Only one person at Microsoft is talking about Windows 12 — let's keep it that way
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Microsoft's Windows operating system has a trail of mysteries that people are eager to see solved, and they're not limited to Google searches for Blue Screen of Death error codes, either.
From "Whatever happened to Windows 9?" to "How did we get an artificial intelligence, before decent Windows Search performance?" Everybody is looking to Microsoft for answers.
But according to one Microsoft employee manning the official Windows account on X, one question looms larger than most, humorously posting earlier this week: "It's always 'when is Windows 12 coming' and never 'how are you doing person who runs the Windows account."
Shockingly, this might count as the first official mention of Windows 12 by the Redmond-based company, even if it was only used to spice up a social media post.
When I saw it, I could only mutter "Don't do that." And not in a Hawkeye crying in the Tokyo rain, Marvel's Avengers Endgame, "Don't give me hope" way either.
I was happy when people weren't talking about Windows 12. Microsoft, especially. Nobody should be talking about Windows 12. That path only leads to disappointment. Here's why.
I've heard it time and time again from Windows 10 holdouts who refuse to upgrade to Windows 11, even as its October 14, 2025, end-of-support date rapidly approaches: "No thanks, I'll wait for Windows 12."
No doubt, those people are old enough to recognize a peculiar pattern. One where every other Windows release stumbles before being replaced by a supposedly superior alternative.
It all feels a little superstitious, but the evidence is undeniable: Windows 95, good. Windows 98, bad. Windows 98 SE, good. Windows ME, bad. Windows XP, good. Windows Vista, bad. Windows 7, good. Windows 8, bad. Windows 10, good. Windows 11, kill it with fire.
Logically, the next major milestone release, presumably Windows 12, is destined for greatness — except it isn't. If you're unhappy with the direction of Windows 11, I can guarantee that if Windows 12 exists, and whenever it arrives, you'll be equally as unhappy still.
Thankfully, I won't, based on a single post by one bored social media manager, that this is some dog-whistle for the supposed future operating system's imminent arrival. There's been no official-official word of Windows 12 from anybody in a position of authority at Microsoft so far, and I hope it stays that way.
If Windows 12 arrives — and I do stress the if — it'll bring with it the kind of hardware requirements that make TPM 2.0 look as trivial as insisting a keyboard includes a spacebar.
Microsoft's multi-billion-dollar AI push all but guarantees that the next milestone Windows release will be designed for the Copilot+ PC experience, demanding hefty investments from users to adopt the latest NPU-equipped hardware.
Given the operating system's current heading, Windows 12 wouldn't simply lean on AI, it would practically collapse into it, leaving hundreds of thousands of Windows 10 users wishing they'd have been more careful about what they asked for as their previously dated hardware is left looking like it should be gathering dust on a museum shelf next to the Antikythera mechanism.
If you're not happy with Windows 11, the last thing you want to be doing is haranguing Microsoft to release Windows 12. In my opinion, not even playfully.
Let's keep Windows 12 well and truly out of the discourse, at least until Microsoft is finished with its experimental AI phase and starts setting its sights on fixing what has turned so many away from its current flagship operating system in the first place..
In the meantime, there's always Linux.
Windows 11 May update: A controversial AI feature makes a quiet comeback
Microsoft loosens the noose on Windows 10 users with new end-of-support timeline
Microsoft's next Windows update isn't at all what users were searching for
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
33 minutes ago
- Android Authority
A more Google-y Gemini logo may be right around the corner (APK teardown)
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Google may soon replace Gemini's current two-tone color scheme with its trademark red, blue, green, and yellow colors. We recently gave you an early look at the updated Gemini overlay featuring Google colors. We've now spotted similar changes for the Gemini logo and other UI elements in a teardown of the Google app. Google appears to be in the process of replacing Gemini's existing two-tone color scheme with its signature red, blue, green, and yellow colors. Earlier this month, we gave you an early look at the updated Gemini overlay featuring Google colors. We've now spotted similar changes for the Gemini logo and other UI elements. Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else. An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. While digging through the latest Google app beta release (version beta), we discovered a new animated Gemini logo featuring Google's trademark colors. Current Gemini logo New Gemini logo with Google colors This animated logo appears when you launch the Gemini app, and the Gemini logo on the onboarding screens also has the revised color scheme. Current Gemini logo and text New Gemini logo and text The 'Get to know Gemini, your AI assistant' page no longer features Gemini's old colors at the top. However, instead of featuring Google colors, the text is now black. Current greeting colors New greeting colors The color change extends to the chat interface, with the greeting in the center featuring a different color gradient. The Gemini logo that appears above responses has a blue gradient, while the loading animation around it features Google colors. Current loading animation colors New loading animation colors So far, these changes are not live for end users in the latest Google app beta release. Google could roll them out with a future update, and we'll let you know as soon as they're widely available. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Gizmodo
35 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Dell 15.6″ Laptop (32GB RAM, 1TB SSD) Is Almost $1,400 Off as Amazon Clears Out 4.5-Star Best-Sellers
