Too good to be true ADHD videos on TikTok are often misleading, US study finds.
On TikTok, misinformation about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can be tricky to spot, according to a new study.The study, published this month in the scientic journal PLOS One (published by Public Library of Science, based in California, the United States), found that fewer than 50% of the claims made in some of the most popular ADHD videos on TikTok offered information that matched diagnostic criteria or professional treatment recommendations for the disorder.
And, the researchers found, even study participants who had already been diagnosed with ADHD had trouble discerning which information was most reliable.
About half of the TikTok creators included in the study were using the platform to sell products, such as fidget spinners, or services like coaching. None of them were licensed mental health professionals.
The lack of nuance is concerning, said Vasileia Karasavva, a doctoral student in clinical psychology at Canada's University of British Columbia in Vancouver and the lead author of the study. If TikTok creators talk about difficulty concentrating, she added, they don't typically mention that the symptom is not specific to ADHD or that it could also be a manifestation of a different mental disorder, like depression or anxiety.
Just because a video or post goes viral doesn't mean it is accurate.
"The last thing we want to do is discourage people from expressing how they're feeling, what they're experiencing and finding community online," Karasavva said.
"At the same time, it might be that you self-diagnose with something that doesn't apply to you, and then you don't get the help that you actually need."
Karasavva's results echo those of a 2022 study that also analysed 100 popular TikTok videos about ADHD and found that half of them were misleading.
"The data are alarming," said Stephen P. Hinshaw, a professor of psychology and an expert in ADHD at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in either study. The themes of the videos might easily resonate with viewers, he added, but "accurate diagnosis takes access, time and money."
In Karasavva's study, the researchers began by selecting the 100 most viewed videos on a single day in January 2023 and asked two licensed clinical psychologists to review each video. The psychologists were called to assess whether the videos accurately captured the symptoms of adult or adolescent ADHD that are characterised in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which is used by medical professionals in the US to diagnose and classify mental health conditions.
If a video's claim didn't match up with the manual, the psychologists then established whether the symptoms in the video better reflected a different type of disorder or something that anyone, including those without ADHD, might experience. Finally, they rated on a scale of one to five whether they would recommend the video to help educate other people about ADHD.
One limitation of the study was that it did not rely on a large panel of experts to evaluate the videos.
The researchers then asked more than 840 undergraduate students to rate the videos using the same scale used by the psychologists.
The study participants who were the most frequent consumers of ADHD-related TikTok content were more likely than the other participants to recommend the top five most reputable videos. But they were also more likely to recommend the bottom five videos. And that was true regardless of whether they had been diagnosed with ADHD or not.
Karasavva said this could be because the TikTok algorithm serves videos that are similar to those a person has already watched - and as we come across the same information again and again, it's tempting to think that "all these people can't be wrong."
"In the end, you might come to believe things that don't really match up with the science," she said.
Notably, the students in the study also vastly overestimated how many people actually had ADHD.
In an email, TikTok said that it strongly encourages people to seek professional medical advice if they are in need of support and that the platform directs users to reliable resources when they search for ADHD-related content.
The information on TikTok "doesn't always tell you the full story, and it can also lead the loudest voices to be overrepresented,' said Margaret Sibley, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle who was not involved in the study. "People might not be discerning about what aspect of their experience is ADHD versus something else." - ©2025 The New York Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Too good to be true ADHD videos on TikTok are often misleading, US study finds.
