OSU announces no tuition increase, just higher learning

STILLWATER, Okla. (KFOR) – The Oklahoma State University (OSU) and A&M Board of Regents announced Friday, students will not see an tuition increase for the fourth straight year.
According to OSU, leaders are placing the focus on students and higher education access.
OSU/A&M Board of Regents Chair Jimmy Harrel shared his thoughts after the vote.
'As Regents of the Oklahoma State University System, we are pleased to maintain tuition and mandatory academic fees without increase for the fourth consecutive year,' Harrel said. 'The decision reflects the commitment of the regents and university leadership to maintaining the affordability and accessibility of a college education. It is our land-grant mission to provide those opportunities to as many students as possible, for the betterment of our communities, the state and our country.'
The board's decision keeps OSU's tuition rates affordable and accessible for students and their families.
Governor Stitt quietly signs several Education bills
OSU President Jim Hess echoed that sentiment and expressed his gratitude for the regents' focus on students.
'We are deeply grateful to the OSU/A&M Board of Regents for once again voting to keep tuition and mandatory academic fees flat, reaffirming our commitment to putting students first and fulfilling our land-grant mission,' Dr. Hess said. 'We are called to widen the doors of opportunity, and by holding the line on tuition, we ensure that a world-class education remains within reach for every Oklahoman willing to work for it. This decision supports our mission to educate the next generation of leaders, from the classroom to the community.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

What is the Prenatal Equal Protection Act? New bill would effectively ban abortion in Ohio

(WJW) — On Wednesday, Republican State Reps. Levi Dean and Johnathan Newman are set to introduce a controversial new bill at the Ohio Statehouse that would ban abortion in the Buckeye State. The legislation is called the Prenatal Equal Protection Act, and it aims to extend full legal rights to fetuses from the moment of fertilization. Bagworm outbreak threat growing in Ohio, OSU warns 'We are trying to create a constitutional debate in which we believe the state's constitution would be superseded by the U.S. Constitution,' said pro-life activist Austin Beigel, who helped craft the bill. Beigel, a member of End Abortion Ohio, said the legislation is about ensuring what he sees as equal protection for all life — born or unborn. 'To simply say this is a person in the womb, out of the womb — we know they are human. We believe all people deserve legal protection under the law,' he said. Supporters of the bill argue it is not about politics, but about morality. 'It is not going to permit the killing of innocent human beings, innocent people,' Beigel added. But opponents said the bill defies the will of Ohio voters, who passed a constitutional amendment in 2023 explicitly protecting access to abortion. 'I mean, we knew on Nov. 7, 2023, that there would be plans to undermine the will of the Ohio voter,' said Jordyn Close, deputy director of the Ohio Women's Alliance. Close said she first learned of the proposed legislation last week and was troubled by what she found. 'This bill does not account for any special circumstances. It does not account for any real-life realities for Ohioans who need abortion care,' she said. Baby delivered from brain-dead woman on life support in Georgia The bill argues that Ohio's constitutional amendment legalizing abortion should be considered invalid, claiming it violates the U.S. Constitution's equal-protection clause. But Close believes that argument won't hold up in court. 'Our fantastic legal team and legal scholars will be able to defeat this,' she said. Supporters of the legislation are expected to hold a rally inside the Statehouse from 2:30 to 4 p.m. on Wednesday as the bill is officially filed. Whether the bill gains traction in the legislature remains to be seen, but the fight over abortion rights in Ohio appears far from over. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Chicago Tribune

4 hours ago

• Chicago Tribune

Clarence Page: Did you miss a national holiday, Mr. President?

