AstraZeneca signs AI research deal with China's CSPC for chronic diseases
AstraZeneca has signed an AI-led research agreement with China's CSPC Pharmaceutical Group worth up to $5.3 billion, which would help the Anglo-Swedish drugmaker develop therapies for chronic conditions, it said on Friday. The deal marks the latest effort by AstraZeneca to revive its business in China, its second-biggest market, where it has faced several challenges including the arrest of its China president last year and potential fines related to imports. Under Friday's agreement, the two companies will collaborate to discover and develop pre-clinical candidates, including a small molecule oral therapy for immunological diseases, with CSPC conducting AI-driven research in Shijiazhuang City.
"This strategic research collaboration underscores our commitment to innovation to tackle chronic diseases which impact over two billion people globally," AstraZeneca executive Sharon Barr said in a statement.
Friday's agreement follows AstraZeneca's announcement in March that it will invest $2.5 billion in a R&D hub in Beijing, and it also marks further investment in AI following collaborations with Immunai, Qure.ai and Tempus AI.
AstraZeneca will pay CSPC an upfront fee of $110 million. The Hong Kong-listed firm is also eligible to receive up to $1.62 billion for reaching development milestones and $3.6 billion linked to sales-related milestones, the groups said in separate statements.
They signed a licensing deal last October in which AstraZeneca agreed to pay up to $1.92 billion to CSPC to develop a candidate which would boost its cardiovascular pipeline. AstraZeneca and CSPC both have wide-ranging pipeline portfolios, including cancer treatments and those targeting cardiovascular diseases. However, about 80% of CSPC's total revenue comes from its finished drug segment, according Morningstar analysts. The Chinese group said last month it was in negotiations with third parties on new licensing and collaboration. Friday's agreement also gives AstraZeneca the rights to exercise options for exclusive licenses for candidates identified as part of the collaboration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ringfencing India? After Pakistan and Afghanistan, now China holds a tri‑nation meet with Bangladesh. What it means
China recently hosted Bangladesh and Pakistan for talks in Kunming. The meeting aimed to boost cooperation in trade and connectivity. A working group will explore joint projects. This follows a similar China-Pakistan-Afghanistan meeting. India is concerned about China's growing influence in the region. Security ties between Bangladesh, Pakistan, and China are also under scrutiny. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why China, Bangladesh, Pak meeting matters for New Delhi What Pakistan, China, Bangladesh agreed in the meet Focus area Planned cooperation Economy & trade Joint projects in industry, digital economy and maritime logistics Connectivity Exploration of Belt and Road links—potentially an eastward spur of CPEC People's welfare Agriculture, climate action, health, education and youth exchanges Follow‑up A working group to translate the Kunming understandings into pilot projects Bangladesh's quiet pivot towards Pak, China Former Bangladesh military intelligence chief end 12-day China trip Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Meeting comes after China, Afghanistan, Pakistan meet last month China on Thursday brought Bangladesh and Pakistan together for an inaugural trilateral dialogue in Kunming, barely a month after hosting a similar meeting with Pakistan and Afghanistan. The closed‑door talks, led by Chinese Vice‑Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, agreed to set up a working group for 'good‑neighbourly, equal and mutually trusted' cooperation, signalling Beijing's intent to knit India's neighbours more tightly into its strategic India, the move feeds a long‑running concern that China is cultivating a ring of friendly states along the subcontinent's periphery. New Delhi already objects to the China‑Pakistan Economic Corridor running through Pakistan‑occupied Kashmir. Now, with Bangladesh's interim leadership warming to Beijing—and exploring closer ties with Islamabad—the prospect of a three‑way framework on trade, infrastructure and security raises fresh questions about India's strategic Acting Foreign Secretary Ruhul Alam Siddique joined Sun at Kunming, while Foreign Secretary‑designate Amna Baloch represented Pakistan via video. The gathering came soon after Dhaka's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus publicly asked Beijing for economic help and discreetly revived contact with Islamabad—moves that have already drawn attention in New another development that has raised red flags within India's security establishment, Major General (Retd) Rezzakul Haider Chowdhury, former Bangladesh military intelligence chief and a convicted figure in the 2004 Chittagong arms smuggling case, reportedly concluded a 12-day trip to Guangzhou, China, on June 18. His visit coincided with that of Bangladesh's interim National Security Adviser Dr Khalilur Rahman, who reportedly sought Beijing's help to arrange a backchannel meeting with Pakistan's ISI chief. Indian agencies view this synchronised movement of high-level security actors—linked to past anti-India plots—as a signal of a deeper and potentially coordinated security alignment between Beijing, Islamabad, and follows a May meeting in which China, Pakistan and Afghanistan agreed to extend CPEC into Afghan territory. India had protested that any third‑country role in CPEC infringes on its sovereignty. The new Bangladesh‑Pakistan‑China line‑up suggests Beijing is applying the same template to India's eastern Thursday's statements highlighted 'true multilateralism' and insisted the talks were 'not directed at any third party', the meeting comes at a time of heightened tensions in South Asia:India's May strikes on terror camps in Pakistan and PoK, which prompted Beijing's vocal support for Islamabad.82 per cent of Islamabad's defence imports already come from agencies are probing reports that Dhaka's interim National Security Adviser has sought a Beijing‑brokered meeting with Pakistan's ISI chief.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is.
