Loss of over-the-air TV leaves some Chicago sports fans frustrated with new CHSN-Comcast deal
CHICAGO — When the Chicago Sports Network went live Oct. 1, it didn't have a deal to be carried by Comcast, the market's largest pay-TV provider. But it touted an old school solution — broadcasting the network over-the-air — as a way to reach new fans in Chicago.
The great free-TV regional sports network experiment lasted eight months, a sudden demise that may be creating some static among Chicago viewers that bought into the antenna solution.
Advertisement
The nascent sports network finally joined the Comcast lineup Friday, but on the higher-priced Ultimate tier, which costs an additional $20 per month, on top of the $20.25 regional sports network fee charged to Chicago-area subscribers each month.
In the wake of the deal, CHSN abruptly pulled the plug Monday on local TV affiliates in Chicago, Rockford, Peoria, and Fort Wayne and South Bend, Ind.
'We are excited by our recent announcement bringing CHSN to Comcast viewers across the Chicagoland area, and we have heard a great deal of enthusiastic support from those viewers,' a CHSN spokesperson said in an email. 'While we appreciate the frustration felt by OTA users in the impacted markets, we continue to make OTA available in certain areas outside of Chicagoland.'
That leaves an untold number of fans who may have purchased an indoor antenna, a new receiver or even clambered up onto a roof to hook up an outdoor antenna, with a bunch of wires and a blank TV screen where the White Sox, Bulls and Blackhawks once beamed into their homes.
Advertisement
Tom Hedstrom from Skokie, who said he's been a White Sox fan since 1952, is one of them.
'The worst thing about this deal was CHSN agreeing to pull the plug on OTA,' Hedstrom said in an email Monday.
A Comcast subscriber whose older TV was not equipped to receive the digital over-the-air broadcasts, Hedstrom bought a new receiver — at CHSN's advice — to go with his antenna, and was able to view the network within weeks of its October launch.
But Hedstrom will now need to upgrade his Comcast subscription to continue watching CHSN.
'As a result, it will cost me an additional $30 per month because I will need to change my TV service from 'Popular' to 'Ultimate' and pay the full RSN fee plus some additional tax,' Hedstrom said. 'Will I do it? Yes, but I'm unhappy about it.'
Advertisement
Getting on Comcast, and potentially reaching its one million Chicago-area subscribers, was nonetheless crucial for CHSN.
A joint venture between the Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks and Nashville, Tennessee-based Standard Media, CHSN went live Oct.1 on pay-TV platforms DirecTV and Astound, and over the air in Chicago and several other markets. It added streaming service FuboTV and its own direct-to-consumer app, but was unable to strike a deal with Comcast, the market's largest pay-TV provider.
In Chicago, CHSN leased two digital subchannels of WJYS-Ch. 62, a full-powered UHF TV station licensed to Hammond, to broadcast the sports network in high-definition to anyone that could capture the signal with a TV antenna.
About 15% of the 3.46 million homes in the Chicago market watch TV using an antenna, according to Nielsen. Beyond reception limitations, some viewers with older TVs needed to buy new receivers to get the picture, a problem CHSN addressed on its website.
Advertisement
Prior to launching the network, Jason Coyle, president of Chicago Sports Network, told the Chicago Tribune the over-the-air platform was an integral part of the strategy to 'reimagine' regional sports networks amid cord-cutting and declining pay-TV subscribers.
But the over-the-air offering proved to be a stumbling block in negotiations with Comcast, which balked at paying carriage fees to CHSN for programming some viewers could get for free.
Comcast also pushed for moving CHSN to its more expensive Ultimate tier, something it has done with other regional sports networks across the U.S. in recent months. The Marquee Sports Network, the pay-TV home of the Cubs, remains on the lower-priced basic tier, at least for now.
CHSN went live Friday on Comcast Channel 200, where its predecessor NBC Sports Chicago, resided until last fall. For Comcast customers on the lower-priced basic plan, Channel 200 bears a message that CHSN requires a subscription upgrade to watch.
Advertisement
Comcast declined to say how many Chicago-area customers currently subscribe to the Ultimate plan.
