Capitol View: Maternal Health, columnist John Brummett
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – One of the bigger issues over this last legislative session was addressing Arkansas's maternal healthcare crisis.
Capitol View host Roby Brock met with UAMS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Chair Dr. Nirvana Manning and Arkansans for Improving Maternal Health executive director Ashley Bearden Campbell about the impact of some legislation passed for the benefit of mothers.
Roby then talks with Arkansas Democrat-Gazette columnist John Brummett to talk about a host of political issues.
Capitol View airs on Sundays at 8:30 a.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Oz nudges Senate Republicans to ease off on Medicaid cuts
House Republicans are aiming to slash funding for the nonpartisan watchdog for waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government by nearly half in the next fiscal year, according to spending bill text released Sunday night. The House Appropriations subcommittee funding Congress and its support agencies, led by chairman David Valadao (R-Calif.), is set to mark up their fiscal 2026 measure Monday evening, with the full committee set to act Thursday. The Legislative Branch bill would provide $6.7 billion — $51 million below the current funding level, which was set in fiscal 2024. Per tradition, the House bill does not touch any Senate funding. 'Chairman Valadao's bill puts the American people first — in strengthening the institutions that represent them, protecting effective governance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars,' said House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a statement. The deepest cuts in the bill are to the Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress that would see a $396.5 million reduction from current levels to $415.4 million. GAO has served as the nation's chief investigator of wrongdoing at federal agencies for more than a century, but has been fighting for months as Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration have attempted to undercut its legal conclusions and independence. Now, they are attempting to shrink the agency into submission as it pursues nearly 40 investigations into whether the White House is illegally withholding, or 'impounding,' money Congress had previously approved. Also tucked into the bill is a major policy change that would eliminate the GAO's ability to bring civil action against the executive branch over impoundments of funds. 'GAO's work makes it possible for the legislative branch to hold government accountable,' said Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute. 'Congress needs independent expert advice, which is exactly what GAO provides.' Also on the chopping block is the Library of Congress, which is another legislative branch agency also engaged in a power struggle against intrusion by the Trump administration. The bill allocates $767.6 million for the Library of Congress, which is $84.5 million below the current funding level and $133.7 million below the FY26 request. 'This bill does nothing to safeguard against the growing levels of executive overreach into legislative branch agencies,' said Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the legislative branch subcommittee. Some other key provisions in the GOP-written bill include: Capitol Police: The Capitol Police would see a $84.4 million boost to their funding under the bill, bringing the total to $891 million. Some lawmakers had asked for an increase in office funding for use for security, but the bill flat-funds the Members Representational Allowance, which can be used for some member security purposes. Member Pay: The bill would continue the member pay freeze that has been in effect since 2013, halting automatic cost of living increases that members of Congress are supposed to get under law. Gay marriage: The bill includes language that prohibits discrimination against any person who 'speaks, or acts' in accordance with a 'sincerely held religious belief, or moral conviction, that marriage is, or should be recognized as, a union of one man and one woman.'
Politico
43 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump federal court nominee Bove to testify Wednesday
House Republicans are aiming to slash funding for the nonpartisan watchdog for waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government by nearly half in the next fiscal year, according to spending bill text released Sunday night. The House Appropriations subcommittee funding Congress and its support agencies, led by chairman David Valadao (R-Calif.), is set to mark up their fiscal 2026 measure Monday evening, with the full committee set to act Thursday. The Legislative Branch bill would provide $6.7 billion — $51 million below the current funding level, which was set in fiscal 2024. Per tradition, the House bill does not touch any Senate funding. 'Chairman Valadao's bill puts the American people first — in strengthening the institutions that represent them, protecting effective governance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars,' said House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a statement. The deepest cuts in the bill are to the Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress that would see a $396.5 million reduction from current levels to $415.4 million. GAO has served as the nation's chief investigator of wrongdoing at federal agencies for more than a century, but has been fighting for months as Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration have attempted to undercut its legal conclusions and independence. Now, they are attempting to shrink the agency into submission as it pursues nearly 40 investigations into whether the White House is illegally withholding, or 'impounding,' money Congress had previously approved. Also tucked into the bill is a major policy change that would eliminate the GAO's ability to bring civil action against the executive branch over impoundments of funds. 'GAO's work makes it possible for the legislative branch to hold government accountable,' said Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute. 'Congress needs independent expert advice, which is exactly what GAO provides.' Also on the chopping block is the Library of Congress, which is another legislative branch agency also engaged in a power struggle against intrusion by the Trump administration. The bill allocates $767.6 million for the Library of Congress, which is $84.5 million below the current funding level and $133.7 million below the FY26 request. 'This bill does nothing to safeguard against the growing levels of executive overreach into legislative branch agencies,' said Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the legislative branch subcommittee. Some other key provisions in the GOP-written bill include: Capitol Police: The Capitol Police would see a $84.4 million boost to their funding under the bill, bringing the total to $891 million. Some lawmakers had asked for an increase in office funding for use for security, but the bill flat-funds the Members Representational Allowance, which can be used for some member security purposes. Member Pay: The bill would continue the member pay freeze that has been in effect since 2013, halting automatic cost of living increases that members of Congress are supposed to get under law. Gay marriage: The bill includes language that prohibits discrimination against any person who 'speaks, or acts' in accordance with a 'sincerely held religious belief, or moral conviction, that marriage is, or should be recognized as, a union of one man and one woman.'
