WV Legislature may be called for PEIA special session in July
The Public Employees Insurance Agency is proposing increasing premiums by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees during the 2026 fiscal year. (Lori Kersey | West Virginia Watch)
While West Virginia employees prepare for their health insurance to take up more of their paychecks this summer, a special session may be coming in July — the same month those increases take effect — to deal with ongoing cost and sustainability challenges at the Public Employees Insurance Agency.
At the finance board's regular meeting Thursday, Chairman Eric Householder said the agency has been working with Gov. Patrick Morrisey's office as he prepares to call the special legislative session.
'I know currently … we are working providing data to the governor,' Householder said. 'There's been no decision on what to do, just providing data, having roundtable discussions. That's all we're doing right now.'
Householder said Morrisey tentatively intends to call a special session for PEIA in mid July.
Beginning in July, PEIA premiums are increasing by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees. Out-of-pocket and copay costs will also go up. The agency will also raise premiums by 12% for retirees.
PEIA leaders have said that the rising cost of health care — particularly inflation on prescription GLP-1 drugs that treat obesity and diabetes — are a major driver of the rate increases.
Union leaders and state employees have repeatedly called on the Legislature to come up with a solution to PEIA's rising costs, but the issue largely went unaddressed during the 2025 regular session.
Morrisey said in April that he plans to call a special session for PEIA, but he has not said how exactly the issue of increasing costs will be addressed..
'That was kicked down the road for many, many years,' the governor said in April. 'I don't intend to kick it down the road. We have to bring everyone together, all the stakeholders: listen, learn and then you'll be seeing some activity.'
In a news release Thursday, leadership from the West Virginia Democratic Party blamed Morrisey for 'falling to act' and letting 'devastating' PEIA increases go into effect.
'Pay-Cut Patrick failed to take action to stabilize PEIA premiums,' Democratic Party Chair Mike Pushkin said in the statement. 'So now, state employees, including law enforcement officers, school teachers, school service personnel, CPS workers, and retirees will soon be paying a price for his inaction. Morrisey had a choice — he could have fought to protect working West Virginians. Instead, he did what he always does: protect his political donors and let working families bear the burden.'
In an email Thursday, Morrisey spokesman Drew Galang said the governor has emphasized that the state 'must address the inherited challenges facing PEIA and its long term sustainability.' He said Morrisey had 'already indicated' that a special session to do so would occur in 'mid to late July.'
Galang did not respond to an email asking to clarify when, publicly, the July timeframe had been set by Morrisey and no such references to it have been made clear in previous PEIA meetings or announcements prior to Thursday.
A spokeswoman for the House of Delegates and one for the state Senate said the governor has not formally told lawmakers the special session will be in July.
Dale Lee, president of the West Virginia Education Association, told Householder the discussions about PEIA solutions should include public employees and their representatives.
'The employees can't be the ones providing all of this,' Lee said of the cost increases. 'We have to have the Legislature. There has to be not only the Legislature but also the providers. That's why I continue to ask that we all go back to the table and that we come up with a plan that people can agree on.'
Lee, who has repeatedly criticized state leaders for failing to act on the recommendations of a task force called by former Gov. Jim Justice after statewide teacher strikes in 2018 and 2019, said it's important that the Legislature act upon a plan for PEIA this time.
