‘Over' versus ‘under' toilet paper debate finally settled
Don't miss out on the headlines from Lifestyle. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The position of a toilet paper roll may seem innocuous, but TP trustees have long been embroiled in a heated debate over the proper angle of the next square.
There are two types of people in the world: The 'over' devotees who hang the roll so the on-deck wipe is facing the user, and the 'under' fans who position it so it's closer to the wall.
Thankfully, a professional has finally closed the book on the matter — a whopping 250 years since the hygiene tool's invention.
Are you 'over' or 'under'? Picture: iStock
Primrose Freestone, professor of clinical microbiology at the UK's University of Leicester, says the somewhat counterintuitive 'under' position is more hygienic and effective — despite the original 1800s patent showing the roll in the more natural-seeming 'over' orientation, the Daily Mail reported.
'For the under position, there is less likely to be whole roll contamination,' Freestone argued.
That's because 'handling of the toilet roll from the over position' requires the user to employ two hands to extract a square after doing one's business, per the microbiologist.
One hand is used to hold the roll in place so it doesn't keep spinning forward and depositing too much paper, while the other takes the next segment.
On the other hand, the 'under' method allows bathroom users to 'pin the sheets against the toilet wall' and tear them off with the same mitt without 'having to touch the exterior of the roll,' Freestone said.
'For the under position, there is less likely to be whole roll contamination,' Freestone said. Picture: iStock
The position of a toilet paper roll has been debated for years. Picture: iStock
By only using one hand to harvest a square, the odds of transferring hand bacteria to the toilet tissue and perhaps vice versa are reduced.
Meanwhile, using two hands increases the chances of spreading germs from one hand to the other.
'If someone who has wiped, say, once and the faecal matter has soaked through the layers of toilet paper and makes hand contact, the presumably right hand that did the wiping will likely be contaminated,' explained Freestone. 'Then that right hand may contaminate anything it touches as the toilet user reaches for more toilet paper, which they then fold for wipe two, possibly touching the left hand as it does so.'
This is especially important given that both hands have, by the time we've sat down on the toilet, likely touched multiple microbe-laden surfaces from the doorknob to the toilet seat and lid. Even seemingly harmless items like bath mats are dirtier than toilet seats, research suggests.
Women are most at risk of getting infected. Picture: iStock
Freestone said public rest rooms are of particular concern due to excrement potentially contaminating the toilet door, stall, seat and other areas.
Women, meanwhile, are the most at risk of getting infected via accidentally transferring microbes from the groin to the genitalia. On average, they also use more paper for both peeing and pooping.
Interestingly, Freestone's theory is not shared by everyone.
Dr Christian Moro, an associate professor of health sciences and medicine at Bond University in Australia, claimed that the 'under' method is the 'hanging' offence as it ups the likelihood that the toilet user will 'touch the wall behind when fishing for paper, leaving germs behind on that surface which can be spread to the next user.'
Coincidentally, studies show that 70 per cent of people still prefer it compared to 30 per cent in favour of the 'under.'
This article originally appeared in New York Post and was reproduced with permission
Originally published as 'Over' versus 'under' toilet paper debate finally settled
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Kate breaks silence after abruptly cancelling Ascot appearance
IN LONDON The Princess of Wales has released a heartfelt statement just days after pulling out of Royal Ascot at the last minute. Kate, 43, released a personal note on Friday, UK, speaking about the life-changing work of children's hospices. Royal-watchers were left disappointed earlier this week after it emerged that she'd had to cancel her scheduled appearance in the royal carriage procession alongside the King, Queen and Prince William at the iconic raceground, after also missing it last year due to her cancer treatment. In her statement on Friday, which was shared in honour of the UK's Children's Hospice Week, the princess expressed her gratitude for the vital care provided by those working with sick children. 'No parent expects to hear that their child has a serious health condition that could shorten their life,' Kate wrote. 'Sadly, this is the reality faced by thousands of families across the country, leaving them heartbroken, fearful of the future and often desperately isolated. 'Being able to access the support of one of the UK's 54 children's hospices means they don't have to face that future alone.' The princess has been Royal Patron of East Anglia Children's Hospices for more than a decade, and this year also became the Royal Patron of TÅ· Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales. 'As Patron of East Anglia's Children's Hospices and TÅ· Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales, I have the immense privilege of seeing for myself the extraordinary work of our children's hospices,' she said. 'Lifting spirits through laughter, fun and play, as well as listening, holding, caring and sharing, they support children and families through life, death and beyond. 'This Children's Hospice Week, I hope you will join me in celebrating the life-changing work they do and thanking them for the vital care they provide to children and families experiencing the most challenging times.' Despite being on a positive trajectory since announcing her gradual return to public duties following the completion of her chemotherapy, there were concerns on Wednesday when Kate pulled out of the racing event at the last minute. She had already been listed to travel in the second carriage of the royal procession, alongside her husband. However, a short time later it was confirmed by Kensington Palace that Kate would not be attending, with local media reporting she was 'disappointed' but was having to 'find the right balance as she fully returns to public facing engagements'. It came after a busy week for the Princess of Wales, who attended a series of events including Trooping the Colour, in the days leading up to Ascot. Back in January, she revealed she was in remission from cancer, which she had first publicly disclosed last March. Last September, she released an emotional video message, featuring personal footage of herself with William and their three children, opening up about the challenges they'd all been privately battling – but also proudly announced she had completed her treatment.
