Trump calls again for a Fed cut but resilient jobs report makes that even less likely
President Trump once again suggested the Federal Reserve should lower rates, but any slim chance of a June cut evaporated Friday with a jobs report that showed continued resilience in the labor market.
There were questions about the possibility of a June cut this week following a weak ADP National Employment Report released Wednesday, said Wellington Management fixed income portfolio manager Brij Khurana, but the new Labor Department report released Friday "is good enough that it takes away June."
"The labor market is not cracking yet even though it is decelerating," he added.
What the Labor Department said Friday is that the US economy added 139,000 nonfarm payrolls in May, more than the 126,000 expected by economists. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%.
Following the release, Trump posted on social media that 'AMERICA IS HOT' and said, in a reference to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, that ''Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster!'
He also suggested more cuts were now necessary, referring to moves made by other central banks to ease monetary policy.
'Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none. Despite him, our Country is doing great. Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!' That follows a similar post from the president Wednesday where he called Powell 'unbelievable!!!' and said "'Too Late' Powell must now LOWER THE RATE."
But Friday's Labor Department report makes it even less likely the Fed will consider rate cuts in the near term, Fed watchers said, since it doesn't show that the jobs market is grinding to a halt.
Investors currently are betting there is virtually no chance of a cut out of the June 17-18 meeting, and that the central bank won't ease its policy again until September at the earliest.
The Fed has not altered its benchmark rates at all in 2025 after reducing them by a full percentage point at the end of 2024, citing uncertainties about Trump's policies.
In fact, in recent days several fed policymakers have made it clear they are more worried about inflation than employment — and thus are content to be patient about any changes to the Fed's current stance.
"I see greater upside risks to inflation at this juncture and potential downside risks to employment and output growth down the road, and this leads me to continue to support maintaining the FOMC's policy rate at its current setting if upside risks to inflation remain," Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler Kugler said Thursday in a speech at the Economic Club of New York.
Kansas City Fed president Jeff Schmid also said Thursday he is very focused on the risk for higher inflation from tariffs and that the Fed should 'not let down our guard.'
'While the tariffs are likely to push up prices, the extent of the increase is not certain, and likely will not be fully apparent for some time,' Schmid added.
Schmid noted that "the extent of the drag on growth and employment is also unclear but "I intend to remain focused on the importance of maintaining credibility on inflation."
But there is certainly a divide emerging among some Fed policymakers about whether to hold rates steady or get more comfortable about cuts later this year.
Some policymakers are arguing for "looking through" the impact of the duties as temporary, a stance that would leave the door open for cuts.
Federal Reserve governor Chris Waller is now firmly in the first camp. Last Sunday, he made an argument for why any impact on inflation from tariffs likely won't last.
"Given my belief that any tariff-induced inflation will not be persistent and that inflation expectations are anchored, I support looking through any tariff effects on near-term inflation when setting the policy rate," Waller said in a speech in Seoul, South Korea.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO leaders are set to agree a historic defense spending pledge, but the hike won't apply to all
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5% of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communique — a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs — would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the U.S. has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada 'a low payer.' NATO's new spending goals The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2%, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5% would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5% on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28% of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1% of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3%, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned 'capability targets' to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that 'the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain 'can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1%.' Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Setting a deadline It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2% target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The U.S. insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said. ___ Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major U.S. banks poised for massive shift in approach toward cryptocurrency: 'Defend your right to buy'