'We don't provide the percentage of customers on Ultimate but can confirm that many sports fans already subscribe to the Ultimate TV level of service because of its comprehensive sports channel lineup,' a Comcast spokesperson said in an email Monday.
Going live on Comcast Friday may have already given CHSN a boost in ratings. Sources said Friday's primetime audience for the Sox-Royals game was up 66% over the previous week's Sox-Orioles broadcast, which was prior to Comcast joining the pay-TV lineup.
Marc Ganis, a Chicago-based sports marketing consultant, said it was nonetheless unlikely that many subscribers will upgrade to the Ultimate plan amid another losing White Sox campaign, with the team sporting the worst record in the American League through 66 games.
Advertisement
He said subscription upgrades will likely pick up when the teams do better.
'It will be one of those rare examples when the customers will speak very loudly with their purchases deciding when and whether they choose to pay up or not for the sports package upgrade,' Ganis said.
Cheered by many, the new carriage deal has nonetheless frustrated some Chicago sports fans, especially those who took the antenna plunge, and now are being asked to pay up to see CHSN on Comcast.
Erin Blasko, a longtime Sox fan living in South Bend, watched CHSN over-the-air on the digital subchannel of local affiliate WHME-TV.
Advertisement
'I'm disappointed to learn CHSN is ending its OTA broadcasts,' Blasko said in an email. 'The Sox and other MLB teams should be expanding — not shrinking — opportunities for fans to watch games at all price levels.'
While Comcast is available on the Ultimate tier in South Bend, Blasko, who hasn't subscribed to the cable provider 'in more than 15 years,' plans to sign up for the $19.99 per month CHSN streaming app to keep watching the Sox this season.
Keith Williams, a Comcast Ultimate subscriber who lives in north suburban Lake Forest, bought a $70 amplified indoor antenna in September as a backup for when his cable service goes out. It ended up in the starting lineup, delivering CHSN amid the protracted Comcast blackout through the entire Bulls and Blackhawks seasons, and a chunk of the current White Sox season.
While CHSN is now live on his cable plan, Williams said the cost to watch the regional sports network has risen enough for him to consider other pay-TV options.
Advertisement
'Sad though that Comcast forced them to take OTA service away from people … and especially away from people who will find $500 per year to be a substantial or overwhelming burden on their family budgets,' Williams said in an email.
Meanwhile, David Perlman, a Comcast Ultimate subscriber in Chicago's Rogers Park neighborhood, was never able to get the CHSN over-the-air broadcasts. He tried an old roof antenna, bought a new antenna and eventually gave up as both the Bulls and Hawks seasons slipped away.
On Friday, CHSN magically appeared in his Comcast channel lineup. But Perlman said he doesn't plan to tune in until the Bulls and Hawks return to action.
'Being a lifelong Cubs fan, I have no particular use now for their station until the fall, when next season begins for both teams,' Perlman said.
____
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are a winning pair on date night at Game 4 of Stanley Cup Final
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce looked like quite the power couple as they were spotted on a date night at Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final. The pair was seen holding hands as they arrived at the Amerant Bank Arena in Sunrise, Fla., on Thursday night to watch the Edmonton Oilers take on the Florida Panthers for the coveted trophy. The pop star, 35, looked stylish in an Area Crystal Trim Track Jacket ($995) paired with the matching Crystal Trim Track Shorts ($595). She completed the look with the Prada's Buffalo Neoprene Lace Up Chelsea Ankle Boots, which are currently sold out. Meanwhile Kelce, 35, sported a red long-sleeved top and matching shorts. He finished off his look with a pair of red-and-white sneakers and a baseball cap. Once seated, the lovebirds looked cozy as they were shown on the TV broadcast footage chatting while Kelce showed the 'Cruel Summer' singer something on his phone. Swift sipped on a drink with a straw. At one point, the A-list couple stood up to cheer on the game. They beamed while applauding alongside other spectators. Swift and Kelce have been spending time together in Florida while the tight end rents a $20 million mansion in the Sunshine State to prepare for the forthcoming 2025-26 NFL season. The Kansas City Chiefs star reportedly snagged the Boca Raton property in April, bringing along his personal chef and his luxurious car collection. Last month, he went viral when he was seen shirtless shortly after wrapping up an intense workout. Swift and Kelce were first spotted in Florida together on a date night at Harry's in West Palm Beach on May 23. At the time, eyewitnesses caught them getting cozy in a booth. They were also photographed holding hands after dining at Buccan restaurant earlier this month.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Father of Steelers offensive coordinator and founder of FedEx, Fred Smith, dies at 80