On TikTok, misinformation about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can be tricky to spot, according to a new study, published this month in the scientic journal PLOS One (published by Public Library of Science, based in California, the United States), found that fewer than 50% of the claims made in some of the most popular ADHD videos on TikTok offered information that matched diagnostic criteria or professional treatment recommendations for the disorder. And, the researchers found, even study participants who had already been diagnosed with ADHD had trouble discerning which information was most reliable. About half of the TikTok creators included in the study were using the platform to sell products, such as fidget spinners, or services like coaching. None of them were licensed mental health professionals. The lack of nuance is concerning, said Vasileia Karasavva, a doctoral student in clinical psychology at Canada's University of British Columbia in Vancouver and the lead author of the study. If TikTok creators talk about difficulty concentrating, she added, they don't typically mention that the symptom is not specific to ADHD or that it could also be a manifestation of a different mental disorder, like depression or anxiety. Just because a video or post goes viral doesn't mean it is accurate. "The last thing we want to do is discourage people from expressing how they're feeling, what they're experiencing and finding community online," Karasavva said. "At the same time, it might be that you self-diagnose with something that doesn't apply to you, and then you don't get the help that you actually need." Karasavva's results echo those of a 2022 study that also analysed 100 popular TikTok videos about ADHD and found that half of them were misleading. "The data are alarming," said Stephen P. Hinshaw, a professor of psychology and an expert in ADHD at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in either study. The themes of the videos might easily resonate with viewers, he added, but "accurate diagnosis takes access, time and money." In Karasavva's study, the researchers began by selecting the 100 most viewed videos on a single day in January 2023 and asked two licensed clinical psychologists to review each video. The psychologists were called to assess whether the videos accurately captured the symptoms of adult or adolescent ADHD that are characterised in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which is used by medical professionals in the US to diagnose and classify mental health conditions. If a video's claim didn't match up with the manual, the psychologists then established whether the symptoms in the video better reflected a different type of disorder or something that anyone, including those without ADHD, might experience. Finally, they rated on a scale of one to five whether they would recommend the video to help educate other people about ADHD. One limitation of the study was that it did not rely on a large panel of experts to evaluate the videos. The researchers then asked more than 840 undergraduate students to rate the videos using the same scale used by the psychologists. The study participants who were the most frequent consumers of ADHD-related TikTok content were more likely than the other participants to recommend the top five most reputable videos. But they were also more likely to recommend the bottom five videos. And that was true regardless of whether they had been diagnosed with ADHD or not. Karasavva said this could be because the TikTok algorithm serves videos that are similar to those a person has already watched - and as we come across the same information again and again, it's tempting to think that "all these people can't be wrong." "In the end, you might come to believe things that don't really match up with the science," she said. Notably, the students in the study also vastly overestimated how many people actually had ADHD. In an email, TikTok said that it strongly encourages people to seek professional medical advice if they are in need of support and that the platform directs users to reliable resources when they search for ADHD-related content. The information on TikTok "doesn't always tell you the full story, and it can also lead the loudest voices to be overrepresented,' said Margaret Sibley, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle who was not involved in the study. "People might not be discerning about what aspect of their experience is ADHD versus something else." - ©2025 The New York Times
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Advancing autism screening
A NEW artificial intelligence (AI) model is reshaping how autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is screened, offering faster, more accurate and more scalable detection across age groups. Developed through an international research collaboration that included INTI International University, the model achieved up to 99.06% accuracy in identifying ASD in children, adolescents and adults, outperforming many existing diagnostic systems. At the centre of the study is the Chaotic Binary Butterfly Optimisation Algorithm-based Feature Selection and Data Classification (CBBOAFS-DC) model. It analyses behavioural and developmental data to identify the traits most relevant to autism, supporting healthcare professionals in making earlier assessments. For many families, autism diagnosis is often delayed due to long wait times, limited access to specialists, or a lack of services in rural and underserved areas. These delays can mean children miss out on early intervention support that has been shown to improve communication, behaviour and learning outcomes significantly. Traditional screening tools also face consistency challenges, particularly when applied across different age groups or populations. INTI International University Faculty of Data Sciences and Information Technology academic Prof Dr Siti Sarah Maidinat (pic) said the new model is not a replacement for conventional methods. 'It's a tool to support healthcare providers, especially in early screening. The earlier autism is detected, the earlier children can receive the necessary interventions. 'We're helping to bridge the gap between limited diagnostic resources and the growing need for early autism detection. 'The idea is to support, not substitute, clinical expertise – especially in underprivileged communities,' she said. CBBOAFS-DC uses AI to process data from screening tools quickly and consistently, reducing reliance on time-intensive manual evaluations. Its hybrid architecture sets it apart from conventional approaches, according to an INTI press release dated May 23. While traditional models often rely on algorithms like decision trees or logistic regression, the new model uses a three-step design. 'It selects only the most relevant features using a butterfly-inspired optimisation technique, applies a deep learning engine to detect subtle behavioural patterns, and then finetunes its internal parameters using a bacterial colony optimisation algorithm,' the press release read. It added that this layered approach allows the model to handle the complexity of ASD traits across age groups and adapt to a variety of screening contexts – bringing researchers closer to a more universal screening solution. The research was conducted in collaboration with Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College and Vellore Institute of Technology in India, as well as institutions in Saudi Arabia.
