Call for lollipop people to be brought back at Peterborough schools

Parents have called on a council to reinstate school crossing patrols before a "tragedy strikes".Peterborough City Council (PCC) cut the patrols (also known as lollipop people) near primary schools in Eye, Fletton, Newark Hill and Werrington in Cambridgeshire to help balance its budget.However, parents want them brought back and in a petition, said their removal put "children's lives at risk".Angus Ellis, cabinet member for environment and transport at PCC told the BBC it was one of the "difficult decisions" councillors had to make, and "20mph zones are in place" near the schools.
Mum Kerri Deboo, whose children attended Werrington Primary School, said she was "really concerned by the local authority's recent decision". "There are lots of different vehicles... often at quite high speeds despite the fact there are signs for the crossing," she said."There is no way my children - aged four and seven - can cross this road safely on their own. I would never feel safe that the cars would stop here."Parents at the schools protesting against the plans started a petition which said: "Let's not wait for a child to be injured or killed before we take action - we call on councillors to do it before tragedy strikes."
South Norfolk Labour MP Ben Goldborough said he had great support for lollipop people."Just opposite my constituency office, there is a brilliant one - Paul," he told BBC Politics East."They are not just about road safety, they are about community engagement and cohesion."They are the glue that binds our small villages and towns together."East Suffolk independent councillor Julia Ewart said: "The lollipop people are guardians of schools. "They make sure your children are getting there safely and they know children who aren't there, and that's important too."Conservative South Northamptonshire MP Sarah Bool added: "We need to give much more attention to how we keep our communities safe and particularly our little children."
'Education for pupils'
Ellis said a "proposal to remove the school crossing patrol service at four schools in Peterborough was agreed as part of the council's budget for 2024-25". "It is one of a number of difficult decisions councillors have had to make to be able to balance the budget," he added. "Crossings and or speed restrictions such as 20mph zones are in place at each of the schools, and we are also providing road safety education for pupils."
BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday 18 May at 10:00 GMT on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC iPlayer.Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

33 minutes ago

• The Sun

My Rotherham grooming gang rapist was offered access to our son from jail… it felt like his rights were put before mine

