All about Sean Diddy's leagal team the 'Bad Boy for Life' rapper hired using his $800M war chest
Armed with an estimated £800 million fortune, Sean "Diddy" Combs is sparing no expense as he faces a slate of serious charges—including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and prostitution. With prosecutors alleging that the hip-hop mogul used coercion and violence to secure sexual acts and protect his empire, a conviction could put him behind bars for life.
#Operation Sindoor
The damage done at Pak bases as India strikes to avenge Pahalgam
Why Pakistan pleaded to end hostilities
Kashmir's Pahalgam sparks Karachi's nightmare
But Combs, who coined the iconic phrase "Bad Boy for Life," is fighting back with a powerhouse legal team boasting over 150 years of combined courtroom experience. The high-profile group includes lawyers who've defended some of the most infamous names in recent history—from alleged UnitedHealthcare CEO killer Luigi Mangione to disgraced pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli and rapper Young Thug.
Combs has pleaded not guilty, denied all allegations, and recently turned down a plea deal. His legal strategy is expected to rest on the argument that all sexual encounters were consensual, according to ABC reports.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Co-Founder of Google Brain, Andrew Ng, Recommends: "These 5 Books Will Turn Your Life Around"
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Leading the Charge: Marc Agnifilo
At the forefront of Combs' defense is veteran trial lawyer
Marc Agnifilo
, known for navigating high-stakes and high-profile cases. His client list reads like a courtroom who's who: NXIVM cult leader Keith Raniere, "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli, and ex-Goldman Sachs banker Roger Ng.
Raniere was sentenced to 120 years for operating a secretive sex cult; Shkreli received seven years for securities fraud; and Ng got a 10-year sentence for his role in a $1.66 billion bribery scheme.
Live Events
Agnifilo, a former state and federal prosecutor, has tried more than 200 cases over his 30-year career. He's also one half of a legal power couple—his wife, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, is a former Manhattan DA who once investigated the Trump Organization and recently defended Luigi Mangione in a murder case.
Teny Geragos: Legal Legacy in Action
Also on the defense team is Teny Geragos, co-founder of the Agnifilo Intrater law firm. Like her colleague, she's defended notorious figures like Raniere and Shkreli.
A 2016 graduate of Loyola Law School, Geragos is the daughter of famed defense attorney Mark Geragos, who's represented clients including Hunter Biden, Chris Brown, and Michael Jackson.
Although Mark Geragos is not officially part of Combs' legal team, he made headlines during jury selection when prosecutors accused him of violating court rules by discussing the case on his podcast.
Mark is also currently working to secure the release of the Menendez brothers, more than 35 years after their conviction for the murder of their parents.
Alexandra Shapiro: The Appeals Expert
Bringing deep appellate experience to the team is Alexandra Shapiro. A former deputy chief of appeals for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan, she once advised the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel and clerked for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Shapiro is currently handling Sam Bankman-Fried's appeal following his recent conviction, and she has argued multiple cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Interestingly, the judge overseeing Combs' trial also once clerked for Ginsburg, though during a different period.
Brian Steel: Battle-Tested in the South
Most recently added to the defense roster is Atlanta-based attorney Brian Steel, best known for representing rapper Young Thug in Georgia's longest-running criminal trial.
Steel gained national attention after he was briefly jailed for contempt when he refused to reveal how he learned about a private meeting between a witness, prosecutors, and the judge—a ruling that was later overturned. His client ultimately avoided a long prison sentence despite multiple guilty pleas.