Fred Smith, the founder of the FedEx Corporation, which revolutionized express delivery, and father of the Steelers' offensive coordinator, has died at 80, according to Memphis Mayor Paul Young. "Fred Smith was more than a business leader; he was a visionary whose ideas reshaped not only the global economy but the very identity of Memphis," said Mayor Young. "When he founded FedEx, he didn't just launch a company, he changed the way the world moves." Smith, the Marine Corps veteran, started FedEx in the 1970s, and in 1973, it began operation. They delivered small parcels and documents at first, and it ultimately grew into a global transportation and logistics company with an average of 17 million shipments per day. Smith would step down as CEO in 2022 but would remain as the executive chairman of the company. "As we begin to process this tremendous loss, it is important that we take care of one another and demonstrate the passion and compassion that Fred embodied every day," said Raj Subramaniam, FedEx President, CEO, and Director. "In the coming days and weeks, I know we will all find ways to honor his memory and pay tribute to his legacy." In a 2023 interview with the Associated Press, Smith discussed a gift to the Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation that he believed could grow in value to $65 million. "The thing that's interested me are the institutions and the causes, not the naming or the recognition," he said at the time. The Steelers hired Fred's son, Arthur, in 2024 after he spent 2021-23 as the head coach of the Atlanta Falcons. He has been a coach in the NFL since 2007, when he first was the defensive quality control coach for Washington. He would then go on to Tennessee, where he held multiple jobs, including defensive quality control coach, offensive quality coach, assistant offensive line coach, assistant tight ends coach, and offensive coordinator. We have reached out to the Steelers for comment and will update the story once we hear back.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California insurance crisis could have dire consequences for affordable housing
Insurance bills have always been on the high side for Episcopal Community Services, a San Francisco nonprofit that operates more than 2,000 units of permanent supportive housing and serves a population insurers deem risky. But over the past few years, ECS has seen insurance costs skyrocket. Its premiums rose 84% last year, on top of 10% and 15% increases the previous two years. At the same time, ECS' deductibles quadrupled last year and reached $100,000 for some properties, forcing ECS to cover most of its own claims. Those rising costs were a factor in ECS' decision to lay off six employees this year, and staff members fear that continued increases could jeopardize essential but expensive ECS services, like the homeless shelter it operates or the seven hotels it leases for supportive housing. 'If we're gonna continue to operate the housing, we have to pay the insurance,' said Chris Callandrillo, ECS' chief program officer. 'We've got to get that from somewhere, and that burden is huge.' Across California, affordable housing developers say they're being squeezed by ever-rising premiums, increasingly convoluted coverage arrangements and deductibles so high that they're self-insuring for all but the most catastrophic losses. Advocates are pushing the federal government for relief in the form of subsidies for risk mitigation or the creation of a federally backed insurance product, but few solutions appear likely in the short term. According to an analysis of over 130 California properties financed by a key federal low-income tax credit and included in the national nonprofit Enterprise Community Partners' portfolio, median annual per-unit insurance expenses increased 142% from 2019 to 2024, from $409 to $989. From 2022 to 2024, some California affordable developers reported insurance expense increases as high as 500%. Without intervention, affordable housing providers say, these ballooning costs could force cuts to staffing or on-site services and imperil future projects at a time when demand for affordable units is as high as ever. The problem goes far beyond the affordable housing sector; statewide, insurers have sought perennial rate hikes, nonrenewed customers or ceased writing new policies as they grapple with wildfire-fueled losses and high construction costs. But over the past few years, insurance costs for affordable housing developments have been about 25% higher than for market rate developments in the same areas, said Jordann Coleman, senior vice president at Walnut Creek-based Heffernan Insurance Brokers, whose client base is 40% affordable housing. And affordable housing developers say they're especially vulnerable because they're already operating on razor-thin margins — and because unlike for their market-rate counterparts, the law limits their ability to pass on costs to tenants. 