U.S. Army can't "continue to buy VCRs" amid global security shift

The U.S. Army Transformation Initiative trotted out by service leaders last month is just the tip of the iceberg.
There will be additional pivots, debates, cuts and media appearances.
Why it matters: "The risk is in not changing," Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George told Axios during an interview in his Pentagon office.
"We've got to get better by 2026," he said, shrugging off longer-term ambitions like the Army of 2030 or 2040. "I think we have to be improving on a day-by-day, week-by-week basis."
State of play: The changes introduced May 1 — combining Army Futures and Training and Doctrine commands, shifting to mobile brigade combat teams, axing AH-64D Apaches and M10 Bookers and more — are colloquially known as "1.0."
There's "going to be 2.0 and 3.0," George said, "and that's how we need to look at it."
He did not say what each iteration might comprise or target. Officials have claimed ATI will save some $48 billion over the next five years.
Context: The goal is to produce a force that can shoot and kill more accurately from farther away while also being harder to detect, especially on the electromagnetic spectrum.
"World events will tell you that we need to make adjustments," George said. (We spoke just days after Ukraine's surprise Spiderweb drone assault.)
"We don't want to continue to buy VCRs just because that's what people are producing."
Between the lines: Expect the fruits of canceled programs to be applied elsewhere.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

9 hours ago

• Yahoo

2 aircraft carriers, 9 destroyers, and multiple fighter wings gather in the Middle East

As fighting between Israel and Iran carries on for a second week, the United States continues to build up its already large presence in the Middle East. For the last 20 months, U.S. forces have sent ground, air, and naval assets into the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, both as deterrents against Iran and as part of more than a year of fighting against the Houthis in Yemen. There are approximately 40,000 U.S. troops in the area currently, including a Navy carrier strike group with another on the way, several fighter squadrons and two of the United States' Terminal High Altitude Area Defense or THAAD systems, one of its most advanced missile defense interceptors. The Pentagon recently sent additional air and naval assets to the area, as the Trump administration threatens to potentially attack Iran, out of the stated intent of stopping Tehran from getting a nuclear bomb, though American intelligence found in March that the country is not pursuing development of nuclear weapons. The military maintains 10 bases in the region, including major installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as smaller outposts in Jordan and Syria, among others. There are also additional forces and support infrastructure in Turkey and Djibouti, although those are not under CENTCOM's purview, which covers the Middle East, Egypt, and much of Central Asia, including Afghanistan and Pakistan. There are currently 2,500 service members in Iraq and roughly 1,500 in Syria. They are there primarily as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the ongoing anti-ISIS fight. American forces are starting a drawdown from Syria but still maintain posts in the country's south and east. In Iraq, U.S. soldiers have at least two MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries — one in Irbil in Iraqi Kurdistan and another at the al-Asad airbase in the country's west. Both have seen action in past interception missions over the Middle East. Additionally, two THAAD air defense systems, operated by roughly 100 American soldiers each, are deployed to Israel. The USS Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group is in the Arabian Sea. Along with the carrier and its embarked Carrier Air Wing 2, the task force includes the guided-missile cruiser USS Princeton and the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers USS Sterett and USS William P. Lawrence. Carrier Air Wing 2 includes close to 50 fighters and strike aircraft across three squadrons of F/A-18E/F strike fighters and one squadron each of F-35C fighters and E/A-18G Growler electronic warfare fighters. Three other destroyers, the USS Sullivans, the USS Arleigh Burke, and the USS Thomas Hudner, are in the eastern Mediterranean. The USS Thomas Hudner had previously taken part in interceptions of Houthi missiles in late 2023. Another pair of independent destroyers are in the Red Sea, per USNI News. In Bahrain, the headquarters of the 5th Fleet, the Navy also has four anti-mining vessels. Soon to join the Carl Vinson is the USS Nimitz, whose deployment to the region was moved up earlier this month. The Nimitz, on its final operational deployment before being decommissioned, will arrive with four guided-missile destroyers and similar air power to the Vinson with Carrier Air Wing 17. Originally meant to replace the Carl Vinson, the two carrier groups will overlap in their deployment to the CENTCOM area of responsibility, a tactic that has been regularly used in the last 20 months. The U.S. Air Force also maintains a strong presence at some of CENTCOM's major bases. Ali al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait hosts the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, while the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing is in Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Both installations include dozens of combat aircraft as well as military drones such as the MQ-9 Reaper. Air Force jets proved to be a major part of the successful interception operation in April 2024, when American and other partner forces shot down dozens of Iranian drones and ballistic missiles aimed at Israel. In the last week, more than two dozen Air Force refueling tankers flew across the Atlantic to the Middle East and Europe, in a buildup of logistical support. Earlier this week, Reuters reported that an unspecified number of F-16, F-22, and F-35 fighter jets were being sent over. Outside of the CENTCOM area of responsibility, U.S. forces also maintain bombers and other aircraft at their Indian Ocean base on the island of Diego Garcia. That strategic outpost — jointly operated with the United Kingdom — is a staging base for B-2 bombers. B-2s were briefly sent over earlier in the spring. Their ability to be based there has been a major discussion point this week as the U.S. weighs targeting Iranian nuclear facilities — the Fordo nuclear site is several hundred feet underground, too deep for most bombing campaigns but within the destructive range of the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs, which only the B-2 can carry. If the ongoing fighting in the Middle East were to spread, many of these installations and vessels in the region could be at risk. Many were targeted by pro-Iran militias inside Iraq over the last two years, as regional violence picked up as the Israeli war in Gaza began. In his own warning amid back-and-forth threats, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, posted to social media this week that 'The harm the U.S. will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily.' During the two stages of fighting around Yemen over the past 20 months, Houthis repeatedly fired one-way attack drones and missiles towards Navy ships, which were all intercepted. Meanwhile, several militias active in Syria and Iraq fired multiple barrages of rockets and drones at various American and coalition bases in multiple countries in the area. Dozens were injured, including receiving traumatic brain injuries as a result. The dangers of shorter-ranged attacks were already proven last year, when three Army reserve soldiers were killed at Tower 22 in Jordan and several more were injured. Given the rise in small rocket and drone barrages on bases in the regions, troops deploying to the Middle East have begun training on simulators on how to respond to such an attack. Sailors who can't deploy will be moved to empty jobs under Navy program Air Force relieves commander of pilot training squadron US military's highest-ranking transgender officer says the separation process is broken Army bringing in big tech executives as lieutenant colonels Trump reverts 7 Army bases to former names with new honorees, including Delta Force soldier