SHE was viciously raped and beaten hundreds of times, forced to have an abortion and used 'like a sex doll' from the age of just 14. Grooming gang victim Sammy Woodhouse gave birth to her rapist's baby - yet even when her abuser was behind bars her ordeal wasn't over. 4 4 The 39-year-old mum, targeted in Rotherham, South Yorks, had a child at 15 following sexual and physical abuse by gang ringleader Arshid Hussain. She said she had to face a further 'nightmare' when she was told the convicted paedophile could apply for parental rights over her son, despite serving a 35-year prison sentence. After being repeatedly abused from the age of 14, Sammy has tirelessly campaigned for victims. She welcomes the newly announced national inquiry but called Sir Keir Starmer 'vile' for initially opposing it, then finally making a humiliating U-turn last week as he travelled to the G7 conference in Canada. Sammy told The Sun on Sunday: 'I support a national inquiry as long as it will bring real change. They're saying it could take three years, but I'd wait a lifetime if it's effective. 'As well as holding people to account — including those in positions of power at the council, police and social services — I'm hoping it will address the issue of children born to perpetrators. 'Almost laughable' 'I haven't seen anything yet about abusers losing parental rights to children conceived as a result of rape, and that is something I have been campaigning for since 2018. 'Surely it's just common sense that they should be stripped of having access to their kids born as a result of grooming?' She said of her own son, born as a result of rape: 'Rotherham Council invited his father to apply for parental rights over my child without informing me, even though it was proven in court that he was a danger to myself and other children. 'It was another nightmare I had to live through. He'd had no involvement with my son, was in prison for the abuse I suffered, and wasn't even on the birth certificate. 'But I was told that the council had reached out to him — he hadn't even requested access himself — because human rights laws meant he had a right to family life. 'It's almost laughable. What about my rights, my son's rights?' Sammy's campaign to change the law has been backed by politicians including Rotherham MP Sarah Champion and former shadow policing minister Louise Haigh. Ms Champion said ministers could sign off new guidance making it clear that any rapist, abuser, or anyone who is a risk to a child does not have the right to comment on their future, adding: 'They could do that today but they don't. 'They sort of shove it out to councils to make their interpretations.' As it stands, the law allows a father to apply through courts for access or visitation rights to his children. That means he could have a say over his child's education, healthcare and where they can live. The victim and their children would have to attend court and could be cross-examined — having to relive the trauma all over again. A law introduced last year means perpetrators will automatically have parental responsibility stripped, but it applies only to those who have raped a victim aged under 13. It also applies only when someone has abused their own child or stepchild. CHANGE TO LAW IS VITAL By Natalie Fleet, Labour MP, Bolsover ONE in four of us has been raped or sexually assaulted, yet barely anyone is speaking about it. My rape was statutory rape, I was 15 and he was an older man. I have my birth certificate, my daughters, and a DNA test that proves it. Most women don't have that kind of proof a rape has been committed. That's why I'm using my platform to speak out about rape, despite me wishing it wasn't my story to tell. We estimate there are ten births per day from rape in the UK, yet there is no advice on the NHS website to tell you where to get help, no charity to support you, very few laws to protect you. I'm fighting for a change to the law. As it stands, a man can rape a woman, cause a pregnancy and have rights over the child he does not deserve. I'm tabling an amendment to the Victim and Courts Bill that means where a child is born as a result of rape, the father does not get parental responsibility. It's shocking children are the only proceed of crime a criminal can have lifelong access to. I'm determined to change that. Sammy, who has written a book about her ordeal, Just A Child, bravely waived her right to lifetime anonymity to expose the Rotherham grooming scandal. But she became pregnant at 15 in 1999, so the law would not apply to her. She said: 'I don't see how the Government can carry out a national inquiry and fail to address this huge issue. It hasn't just affected me and my son — so many victims of grooming gangs have suffered the same. 'It has happened all over the country, not just Rotherham. 'Children are being removed, being given to rapists and murderers, for their families to have access. I call it child trafficking through the system. 'Rape victims are also having to go to support centres to share access and see the men that raped them. 4 4 'Women and children are being put at direct risk. It's just wrong, plain and simple.' Arshid 'Mad Ash' Hussain, who is ten years older than Sammy, was jailed in 2016 for 23 offences including rape and assault on victims as young as 11. He is not named on Sammy's son's birth certificate and has never had parental responsibility for him under its legal definition. But he was listed as a respondent in court proceedings instigated by Rotherham Council in 2017. Officials told him he could seek visits from his son and promised to keep him informed of all future proceedings. At a family court hearing, Sammy was told — with no prior warning — that Hussain could attend and seek legal representation. He chose not to, but would have been entitled to request visitation rights, or for his son to be given into the custody of his relatives. I just felt like a dead body on a slab in a morgue. Sammy Woodhouse Sammy said: 'Thankfully he never wanted any part in his son's life so never applied. But the point is, he should never have been given the option. I felt like his rights were put before mine or my son's.' In a statement at the time, Rotherham Council said: 'At no stage has it been the intention of the council to put any child at risk, or to allow any convicted child sexual exploitation offender to have care of any child.' It sought clarification from the Ministry of Justice as to how legal directions relating to Family Court proceedings should be applied. An MoJ statement said: 'Local authorities can apply to courts to request permission not to notify parents without parental responsibility about care proceedings, and courts should consider the potential harm to the child and mother when making this decision. 'This is obviously a very distressing incident and the relevant departments and local authority will work urgently to understand and address the failings in this case.' Victims' Commissioner Baroness Newlove said it was a 'perverse situation', adding: 'A victim of the worst sexual violence faced the prospect of continuing to be abused by her perpetrator, this time via the family courts.' Sammy's 2018 campaign calling for the amendment of the 1989 Children Act to 'ban any male with a child conceived by rape from applying for access/rights' attracted nearly half a million signatures. 'Absolute monster' She is also campaigning for grooming gang victims to have their criminal convictions quashed when they were coerced into crimes by their abusers. And she wants those in positions of power who turned a blind eye to the gangs to be held to account. She said: 'They should face criminal convictions. It's the only way to stop it happening in the future. 'At the very least, they should be stripped of their pensions.' Sammy has also campaigned — successfully — for children born from rape to be legally recognised as victims, so they can access any support they may need. She felt passionate about the issue after witnessing at first hand how hard it was for her son to come to learn that his father was a rapist. The new law was introduced in 2023, making England and Wales among the first nations in the world to officially confer victim status to children born of rape. Sammy was subjected to horrendous abuse from the age of 14, including rape, assaults and coercion, with threats to kill her family at the hands of Hussain. She has previously said: 'I was pretty much his sex doll. He was an absolute monster. 'I just felt like a dead body on a slab in a morgue.' In 2013, after years of abuse, she approached The Times anonymously with her claims. The resulting coverage led to the 2014 Jay Inquiry, which exposed the Rotherham gang and led to the discovery of more than 1,400 abuse victims in the town between 1997 and 2013.

