Second Air India 787 Incident in 4 Days Sparks Fresh Safety Concerns

An Air India flight bound for New Delhi was forced to return to Hong Kong shortly after takeoff on Monday due to what the airline called a "technical issue" — the second serious incident involving one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliners in less than a week.
CBS News reported that Flight AI315 departed as scheduled from Hong Kong but turned around midair after pilots reported a mechanical concern. The aircraft landed safely at approximately 1 p.m. local time and was undergoing checks "as a matter of abundant precaution," Air India said in a statement.
The incident follows Thursday's catastrophic crash of Flight AI171, also a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which slammed into a residential area in Ahmedabad, India, just minutes after takeoff. That crash claimed the lives of 241 passengers and crew, along with at least 29 people on the ground. One British passenger survived.The timing and aircraft model overlap has raised eyebrows. Both flights were 787 Dreamliners, and both events occurred within days of each other. While no injuries were reported in Monday's turnback, the proximity to Thursday's tragedy has heightened public scrutiny.
In response to the crash, Indian aviation authorities ordered Air India to conduct enhanced safety checks on all 787 aircraft in its fleet. Despite that, no orders have been issued to ground the aircraft.
Boeing has not released a statement regarding the Hong Kong incident but is reportedly assisting with the ongoing investigation into the Ahmedabad crash.
Air India has arranged alternative travel for the affected Hong Kong passengers.
More than 360 Boeing 787-8 aircraft are currently in service worldwide. American Airlines operates the largest number of them. The model is prized for its fuel efficiency but has had a complicated safety history.
While Monday's incident ended without injury, two serious events involving the same aircraft type in under a week have reignited questions about reliability and whether more stringent oversight is now overdue.Second Air India 787 Incident in 4 Days Sparks Fresh Safety Concerns first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 16, 2025

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

5 hours ago

• Yahoo

Here's Why Airbus Shares Took Off Today

A solid performance on orders at the Paris Air Show bolstered prospects at Airbus. The mix of orders was spread across wide-bodies, such as the A350, all the way down to smaller aircraft like the A220. 10 stocks we like better than Airbus SE › Shares in aerospace giant Airbus (OTC: EADSY) rose by as much as 3.1% in early trading as the Paris Air Show concluded for industry professionals (it remains open to the public until Sunday). Airbus had a lot to say and $21 billion in orders to announce , but unfortunately, its great rival, Boeing (NYSE: BA), had very little to say. While Boeing didn't release an official statement on the matter, it's widely reported that Boeing scaled down its participation and elected not to announce new orders following a recent Air India crash involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Boeing had previously announced it would offer full support for the investigation currently taking place. Consequently, Airbus took center stage in the commercial aerospace industry, announcing $14.2 billion in firm orders and a further $6.7 billion under memoranda of understanding (MoUs). Among the 148 firm orders was the first-ever order from LOT Polish Airlines for 40 A220 aircraft. All Nippon Airways, a subsidiary, ordered 27 A321 airplanes. Riyadh Air of Saudi Arabia ordered 25 A350 wide-bodies and will be the first Saudi airline to fly the 350. Vietnam's VietJet signed an MoU for 100 Airbus A321neo aircraft. The strength in A350 (which competes with the Boeing 787) and A321 orders (a highly successful plane Boeing is struggling to compete with) is a continuation of an order trend this year. Meanwhile, the 40 A220 orders are a shot in the arm for an aircraft that Airbus has found it difficult to sign deals on in the last year or so. Overall, it was a positive air show for Airbus, and that's reflected in the stock price today. Before you buy stock in Airbus SE, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Airbus SE wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's Why Airbus Shares Took Off Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

CNBC

8 hours ago

• CNBC

The scale of Trump's 'Golden Dome' is a boon for defense stocks even if it isn't completed, says Bernstein

Major defense stocks can still benefit even if President Donald Trump 's "Golden Dome" project fails, according to Bernstein. The prospect of completing the missile defense system before the end of Trump's term in 2029, which the president has cited as his goal for the project, is highly unlikely, analyst Douglas Harned wrote in a note to clients last week. However, that doesn't mean the effort won't drive business for the defense industry, he said. "Even if the system fails to deliver, we expect elements to survive and for companies to profit off efforts, even when they do not succeed — and spending could go much higher," Harned said. Creating such an expansive defense system will likely require contributions and cooperation from the entire industry, Harned explained. Also, Trump has also mentioned extending contracts to some nontraditional companies, Harned said, adding that this decision may not make the project any easier. "While we see little chance that the system will be complete within three years, we expect money will be spent and benefit most major defense contractors," he said. Harned expects L3Harris Technologies , RTX, Northrop Grumman , Lockheed Martin , BAE Systems and Boeing will be among the beneficiaries. Bernstein rates Boeing and L3Harris Technologies overweight, and has a market perform rating on the rest. Harned's $273 per share price target on L3Harris implies nearly 10% upside from Wednesday's $248.83 close, while his $249 price target for Boeing suggests roughly 25% upside. Boeing shares closed at $197.68 on Wednesday, giving it a 13% year to date gain. L3Harris shares are up 19% over the same period. (Markets were closed Thursday.) Trump estimated last month that the project will cost roughly $175 billion, but Harned anticipates it will ultimately cost more than that. About $25 billion has already been included in the 2026 U.S. defense budget, according to Trump. The project's ambitions are a big challenge, according to the analyst. "In order to truly defend the entire US," he said, "it will be necessary to go back to a complex multi-layered system, that can address a wide range of attacks." "The cost of true coverage of the US will be extreme, with the problem that the system would always need to evolve as enemies evolve their capabilities," Harned said. "The situation is analogous to cybersecurity. It is much less expensive to attack than it is to defend."