The Sun
5 days ago
- The Sun
Brain degeneration effects of digital addiction
PETALING JAYA: The habit of endlessly scrolling through social media content, especially non-educational or trivial material, is becoming alarmingly common among Malaysians, sparking concerns over a rising wave of internet addiction. Mental health experts warn that the compulsive behaviour, known as doomscrolling and driven by constant exposure to digital media, may take a toll on cognitive health and carry serious, long-term neurological consequences. Malaysia Organisation of Psychospiritual Wellbeing deputy chairman Dr Adnan Omar said internet addiction often begins in the early stages of life, forming during childhood and adolescence when behavioural patterns are still developing. He referred to statistics from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2022, which revealed that 66.7% of secondary school students exhibited sedentary behaviour, up from 50.1% in 2017 and 47.3% in 2012. 'The Malaysian Youth Index 2020 reported that adolescents spend an average of four to five hours daily on mobile phones and the internet.' 'About 29% of students aged 13 to 17 are already showing signs of internet addiction. That's a significant portion of our youth being shaped by these habits from a very young age,' he said, adding that digital addiction does not develop overnight. 'No one suddenly wakes up addicted. These behaviours evolve gradually, often reinforced by social media algorithms that narrow a user's exposure and stifle broader experiences. 'If a child is constantly fed repetitive or shallow content, they may grow into adulthood with a limited range of interests and diminished curiosity.' He also said the World Health Organisation now recognises internet addiction as a clinical mental disorder under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). He added that the endless supply of online content has made procrastination more prevalent than ever. 'People have always procrastinated, even before the digital era. Back then, it might have meant going for a jog or chatting with a neighbour. But physical activities have limits – time, energy and space. 'The internet doesn't. It's always available, always updating and never runs out. That's what makes it such a powerful enabler of bad habits.' Based on DSM-5 criteria, Adnan said anyone spending more than 21 hours per week on non-essential internet use – not related to work, family or education – could be classified as experiencing clinical addiction. 'This is internationally recognised. Countries such as China and Australia have introduced legislation to limit children's access to the internet.' Beyond emotional well-being, experts also say internet addiction could be quietly impairing how the brain processes, focuses and remembers. Universiti Putra Malaysia consultant neurologist Assoc Prof Dr Abdul Hanif Khan said there is growing evidence linking compulsive smartphone use to reduced attention span, working memory and decision-making capabilities. 'Constant scrolling trains the brain to seek fast, bite-sized information. Over time, it erodes the ability to concentrate, reduces mental clarity and leads to subtle memory lapses. 'These are early indicators of what we call minimal cognitive impairment. If this trend continues, we may see it becoming far more common among Generation Z in the next three decades.' He also said the prefrontal cortex of the brain, the region responsible for impulse control and reasoning, is overstimulated by dopamine surges triggered by constant digital engagement during doomscrolling. He added that symptoms of concern include short-term memory issues, mental fatigue and difficulty focusing or completing tasks. 'These may not directly cause dementia, but once such impairment begins to affect a person's ability to manage money, operate devices or carry out basic responsibilities, we're entering the territory of neurocognitive disorders.' Abdul Hanif also warned about the emotional fallout of excessive screen time, pointing to increased rates of anxiety, depression and sleep disruption. He linked these patterns to overstimulation of the amygdala, the emotional control centre of the brain, which becomes hyperactive due to constant digital input. 'You'll notice how people become restless or anxious when separated from their phones. That's not a coincidence. 'Emotion and cognition are closely linked. If unhealthy internet habits formed in youth go unchecked, they can evolve into serious neurological and emotional dysfunction in adulthood.'