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Melinda French Gates says some tech titans siding with Trump are doing ‘what some comms person' tells them instead of living by their values
Silicon Valley has seen a noticeable shift to the right, with several tech leaders engaging more closely with the current administration, a trend Melinda French Gates views critically, especially when it comes to leaders not living by their stated values. The shift in Silicon Valley in the lead-up to, and since, the presidential election has been marked. Billionaire tech titans have been in and out of the White House and Trump's residence at Mar-a-Lago, with many lending their voices to the second Trump administration. But Melinda French Gates, a veteran of the tech scene since her early days working for Microsoft, is concerned by Silicon Valley's political shift to the right, particularly when powerful individuals aren't living by their values. French Gates's ex-husband, Bill Gates, sat down with the president after he won the Oval Office and spoke with Trump about his philanthropic efforts. Since then, Microsoft's cofounder has been unimpressed by some of the actions taken by the White House, namely through its Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by Tesla CEO Elon Musk. While Musk was a major financial and political partner to the Trump 2.0 team, the ranks of those affiliating themselves with the current administration include Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Apple CEO Tim Cook, all of whom were given prime spots for the president's January inauguration. But a wider shift to the right among the tech community has also been observed by people like venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who said dinner parties in Silicon Valley are now split across the political spectrum, where previously most leaned left. Andreessen, who was previously a self-described Democrat 'in good standing,' told a podcast earlier this year that there are now two types of dinner parties, one being 'the ones where every person there believes every single thing that was in the New York Times that day…and that is what they talk about at the dinner party. And I'm no longer invited to those, nor do I want to go to them.' French Gates, on the other hand, said now more than ever, people in power should be sticking to their values, having previously told Fortune she intends to set more of an agenda in the U.S. Speaking on the latest episode of Bloomberg's The Circuit podcast, the billionaire philanthropist and businesswoman said: 'What I have seen in the last six months to a year is, many people who used to say one thing have absolutely shifted over here,' she said—gesturing to the right. 'A democracy is made up by our beliefs and our investments and our values. We, of all times right now, should be living those values out, not pivoting to what some comms person tells us is the right thing to do. That would be ridiculous.' Like her former husband and cofounder at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, French Gates was critical of the supreme power awarded to Tesla CEO Elon Musk as a special government employee. While the relationship between Musk and Trump has now cooled off somewhat, French Gates—an advocate for women's and girls' rights—added that handing an entrepreneur with private business interests so much power was 'unprecedented' and 'made no sense' to her. Shifts toward a more right-wing mentality have also been observed across corporate America as DEI initiatives have been scaled back. Here, French Gates said, history will not be kind to the companies that undid some of their policies fostering diversity, equality, and inclusion. 'You have to look at society,' the philanthropist said. 'Who's in our society right now and does our democracy, do our state legislatures and does our Senate or our Congress look like society? The answer is no. 'The reason you need to have of all society representative in the legislature in any governing body is because they make good policy based on their lived experience.' Data supports French Gates's opinion. While the 119th Congress is the most racially and ethnically diverse group in history, it remains far less diverse than the American population as a whole. In January, Pew Research found 139 of today's senators and representatives identify as Black, Hispanic, Asian American, or Native American, continuing a trend of Congress becoming more diverse. However, this figure is still a long way off the social makeup of the voters the legislative body represents. Pew found that non-Hispanic white people make up a larger share of Congress (74%) than the overall population (58%), indeed the gap is about as wide as it was more than 40 years ago in 1981, when 94% of congressional lawmakers were white, compared with 80% of the U.S. population. This story was originally featured on
