'I Was Broke': Gary Oldman Gets Honest About Starring In 1 Of The Most Hated Films Ever
Sir Gary Oldman has opened up about how he came to star in a film that's widely considered one of the worst in history.
Back in 2003, the newly-knighted British actor starred alongside Matthew McConaughey, Patricia Arquette and Kate Beckinsale in Tiptoes (two of whom have gone on to win Academy Awards, as has Sir Gary).
The film centred around a young man, played by Matthew, who gets his girlfriend pregnant, having concealed from her that every member of his family, including his twin brother, has a form of dwarfism.
Sir Gary played Matthew's brother in the movie, for which he donned prosthetics and spent much of the shoot on his knees.
During a new interview with the Happy Sad Confused podcast, Sir Gary admitted that he's never actually seen Tiptoes, and revealed that it came along at a difficult time in both his personal and professional life.
'I'll be very honest with you,' Sir Gary began. 'I had gone through a divorce and a nasty thing with a contractor.'
He continued 'I ended up in California, in LA, at 42 years old, a single dad, and I was broke. And, ironically, I was living under the Hollywood sign, living in this rental. We had no furniture – thank God for Ikea.'
Sir Gary said that when the offer for Tiptoes came along, he'd not worked for just shy of two years, and had been affected by an actors' strike.
'It was a bit of a rough time, and I needed to pay some bills, and I needed some money, and it was an actors' strike ontop of it all, which was a double whammy,' he admitted, noting the situation was a 'terrible time' for everyone in Hollywood.
'And then this film came along, this crazy idea, from this director, that I would play a little person. And I would play Matthew McConaughey's brother.
'There were several [issues]. First of all, I got locked in to doing a voice like that, because I had to sound like Matthew. We were brothers, so somehow, I had to sound like Matthew. So that was that. And then, I'm on my knees… desperate measures, desperate times.'
'I needed to work,' he insisted. 'And it was a crazy idea. But, would I do it now? No.'
He said that if one good thing came out of the film, it's that several actors with dwarfism – including a pre-Game Of ThronesPeter Dinklage – were able to get work at a time when many performers were struggling.
'It was a good thing in that regard, because they were all going through the same thing I was going through, with no work,' Sir Gary said, insisting: 'But it's a misfire, to be sure. Not one I talk about, I'm so glad you brought it up.'
Elsewhere in the interview, Sir Gary was also asked about another of the films he hasn't held in an especially high regard, The Fifth Element.
He explained that his wife of eight years, Gisele Schmidt, has helped to 'convince me that it's a better film than I think it is'.
Sir Gary explained: 'I'm contaminated, because I was the one who had that haircut. And I was the one who was wearing rubber. So, others can experience it in a different way. I get a little triggered when I see it, and I go back to that place of Jean-Paul Gaultier and rubber.'
He added: 'Bruce [Willis] didn't like [that] either – you know that orange vest that he wears? He hated it.'
A year after Tiptoes hit cinemas, Sir Gary made his debut as Sirius Black in the third Harry Potter film – a role with which he's still synonymous to many today.
Since then, he also won an Oscar for his portrayal of Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour.
Over the weekend, it was announced that Sir Gary had been bestowed with a knighthood by King Charles for his services to drama.
Prior to that, he was the only British recipient of Best Actor or Best Actress this century not to be honoured with a knighthood or damehood.