The Sun

43 minutes ago

• The Sun

I thought I'd welcome assisted dying after mum's drawn-out death but vote terrifies me… MPs must stop ignoring experts

EVERYBODY deserves the right to have a dignified death, and many will welcome the passing of the assisted dying bill. After watching my own mother suffer a drawn-out, hideous death I have often thought I would have welcomed a law like this too. 10 10 But Friday's vote terrifies me. I now fear for those of us who want an assisted death, as well as those of us who do want to stay alive. A decision of this magnitude should never have been a private members' bill, it should have been presided over by Government ministers. Corners have been cut, fundamental decisions left up in the air, and advice ignored in a desperate bid to rush it through. That seems senseless when this bill really is a matter of life and death. The first frightening milestone was when the plans to have a High Court judge approve each case were changed because the court doesn't have the capacity to preside over it. But the NHS doesn't have the staff to spare either. Now, to have an assisted death it will need two doctors, a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. Anybody who has been stuck in the NHS system needing to see any of those knows that there are not enough to go round as it is. And if anybody voting on Friday had stopped to listen, they would have heard many doctors saying they want no part in assisting suicide. Which means that dying people spend their final — precious — days battling to get an assisted death. Our own Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was opposed to it because it would mean the NHS now has less money for other priorities. But he was ignored. Former Home Secretary Sir James Cleverly warned a 'blank cheque' would be needed to get the service up and running. But he was ignored. Doctors said it will be a 'real threat' to patients and medics because the NHS, already under-resourced and overspent, can't cope with this extra burden. Again, they were ignored. And nobody, cruelly, bothered to listen to the charities involved in hospices and disability who voiced their concerns. I just hope the House of Lords does the decent thing now and stops to listen — and stop this bill going ahead. Because our crumbling NHS hasn't got the time, or money, to deal with it. Added pressure Figures released on Friday show that the establishment of a voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and panels will cost about £13million a year. I imagine that really is the tip of the iceberg. This huge sum will have to come from somewhere — and one of the biggest areas will be palliative care. The bill's backers say healthcare costs at the end of life could be reduced by almost £60million after ten years. Which is great news, unless you actually don't want to die. Now our underfunded palliative care will get less cash, there will be fewer places for vulnerable and weak people to access, more pressure on them, well . . . to die. They may feel they have no other option but to say yes to the doctor — who is now actually legally allowed to ask them if they want an assisted death. We will watch helplessly as people who have fought to live all their lives give up because they have little other option. Just how scandalous is that? Our NHS can't cope right now. They are paying BILLIONS a year in compensation claims for clinical negligence. This added pressure will see those cases rise. Meanwhile, NHS waiting lists will get longer and we will see more people dying who could have been saved. While those who actually wanted help with their death will die long before they get to the front of the queue. I THOUGHT we'd seen it all when Sharon Stone uncrossed her legs in Basic Instinct. But in a racy new shoot for Vogue, the 67-year-old actress strips off to be worshipped by a sultry pile of hunky male models. 10 10 Nice work if you can get it. And yet she claims to struggle with everyday concerns because: 'When it comes to life, we're all the same.' I get the sentiment Shaz. But when you're a millionaire film star I imagine there's an awful lot less to worry about. HUE 'N' CRY IS CRAZY AFTER touring a lab in Norwich with Prince William to learn about fabric dye, actress Cate Blanchett says she will reconsider the colour of clothes she wears in the future. Apparently, colours such as black, green, blue and even white are difficult to make without causing damage to the environment. 10 You've got to feel sorry for the celebs who may now be judged on their colour choices as well as fashion ones. Take Geri Horner, who has vowed to wear only white and hails it as 'a symbol of purity, cleanliness, immaculacy and perfection'. Nope, now it also means you don't care about the environment. AS a farmer's daughter I have always had a touch of vegaphobia, finding vegans a bit smug and self righteous. So I couldn't help smirking when the founder of the toxic gossip website Tattle Life was unmasked and turned out to be Sebastian Bond, a very annoying, vegan blogger. Perfect. THERE are two words that are guaranteed to send a shiver down the spine of 'booze o'clock' mums and they are 'wine shortage'. But start stockpiling, ladies, as it's about to happen. 10 Workers at the country's biggest bottling plant are going on strike. Gallons of New World wines are shipped to the UK in containers and bottled here to save transporting millions of heavy glass bottles. I predict Prime-style stampedes for the last bottle of Sauvignon Blanc in Tesco. CAN'T KID ME KATE APPARENTLY if parents tell their kids they are naughty, the chances are that they are going to be naughty. Sounds madness but child therapist and former BBC newsreader Kate Silverton explains that children internalise what we tell them and start to believe 'that's who I am'. So instead, parents should say: 'I didn't like that behaviour.' Which, when you think about it, does actually make sense. And I was fully on board with Kate's advice until she added that children 'are not making conscious choices for the majority of the time'. Hmm, she clearly didn't see the grin on my six-year-old's face this morning – trust me, he was definitely choosing to be naughty and most certainly knew what he was doing wrong. ANGE'S BUZZIN' SHE'S blunt, bolshie and terrifies the Tories. And this week Angela Rayner did battle in the Commons with one of her four tattoos on display. 10 As she took to the dispatch box, the Deputy Prime Minister did not seem to care who saw Celtic love knot on her wrist. It may have raised a few eyebrows in the debating chamber, but she also has a red rose on her leg and a geometric design on the back of her neck. Then there is the bee on her right shoulder, a symbol of Manchester's resilience and community spirit in the wake of the 2017 terrorist attack. Even her harshest critics can't argue with that.