Over the past few weeks, I've been on the road. Parbhani, Pune, Chennai, Jaipur. In small-town labs and factory floors, I saw jobs that still exist, but don't look like they used to In Parbhani I met Dr. Chaitanya, who runs a 24-hour diagnostics lab above a heart clinic. He told me he's failed to detect cancer before—not out of neglect, but because he was worn out. Now, when something doesn't feel right, he runs the slide through a machine. It doesn't get distracted. It doesn't get tired. It caught leukaemia in a boy whose report looked normal at first glance. In Jaipur I spent time inside Wipro's factories. I met Chandni—just out of college, far from home—running a CNC machine built for someone twice her size. The platform was raised to fit her. Sensors pause the line if she skips a step. She's not fighting the machine. She's learning to work with it. And then I came back to Bengaluru. Over the weekend, I caught up with a few junior engineers—entry-level coders, recently let go. We sat in a noisy café near HSR, talking about layoffs. Some of their friends—older, with fatter salaries—had been let go, too, from well-known names on Outer Ring Road. Most of them hadn't told their families yet. Someone joked their severance would go into a 'detox trip". But the silence after that said more. Also read | Mary Meeker's AI report: Decoding what it signals for India's tech future I kept thinking about all of it. From Parbhani to Jaipur to Bengaluru, I've seen AI reshape work—but in such unsettling ways. In some places, it keeps people going. In others, it shuts the door. And I've come back with questions I can't truly answer. Who gets to stay in the game? Who gets to rewrite their role? And who just disappears? *** We've spent years asking the wrong question. It's never been just 'Will AI take jobs?" That's the headline version—the one that misses what's actually unfolding on the ground. What I've seen is something slower and harder to name: jobs are shifting shape. The work still exists, but it doesn't look like it used to. Doctors don't just rely on training—they rely on machines to catch what their fatigue might miss. Factory workers aren't lifting metal—they're supervising systems. Engineers aren't writing code—they're managing what the agents spit out. In some places, people are being lifted. In others, pushed out. This isn't about replacement. It's about redefinition. And not everyone is getting the chance to adapt. *** In Parbhani, Dr. Chaitanya isn't trying to be some AI-era pathologist. He just doesn't want to miss a sign of cancer again. He bought the scanner not because anyone sold him a pitch-deck future, but because he was tired. Because late at night, after hours of non-stop samples, the eyes slip. And he knows what that costs. The machine doesn't replace his judgment – it just doesn't lose focus when he does. In Jaipur, Wipro didn't automate Chandni out. They built the floor to fit her. She's running a CNC machine designed for someone taller, stronger—but they raised the platform instead. Her job wasn't taken. It was made possible. She oversees the system now. And when she sends money home, there's no debate anymore about whether girls can handle mechanical work. Also read: Indian companies lag in workforce upskilling amid AI disruption, job cuts And then there's Bengaluru. The coders I met had barely started. A few months in, then gone. Not for bad performance. Just… gone. Their work was handed to tools they weren't trained to supervise. Their seniors—some drawing seven-figure salaries—were asked to leave too. One of them said most of his severance would go into a detox trip. We all laughed. But it didn't feel funny. Same tool. But in Parbhani, it buys time. In Jaipur, it makes the job possible. In Bengaluru, it ends it. **** There's something I've been noticing everywhere lately—in factories, hospitals, GCCs, even small startups. Someone in the room knows how to work with the AI. Not just use it, but shape it. Prompt it right. Catch when it's wrong. That person sets the tone for how work flows. And then there's everyone else. Trying to keep up. Hoping they're not left behind. It's not just a skill gap. It's who gets the confidence to speak up. Who gets the permission to push back when the machine's answer doesn't feel right. Who gets to set the rules for how AI shows up—and who's left cleaning up after it. One founder told me straight: 'We're not hiring another ops exec. We're hiring someone to manage the agents." The job still exists. It just looks different now. And the person who knows how to talk to the machine gets to decide how everyone else works around it. That's the shift I can't ignore. It's not about mass layoffs. It's about brutal sidelining. Not fired. Still on payroll. But it is no longer in the loop. *** I keep coming back to something Andy Grove once said. Intel was stuck in the memory chip business, losing ground fast. Grove turned to CEO Gordon Moore and asked, 'If we were fired, and the board brought in someone new, what do you think they'd do?" Moore said, 'They'd get us out of memories." Grove paused, then said, 'Then why don't we walk out the door, come back in, and do it ourselves?" And that's what they did. They walked back in and changed the company. Also read: Microsoft envisions a web driven by AI agents. What will it look like? What stayed with me wasn't the decision itself—it was the mindset. They gave themselves permission to reset. Same chairs. Same table. Just a different way of thinking. Most people I meet don't get to do that. In every workplace I've visited lately—factories, hospitals, GCCs—there's always someone who gets to reframe the game. The person who speaks up, shapes the tool, sets the tone. Everyone else is just trying to stay in the room. Or figuring out the exit. *** I asked Dr. Chaitanya if he ever worries AI will take over his work. He didn't hesitate. 'I just don't want to miss what matters," he said. 'Let the machine help with the rest." Chandni said the same thing, in different words. 