'Somebody's got to come up with a way to pay for that, and for us, it can't be rent,' said Linda Mandolini, CEO of Eden Housing, a Hayward developer with dozens of Bay Area affordable housing complexes. The amount Eden Housing has paid for insurance has risen every year since 2018, including a 20% jump this year on top of a 28% jump the previous year. Insurers have long considered affordable housing riskier to underwrite than market-rate housing — especially permanent supportive housing, where formerly homeless residents less used to living inside can spark fires or cause damage. But developers say insurance costs are out of step with claims, and they don't seem to take into account efforts to mitigate risks — such as hiring more security or replacing gas stoves with electric ones — or how affordable complexes can make neighborhoods safer and spur economic development over time. One insurer that writes policies for affordable housing developers declined to comment on its rationale for increasing premiums and deductibles, and another insurer did not respond to a request for comment. Before around 2020, it was possible to find a single insurer willing to underwrite an affordable housing provider's whole portfolio of properties, Coleman said. Now, she's sometimes working with up to 12 different insurers to piece together more scant coverage with higher deductibles — and each insurer has its own set of questions and restrictions. Coleman said she is increasingly reliant on more complicated risk-sharing arrangements, such as 'insurance towers' — Jenga-like stacks of policies where different insurers underwrite fractions of a single property (one of ECS' properties is underwritten by six insurers, Callandrillo said). In cases where clients have preexisting contracts that require lower deductibles than insurers are willing to grant, Coleman has also turned to deductible buy-down policies — additional coverage from a separate insurer that pays the difference in the case of a claim. 'The work is exponential, not just for us, but for our clients as well,' Coleman said. These days, it's rare that she has more than one option to offer a client. Most affordable developers are already working on shoestring budgets stretched thin by rising construction costs and still recovering from lower revenue from tenants who got out of the habit of paying rent during COVID-19. Because most expenses are nonnegotiables, such as payroll and maintenance, keeping up with insurance payments can mean dipping into funds earmarked for longer term projects. 'This is really depleting our property level reserve, our rainy day fund,' said Janelle Chan, CEO of East Bay Asian Local Development Corp., which has developed about 2,500 affordable units in Oakland. The nonprofit has diverted $12 million from its reserves over the last few years to pay for property expenses including insurance, increased utility costs and rent collection deficits, she said. As part of belt-tightening measures, the East Bay Asian Local Development Corp. is considering cutting community programming or stripping nice-to-have features from planned projects, Chan said. But if premiums stay high, affordable developers say, future projects could be in jeopardy if insurance — a prerequisite for securing loans — is just too expensive, or if developers' reserves have been too depleted to buy properties in the first place. 'We might have to put stuff on hold,' Mandolini said. Among Eden Housing's pipeline of 4,500 planned affordable homes is a complex for seniors at risk of homelessness in San Jose, converting the former Richmond Health Center into dozens of units of permanent supportive housing, and a 119-unit Liberation Park intended to revitalize a historically Black neighborhood in East Oakland. There's another even more serious risk: If mounting expenses cause developers to default, foreclosure can wipe out a property's low-income housing use designation — a more permanent setback for constructing affordable units. 'That's just a critical loss that can't be allowed to happen,' said Thom Amdur, senior vice president for policy and impact at Lincoln Avenue Capital, which invests in affordable housing across the country. Delays or defaults could threaten the region's ability to meet its housing goals. The Bay Area is required to plan to build close to 450,000 new units by 2031, of which 40% should be allocated for low- or very low-income residents, according to the state's Regional Housing Needs Determination. Affordable developers want the government to step in, either by subsidizing risk mitigation efforts or by stabilizing the insurance market through creating a federally backstopped insurance product or expanding FAIR plans — state-created insurers of last resort, such as the one in California — to cover more affordable housing. California lawmakers are considering a bill, AB1339, that would require the Department of Insurance to conduct a study on barriers to affordable housing insurance statewide. For now, developers continue to feel the squeeze. 'We're being asked to build more, and yet we are struggling to protect what we have,' Chan said. 'The candle's burning at both ends.'