Bloomberg

9 hours ago

• Bloomberg

Deal, Not Bombs, Seen as Only Way to End Iranian Nuclear Threat

By , John Bowker, and Ramsey Al-Rikabi Save While President Donald Trump weighs whether to join Israel's assault on Iran, foreign policy veterans and analysts argue that a negotiated settlement, not bombs nor commandos, is the only way to eliminate the threat of Tehran gaining a nuclear weapon. 'I don't believe there's a lasting military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem,' said Caroline Zier, a former senior Pentagon official under both Republican and Democratic administrations. 'You can delay, you can set back, but the long-term solution comes at the negotiating table.'

Politico

9 hours ago

• Politico

Trump says the US doesn't have to meet NATO spending goal

President Donald Trump said Friday that the U.S. shouldn't have to abide by the same defense spending standards as the rest of NATO — potentially antagonizing leaders from the rest of the alliance days before he's to meet with them in The Netherlands. Trump has long demanded that NATO states spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense but has never said if the U.S. should be included in that or not. The U.S. is currently at 3.4 percent. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said, responding to a question about his 5 percent defense spending goal. 'We've been supporting NATO so long. … So I don't think we should, but I think that the NATO countries should, absolutely,' he added. The summit kicks off Tuesday in The Hague with the leaders of 32 member states coming together to plan spending goals and reaffirm NATO force structure and deployment plans. Most NATO states spend just over 2 percent of their GDP on defense currently, with a growing number having outlined plans to get to around 3 percent over the next year or two. Trump's spending demand has hovered over the alliance since his reelection however, and the alliance has come up with a novel solution: Call for 3.5 percent on defense, with the remaining 1.5 percent taken up by domestic infrastructure and cybersecurity spending. Trump's apparent opting out of the higher target is unlikely to sit well with Republicans on Capitol Hill who've pushed for larger Pentagon budgets and have clashed with the administration over defense spending. Both Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), the chairs of the Senate and House Armed Services Committees respectively, have been pushing to drive U.S. defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. They and other GOP leaders criticized Trump's budget plans for keeping annual defense funding flat, save a one-time investment from Republicans' megabill of spending and tax cuts. Hitting that goal would mean a roughly $1.4 trillion defense budget for the Pentagon. Only Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have committed to 5 percent number so far, but most of the rest of the alliance is expected to follow suit at The Hague. There are outlines, however. The Spanish government, which is one of the lowest spenders on defense in the alliance, flatly rejected the 5 percent goal this week. In a letter to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte obtained by POLITICO, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his government 'cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP at this summit.' Other allies who have spent more on defense in recent years are also grappling with how to keep pumping more money into their militaries. 'We have to find a realistic compromise between what is necessary and what is possible, really, to spend,' Germany's defense minister, Boris Pistorius said this month during a NATO meeting in Brussels. Seth Jones, president of the defense and security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said in a press call Friday that U.S. defense spending, at 3.4 percent of GDP, is 'lower than during any time during the Cold War,' and the Trump administration's defense budget as a percentage of GDP 'is likely to be lower than the Carter administration's defense budget in the 1970s.' Connor O'Brien contributed to this report.