Political heat rises as assembly polls approach in state
Patna: With assembly elections due in Oct-Nov this year, political activity is heating up in the state.
A day after leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha,
Rahul Gandhi
, launched the Shiksha Nyay Samvad in Darbhanga, the BJP has begun preparations for Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi's proposed visit to Bihar on May 30.
According to the BJP, the PM will address a public meeting at Bikramganj in Rohtas district.
The PM's visit has drawn attention, coming soon after the Indian armed forces' action against Pakistan-based terrorists. Political observers believe the PM may refer to these developments during his speech.
The opposition INDIA bloc has said it will oppose any attempt to politicise the armed forces' action.
"The army's action was necessary, but the BJP is adding a political touch by undertaking the Tiranga Yatra.
The masses are very much aware of the matter and will give a suitable reply in the upcoming assembly elections," Congress legislature party leader in the state assembly, Shakeel Ahmad Khan, said on Friday.
The Congress has stepped up its activities in Bihar. Rahul has been visiting the state frequently, taking part in events such as Shiksha Nyay Samvad, Palayan Roko Naukari Do Yatra, Samvidhan Suraksha Sammelan and the Nyay Yatra, aimed at connecting with marginalised communities, whom the party sees as potential gamechangers in the upcoming polls.
The party's morale has risen following a better showing in last year's Lok Sabha elections, where it won three out of the nine seats it contested compared to just one seat in 2019.
The RJD has also criticised the BJP over the issue, warning against politicising military operations.
"Tricolour holds a special place in the life of each and every Indian, but the BJP is trying to politicise the army action by launching Tiranga Yatra.
They could go to any extent to win elections," said RJD spokesperson Shakti Singh Yadav.
Defending the BJP, party spokesperson Manoj Sharma questioned the opposition's criticism.
"Is the issue of India-Pakistan not relevant to the country? If this discussion doesn't happen in the country, then will it take place in Turkiye?" Sharma asked.
Describing the matter as one of national sentiment, he added, "Quite many soldiers from Bihar also laid down their lives for the nation's sake."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Shah's take on English has serious repercussions
This is with reference to the news items "Those who speak English in India will soon feel ashamed: Shah'. India's strength lies in its linguistic diversity. By framing English as a foreign language and linking it to shame, Shah's statement fuels the flames of linguistic chauvinism. This spells danger, especially in a country like India where language has been the flashpoint that triggered regional and communal violence in almost every nook and corner. One must forget that English serves as a bridge language in India, including in higher education, business and inter-state communication. Non-Hindi speaking states are likely to see Shah's statement as one more attempt to establish a Hindi-centric identity in the entire country. Shah's controversial statement carries deep political and global implications. P Victor Selvaraj, Tirunelveli- 627002 Unbecoming of Shah A new controversy is likely to start following the statement of Union Hoe Minister Amit Shah on languages, which is a sensitive issue in India where states have come into existence based on language. This is evident from Maharashtra, where a controversy is underway over adoption of Hindi. Shah warned of a day when speakers of English in India would feel ashamed, but the question is why make such a damaging statement, in the firstplace. By all accounts, it is a shameful remark from a leader of Shah's stature. It reeks of prejudice and myopia, elements that knowledgeable politicians ought to shun. English's centrality to the Indian context is undeniable. To make matters worse, he said 'our culture, our history, and our religion cannot be understood in foreign languages. We will run our country in our own languages and lead the world too.' Earlier this month, Shah launched the Bharatiya Bhasha Anubhag (BBA), or Indian Languages Section, to provide an organised platform for all Indian languages to move towards 'freeing the administration from the influence of foreign languages'. States like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have witnessed protests on the imposition of Hindi. The Tamil Nadu government has opposed the three-language formula in the National Educational Policy (NEP) tooth and nail, claiming it was an attempt to bring Hindi to the State 'through the backdoor'. In a country that speaks in many tongues and where linguistic tensions are quite common, English has served as the veritable lingua franca, bridging segments of the population. In this globalised world, English is the bridge that connects India to the world and its economy. Shah's demonisation of English needs to be located within a broader ideological and epistemic thrust. But the spirit of the idea of India - linguistically or otherwise - is a celebration of pluralism and accommodation: English, with its many virtues and uses, has a firm place in the Indian ethos. It is expected that the government will see the pros and cons before implementing ill-conceived initiatives. Yash Pal Ralhan, Jalandhar-144003 Shah's shameful statement It was a shameful statement that the Union Home Minister Amit Shah made during a book launch event in Delhi where he spoke of a time "when those speaking English in the country would feel ashamed". English is one of the global languages and helps to understand our living world, especially in the AI era. When we study in our mother tongue, we understand well. But when we need to exchange what we