'If it helps us do the work better, why fear it?" Neither of them were trying to protect their turf. They just wanted the tools to hold up when it counted. When they're tired. When something's easy to miss. When a mistake can't be undone. They weren't talking about AI as a threat. They weren't talking about it as the future. They were talking about the work—what it asks of them, what it gives back, and what they still want to hold on to. ***** So yes, people will need to learn. New tools, new ways of working, new habits. That's always been part of work. But before any of that, they need a little space to figure things out. To ask questions without sounding slow. To try, to fumble, to not know right away—and not be punished for it. Because the bigger risk isn't that AI takes your job. Also read: Why AI is central to the new browser wars It's that you're still in the role, still showing up every day—but slowly pushed out of the decisions. Not because you can't contribute. But because no one gave you the chance to learn how. And by the time you notice what's changed, the work has already moved on—without your voice in the room. Pankaj Mishra is a journalist and co-founder of FactorDaily. He has spent over two decades reporting on technology, startups, and work in India with a focus on the people and places often left out of the spotlight.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
ICICI Bank once wanted to acquire HDFC, Deepak Parekh spills the secret
Deepak Parekh revealed Chanda Kochhar's merger proposal between ICICI and HDFC, predating HDFC's reverse merger. Parekh cited regulatory pressure from the RBI as the primary driver for the HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, emphasizing the need for larger Indian banks. Post-merger, ICICI Bank has outperformed HDFC Bank in key metrics like profit growth and net interest margin. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh has revealed that former ICICI Bank chief Chanda Kochhar once proposed a merger between ICICI and HDFC, well before HDFC's reverse merger with its own banking a conversation with Kochhar on her YouTube channel, Parekh recounted, "I remember you talking to me once. I remember it very clearly. It's never been talked about in public, but I'm willing to share it now. You said that ICICI started HDFC. 'Why don't you come back home?' That was your offer."Parekh said he declined the offer at the time, saying it "won't be fair" or "proper with our name and the bank and all."Parekh described the eventual HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, completed in July 2023, as a move driven by regulatory compulsions rather than business ambition. The Reserve Bank of India had classified large NBFCs like HDFC, which then held assets exceeding ₹5 lakh crore, as systemically important — well above the ₹50,000-crore threshold."RBI supported us and they pushed us into it to some extent and they helped us," Parekh said. However, he added that there were "no concessions, no relief, no time, nothing."Parekh also said the deal had been executed with extreme confidentiality. 'It was kept a secret. No one knew about it—when it hit the press in the morning, that's when everyone found out. The government was aware because RBI was in touch with them, and we kept it so close—just lawyers, due diligence, accountants,' he on the conclusion of the merger, Parekh called it "a sad day and a happy day." He added, "It's good for the institution. It's good for the country to have large banks. Look at how large Chinese banks are. We have to be bigger, larger in India."On April 4, 2022, HDFC Bank announced its plan to acquire mortgage lender HDFC in a deal valued at about $40 billion, creating one of the largest financial institutions in Indian history. The merger gave rise to a banking entity worth $172 billion, affecting tens of millions of customers and shareholders across both companies, along with their group insurance and asset management said Indian banks must grow through acquisitions in order to become stronger in the also listed key concerns for chief executives, including continuing uncertainty in supply chains, trade policies, and export the insurance front, Parekh described it as the "least understood product" and criticised "mis-selling by banks" which, he said, was driven by the lure of high upfront HDFC Bank , in April this year, crossed the ₹15 lakh crore market capitalisation mark — an elite milestone — a quieter shift has been unfolding in the private banking space. ICICI Bank has steadily pulled ahead of HDFC Bank on several key performance Bank is now seen as a frontrunner among private sector lenders in India. HDFC Bank, meanwhile, has been navigating the after-effects of the 2023 merger, which have affected its growth FY25, ICICI Bank recorded profit growth of 15%, while HDFC Bank's profits rose by 11%. Both banks registered similar net interest income (NII) growth, but ICICI had a stronger net interest margin (NIM) of 4.41% compared with HDFC Bank's NIM of 3.65%.ICICI Bank also reported 14% growth in both advances and deposits for FY25. HDFC Bank, however, saw its advances grow at nearly half the pace of its merger added a substantial loan portfolio to HDFC Bank but did not bring in a matching level of deposits. This resulted in a spike in the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) to over 100% post-merger. Although HDFC Bank reduced this figure to 96.5% by the end of FY25, it still faces pressure to either increase deposits or slow down contrast, ICICI Bank's LDR stood at a healthier 82.4% as of March to the elevated LDR, HDFC Bank deliberately slowed down its credit expansion during FY25 to maintain balance. The bank's management believes that improving systemic liquidity will help raise deposits going forward.A high LDR suggests a bank is lending a large proportion of its deposits, which can become a risk if too many depositors withdraw funds at once and liquidity tightens.