'[It] never even got on a committee agenda,' he said of the recommendations. 'That's just disingenuous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Why Ozempic users should be extra careful during heatwaves
Talk about melting the weight off. Summer may be filled with beach days and barbecues, but it can also bring blistering temperatures. This week, millions of Americans — including New Yorkers — are bracing for what forecasters are calling a 'very sweaty' heatwave. People who are on GLP-1s need to be on particularly high alert amidst the high degrees. New Africa – And people who are on weight loss drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro need to be on particularly high alert amidst the high degrees. That's because these drugs work by suppressing appetite, which means they can wind up curbing thirst as well. This, in turn, can unwittingly lead to dehydration — a dangerous condition that can cause dizziness, headaches, low blood pressure, blurred vision, kidney problems and, in extreme cases, fatal heatstroke. Since eating normally stimulates saliva flow, eating less while on Ozempic can mean less stimulation to the salivary glands, which can in turn lead to dry mouth — another symptom of dehydration left unchecked. And if you've heard about Ozempic teeth, you know some of the most common side effects of GLP-1s pose their own dangers during a heatwave. 'You'll need to be extra careful about hydration during hot weather as these medications often cause nausea, vomiting or diarrhea — all of which can lead to fluid loss,' nutritional therapist Deborah Grayson told The Daily Mail. 'This is particularly important for new users of the weight loss medication, whose bodies are still adjusting.' 'You'll need to be extra careful about hydration during hot weather as these medications often cause nausea, vomiting or diarrhea — all of which can lead to fluid loss,' Grayson said. millaf – To remain vigilant, Grayson recommends the following: Drink plenty of water, even if you don't feel thirsty Put a timer on to remind you to hydrate Avoid alcohol and caffeine Avoid being outdoors during peak heat hours Eat easy-to-digest foods such as those on the BRAT diet In addition to suppressing thirst and potentially inducing vomiting/diarrhea, GLP-1s could mess with your body's ability to regulate body temperature, making it harder to tolerate heat. This is all the more reason to drink lots of water — sprinkle some electrolytes into the mix to stay hydrated longer. Use urine as your barometer — light yellow means you're in the clear, whereas darker colors are a bad sign. And avoid physical exertion, especially outside. It might be excruciatingly hot, but perhaps the heatwave is a good excuse to stay on your Ozempic butt for a bit.
Los Angeles Times
10 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
How Trump has targeted Harvard's international students — and what the latest court ruling means
President Trump and his administration have tried several tactics to block Harvard University's enrollment of international students, part of the White House's effort to secure policy changes at the private Ivy League college. Targeting foreign students has become the administration's cornerstone effort to crack down on the nation's oldest and wealthiest college. The block on international enrollment, which accounts for a quarter of Harvard's students and much of its global allure, strikes at the core of Harvard's identity. Courts have stopped some of the government's actions, at least for now — but not all. In the latest court order, a federal judge Friday put one of those efforts on hold until a lawsuit is resolved. But the fate of Harvard's international students — and its broader standoff with the Trump administration — remains in limbo. Here are the ways the Trump administration has moved to block Harvard's foreign enrollment — and where each effort stands. In May, the Trump administration tried to ban foreign students at Harvard, citing the Department of Homeland Security's authority to oversee which colleges are part of the Student Exchange and Visitor Program. The program allows colleges to issue documents that foreign students need to study in the United States. Harvard filed a lawsuit, arguing the administration violated the government's own regulations for withdrawing a school's certification. Within hours, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston put the administration's ban on hold temporarily — an order that had an expiration date. On Friday, she issued a preliminary injunction, blocking Homeland Security's move until the case is decided. That could take months or longer. The government can and does remove colleges from the Student Exchange and Visitor Program, making them ineligible to host foreign students on their campuses. However, it's usually for administrative reasons outlined in law, such as failing to maintain accreditation, lacking proper facilities for classes, failing to employ qualified professional personnel — even failing to 'operate as a bona fide institution of learning.' Other colleges are removed when they close. Notably, Burroughs' order Friday said the federal government still has authority to review Harvard's ability to host international students through normal processes outlined in law. After Burroughs' emergency block in May, DHS issued a more typical 'Notice of Intent to Withdraw' Harvard's participation in the international student visa program. 'Today's order does not affect the DHS's ongoing administrative review,' Harvard said Friday in a message to its international students. 'Harvard is fully committed to compliance with the applicable F-1 (student visa) regulations and strongly opposes any effort to withdraw the University's certification.' Earlier this month, Trump moved to block entry to the United States for incoming Harvard students, issuing a proclamation that invoked a different legal authority. Harvard filed a court challenge attacking Trump's legal justification for the action — a federal law allowing the president to block a 'class of aliens' deemed detrimental to the nation's interests. Targeting only those who are coming to the U.S. to study at Harvard doesn't qualify as a 'class of aliens,' Harvard said in its filing. Harvard's lawyers asked the court to block the action. Burroughs agreed to pause the entry ban temporarily, without giving an expiration date. She has not yet ruled on Harvard's request for another preliminary injunction, which would pause the ban until the court case is decided. 