learned, English is the tool. It may help unite the world but not to lead. Unnikrishnan Mangalasseri, Manjeri PO, Kerala-676121 Union Minister should eat his words Ourministers and senior politicians should always talk using measured words and not in an irresponsible manner (Those who speak English will soon feel ashamed: Shah). English (the lingua franca) is an international language. Undermining its importance in our country is like cutting one's nose to spite one's face. It is widely used in businesses, education and judiciary and provides ample opportunities for global communication as well as career advancements. A good command over English boosts our students' prospects not only in India but also abroad. Amit Shah should eat his own words. Dr Sunil Chopra,Ludhiana Shah's gaffe is regrettable AmitShah's statement that "those who speak English in this country would soon feel ashamed" deserves to be taken with a fistful of salt. English, as we all know, is the aspirational language of India's rising middle class. On that count, regional languages, even Hindi, serve a limited purpose. English is the sine qua non of today's India that has set out to claim its place on the global high table. Even the Prime Minister with his RSS/Hindi background, thought it fit to give English a brief hug while driving home a point about terrorism, and that too in Bihar. Mignon McLaughlin, American journalist and author, had said, "Every American child should grow up knowing a second language, preferably English." And that perhaps holds water for every Indian child living in these times. Amitji, are you listening? Avinash Godboley, Dewas (MP)
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Gender Agenda Newsletter: The missing women in politics
Last week, the World Economic Forum released its Global Gender Gap Index Report 2025. While India's performance in three of the four dimensions — economic participation and opportunity; educational attainment; health and survival — is either stable or has marginally improved, the significant lack of achievement in the fourth — political empowerment — 'weighs down the overall result,' says The Hindu editorial. Last year, as this explainer pointed out, 40% of the MPs elected to the House of Commons in the U.K. were women, while the South African National Assembly has around 45% women representation. In India, however, representation of women in the Lok Sabha is only 14%. In State Legislative Assemblies, it is even lower with the national average being around 9%. Many women leaders, especially at the panchayat level, tend to be figure heads, with the power being wielded by their husbands or fathers. At a glance, the data does seem odd given that India has had several powerful women politicians, including a Prime Minister. Today, the Union Finance Minister and the Chief Ministers of at least two large/politically significant States — Delhi and West Bengal — are women. Women have also become an important vote bank over the years. Recognising this, political parties have been 'actively wooing' them by providing subsidies for gas connections, cash transfers, and income support schemes, pointed out Nistula Hebbar in this video, before the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. She said, 'Studies by CSTS (Centre for Studies of Tradition and Systems) and Axis India have shown that women are voting increasingly according to their individual and not family preferences.' These are signs of empowerment. Why then are women, who are more educated than before and who are voting in larger numbers, not represented in politics? In a 2004 paper, professor Rajeshwari Deshpande wrote that political parties believe that women candidates have a lower winning ability than men; in 2018, former Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi said that this belief continues to be held even though it flies in the face of data. Also, elections are an expensive affair and many women continue to remain financially dependent on their families. The political scientist, Kanchan Chandra, wrote in a chapter in the 2016 book, Democratic Dynasties: State, Party and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics, that women, even when they are represented in politics, tend to be from political families. Structural barriers and societal bias are other widely cited factors as well. The Women's Reservation Bill, which promises 33% reservation to women in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, raises hope of greater political empowerment, but it will be implemented only after 2029. Until then, every small step counts in pushing women closer to decision-making positions in political bodies. In Tamil Nadu, panchayatars are increasingly compelled to consult women before taking major decisions, reported Nacchinarkkiniyan M. The IAS officer, Uma Mahadevan Dasgupta, wrote, 'One important way to improve women's participation in gram sabhas is with the involvement of women's self-help groups.' Last week, Telangana Jagruthi president K. Kavitha announced that the organisation will provide political training to youth, women, and students who do not have any political background. At times, reel life stories could do the trick too. This March, Asli Pradhan Kaun? — a three-part web series, which is an extension of the popular show Panchayat — was made in collaboration with the Panchayati Raj Ministry. At the local body level, one-third of the seats are reserved for women, with 22 States reserving 50% of seats. In Asli Pradhan Kaun?, Manju Devi, the reluctant, submissive pradhan in Panchayat, was no longer shown as a titular head but as an assertive leader. Within 48 hours of its release, the series had three million views. The hope is that Manju Devis across India will come into their own. Toolkit On June 17, UN Women released the 2024 Afghanistan Gender Index, which it described as 'the most comprehensive