News.com.au
17 hours ago
- News.com.au
What your doctors are writing about you behind your back
Have you ever wondered what your doctor is really thinking about you when you're sitting in their office? The truth is, the world of medicine has long been home to its own secret language – shorthand acronyms and slang that doctors use to communicate about patients to other healthcare staff, often behind their backs. However, this is somewhat of a dying art, as today's medical slang now largely exists in whispered conversations or informal notes. These colloquialisms rarely make their way into a patient's official records, because they're often considered unethical and potentially offensive. Also, using them could result in legal trouble for doctors or hospitals if patients discovered them and decided to pursue legal action. Adam Fox, a collector of medical slang, once shared an example from one of his annual reports to the BBC. A practitioner had written 'TTFO', meaning 'told to f**k off', on a patient's chart. When asked about the entry in court, the practitioner had to pretend the initials stood for 'to take fluids orally'. Another reason for the decline in this sort of slang is that they may be confused with genuine medical terms, potentially leading to misunderstandings. Leading GP, Dr. Zac, tells that he remembers an incident where this happened. 'A patient ended up suing – and winning – after she overheard a clinician referring to 'the cow in the room',' he says. 'She assumed she was being insulted. But the reality was that the clinician had been venting about a COW: a 'Computer on Wheels' that was malfunctioning again (as they often do). 'The context was lost, and what followed was a legal headache no one needed, but it served as a wake-up call. Ever since then, there's been a push to remove any language that could be easily misconstrued, especially when emotions are already heightened in a hospital setting.' According to ex-TedxSydney founder, Remo Giuffre, who explored this phenomenon in his book series Remorandum, some of the codes include: ART: Ain't Right There (patient has an unusual demeanour or behaviour) BWCO: Baby Won't Come Out (needs Caesarian) CFL: Chronic Frustrated Lawyer (frustrated patient who threatens legal action frequently) CSTO/DSTO: Cat/Dog Smarter Than Owner (used by vets) CTD: Circling the Drain (a critically ill patient who is deteriorating) DBI: Dirt Bag Index (this multiplies the number of tattoos by the number of missing teeth to give an estimate of the number of days since the patient last bathed) DUB: Damn Ugly Baby EGO: Excessive Gas Output (patients with frequent flatulence complaints) FF: Frequent Flyer (patient who frequently visits the ER for non-emergency issues) FLK w/ GLM: Funny-Looking Kid with a Good Looking Mum FUBAR: F**ked Up Beyond All Recognition (extremely complex or difficult situation) FURB: Funny, Unusual, Rectal Blockage (people who use unusual objects in their anus) GOK: God Only Knows (patient with symptoms that are baffling or defy a clear diagnosis) GOMER: Get Out of My Emergency Room GPO: Good for Parts Only (patients whose injuries may mean they are unlikely to survive) GRAFOB: Grim Reaper At Foot Of Bed LOBNH: Lights On But Nobody Home (patients who are alert but mentally absent) LOFA: Lack of F**king Ability (patients who struggle with simple tasks or who seem helpless) LOLINAD: Little Old Lady In No Apparent Distress NQR: Not Quite Right (patient who doesn't have a clear diagnosis but isn't healthy either) PITA: Pain In The A** TEETH: Tried Everything Else, Try Homeopathy (chronic cases that resist standard treatment) TMB: Too Many Birthdays (elderly patients, often with multiple chronic issues due to age) TOBP: Tired of Being Pregnant (especially patient demanding Caesarian) TSTL: Too Stupid To Live (patients engaging in extremely risky or unhealthy behaviour) UBI: Unexplained Beer Injury (injuries of unknown origin associated with alcohol consumption) VIP Syndrome: A high-status patient who expects special treatment that disrupts standard care WADA: Weak And Dizzy All-over (patients with vague, non-specific symptoms) Dr Zac says that while most of these terms are on the way out, some acronyms still hold a strong clinical place and are routinely used in day-to-day care. These are the ones that serve a real purpose in communication and patient safety, not 'cheap laughs', he says. Here are a few that remain in standard use: FAST – Face, Arms, Speech, Time (stroke recognition tool) ABCDE – Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (standard trauma and emergency assessment structure) SOAP – Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (common structure for medical notes) PEARL – Pupils Equal And Reactive to Light (used in neurological exams) AVPU – Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (used to measure level of consciousness) 'So while the cheeky acronyms of old might still make the rounds on Reddit or late-night handover jokes, in practice, they've mostly been replaced with clearer, standardised terminology,' Dr Zac says. 'And maybe that's a good thing.'
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Jourdan Dunn donates blood and calls for more black heritage donors
Model Jourdan Dunn has highlighted the need for more black heritage donors to come forward to give blood – as she provided a blood donation herself. Dunn, known for appearing on the catwalks of London, Paris and New York, attended the capital's newest blood donation centre in Brixton, south London, to mark World Sickle Cell Day. Dunn's teenage son Riley is one of the country's 13,000 sickle cell patients who rely on blood transfusions from black heritage donors so they can live with the condition.