'We expect the judge to issue a more enduring decision in the coming days,' Harvard told international students Friday. At the center of Trump's pressure campaign against Harvard are his assertions that the school has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment, especially during pro-Palestinian protests. In seeking to keep Harvard students from coming to the U.S., he said Harvard is not a suitable destination. Harvard President Alan Garber has said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism and will not submit to the administration's demands for further changes. In late May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio directed U.S. embassies and consulates to start reviewing social media accounts of visa applicants who plan to attend, work at or visit Harvard University for any signs of antisemitism. On Wednesday, the State Department said it was launching new vetting of social media accounts for foreigners applying for student visas, and not just those seeking to attend Harvard. Consular officers will be on the lookout for posts and messages that could be deemed hostile to the United States, its government, culture, institutions or founding principles, the department said, telling visa applicants to set their social media accounts to 'public.' In reopening the visa process, the State Department also told consulates to prioritize students hoping to enroll at colleges where foreigners make up less than 15% of the student body, a U.S. official familiar with the matter said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to detail information that has not been made public. Foreign students make up more than 15% of the total student body at almost 200 U.S. universities — including Harvard and the other Ivy League schools, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal education data from 2023. Most are private universities, including all eight Ivy League schools. Some Harvard students are also caught up in the government's recent ban against travel to the U.S. by citizens of 12 nations, mostly in Africa and the Middle East. The Trump administration last weekend called for 36 additional countries to commit to improving vetting of travelers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. Harvard sponsors more than 7,000 people on a combination of F-1 and J-1 visas, which are issued to students and to foreigners visiting the U.S. on exchange programs such as fellowships. Across all the schools that make up the university, about 26% of the student body is from outside the United States. But some schools and programs, by nature of their subject matter, have significantly more international students. At the Harvard Kennedy School, which covers public policy and public administration, 49% of students are on F-1 visas. In the business school, one-third of students come from abroad. And within the law school, 94% of the students in the master's program in comparative law are international students. The administration has imposed a range of sanctions on Harvard since it rejected the government's demands for policy reforms related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Conservatives say the demands are merited, decrying Harvard as a hotbed of liberalism and antisemitism. Harvard says the administration is illegally retaliating against the university.
Dominion Post
21 hours ago
- Dominion Post
DOGE terminates $9 million state digital equity grant
dbeard@ MORGANTOWN – A $9 million federal grant to the state Economic Development Department recently got DOGE'd. But the department and Gov. Patrick Morrisey both failed to answer questions about it. The $9,011,588 grant came from the U.S Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration to support the state's digital equity program. DOGE gives the termination date as May 9 and notes a total savings of $8,791,067.90. The $2.75 billion Digital Equity Act, passed in 2021 as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, was intended to expand internet access for certain disadvantaged populations, according to the Associated Press. 'It gave states and tribes flexibility to deliver high-speed internet access to families that could not afford it, computers to kids who did not have them, telehealth access to older adults in rural areas, and training and job skills to veterans.' But President Trump announced in late May his intention to end it, AP reported. USASpending shows that the grant began Dec. 1, 2024 and was slated to run through Nov. 30, 2029. Its stated purpose was to implement West Virginia's digital equity plan. Among its missions: launching digital skills and local digital equity planning programs; a piloting program to supply laptops; and collecting data on such things as number of covered populations served, total number served, and personal testimony of participants. The grant description said, 'The proposed projects will result in narrowing the digital divide, improved access to digital resources, and increased accessibility and impact initiatives for community development.' Morrisey and the Economic Development Department failed to respond to three inquiries sent to each on two separate days. In early January, echoing Trump, Morrisey issued an executive order eliminating DEI – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – from state government. DEI opponents generally view it as a form of reverse racism. Among the questions we asked Morrisey and the department were if the grant termination was tied to DEI opposition, what the impact of the grant termination might be, and if the state would continue the digital equity program via some other means. The general consensus is that West Virginia's broadband access challenges are tied to terrain and the state's rural nature, and we asked Morrisey and the department how those issues factor into the aims of the digital equity plan – getting no answer, of course. We also asked about the difference between the full grant amount and the listed savings – $220,520.10 – and if some of the money has been spent, what on, and if they have to return it. As it happens, on Thursday, Morrisey announced funding for broadband infrastructure deployment projects in 10 counties to facilitate the expansion of fiber-to-the-home broadband infrastructure. Morrisey said that with the installation of approximately 362 miles of fiber infrastructure, 2,897 locations will gain access to high-speed broadband. The counties are Preston, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Jackson, Lewis, Mason, Pendleton and Putnam.