With a legal dream team like this, Combs is clearly preparing for a long and bitter courtroom battle. Whether their combined firepower can keep him out of prison remains to be seen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Pak-backed BKI terror module busted, one held with 6 pistols
Jun 22, 2025 07:26 AM IST Amritsar commissionerate police on Saturday dismantled a Pakistan-backed Babbar Khalsa International (BKI) terror module operated by UK-based handler Dharam Singh alias Dharma Sandhu. The weapons, smuggled via drones from across the border include four 9MM Glock pistols and two .30-bore PX5 pistols. (HT) Police have arrested a local operative of the module and recovered six foreign-made pistols from his possession, director general of police Gaurav Yadav said. The arrested accused has been identified as Onkar Singh alias Nawab, a resident of Jalalusma village in Amritsar. The weapons, smuggled via drones from across the border include four 9MM Glock pistols and two .30-bore PX5 pistols. The DGP said foreign-based handler Dharam Singh, who has been operating the terror module, is a close associate of Pak-based terrorist Harvinder Singh alias Rinda. Further investigations are underway to establish forward and backward linkages in this case and unearth the broader network, he said. Sharing operation details, Amritsar commissioner of police (CP) Gurpreet Singh Bhullar said the arrest followed precise intelligence and coordination. 'The accused disclosed during interrogation that the weapons were delivered via drones and were meant for disruptive activities,' he added. He said preliminary investigations revealed the accused was part of a sleeper cell activated by foreign-based handlers to destabilise the state. 'The weapons were to be distributed among local operatives to execute targeted killings and terror activities in the state. We are working to uncover the entire network and its international linkages,' Bhullar said, adding that further investigations are underway to identify other accomplices and handlers. A case under the Arms Act has been registered at Maqboolpura police station in Amritsar.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
After Pahalgam, what is the counterterrorism grid in Jammu and Kashmir up against?
Two months ago, on April 22, a group of militants gunned down 25 tourists holidaying in the meadows of Pahalgam in South Kashmir. A local man was also killed. Even by the standards of violence seen in Kashmir's 36-year-old armed insurgency, the targeted killing of tourists was a first. It pushed India and Pakistan to the brink of war. On May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor and carried out military strikes on alleged terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The four-day conflict eventually came to an end following the purported intervention of the United States. But the attackers of Pahalgam are still untraced. The National Investigation Agency has taken over the investigation but there has been no major breakthrough in the case. The Pahalgam attack came at a time when the Centre's grip over the restive region was absolute and militancy-related violence was at its lowest. After New Delhi scrapped Jammu and Kashmir's special status under Article 370 of the Constitution and downsized it from a state to a Union territory, it has ruled the region directly with the security establishment under the central government's exclusive control. For the counterinsurgency grid in Jammu and Kashmir, the April 22 terror strike has left behind several questions. Scroll spoke to security officials in Kashmir, who mapped the landscape in which they now operate post-Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor. They contended that the Pahalgam attackers had crossed a 'red line'. 'The line between who can be targeted and who cannot has blurred in the eyes of terrorists,' said a senior police officer in Kashmir. 'After Pahalgam, we are working on the assumption that they can go for any soft target.' In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, security forces detained around 2,800 individuals for questioning, most of whom were eventually released. In addition, more than a hundred individuals, with past records of militancy, have been detained under the preventive detention law Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The security agencies also demolished the homes of the families of around nine active local and Pakistan-based militants to send a message. Yet, success has eluded them. Security officials told Scroll that they are up against a lack of strong intelligence, the evolving tactics of hardened Pakistan-backed militants in Kashmir – and the possibility of a new front opening up in the skies through drones. A new militancy After 2019, the Centre carried out a widespread crackdown on militancy and its support system in Kashmir. As a result, local recruitment to militant ranks drastically went down. According to government officials, there are only seven active militants from Kashmir Valley at the moment – the lowest since militancy broke out in 1989. However, the number of foreign militants has continued to remain in two digits owing to infiltration from across the border. Even if few, these militants have made their presence felt in the last six years. 'How does a terrorist show his presence? It's not that a militant will leisurely walk with a gun on a street to show he exists. He needs to attack someone in order to show that they exist,' said a second police officer, not wishing to be identified by name. 'A single militant with a gun can kill 100 people if there's no gun against him.' Among the many tactics adopted by these militants is choosing what the security officials describe as 'soft targets' – like migrant workers, and members of the minority community. From August 5, 2019, to July 9, 2022, 118 civilians were killed in militancy-related incidents across Jammu and Kashmir, the Minister of State for Home Affairs told Parliament. Five of the dead were Kashmiri Pandits and 16 belonged to other Hindu or Sikh communities. Observers see the Pahalgam incident as part of the same continuum of tactics. 'Counter-terrorism is a cat-and-mouse game,' explained retired Lieutenant General Deependra Singh Hooda, former Northern Commander of the Indian Army. 'The terrorists observe the tactics of the security forces and they look for weaklings, soft spots and areas with weak presence of security forces.' The dip in intelligence Conventionally, the counter-insurgency policy adopted by the security forces in Jammu and Kashmir involved reliance on quality intelligence, a third police officer explained. 'Once terrorists started using mobile phones, technical intelligence was key to eliminating them,' the officer said. 