulnerability to public health emergencies. In Pakistan's case, where over 50% of health expenditure is still borne out-of-pocket by households, reducing development spending can further widen inequalities and push more families into financial hardship due to medical costs.
What makes this budget decision even more concerning is that it comes at a time when Pakistan faces a dual disease burden: persistent infectious diseases on one hand, and rapidly increasing non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, and mental health disorders on the other. Development funding is crucial to building the institutional capacity needed to tackle this complex mix of health challenges, especially in under-served rural and peri-urban areas.
The budget also misses an important opportunity to introduce health-related fiscal reforms. Despite strong evidence linking ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks to growing rates of non-communicable diseases, the government has chosen not to impose any new taxes on these items. This is a missed opportunity to both generate additional revenue and steer consumer behaviour toward healthier choices. Globally, such taxes have proven effective in improving public health outcomes while creating fiscal space for investment in health systems.
Additionally, the budget maintains the existing two-tier Federal Excise Duty (FED) structure on cigarettes, with no increase in tax rates. The upper-tier remains at Rs 16,500 per 1,000 sticks, and the lower-tier continues near Rs 12,500 per 1,000 sticks. This effectively keeps cigarette prices static in real terms, despite inflation and rising disposable incomes. From a public health standpoint, this decision represents a clear deviation from evidence-based fiscal strategy.
Maintaining cigarette excise rates at current levels ignores a growing body of economic and health research suggesting that increasing tobacco taxes not only reduces consumption but also substantially increases government revenue. For example, a targeted increase of Rs 39 per pack, raising the average rate to around Rs 140 for economy brands and Rs 369 for premium brands, could reduce cigarette consumption by nearly 7 percent and bring in an estimated Rs 67 billion in additional revenue. This revenue could be directly reinvested in health services, disease prevention programs, and infrastructure.
The government's decision to hold back on increasing cigarette taxes, despite the health risks and economic opportunity, reflects a worrying pattern of inaction. It suggests that political considerations or lobbying pressures may have outweighed long-term fiscal and health imperatives. In a country where tobacco consumption contributes to over 160,000 deaths annually and disproportionately affects the poor, failing to revise cigarette taxes is a missed chance to use fiscal tools to improve both public health and equity.
Similarly, the absence of new taxes on sugary beverages and processed foods, despite their well-documented contribution to Pakistan's growing non-communicable disease crisis, reinforces the perception that the government has shied away from confronting powerful industry interests. This reluctance undermines broader efforts to promote preventive health and reduce long-term medical costs, which are increasingly borne by low- and middle-income households.
From a macroeconomic perspective, the budget's overall trajectory leans toward short-term fiscal stability but lacks the bold, forward-looking investments needed to address structural vulnerabilities. While allocations for debt servicing and defense remain protected, social sector development, particularly in health, continues to be deprioritized. This imbalance suggests a recurring policy bias that views health as a discretionary expense rather than a strategic investment.
In times of economic constraint, governments face difficult choices. However, smart fiscal policy does not mean cutting essential development expenditures, it means spending more wisely and protecting sectors that yield long-term returns. Health is one such sector. Delayed infrastructure, inadequate surveillance systems, and a weakened public health response capability may not show immediate consequences in budget sheets, but they will manifest in slower human capital development and greater costs down the line.
Conclusively, while the Budget 2025-26 reflects a certain degree of fiscal discipline, the decision to reduce health sector development spending and to leave cigarette taxation untouched is both short-sighted and economically risky. Pakistan cannot afford to treat health as a secondary priority.
