How your ear wax could tell you if you have Parkinson's disease, according to experts
Could your ear wax tell you if you have Parkinson's disease?
Some 90,000 people are diagnosed with the degenerative neurological condition in the U.S. each year, and annual deaths have surged in recent decades to tens of thousands.
Now, researchers at the American Chemical Society claim they have developed a new system that could help catch the disease at an early stage.
The identifier is in the odor of ear wax's main ingredient, known as sebum. The oily substance is produced by the body to lubricate and protect the skin. Sebum from people with Parkinson's may have a characteristic and musky smell because the volatile organic compounds released by sebum are altered by disease progression. This association has been identified in previous research.
To identify the compounds released by sebum in people with the disease, the researchers swabbed the ear canals of 209 participants, more than half of which were diagnosed with the condition. Then, they analyzed what was collected using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry techniques.
Four of the volatile organic compounds they found in people with Parkinson's were different than people without it. Those include ethylbenzene, 4-ethyltoluene, pentanal, and 2-pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane. The researchers said they are potential biomarkers for Parkinson's.
Using these findings, published this week in the journal Analytical Chemistry, they were able to develop a system that inexpensively screens for Parkinson's.
They trained an artificial intelligence olfactory system - a robotic model that can mimic how we smell - with their ear wax compound data. Using the model, they found it was able to categorize samples with and without Parkinson's with 94 percent accuracy.
Some 1.1 million Americans are living with Parkinson's right now. Because most treatments for Parkinson's only slow the progression of disease, catching it early is critical. Current testing is also costly, and can be subjective.
This AI system, the researchers say, could be used as a first-line screening tool for early detection.
'This method is a small-scale single-center experiment in China,' explained author Hao Dong. 'The next step is to conduct further research at different stages of the disease, in multiple research centers and among multiple ethnic groups, in order to determine whether this method has greater practical application value.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jaw-Dropping Explosions on The Sun Captured in First NASA PUNCH Images
A NASA mission to observe the activity of the solar wind has returned its first images of giant coronal mass ejections (CMEs) billowing out from the Sun. Images from the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH) were presented at the 246th meeting of the American Astronomical Society, showing these giant events on an unprecedented scale. "I promise you you have never seen anything quite like this," heliophysicist and PUNCH principal investigator Craig DeForest of the Southwest Research Institute said in his presentation. CMEs are huge expulsions of billions of tons of solar plasma and magnetic fields that are blasted out from the Sun, a massive release of energy and solar particles that occurs when the Sun's magnetic field lines tangle, snap, and reconnect. They often, but don't always, occur with solar flares. A halo CME is what we call it when the CME blasts right in the direction of Earth. From our perspective, the expanding ejecta looks to surround the Sun like a halo, before barreling through the Solar System at tremendous speed. "That halo CME is something you have never seen before. I'd like to call your attention to the white circle near the center of the field of view here. That circle represents the LASCO field of view; that is the largest coronagraph currently used to forecast space weather. "You've seen halo CME movies before, if you've paid attention to the science press. But you have never seen one 30 to 40 degrees from the Sun … you're seeing something that is literally washing across the entire sky of the inner Solar System as it comes toward the Earth." In this case, they were able to track a CME as it blasted through the Solar System at 4 million miles an hour until about two hours before it collided with Earth's magnetic field. These events often produce the aurora that light up Earth's polar skies, but can also interrupt communications and damage satellites, so scientists are keen to develop better space weather tracking and prediction tools. PUNCH is just beginning its planned two-year mission to record solar events in 3D, in an attempt to better understand space weather. The four probes aren't quite yet in their final positions, but the team here on Earth is testing the instruments and taking observations. "These are preliminary data. They look good now, but they are going to look fabulous once we are done with calibration later this summer," DeForest said. "This is the first of many, I'm sure, and the best is still to come." SpaceX Starship Explodes in Towering Fireball Astronomers Uncover a Massive Shaft of Missing Matter Our Galaxy's Monster Black Hole Is Spinning Almost as Fast as Physics Allows
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michael Hicks column: The labor demand shocks of artificial intelligence
The most disruptive technology in human history was almost certainly the wheel. That economic shock, and all the others that followed, give us useful insight into labor market effects of artificial intelligence. The invention of the wheel cut transportation costs by 80% or 90%, dramatically reducing demand for workers who carried goods across and between towns. We've had other technology shocks — the use of fossil fuels, steam and then electric power, the internal combustion engine and computers. All these technologies replaced tasks that were part of jobs. The wheel replaced a strong back, the steam loom replaced strong legs. The use of fossil fuels replaced the cutting, splitting and drying of lumber, and electricity replaced the use of steam looms. For us, the computer has been the most disruptive technology. It radically changed the types of work that almost everybody performs. It also changed our ways of communicating, our amusements, our safety and health. It brought us the internet, social media and now AI. AI has been around in some form since the 1950s. I first heard about it in 1992, when a colleague of mine, then an infantry captain, was sent to obtain a master's degree in AI. By 1997, I was learning the use of rudimentary AI in economic modeling. The new, commercial applications of AI are much more advanced — and interesting — than the early AI algorithms of the 1990s. The large language models are superb for writing reports, school papers and summaries of some topics. Generative AI can construct pictures and movies that are almost indistinguishable from the work