'Plus, terrorists hiding in populated areas would also lead to human intelligence on them. As a result, it's easier to nail them down and neutralise them,' the officer added. Over the last few years, the third officer conceded, there has been a considerable impact on the quality of the intelligence primarily as a result of the different tactics adopted by the militants. 'Technology is an evolving spectrum and we have seen terrorists using high-end encrypted communication devices which are difficult to intercept. As a result, the technical inputs have gone dry to an extent,' the officer explained. Human intelligence, too, has suffered. One of the key strategies adopted by militants post-2019 is that they have largely avoided staying in populated areas. 'The cost of aiding militants has increased manifold because of the government,' the officer said. 'Therefore, anyone who was sheltering militants would find his house seized and himself in jail. While this helped in creating fear and a deterrence among over-ground workers, it also compelled terrorists to stay deep inside jungles. The net result was that human intelligence on them was not much because they were not seeking shelter among the people.' Besides the change in tactics, the officer added, the terrorists seemed to be well-trained and prepared for jungle warfare, particularly in the Jammu region. In the last five years, ostensibly well-trained Pakistani militants have carried out multiple precision strikes or ambushes against the security forces in the challenging and dense topography of Jammu hinterland. Militants from across the border infiltrate into Jammu region via Kathua and Samba districts, which sit on the international border with Pakistan. Once inside the Indian territory, the militants then venture deep into other districts of the region while navigating a dense terrain and challenging topography. 'The assumption with the Pahalgam attack is also that the terrorists who carried it out came from across the border and had been active in the mountainous areas along the border dividing Kashmir Valley and Jammu region,' explained the first senior police officer. In most cases, the militants are adept at surviving in deep jungles. 'They rely on dry rations and mostly take food once a day,' said the third police officer. 'They hardly venture into civilian areas and even when they do, they will pick an isolated house, take whatever they need and never come back to that house again.' That the militants are highly trained is also reflected in the weaponry and type of attacks they have carried out in the last few years. 'These are terrorists who wear body cameras to shoot their action and then use that footage for propaganda…in most of the attacks, the slain soldiers had been shot in the upper parts of their body or head suggesting that these are professionally trained foreign terrorists,' he added. 'In almost every attack, we have seen the use of US-made M4 carbine rifles.' Significantly, none of these militants tracked down by security forces in the Jammu region has given up without a fight. 'It's possible to get a good amount of information from a militant if he's arrested alive but in this case these terrorists have preferred to fight till death than surrender.' 'Challenge of drones' During the four-day-long military clashes between India and Pakistan in May, Indian security forces spotted massive drone activity across the length and breadth of Jammu and Kashmir. While these drones were not able to create any significant damage, the fact that Pakistani drones could land up in the heart of Srinagar city was not lost on anyone. The security establishment has been aware of this aspect of warfare for some years now. In 2020, then Director General of Jammu and Kashmir Police, Dilbag Singh, had pointed out a new tactic adopted by the militants across the border. 'Pakistan has been trying to send arms and ammunition to militants through drones. We have detected several such incidents in the past," Singh told reporters in Srinagar. Weapons had been delivered via unmanned aerial vehicles, Singh added, in border areas of Jammu and Kashmir including Jammu's Kathua and Rajouri and along the line of control in Kupwara in North Kashmir. Less than a year later in June 2021, Indian Air Force's Jammu station was hit by two improvised explosive devices that had been dropped by low-flying drones. While there was no significant damage, this was something new. Since the early 2000s, drones have increasingly become part of modern warfare with the United States using UAVs to hit targets in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Prior to this groups like Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Houthis have used drones as a part of their military arsenal. However, the 2021 attack was arguably the first time drones had entered the landscape of militancy in Jammu and Kashmir. After Operation Sindoor, the threat of drones being used for combative use has become more real than ever – and it is one that the Jammu and Kashmir's security establishment is not taking lightly. 'Not only the armies but even terrorists have used drones in many regions of the globe and this is not the first time we have anticipated such a thing,' the first senior police officer added. 'Having seen what Pakistan tried to do during the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, we cannot ignore the possibility of terrorists also using drones for their actions.' On June 16, Jammu and Kashmir union territory administration declared all the routes leading to the Amarnath holy cave as a 'no flying zone'. As per the orders, no one is allowed to use 'any kind of aviation platforms' including drones and balloons during the duration of the yatra that begins from July 1 and goes on till August 10. According to the administration, the decision was taken on the 'advice' of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Retired Lieutenant General Hooda, who was the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Indian army's Northern Command during the 2016 'surgical strike' in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, said the concern of the security establishment in Jammu and Kashmir regarding drones is rightly placed. 'After seeing how drone technology has been used in Ukraine, I anticipate that for not just the Pakistani military but even the non-state actors, the use of drones is a feasibility they will adopt.' Given their readiness of use, low cost and capacity to go unnoticed, Hooda added, the security establishment has to be proactive. 'Drones are easy to fly and very difficult to protect against. They are so small that one often doesn't even notice how suddenly they appear. We have already seen an attack on the Jammu airbase,' Hooda remarked, referring to the June 2021 attack on Jammu station of the Indian Air Force. 'So now, when it comes to security force establishments, sensitive areas, and sensitive targets, we have to be extremely concerned and careful.'