A more strategic and balanced approach is needed, one that protects and promotes public health as a critical enabler of sustained economic growth and national resilience.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Health system suffers as cigarette tax left untouched
The federal budget for 2025-26, announced amidst a backdrop of fragile economic recovery, signals a continuation of fiscal restraint. While the government has rightly focused on maintaining macroeconomic stability and ensuring essential current expenditures, the significant reduction in the health sector's development allocation raises serious concerns about the country's long-term human development and economic resilience. According to the budget documents released by the Ministry of Finance, the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) allocation for health has been reduced by 16 percent, from approximately Rs 54.7 billion in the previous year to Rs 46.1 billion in the current fiscal cycle. This is not just a numerical adjustment; it has real and immediate implications. Development allocations typically fund the expansion of healthcare infrastructure, procurement of new equipment, training programmes, and the rollout of disease prevention and surveillance systems. A cut of this magnitude effectively means that many of these critical initiatives will be scaled back or shelved. From an economic standpoint, this trend is deeply concerning, because health is not just a social good, it is a foundational pillar of economic productivity. A healthy population is more capable, more employable, and less financially burdened. Countries that underinvest in health eventually pay the price in terms of lost productivity, increased poverty, and heightened vulnerability to public health emergencies. In Pakistan's case, where over 50% of health expenditure is still borne out-of-pocket by households, reducing development spending can further widen inequalities and push more families into financial hardship due to medical costs. What makes this budget decision even more concerning is that it comes at a time when Pakistan faces a dual disease burden: persistent infectious diseases on one hand, and rapidly increasing non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, and mental health disorders on the other. Development funding is crucial to building the institutional capacity needed to tackle this complex mix of health challenges, especially in under-served rural and peri-urban areas. The budget also misses an important opportunity to introduce health-related fiscal reforms. Despite strong evidence linking ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks to growing rates of non-communicable diseases, the government has chosen not to impose any new taxes on these items. This is a missed opportunity to both generate additional revenue and steer consumer behaviour toward healthier choices. Globally, such taxes have proven effective in improving public health outcomes while creating fiscal space for investment in health systems. Additionally, the budget maintains the existing two-tier Federal Excise Duty (FED) structure on cigarettes, with no increase in tax rates. The upper-tier remains at Rs 16,500 per 1,000 sticks, and the lower-tier continues near Rs 12,500 per 1,000 sticks. This effectively keeps cigarette prices static in real terms, despite inflation and rising disposable incomes. From a public health standpoint, this decision represents a clear deviation from evidence-based fiscal strategy. Maintaining cigarette excise rates at current levels ignores a growing body of economic and health research suggesting that increasing tobacco taxes not only reduces consumption but also substantially increases government revenue. For example, a targeted increase of Rs 39 per pack, raising the average rate to around Rs 140 for economy brands and Rs 369 for premium brands, could reduce cigarette consumption by nearly 7 percent and bring in an estimated Rs 67 billion in additional revenue. This revenue could be directly reinvested in health services, disease prevention programs, and infrastructure. The government's decision to hold back on increasing cigarette taxes, despite the health risks and economic opportunity, reflects a worrying pattern of inaction. It suggests that political considerations or lobbying pressures may have outweighed long-term fiscal and health imperatives. In a country where tobacco consumption contributes to over 160,000 deaths annually and disproportionately affects the poor, failing to revise cigarette taxes is a missed chance to use fiscal tools to improve both public health and equity. Similarly, the absence of new taxes on sugary beverages and processed foods, despite their well-documented contribution to Pakistan's growing non-communicable disease crisis, reinforces the perception that the government has shied away from confronting powerful industry interests. This reluctance undermines broader efforts to promote preventive health and reduce long-term medical costs, which are increasingly borne by low- and middle-income households. From a macroeconomic perspective, the budget's overall trajectory leans toward short-term fiscal stability but lacks the bold, forward-looking investments needed to address structural vulnerabilities. While allocations for debt servicing and defense remain protected, social sector development, particularly in health, continues to be deprioritized. This imbalance suggests a recurring policy bias that views health as a discretionary expense rather than a strategic investment. In times of economic constraint, governments face difficult choices. However, smart fiscal policy does not mean cutting essential development expenditures, it means spending more wisely and protecting sectors that yield long-term returns. Health is one such sector. Delayed infrastructure, inadequate surveillance systems, and a weakened public health response capability may not show immediate consequences in budget sheets, but they will manifest in slower human capital development and greater costs down the line. Conclusively, while the Budget 2025-26 reflects a certain degree of fiscal discipline, the decision to reduce health sector development spending and to leave cigarette taxation untouched is both short-sighted and economically risky. Pakistan cannot afford to treat health as a secondary priority. A more strategic and balanced approach is needed, one that protects and promotes public health as a critical enabler of sustained economic growth and national resilience. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
