Idaho legislators address ‘monetization of politics' in new campaign finance bills
Idaho House Speaker Mike Moyle, R-Star, answers a reporter's question during a press conference on Jan. 6, 2025, at the Statehouse in Boise. (Pat Sutphin for the Idaho Capital Sun)
Republican House leadership introduced four bills on Friday to address the influx of out-of-state spending involved in Idaho elections.
A total of $17 million was spent on campaign and independent expenditures on 2024 legislative races. More than $9.3 million of that money was spent on materials to oppose or support candidates, according to VoteIdaho.gov, an official website managed by the Idaho Secretary of State.
'We've never seen that before, so it's our intention to do a little bit better job of identifying who's sending that money in here, where that money's coming from and what it's getting spent on,' House Speaker Mike Moyle, R-Star, said about the legislation. 'The voters deserve to know that.'
Moyle, alongside House State Affairs Committee Chairman Brent Crane, R-Nampa, introduced four bills to the committee, including:
House Bill 306, which would establish 'criminal libel,' is a bill to make it a felony for someone to publish false statements about another person, establishing a maximum $100,000 fine, imprisonment for at most five years, or both.
House Bill 307 is a bill to allow the Idaho Secretary of State Office to investigate false claims against a candidate and publish its findings on its website.
House Bill 308 is a bill to require electioneering communications costing more than $1,000 to be reported within 24 hours closer to primary and general elections, and require political committees to upload materials they make about a candidate or campaign to the Idaho Secretary of website.
House Bill 309 is a bill which would require lobbyists to disclose expenses on a weekly basis during the legislative session and a monthly basis outside of session.
The legislation has support from Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane, who said in a press conference before the committee meeting began that Idahoans have a right to know who is trying to influence their opinions during elections and who is trying to influence lawmakers.
'You can see it playing out in this session where there's a lot of pressure,' McGrane said. 'If you go to the speaker of the pro tem's office, they've got stacks of postcards from some of these organizations putting pressure on the process, and so adding transparency and disclosure is a key part of this effort.'
Crane said the legislation addresses what he considers 'monetization of politics,' or wealthy groups outside of Idaho getting involved in the state's politics.
Out-of-state campaign spending responsible for many of Idaho's negative campaign ads
'I'm extremely concerned,' Crane told the committee. 'In fact, I'm angry about the out-of-state money that is being spent to influence the outcome of elections in Idaho. If I had a magic wand and I could do what I wanted to do, it would be only Idaho dollars spent on Idaho elections.'
In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruled campaign contributions are protected free speech, thus allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited money on political campaigns. The legislation introduced on Friday is meant to enhance campaign finance transparency, Crane said.
'We just want to let you know that we take it seriously when out of state money is being spent, especially dark money out of state,' Crane said.
During the 2024 primary election, the political committee that spent the most to oppose Idaho legislative candidates was the Make Liberty Win PAC, based in Virginia. The committee spent $716,000 to support and oppose Idaho candidates in 2024. Moyle was one of the candidates the PAC attacked the most, with $112,000 spent against him during the primary, IdahoEd News reported. The political committee sent mailers across his district falsely labeling him as 'anti-gun,' KTVB reported.
The committee voted to advance the bills for a full hearing at a later date. Crane said he would give the legislation a few weeks to circulate among legislators until then.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Andrew Cuomo aide and Eric Adams trade social media blows as NYC mayoral campaign heats up: ‘Which private club was this sent from?'