Sky News

44 minutes ago

• Sky News

Palestine Action: The 'enemy within' or non-violent protesters?

The impending ban on protest group Palestine Action has divided opinion - described as both "outrageous" and "long overdue". Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to take the step after the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on e-scooters and sprayed two Voyager planes with red paint. The prime minister described the attack as "outrageous" and a rapid review of security at MoD bases is under way. It was the latest protest in a five-year campaign from Palestine Action (PA) that has targeted arms manufacturers, financial institutions, political figures and government buildings. Red spray paint has become its signature. On its website, PA says it is a "direct action movement" committed to ending "global participation" in what it calls Israel's "genocidal and apartheid regime". It adds that it uses "disruptive tactics" to target "corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex". Banning the group would make membership of it illegal. It would be treated as a terrorist organisation. Singer-songwriter Paloma Faith, who spoke at a pro-Palestine rally in Whitehall in central London on Saturday, told Sky News she was "devastated" by the move. "I have met some of the people who have friends in that group. They are young students and they are basically trying to do something because they feel that our government is failing them." She added that "everyone" wants to end what she described as a "massacre" in Gaza. Israel says its military campaign in Gaza is a way of defending itself against Hamas, which killed more than a thousand people in its 7 October attacks and took about 240 people hostage. Hamas-run health authorities claim Israeli attacks have since killed almost 56,000 people in Gaza. 1:49 Faith continued: "When you scribble on something, or paint on it, it's a non-violent protest and it shouldn't be made at the same level as a violent protest - it is unjust." Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, backed Palestine Action's use of non-violent protest. He told Sky News: "There has been a place for that in all political movements in history. "In the struggle for the rights of black people in the US, in the struggle against apartheid in South Africa, in the struggle for women to have the vote, people took forms of non-violent direct action. "Imagine if we had the current [situation] back in those days - we would have been proscribing the suffragettes, treating them as terrorists." Others have welcomed the move. Lord Walney, who served as the government's independent adviser on political violence, told Sky News the decision was "long overdue". "Palestine Action have acted as the enemy within which is why it's right, now, to crack down on them," he said. "They have terrorised working people for a number of years and there's a number of serious violent charges that are going through the court system at the moment." The UK government is expected to announce its decision early next week.