Travel Weekly

14 hours ago

• Travel Weekly

Air India's deadly crash could set back its ambitious growth plans

NEW DELHI, India -- Just 10 days before Air India Flight 171 crashed into a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad, killing 270 people aboard and on the ground, company CEO Campbell Wilson held a briefing with the global aviation media, where he laid out the airline's grand ambitions. "Anywhere we point an aircraft, I think we can probably fill it," Wilson stated confidently that morning here, where the IATA Annual General Meeting was taking place. Indeed, in the three-and-a-half years since India's Tata Group acquired the long-neglected carrier from the Indian government, it has been investing aggressively. Its goal: to reinvent Air India as a service-oriented airline, ready to take advantage of the economic dynamics that industry insiders widely believe make India's aviation sector primed for a wave of growth. Since being acquired by Tata, Air India has ordered 570 aircraft, including nearly 520 that have yet to be delivered. The airline has also completed mergers with Vistara and AirAsia India, both of which were already owned by Tata. Buoyed by the Vistara merger, Air India has more than doubled its international weekly frequencies since going private and has sharply boosted domestic flying. But now, as accident investigators search for the cause of the Flight 171 crash, the airline faces a new and different challenge. "No airline CEO wants to face a challenge of this magnitude," said John Strickland, director of London-based JLS Consulting. "But when you are trying to turn around an airline from decades of state ownership and revolving-door management and political interference, it makes it even harder." Even before Flight 171 went down, the Air India transformation was a daunting project. Underinvestment during its long period of state ownership had left the carrier with antiquated cabin interiors and obsolete IT systems, Wilson said. There had been no recruitment of nonflying staff for 20 years. When Tata bought the airline, one-third of the fleet was grounded and being cannibalized for parts. The airline has since put all but one of those 30 grounded planes back in the sky, spent $200 million to replace 43 IT systems and recruited 6,000 new employees. Buoyed by the addition of Vistara's modern fleet and by deliveries of new aircraft, including six Airbus A350 planes, 50% of Air India's fleet now offers either new or upgraded interiors, Wilson said. Still, there is much work to do. The airline has plans to retrofit 40 widebody aircraft by 2028, and in the meantime it is doing a lighter freshening of 13 Boeing 777s to tide it over while it awaits seat replacement availability. Operationally, Air India is still a laggard. In May, the carrier was on time 71% of the time, placing it in the bottom 15% of global carriers, according to OAG. India aviation ministry records show that for the fiscal year that ended on March 31, Air India was on time just 68% of the time, according to the New Delhi-based magazine BW Businessworld. The airline also continued to suffer net losses in 2024-25 fiscal year, though it did record an operating profit as turnaround efforts progressed, according to Indian media sources. Indian macroeconomics have been behind the Tata Group's investment plans. IndiaNote is set to surpass Japan as the world's fourth-largest economy. And through 2050, growth will average 5.4% annually, according to a forecast by the London-based consultancy the Economist Intelligence Unit. Meanwhile, even though India is the world's biggest country by population, Indian airlines are operating just 69 widebody aircraft, according to Bloomberg Intelligence fleet data -- a figure that is lower than the widebody fleet of Singapore Airlines alone. Lacking the capacity to meet demand, India has largely ceded international air service to foreign operators, especially the Gulf carriers. Indian airlines have just 21% of Indian international market share, Wilson said. Also, while India does have the third-largest domestic airline industry in the world, it's still just one-seventh the size of similarly populous China's, IATA figures show. "If the Indian traveler starts traveling at the same rate as the Chinese travelers, it's going to be enormous," Wilson said at the IATA conference. But, for now, growth ambitions will take a back seat at Air India as it deals with the Flight 171 tragedy. On June 16, the airline's chairman, N. Chandrasekaran, told employees at a company town hall that the tragedy should serve as a catalyst to build a safer airline, various media reported. Investigators could take months to determine the cause of the crash. If mechanical or technical issues with the flight's Boeing 787 Dreamliner or General Electric GENx engine are ultimately found responsible, Air India's reputational damage would be less dramatic than if the airline's own safety protocols failed. But no matter what, Strickland said, the accident dents the carrier's progress. "It's not like the airline was top of the heap in terms of reputation and loyalty from customers," he said. "Whatever the cause, it means that management will have to redouble their focus to prove that they can deliver a safe, reliable and high-quality product."