New York City's general election for mayor is still more than four months away — but the mudslinging has already started. Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat running on an independent line in the November contest, sparred with a longtime Andrew Cuomo aide on social media — after she called out Hizzoner's penchant for clubbing. '12:01am tweeting – which private club was this sent from? Or were you busy smoking cigars with more antisemites at the time of the tweet?' Cuomo lieutenant Melissa DeRosa zinged at Adams Thursday. Advertisement 4 Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and longtime Andrew Cuomo aide Melissa DeRosa clashed on social media after the Cuomo lieutenant called out Adams for constantly going clubbing. Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images DeRosa — a fierce backer of Cuomo's comeback bid for mayor who worked as his right-hand in the governor's office — had amplified a New York Times story reporting that Adams' Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Kaz Daughtry was working with ICE on immigration raids. 'Thank god this city has Jessica Tisch @NYPDPC at the helm, or one can only imagine what @ericadamsfornyc and his admin would be doing to bend to Trump's will,' she wrote. Advertisement The mayor shot back with his own choice words shortly after midnight. 'Agreed. Jessica Tisch — second woman NYPD commissioner — is leading the department because I appointed her. And she's delivering results. Andrew Cuomo? He's running for office because he got run out of office?' he posted. DeRosa then slammed Adams' love of nightlife, while also bringing up his recent controversial interview with antisemitic podcaster Sneako over cigars at Gracie Mansion. 4 DeRosa took to X to call out Adams, sending a tweet at 12:01 am speculating that he was at a club or smoking cigars. Eric Adams/X Advertisement Adams hit back, posting: 'I was en route to the Crane Club,' a luxury Chelsea steakhouse that also boasts a members-only club within the restaurant. 'Crime is down, nightlife is back, and the $30 billion industry is helping to rebuild the economy @andrewcuomo tanked with his failed policies like bail reform,' the mayor posted from his campaign account. 'Eric Adams: Delivers. Never quits.' 4 Adams fired back and responded that he was on his way to the Crane club while also taking a shot at mayoral hopeful and Democratic nominee for mayor, Andrew Cuomo. Getty Images Advertisement To political observers, the social media spat was sign that November's election is heating up and likely only to get nastier along the way. Political consultant Chris Sosa said that DeRosa's posts were indicative of Cuomo's political style but that there was little the campaign could gain from it. 'This is the Andrew Cuomo way – insult, antagonize and bully, even when there's nothing to be gained. It's not new to anyone who's had to deal with Andrew in Albany,' he said. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 'But favorably citing the NYPD commissioner to score a point against the mayor who appointed her is head scratcher.' Bill Cunningham, a former Communications Director for Mayor Bloomberg and staffer, agreed that Cuomo's camp came off looking worse in the tiff, and predicted that the general election 'could be very vicious.' 'This episode shows Adams as pretty handy in the clinches. Cuomo people should take heed that when they spot an opening they don't fall into it,' he said. 4 Adams is seen as a long shot to win the mayoral election, while running as an independent, with Cuomo still the front runner to win the Democratic nomination for mayor of New York City. Getty Images Advertisement 'No one voting now or on Tuesday gave a rat's hindquarters about where and when Adams was tweeting. All Melissa did was give him a free shot,' Cunningham added, referring to the June 24 Democratic mayoral primary, in which Cuomo is the frontrunner to get the party's nomination. Cuomo rep Rich Azzopardi fired back even harder in response to an inquiry from The Post. 'He's a desperate man who sold out the city to President Trump for his own personal benefit. We wish the MAGA mayor well with whatever administration appointment he gets come January,' Azzopardi snipped about Adams. Advertisement Adams campaign spokesperson Todd Shapiro said that mayor was more focused on delivering results for New Yorkers than 'social media theatrics.' 'Mayor Adams is focused on good government, not political mudslinging,' he said in a statement. 'We're not going to be distracted by the noise. This campaign is about leadership, not likes' The mayor has previously defended his late nights at members-only clubs like Zero Bond, saying, 'I hang out with the boys at night and I get up with the men in the morning.'
Time Magazine
16 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Man Arrested After Ohio Rep. Max Miller Reports He Was ‘Run Off the Road'
A man accused of threatening U.S. Rep. Max Miller and his family, using antisemitic slurs, and running the lawmaker off the road has been arrested amid mounting political violence against elected officials. The suspect allegedly threatened the Ohio Congressman, who is Jewish and supports Israel, on Thursday morning and called for the death of Israel, the Congressmen, and his family, according to a video shared by Miller Thursday. The individual also waved the Palestinian flag at him, Miller added. Authorities have identified the man as Feras S. Hamdan of Westlake, Ohio. The Rocky River Police Department said the suspect ran Miller off the road on Interstate 90 and left the area before law enforcement arrived. The 36-year-old suspect voluntarily turned himself in, according to police, and is awaiting a court appearance. 'What happened to Max this morning is yet another outrageous example of unhinged rhetoric inspiring unstable people to threaten and attack elected officials who are serving their communities,' wrote Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday. 'We must turn down the temperature in this country.' The incident comes following the shocking shooting of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses last weekend. Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were killed in what authorities described as a premeditated attack during which an assailant disguised himself as law enforcement and shot the victims at their home. Another Minnesota Democrat, state senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, were also shot multiple times and hospitalized. Both survived. A suspect has since been arrested and is facing multiple federal and state charges. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries also denounced the attack on Miller, calling on Congress to take action in response to this 'moment of crisis' to "ensure the safety of every single Member who serves in the People's House.' Research shows that political violence in the U.S. has been on the rise. The number of threats and other statements directed towards members of Congress, their family members, and staffers increased from nearly 4,000 in 2017 to 9,625 in 2021, per the U.S. Capitol Police. President Donald Trump was subject to two assassination attempts during his campaign last year.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Don't pass a ‘Big Beautiful Blue-State Bailout' bill
As the Senate considers the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, blue state Republican House members are pledging to hold $4 trillion in tax relief hostage if the state and local tax or SALT deduction provision in the House-passed version is altered. The current language of the bill allows up to $40,000 in federal tax deductions for state and local tax expenses. Capping the SALT deduction at $10,000 was a big achievement of the 2017 tax bill. SALT is a blue state giveaway that shields politicians in high-tax states from accountability. Eliminating it entirely would pressure these governments to reform their fiscal ways. Although the House-passed bill thankfully would prevent a massive tax hike on millions of Americans, this egregious provision must be fixed in the Senate. SALT rigs the tax code in favor of the worst-managed states, forcing taxpayers in Florida and Texas to pick up the tab for New York City, Chicago, and San Francisco. This is simply unjust and antithetical to the very purpose of the tax code. Under current law, taxpayers who itemize can deduct up to $10,000 of SALT from their federal taxable income, reducing their federal tax bill. Capping this giveaway was an important policy win of the Trump-Pence Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and paid for lowering the corporate tax rate. But even with the current limits, taxpayers in fiscally responsible states are subsidizing bloated governments elsewhere. For high-income earners, this deduction reduces federal taxes owed by more than $400 for every $1,000 in state and local taxes paid. Instead of being content with the wildly generous $10,000 deduction, the SALT Caucus demands a dramatic lifting of the cap — or else subject Americans to the trillions of dollars in tax increases in 2026. Voters in places like California and New York continue to elect politicians who overspend and overtax in a vicious cycle that leaves American families picking up the tab. Constituents of the SALT Caucus should focus their energy on restoring fiscal sanity to their own states before asking Texas, Florida, and the rest of middle America to pick up the tab. Unsurprisingly, before the cap was imposed in 2017, California and New York (population 59 million) received 33 percent of SALT benefits while less than 7 percent of such benefits went to residents of Florida and Texas (combined population: 55 million). Thanks to SALT, Blue state residents pay thousands less in federal taxes per year. To illustrate a SALT deduction with a proposed $40,000 cap, consider two hypothetical families — one in New Jersey and one in Tennessee. Both are married with $400,000 personal income each year, spending $100,000 on consumer goods, with a residence worth $700,000. The family in Tennessee family would pay $11,060 in state and local taxes per year, with a SALT deduction value of $3,539. The family in New Jersey would pay $36,920 in state and local taxes per year, with a SALT deduction of $11,814. The SALT subsidy results in our Tennessee family paying a whopping $8,275 more in federal taxes than its counterpart in New Jersey. This family is funding public schools, roads, police, and fire not only in the Volunteer State but in the Garden State as well! Millions of American families have left New York, New Jersey, and California for lower-tax states. Meanwhile, the SALT Caucus insists these political refugees fund the very, bloated governments from which they fled. SALT subsidy proponents denounce repeal as a federal 'revenue grab.' But making the current $10,000 SALT cap permanent would turbocharge the economy by providing nearly $1 trillion over the next decade for broad-based permanent tax cuts. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) derides SALT repeal as 'double taxation.' He is wrong on two counts. True double taxation occurs when one level of government taxes the same income twice, like corporate income taxes followed by dividend taxes, which both hit shareholders. But federal and state taxes are levied by two distinct sovereign entities with distinct constitutional roles providing distinct public services. The only 'double taxation' related to SALT is that it requires Tennessee taxpayers to foot the bill of their own state, plus a legion of big-spending Blue states. Without the SALT deduction, taxpayers in high-tax states like New Jersey — burdened by public sector unions, corruption, and fiscal malfeasance — would feel the full weight of their states' policies. Residents would surely demand lower taxes and smarter budgets. Congress should prioritize job creators, investors, and workers rather than entrenched state bureaucracies. The tax code should reward innovation rather than reward egregiously high state and local taxes. It's time to end — not expand — the SALT deduction. Paul Teller is executive vice president of Advancing American Freedom, where Joel Griffith is a senior fellow.