UHS approves Rs2.71bn budget, revenue target set at Rs4.2bn
LAHORE: The Board of Governors of the University of Health Sciences (UHS) Lahore accorded approval of a Rs. 2.71 billion budget for the fiscal year 2025-26 during its 59th meeting held, here on Tuesday. The meeting was chaired by Justice Sheikh Ahmed Farooq (retd) and attended by Capt. Zahid Saeed (retd), Naeem Akhtar Sheikh, Vice Chancellor Prof. Ahsan Waheed Rathore, pro-vice chancellor Prof. Nadia Naseem, Registrar Kiran Fatima, Treasurer Mujahid Iqbal, and Additional Secretaries from the Punjab Specialized Healthcare & Medical Education Department and the Finance Department. Treasurer Mujahid Iqbal presented the annual budget, which sets the UHS's revenue target for the year at Rs. 4.2 billion. Key allocations include Rs. 77.57 million for research and scholarships, Rs. 358.77 million for development projects, and Rs. 917.3 million for staff salaries. In line with the Punjab government's policy, a 10 percent increase in employees' salaries was also approved. Operational expenses of the UHS have been earmarked at Rs. 367.1 million, while Rs. 400 million has been allocated for the conduct of examinations. Inter-collegiate sports and co-curricular activities will receive Rs. 25 million. A sum of Rs. 147 million has been allocated for the construction of a mosque and complex at the Jinnah Campus. Additionally, Rs. 72 million has been set aside for installing an elevator at the City Campus and transitioning both campuses to solar energy. For conferences and workshops, Rs. 48 million have been allocated. Speaking on the occasion, the vice- chancellor Prof. Ahsan Waheed Rathore said that UHS had organized more than 750 workshops over the past year for the capacity building of faculty members across Punjab's medical and health education institutions. Furthermore, the budget earmarks Rs. 73.5 million for the procurement of laboratory equipment and chemicals. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Rs181bn allocation made for Punjab health sector
LAHORE: The Punjab government has allocated an amount of Rs 181 billion as development budget for the health sector for the year 2025-26 which is 131 percent higher than the current year allocation. In the year 2025-26, an amount of Rs 450 billion has been set aside for non-developmental expenditures which are 16 percent of total expenditures under this head. As per budget document, the budget estimates for FY 2025-26 for the program loans (foreign) have been set at Rs. 47.896 billion. The Punjab government is likely to receive budgetary support loans from international development partners for National Health Support Program, Access to Clean Energy Investment Program, Punjab Family Planning Program, Punjab Green Development Program, Punjab Resource Improvement and Digital Effectiveness (PRIDE), Punjab Affordable Housing Program (PAHP), Punjab Clean Air Program and Responsive Ready Resilient STEM Secondary Education in Punjab. As per the budget document, health remains a cornerstone with flagship health initiatives such as Medical City, free medicine, and new centres for cancer and cardiac care. The establishment of Nawaz Sharif Medical District at Lahore has been proposed for which Rs 109 billion have been allocated in 2025-26 for land acquisition. Under this project, Rs 54 billion have been allocated for Children Hospital-II & Institute of Genetic Blood Diseases, Institute of Surgical Orthopaedic & Medical Rehabilitation, Center of Excellence for Nursing Education, Specialized Medical Hospital & Medical College, 1000-bed Cardiac Institute, Medical University and state-of-the-art Diagnostic Lab. For the construction of Medical Colleges at Narowal, Okara and Layyah, an amount of Rs. 16 billion has been allocated. For the establishment of Children Hospital at Rawalpindi, Rs 8.5 billion has been set aside. For Teaching Hospital at Sialkot, Rs 7 billion have been allocated. For Maryam Nawaz Community Health Services Program through Outsourced Community Health Inspectors, an amount of Rs. 12.5 billion has been proposed while for the establishment of Center of Excellence for Nursing Education in Multan & Rawalpindi (ADB Loan), Rs. 15 billion have been set aside. Moreover, for the establishment of Burn Unit at B.V. Hospital, Bahawalpur & Rahim Yar Khan, Rs. 5 billion have allocated. Sufficient budgetary allocations have been made in the budget 2025-26 for revamping of remaining/leftover 24/7 BHUs across Punjab, revamping/reconstruction of existing dispensaries and MCH Centers across Punjab and provision of equipment and furniture and fixture of remaining BHUs and RHCs. Under the Chief Minister's Special Initiative for Dialysis Program, Rs. 8.6 billion have been earmarked while for provision of free medicines in public sector hospitals, Rs 79.5 billion have been set aside. With an amount of Rs 25 billion, Universal Health programme is also being launched for provision of cheap and quality treatment facilities. For setting up Cath Labs at district levels, Rs three billion have been allocated in the budget. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