of actual humans. The potential applications of these new technologies are boundless, to the extent that any one person could predict. I see all types of uses in economics and warfare, the two fields I've been trained and educated in. There are also limitations. I've asked commercial versions of LLMs to provide novel testable hypotheses in economics — the lifeblood of economic analysis. The LLMs are good at naming data sources and, with enough prompts, can even construct the mathematical model to support a hypothesis. But none of the hypotheses were really any more than most middle school kids could have derived. The generative AI models are equally poor right now, delivering pictures of people with seven fingers or grilling burgers with lettuce, tomatoes and buns. They'll get better, of course, but what is AI likely to do to the demand for labor? I think the easy answer is that it will increase the demand for labor, in much the same way as the wheel, the steam loom, the automobile and the computer. That is, in a very nuanced way. Technology doesn't replace jobs; it replaces tasks. Almost always, the tasks replaced are the most mundane, routine and trainable ones. In so doing, the technology makes the uniquely human part of the job more valuable. The best long-form description of this comes in an accessible paper by David Autor who described Polanyi's Paradox, that 'we can know more (about our jobs) than we can tell.' The point of Polyani, which Autor fleshed out in superb contemporary detail, is that the unseen part of technology is how humans adapt it to complement their innate skills. Since the end of World War II, technology has replaced more than 80% of the work done by the average American. Throughout the longest and most impactful technology shock, the U.S. boosted wages, production and employment. AI may be different than any technology before it, but the adaptation was not technological — it was human. We humans are much as we've always been, and the economic incentive to match complementary human and technology skills remains robust. The most likely outcome of AI adoption will be positive, like all the other technology adoptions before it. But that doesn't mean there won't be challenges. The most dramatically unpleasant periods of technology adoption occurred in the places, and among the people, that could not adapt. James Whitcomb Riley's The Raggedy Man of 1888 described a type of itinerant worker that existed until at least the 1960s in U.S. agriculture. The Raggedy Man is gone now, because the skills he brought to a farm are no longer sufficient to earn him three meals and a simple room. Even then, one is tempted by this poem to conclude that he was employed for reasons beyond labor productivity. Technology eliminates the less skilled tasks a worker does, pushing them to more skilled — and more uniquely human — tasks. AI is likely to impact skills held by more educated workers than the robotics of the 1980s and later, or the digitization of the 2000s. AI will write simple research summaries, press releases and perform straightforward design work. This will lead to increased demand for more detailed and complex research summaries, more insightful press releases and more innovative designs than AI can produce. AI will also open demand for employment totally divorced from the direct complementarity to technology. As easily replicable human skills become inexpensive, the relative value of scarcer, purely human skills will rise. What does AI portend for education and regions? The one common thread of all previous technologies is that they complemented human-specific intellectual and social skills. So, job losses were clustered among those who were armed with skills that were more readily replaced. Thus, AI is likely to boost demand for workers with a lengthier, broader and more complex education. That education accesses more latent human skills. This used to be called a liberal education, but a better moniker is a classical education. Of course, such an education is not trendy today, in part because it is costly. It is much cheaper and faster to prepare for the last technological shock than the next one.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New study makes startling discoveries after studying birds' feathers: 'It's a slower and more meandering process'
A recent University of Utah study found that birds are molting at earlier dates. The underlying reason? Our planet's warming. Researchers used 13 years' worth of data on 134 bird species to come to their conclusion. They studied molting patterns from 2011 to 2024 and found that fall migratory birds consistently molted a day earlier than in the previous year. Molting is a crucial precursor to migration and, consequently, breeding. Old feathers could negatively impact both their flight and mating capabilities, Kyle Kittelberger, research team lead, told Spring migratory birds, however, were a different story. "We didn't see any shift at the community level for spring body molt," Kittelberger said. "Some of the reasons for that might be birds tend to migrate much faster in the spring … whereas in the fall, it's a slower and more meandering process." The specific reason isn't entirely clear yet. Kittelberger suggests that earlier breeding or later migration times — both of which result from the warming planet — are viable options. If molting overlaps with either breeding or migration, it could sap birds' energy, damaging species' survival in the long run. If that is the case here, it could spell bad news for migratory birds — and humans. Different bird species provide different benefits to humanity. Take hummingbirds, for example. Most hummingbird species migrate and are excellent pollinators. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, about 35% of the entire world's food supply depends on pollinators to reproduce. The extinction of hummingbird species will globally jeopardize human food supplies. And that's just one example out of many. On the whole, every bird plays a part in their local ecosystem, spreading seeds, scavenging carcasses, and keeping pests at bay. Without them, the world will be thrown out of balance. Kittelberger already has the next steps in mind. He told that he plans to research birds in their breeding and/or post-breeding grounds. "That is the next element of this kind of research," he said, "to not only look at what's going on in the summer when they're beginning to molt but to see if that overlaps with anything like breeding." If you'd like to help on an individual level, there are a couple of things you can do. Converting just a portion of your yard to a native lawn can give pollinators, like hummingbirds, crucial food sources. You can also consider donating to climate causes that research birds and conserve their habitats, like the National Audubon Society. Do you think America could ever go zero-waste? Never Not anytime soon Maybe in some states Definitely Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