assessment of women's empowerment and gender equality in Afghanistan since August 2021 [when the Taliban took power].' The findings of the report are stark. Afghanistan has the second-widest gender gap in the world, with a 76% disparity between outcomes for women and men across health, education, financial inclusion, and decision-making. It also has one of the largest gender gaps in labour force participation. Men are three times more likely than women to have a bank account or use mobile money services. No woman holds positions in the de facto Cabinet or in local offices. Wordsworth Gender-affirming care: According to the World Health Organization, this encompasses a range of social, psychological, behavioural, and medical interventions 'designed to support and affirm an individual's gender identity' when it conflicts with the gender they were assigned at birth. The interventions fall along a continuum, from counselling to changes in social expression to medications such as hormone therapy. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Tennessee state law banning gender-affirming care for minors can stand. Ouch! A Nair woman took leave from the job given by the Kerala government to go abroad in search of a thing and she got what she deserved... Don't you know the history of Nair women? K. Rajan, now-suspended Revenue Department official in Kerala, referring to a Malayali nurse who died in the Air India crash People we met Shasvathi Siva, a creative consultant and writer based in Mumbai, is the author of the book Divorce is Normal. Determined to de-stigmatise divorce, she started using social media platforms a few years ago to put out the message that people should be able to speak more freely about divorce. She says, 'It is extremely difficult for women to get a divorce in India. Divorced women are viewed differently from divorced men: it's harder for them to marry a second time, find a house, or travel since there is so much judgment attached to their relationship status. I feel women need more encouragement and support and should definitely not be feeling so guilty about obtaining a divorce.' Shasvathi's views have appealed to many women struggling in bad marriages. She says her messages have not only been received well by many on social media, but have also led to changes in the way her own extended family views divorce.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's strike on Iran raises strategic, political risks ahead of retaliation
Trump's strike on Iran raises strategic, political risks ahead of retaliation Two days after offering Iran a two-week deadline to avoid military action, US President Donald Trump announced airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. The attack, carried out Saturday evening, June 21, marked a sharp escalation in tensions and introduced new uncertainties regarding military outcomes and domestic political fallout. 'Two weeks' turned out to be two days. On Thursday, Trump presented Iran with a negotiation window to avert a strike. By Saturday, he declared the strikes 'very successful' in a social media post, adding, 'Now is the time for peace.' Also read: In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Air conditioners without external unit. (click to see prices) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now Undo It remains unclear whether the original deadline was a tactical feint or if negotiations, reportedly led by Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, collapsed behind the scenes. Trump's message of seeking peace contrasts with the risks of retaliation from Iran , which had previously warned against US involvement in the conflict initiated by Israel. Iran retaliation expected as strike objectives unclear Live Events Among the sites struck was the Fordow nuclear facility, considered a critical component of Iran's uranium enrichment infrastructure. Analysts note that Iran maintains a range of retaliatory capabilities and that the airstrikes may not have neutralized its nuclear operations. Iran's response to direct US involvement is now the central question. The US airstrikes followed weeks of Israeli operations aimed at degrading Iranian military capabilities. However, Tehran retains substantial resources and has warned that further escalation could prompt regional consequences. Trump's strategy appears to involve pressuring Iran into negotiations. However, analysts question whether military action will succeed where diplomacy during Israeli strikes did not. 'Now is the time for peace,' Trump wrote, but Iran's previous refusal to engage under fire suggests continued resistance, not compliance. Also read: Trump wins immediate praise from Republicans in Congress after announcing strikes on Iran It will take time to determine whether the strikes inflicted lasting damage on Iran's fortified nuclear facilities. If they failed to achieve their core objectives, calls for additional US military action may increase, placing greater pressure on the administration and military planners. Domestic backlash grows over US military escalation Saturday's strikes also carry significant domestic political implications. Critics from both major parties have questioned the strategic necessity of the operation. Within Trump's own 'America First' political movement, concerns are growing over US involvement in another potential Middle East conflict. If the operation is limited to a one-off strike, Trump may contain the political fallout. However, any move toward sustained engagement risks alienating voters who supported his non-interventionist stance during the 2024 campaign. Trump frequently highlighted that he initiated no new wars during his first term and criticized prior administrations for foreign entanglements. Having taken decisive military action, the president now faces a situation where subsequent developments may fall outside his control.