Dakota Johnson Speaks Out About Past Sex Scenes That 'Did Not Feel Good'
Will Smith Gets Candid About The 1 Reason He Turned Down Inception Role
11 Behind-The-Scenes Facts You Probably Never Knew About How Batman Begins Was Made
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Babyshambles guitarist Patrick Walden dies aged 46
Former Babyshambles star Patrick Walden has died aged 46. The guitarist - who starred in the British rock band alongside Pete Doherty, Drew McConnell, Mick Whitnall and Adam Ficek - has passed away, with the news being announced via Babyshambles' official Facebook page. A statement read: "It is with deep regret and sadness that we share the news of Patrick Walden's death. "We feel very fortunate to have known, loved and worked with him and we kindly ask for respect and privacy during these difficult times. "Peter, Drew, Mik, Adam. (sic)" Patrick performed in a variety of bands - including Fluid, the Six Cold Thousand, and The White Sport - before he joined Babyshambles back in 2003. The rock group - who were formed by Pete during a hiatus from the Libertines - released three albums together, including Down in Albion in 2005, Shotter's Nation in 2007 and Sequel to the Prequel in 2013. The Libertines re-formed in 2014, but Babyshambles continued to perform sporadic shows and festivals throughout that year. In 2024, Pete revealed that a Babyshambles reunion was in the works. The 46-year-old musician admitted that the band were hoping to reunite to mark the 20th anniversary of their debut album. Pete - who was well-known for his turbulent personal life during his time in Babyshambles - told NME at the time: "It is on the cards. We will get back together and get in a room with the instruments and play through the old songs, then get on stage and do it. "But it's the who and the when that needs to be worked out. I think we'll just keep that one on the horizon and deal with that one next year." Meanwhile, Patrick also worked as a live guitarist and as a session musician for a number of well-known artists, including James Blunt and Whitey.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
I've ditched HR to free my company from the social-justice police
'I want to be the first company without HR.' It was just a throwaway comment I made this month at a conference called Freedom Fest — but the audience went wild, and the line went viral in an Instagram post with over 5 million views. 'They produce nothing,' I continued. 'They monitor our words. They tell us what we can and cannot say. Advertisement 'They inhibit creativity. It's bad for business.' At my own start-up — XX-XY Athletics, the only brand standing up for the protection of women's sports — I'll be damned if I'm going to let the ladies of 'The View' run around policing my employees' conversations. We started with no Human Resources department a year ago, and we'll continue with no HR as we grow. Advertisement My statement touched a nerve because anyone who has worked in corporate America has been subjected to the censorious 'Head Girl' rule-making emanating from HR departments. And they are tired of it. When I started my business career in the early 1990s, HR was responsible for recruiting, benefits and payroll — that was it. As I moved up the ladder and found myself in executive meetings, the HR leader weighed in last on key business decisions, if at all. Advertisement Thirty years on, HR leaders are calling themselves 'Chief Human Resources Officers,' and they proclaim their power with reckless and off-topic abandon. HR departments today are packed with Tracy Flicks, the way-too-eager high schooler played by Reese Witherspoon in the movie 'Election.' Flick is the archetypal 'Head Girl,' a term derived from the British school system and its tight hierarchy of internal discipline — ambitious and officious with little actual skill or intellect. Hand-raisers like these are not selected to lead for intelligence or ability, but for conscientiousness and a willingness to uphold 'the rules.' Advertisement That was fine when HR had no power. But now, after yearning for a seat at the table, HR's midwit elites have found a way to exert increasing influence in the corporate environment — leveraging social-justice buzzwords to accrue power and (what else?) make more rules. In the 2020s, HR asserts its newly found clout with tyrannical zeal. When I interviewed in 2023 for a CEO job at an $8 billion retailer, I made it all the way to the end of the corporate leadership receiving line, successfully fielding queries on my business acumen and brand-building accomplishments. My last interview was with the HR representative on the board. Her first question: 'Will you apologize for what you've done?' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters What I'd 'done' was advocate for opening public schools during the COVID pandemic. By 2023 I'd been proven right. That didn't matter to the HR lady. I'd violated her tightly enforced script. Advertisement I didn't apologize, and I didn't get the job. Over the last two decades, HR has gone from operational support to Operation Head Girl Hall Monitor. They force-feed trainings about acceptable language; they make 'merit' out to be racist; and they set hiring criteria based on risk avoidance rather than excellence. But hiring people who don't offend anyone won't result in employees who take initiative and make things. Advertisement Am I being sexist in calling them Head Girls? In 2023, 76% of HR managers in the United States were female. The shoe fits. (And yes, men can be Head Girl types, too.) British academic Bruce Charlton explains the Head Girl 'can never be a creative genius because she does what other people want by the standard they most value.' That's why the Head Girls of HR made everyone add pronouns to their email signatures starting around 2020: Social standards. Not because it drove the business. Advertisement No, these time-suckers shift focus away from the business. Front-of-house employees — builders, makers and service providers — must spend a significant amount of time thinking about the words they use rather than their actual jobs. Critics of my viral comment pushed back at me: 'You need HR to avoid unnecessary risk!' they chorused. Right. That's the fear HR leverages to maintain its unearned influence. Advertisement Risk avoidance means hiring mediocre people with no opinions who never offend anyone. Those hires won't take my one-year-old start-up to big-brand status. I want big thinkers with creative minds. Sometimes these folks are disruptive. But there are no new products or breakthrough marketing campaigns without them. My company is a walking, talking HR violation. We 'misgender' all day long. In fact, speaking truth (as I call it) is required to work here. We're not in school anymore. We don't need a persnickety Miss Manners etiquette-enforcer telling us to be nice. I'll continue to go it alone without HR. I'll assume the so-called risk so I can lead in my own voice. And I'll succeed, or fail, on my own terms. Jennifer Sey is founder and CEO of XX-XY Athletics.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Danny Boyle says he 'wouldn't even contemplate' making 'Slumdog Millionaire' today because of its 'cultural appropriation'
Seventeen years ago, Slumdog Millionaire swept the 81st Academy Awards, walking away with eight of the 10 Oscars it was nominated for. But Danny Boyle, who took home the 2009 Academy Award for Best Director for his work on the film, says he wouldn't be the right person to helm the Mumbai-set drama if it were in the works today. 'Yeah, we wouldn't be able to make that now,' Boyle recently told The Guardian. Released in 2008, Slumdog tells the story of 18-year-old orphan Jamal Malik (Dev Patel), who survives the violent, poverty-stricken slums of Mumbai to win big on the Hindi version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. The film, which loosely follows Vikas Swarup's novel Q & A, used a local crew for its Mumbai filming locations and featured actors speaking both English and Hindi. 'At the time it felt radical,' Boyle said. 'We made the decision that only a handful of us would go to Mumbai. We'd work with a big Indian crew and try to make a film within the culture.' However, the intervening years caused Boyle to rethink that approach. 'You're still an outsider,' the Trainspotting director said. 'It's still a flawed method. That kind of cultural appropriation might be sanctioned at certain times. But at other times it cannot be.' As proud as the 68-year-old Brit is of the film, he acknowledged that a modern Slumdog would have trouble getting financed under that model. 'You wouldn't even contemplate doing something like that today,' he said. 'And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that. We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world.' Boyle told to EW in 2009 that he dove into Slumdog because he wanted to make a 'very immediate and vital' movie after finishing work on the chilly sci-fi thriller Sunshine. 'I learned quickly that when you work in Mumbai you have to accept what you find,' he said at the time. 'As a Westerner you have this feeling that you can fight bad things and work on good things and separate the two. What you have to do is accept and absorb both. That's what changed me.' In a 2008 director's roundtable convened by The Hollywood Reporter, Boyle acknowledged that he didn't have a full grasp on India during Slumdog's production. 'I know nothing of it, really,' he said in THR's video. 'You get a tiny little glimpse and maybe if we've done it well, there's a bit of it that's convincing, for the time being until somebody makes something better. You absolutely have to humble yourself in front of it.' Boyle told the roundtable that he expected to be viewed as a colonialist when he arrived in Mumbai and was surprised that the people there viewed him as 'a footnote.' 'It lets you let go of that kind of attitude,' he said. 'Either you go home disappointed or you get home and make the film.'Today, however, Boyle told The Guardian that if he were to be part of the team bringing Slumdog to the screen today, he'd want it to be directed by a young Indian filmmaker. 'And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that,' he said. 'We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world.' Boyle discussed his evolving thoughts as the newest film in his zombie horror series makes its worldwide theatrical deb. Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ralph Fiennes, and Alfie Williams, 28 Years Later is a companion piece to 2002's 28 Days Later and 2007's 28 Weeks Later (but not, crucially, the 2000 Sandra Bullock rehab comedy/drama 28 Days). Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