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Pahalgam probe: In hunt for gunmen, 2 possibilities on radar
New Delhi: The manhunt for the Pahalgam attackers continues with no arrests since the April 22 assault at Baisaran meadow. (PTI) Indian security forces are pursuing two theories about the whereabouts of three terrorists who killed 26 tourists in Kashmir two months ago, with officials divided over whether the attackers remain in hiding or have fled to Pakistan. The manhunt for the Pahalgam attackers continues with no arrests since the April 22 assault at Baisaran meadow, according to three security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. Authorities have identified the suspected attackers as Hashim Musa, also known as Suleiman, and Ali Bhai, also called Talha Bhai — both Pakistani nationals — and local operative Adil Hussain Thokker. The government has offered rewards of ₹ 20 lakh for each suspect. Initial eyewitness accounts suggested four to five terrorists could have been involved, though security forces have so far identified these three. Security agencies are split between two assessments of the terrorists' location, the officials said, citing these as based on 'tell-tale signs' and 'intelligence assessments'. The first theory suggests the same group was involved in a May 22 gun battle with security forces in Kishtwar's dense forests, where one army soldier was killed and two others wounded. Officials believe the attackers then fled deeper into the jungle towards the Doda-Kishtwar-Ramban border region and may have crossed into Pakistan. The second assessment holds that the terrorists remain hidden in the Tral ridge area, avoiding electronic communication with Pakistani handlers or local contacts. 'Both theories are based on intelligence assessments and have been discussed in detail by the Army, paramilitary forces and Jammu and Kashmir police,' said one official. 'But there is no definite answer.' Most security officials favour the second theory, citing heavy troop deployment near the border following the attack and continuous satellite surveillance. The National Investigation Agency, which is formally investigating the case, has questioned hundreds of people over two months, including suspected collaborators, pony operators, vendors and tourism workers. Investigators have also examined videos and photographs taken by families at Baisaran that day. Since the April attack, security forces have killed six terrorists in separate encounters across Kashmir, but the Pahalgam attackers remain at large. The Resistance Front, a proxy group for the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba organisation, claimed responsibility for the attack. Indian agencies say the group is a front used by Pakistan to avoid international sanctions. As first reported by HT on April 24, intelligence agencies traced the attack's digital communications to safe houses in Muzaffarabad and Karachi, establishing Pakistani involvement in what officials described as similar to the control room-operated 2008 Mumbai attacks. India responded with Operation Sindoor on May 7, bombing nine terrorist camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in pre-dawn strikes that killed at least 100 militants. The operation sparked four days of cross-border fighting involving fighter jets, missiles and artillery. On the night of May 9-10, the Indian Air Force struck targets at 13 Pakistani airbases and military installations before hostilities ended on May 10. Last week, the Financial Action Task Force condemned the Pahalgam attack, saying such operations require significant funding and money transfer capabilities between terrorist supporters. India also raised the attack at a United Nations meeting in Vienna last month, accusing Pakistan-based groups including Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad of orchestrating attacks on Indian soil.