Despite the instability of cryptocurrency, major U.S. banks are considering a move toward supporting these emerging currencies, Reuters reported. However, they are being rightfully cautious given the shifting legal landscape and how easy it would be to run afoul of laws designed to keep our financial systems honest. Reuters spoke to industry executives about the possibility and revealed that internal discussions are already happening regarding the potential change. However, no bank wants to make the first move. "When I look at the bitcoin universe, the leverage in the system, the misuse in the system, the money laundering issues, trafficking, I'm not a fan of it," said Jamie Dimon, CEO of the largest U.S. bank, JPMorgan Chase, per Reuters. "We're going to allow you to buy it, we're not going to custody it. ... I don't think you should smoke, but I defend your right to smoke. I defend your right to buy bitcoin." It's not surprising that banks have their eye on this move. President Trump has courted cryptocurrency enthusiasts with promises to create a federal cryptocurrency reserve and make other investments as president. However, it's also not surprising that they're hanging back. The risk is high, and anti-money laundering rules and other regulations could sharply limit their activities, with no guarantees yet as to how those rules may change. When banks do enter the game, it will likely be in small ways, as partners to existing organizations. They may also want to create a stablecoin of their own. It's in the best interests of the American public for legal protections regarding cryptocurrency to be strengthened and for banks to be cautious. All the computing power needed is bad for the environment, at least until we switch to a more eco-friendly cryptocurrency. In the meantime, until banking regulators speak up, we're unlikely to see much change in crypto banking. Do you think the federal government should give us tax breaks to improve our homes? Definitely Only for certain upgrades Let each state decide instead No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio

27 minutes ago
How to take care of yourself and your finances when you've experienced a layoff
NEW YORK -- Recent layoffs from technology and media companies and government agencies might have you thinking about job security. Losing your job is a difficult thing to process and you might feel the impact in several parts of your life. But there are things you can do to alleviate some of the stress and anxiety. If you've been laid off, experts recommend that you first take a moment to process and then move on with a plan for your job search. 'A layoff can feel so personal but it's not a reflection of your value or what you contributed. Especially in the U.S., the work we do is so tied to our identity,' said Lindsay Bryan-Podvin, a financial therapist. Here are some expert recommendations to help you take care of your finances and your mental health if you've lost your job: Losing your job can cause a lot of stress and financial anxiety, so it's important that you take time to emotionally process. 'Acknowledge and normalize that they're going to feel a range of emotions, whether it's anger or sadness,' Bryan-Podvin said. Whether you are feeling sadness, shock, anger or even relief, taking a moment to feel those emotions can help you move forward. To make plans for the future, it's essential that you review your current financial situation, said career coach Marlo Lyons. If you have a budget, take a closer look and review whether you have expenses that you can temporarily cut to save money. Lyons recommends that you know how long your severance package will last if you're receiving one. Applying for unemployment benefits as soon as possible can help alleviate some of the financial stress of a layoff. While the amount you get for unemployment might not be as much as your salary, it can help you to stay afloat for some time, Lyons said. The Labor Department has tips on applying for unemployment. Getting laid off from a job can affect your self-esteem, so Bryan-Podvin recommends that you create a list of good qualities about yourself that add to your overall value as a person. Bryan-Podvin calls this a 'non-financial asset list." 'If I were doing a non-financial asset list on myself I might say I'm a pretty good partner and a fun aunt,' she said. When working with her clients, Bryan-Podvin recommends that they create this list to remind them that their self-worth is part of their net worth. If you lose your job, you'll need to be more strategic about your spending, said Jesse Mecham, founder of the money management app YNAB. 'In a layoff, it becomes even more imperative that you treat every dollar with more attention than you have in the past,' Mecham said. Part of YNAB's budgeting strategy is giving each dollar a job, whether it is to pay rent, buy groceries or add to your savings account. When adjusting your spending, Bryan-Podvin also recommends that you approach this with some compassion. Since cutting back can bleed into not doing activities that make you happy, she recommends reminding yourself that this is a temporary pause rather than a permanent change in your lifestyle. While utilizing your credit card to pay for some expenses is almost inevitable, it's best to not completely lean on credit while you're searching for a new job. 'If getting a new job takes them a little longer than they thought, that credit card has just become an anchor for them,' Mecham said. Even though unemployment is temporary, Mecham recommends cutting expenses rather than keeping them at the same level and leaning on credit. Look for community resources, whether that means finding a food bank near you or applying for a temporary hardship program. 'Lots of communities offer temporary hardship programs when it comes to necessary bills, such as electricity or water,' Bryan-Podvin said. offers a benefit finder where you can find available programs and how to apply. As you are applying to new jobs, Lyons recommends that you take some time to assess if your professional goals are still the same. If you're continuing in the same field, Lyons recommends that you make your resume 'forward-looking,' which means showing your future employer what you can do, not just what you have done. 'You want to show the employer what you can do, what unique value you can bring to that particular job that no other candidate can bring because of your previous experience,' Lyons said. Lyons also recommends that you activate your network by reaching out to past colleagues on LinkedIn or attending industry networking events. Online certifications are another great way to make yourself a better candidate, she added. Having a routine can help you take care of your mental health and keep a cadence of applying to jobs. Plan your days so they include eating at your usual time, exercising and applying for jobs for a specific amount of time. 'When we are laid off, unemployment can feel really aimless, especially if it came at us kind of out of nowhere,' Bryan-Podvin said. It's also important to avoid isolating yourself and lean on your support system for emotional support, she added. ___ The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.