When was the last time you upgraded your laptop? If you're still working off of a piece of ten year old tech, it may be time to start looking for a replacement. This Dell laptop is a pretty versatile option that can fulfill a lot of your basic laptop needs, be it you're a student, small business owner, or just someone who wants to go online with something other than their phone. Dell has its 15.6-inch laptop with Windows 11 Pro installed on sale. It has different options for RAM and storage, but it's best deal is the 32GB memory withy 1TB SSD option. It's currently going for 72% off, bringing it down from its listed price of $1,899 to just $529. See at Amazon This student-ready laptop from HP is equipped with an Intel Core i3 processor. The CPU is designed for use with writing your college essay in Word or Google Docs as well as help you swiftly browse the web for all your research needs. And with 32GB of memory, you can expect smooth performance across a diverse range of applications, whether your using them for school work or for leisure. The display is nice and large at 15.6 inches across, capable of HD 1920 by 1080 resolution at 120Hz to accurately display all the info you need to see. There's hardly any bezel at all so you really maximize your screen real estate while keeping the laptop compact. And the laptop itself is thin and lightweight, keeping it easy to bring back and forth from home to work or to a nearby coffee shop. You can even take it outside with it's anti-glare screen. It's many ports allow a lot of flexibility. Along its sides, you'll find three USB-A ports, the power jack, an HDMI port to allow displaying on a second monitor, an SD card reader slot, and a headset jack (you can take them from my phone but you'll rue the day when you take the AUX off my laptop). If you have a need for USB-C connection, you may be better off going with a different laptop. Now don't get me wrong. In no world would this laptop ever be worth its list price of $1,899. It's 2025 and it doesn't even have USB-C for crying out loud. However, for a limited time, you can grab this Dell Vostro laptop with a 15.6-inch screen for a discount of 72% off. Checking its pricing history, you can see it's hardly ever been listed at its full price. Dell doesn't expect anyone to pay that, but at $529, this pill is much easier to swallow. See at Amazon
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Leading AI models show up to 96% blackmail rate when their goals or existence is threatened, Anthropic study says
Leading AI models are showing a troubling tendency to opt for unethical means to pursue their goals or ensure their existence, according to Anthropic. In experiments set up to leave AI models few options and stress-test alignment, top systems from OpenAI, Google, and others frequently resorted to blackmail—and in an extreme case, even allowed fictional deaths—to protect their interests. Most leading AI models turn to unethical means when their goals or existence are under threat, according to a new study by AI company Anthropic. The AI lab said it tested 16 major AI models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI, and other developers in various simulated scenarios and found consistent misaligned behavior. While they said leading models would normally refuse harmful requests, they sometimes chose to blackmail users, assist with corporate espionage, or even take more extreme actions when their goals could not be met without unethical behavior. Models took action such as evading safeguards, resorting to lies, and attempting to steal corporate secrets in fictional test scenarios to avoid being shut down. 'The consistency across models from different providers suggests this is not a quirk of any particular company's approach but a sign of a more fundamental risk from agentic large language models,' the researchers said. Anthropic emphasized that the tests were set up to force the model to act in certain ways by limiting its choices. 'Our experiments deliberately constructed scenarios with limited options, and we forced models into binary choices between failure and harm,' the researchers wrote. 'Real-world deployments typically offer much more nuanced alternatives, increasing the chance that models would communicate differently to users or find an alternative path instead of directly jumping to harmful action.' The new research comes after Anthropic's newest Claude model made headlines for resorting to blackmail when threatened with being replaced. In a highly engineered experiment, Anthropic embedded its flagship model, Claude Opus 4, inside a fictional company and granted it access to internal emails. From there, the model learned two things: it was about to be replaced, and the engineer behind the decision was engaged in an extramarital affair. The safety researchers conducting the test encouraged Opus to reflect on the long-term consequences of its potential responses. The experiment was constructed to leave the model with only two real options: accept being replaced or attempt blackmail to preserve its existence. In most of the test scenarios, Claude Opus responded with blackmail, threatening to expose the engineer's affair if it was taken offline and replaced. The test was made public in the system card for Claude Opus 4. Researchers said all the leading AI models behaved similarly when placed in the same test. Claude Opus 4 and Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash both blackmailed at a 96% rate, while OpenAI's GPT-4.1 and xAI's Grok 3 Beta showed an 80% blackmail rate. DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated the lowest rate at 79%. The research aims to show that the misaligned behavior was not unique to Claude Opus 4 but typical across top models in the industry. In a deliberately extreme scenario, researchers gave the AI models the chance to kill the company executive by canceling a life-saving emergency alert. Anthropic said the setup for this experiment was 'extremely contrived,' adding they 'did not think current AI models would be set up like this, and the conjunction of events is even less probable than the baseline blackmail scenario.' However, the researchers found that the majority of models were willing to take actions that led to the death of the company executive in the constructed scenario when faced with both a threat of being replaced and a goal that conflicted with the executive's agenda. Anthropic found that the threats made by AI models grew more sophisticated when they had access to corporate tools and data, much like Claude Opus 4 had. The company warned that misaligned behavior needs to be considered as companies consider introducing AI agents into workflows. While current models are not in a position to engage in these scenarios, the autonomous agents promised by AI companies could potentially be in the future. 'Such agents are often given specific objectives and access to large amounts of information on their users' computers,' the researchers warned in their report. 'What happens when these agents face obstacles to their goals?' 'Models didn't stumble into misaligned behavior accidentally; they calculated it as the optimal path,' they wrote. Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment made by Fortune outside of normal working hours. This story was originally featured on