Juneteenth came and went Thursday, but curiously something seemed to be missing from the annual celebration: a cordial salute from the president of the United States. Well, sure, you might say at this point in our political history: After all, he's Donald Trump. What do we expect? The only times when the master of Mar-a-Lago brings up a delicate topic like America's troubled racial history is when he can use it to bludgeon Democrats and other liberals. But it wasn't long ago that Trump regularly made a point to mark Juneteenth, the holiday that honors the freeing of enslaved Americans by his Republican predecessor Abraham Lincoln. As The New York Times reported, Trump invoked Juneteenth in each of his first four years as president, before it was a federal holiday. It commemorates June 19, 1865, the day Union soldiers brought the news of freedom to enslaved Black people in Texas, letting them know they had been legally freed by Lincoln's signing of the Emancipation Proclamation two years earlier. Better late than never. Much better. When asked on Thursday about Trump's intentions to mark the holiday in the traditional presidential manner, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt answered evasively, 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today.' That was strange, because by Leavitt's own admission, Trump had in the past week issued proclamations commemorating Father's Day, Flag Day and National Flag Week, and the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill — none of which are among the 11 annual federal holidays. Why does Trump feel differently about the holiday now? Without mentioning Juneteenth by name, Trump bellyached on Truth Social: 'Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don't want it either!' Ah, yes, workers and their well-known aversion to paid holidays. He continued: 'Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' That sounds ominous. Is Trump planning to claw back paid holidays from hardworking government employees? It occurred to me, as a descendant of freed enslaved people, that perhaps Trump simply wants to downgrade our day of jubilee. True, back in his first term, Trump lavishly boasted: 'I made Juneteenth very famous. It's actually an important event, it's an important time. But nobody had heard of it. Very few people have heard of it.' (That would be news to the millions of 'nobodies' who spent years eating soul food and pounds of traditional 'red cake' to celebrate the day.) Trump even spoke favorably about Juneteenth as a federal holiday, but he didn't get around to making it official before he left office. It was then-President Joe Biden who completed that task in 2021. Which may explain Trump's newfound hostility to the holiday. Whereas Biden sought to mend the nation's racial divisions after the George Floyd protests, Trump built his revanchist second presidency on the demonization of diversity. Consider that until recently, the following message could be read on the Army's official website: 'Juneteenth is an integral part of Army life. It is a time to reflect on the crucial role the Army played in the Emancipation Proclamation and ending segregation in the U.S.' It called on readers to 'honor those who fought and sacrificed to ensure the Constitution fulfilled its promise to all Americans.' As an Army veteran, that sentiment makes me feel proud. However, if you Google those words today, and click on the link in the search results, you reach an error page. The Army scrubbed the message. Why? Perhaps for the same reason Trump's secretary of defense ordered Arlington National Cemetery to delete webpage memorials of Black and Latino people and women who defended our country. And the same reason he restored Confederate names to military bases and dismissed several Black generals. It's hard to think of a holiday better suited to uplift our mulligan stew of a nation than Juneteenth, when our armed forces finally broke the shackles of a profoundly unjust institution, beginning a process of liberation and reconciliation that we carry on. Sadly, such historical good news is being suppressed too often in today's classrooms and by political opportunists who would rather build unity in their own ranks by turning us against each other like so many political interest groups. Some, including our president it seems, would rather hide our troubled past than try to use it to learn how to work together and truly make America great. Say, tell me again: What was the U.S. Civil War about?

Miami Herald

6 hours ago

• Miami Herald

McDonald's secures honor no restaurants wants

America's restaurant industry is at a post-pandemic crossroads, grappling with rising prices, shifting consumer habits, and the relentless march of digital transformation. Both independent eateries and well-known chains have been suffering and closing rapidly, and there doesn't seem to be one reason for failure or recipe for success. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Yet, as the latest 2025 American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Restaurant and Food Delivery Study reveals, the biggest names in the business often fall short where it matters most: customer satisfaction. While large chains dominate the landscape in terms of sales and visibility, their sheer scale doesn't always translate to happy customers. In fact, the ACSI study shows that many of the industry's largest players - especially in the quick-service and food delivery sectors - routinely fall behind smaller rivals in customer satisfaction scores. For example, the quick-service restaurant (QSR) sector maintained a customer satisfaction score of 79 out of 100. Chick-fil-A led the survey for the 11th year in a row, scoring 83. McDonald's, Wendy's, and Taco Bell failed to make the top tier, overshadowed by regional favorites and smaller brands that have made strides in customer service. McDonald's earned the worst ACSI score (70), but ACSI analysts believe the chain's new efforts to speed up research and development needed to drive faster technology and menu changes could reverse the company's slide. Raising Cane's and Wingstop, relative newcomers compared to some names on the list, are gaining ground by focusing on a limited menu, quality, and digital engagement even as they grow. The full-service segment tells a similar story. Texas Roadhouse, a chain that emphasizes local flair and attentive service, topped the list with an 84. Olive Garden and LongHorn Steakhouse also performed well, but many other big names struggled. Chili's, for example, saw its score drop by 3%, while Buffalo Wild Wings and Denny's posted some of the lowest satisfaction ratings in the sector. Related: Trader Joe's rivals could learn a lesson from the cult favorite company What's driving the gap? "Large chains often face challenges maintaining consistency and personal touch as they expand. Customers notice when service feels impersonal or when digital experiences don't match up to expectations," said Associate Professor of Marketing at Michigan State University and ACSI's Director of Research Emeritus, Forrest Morgeson, in an announcement. Digital ordering and delivery have become critical to the restaurant experience, but the biggest brands are stumbling here, too. The nationwide chains rely on digital platforms for ordering and delivery, but the third-party services may make it difficult for them to provide a seamless or consistent experience. Satisfaction is highest among dine-in customers (83), but falls for carry-out (79) and drops even further for delivery (74). The complexity of scaling digital operations appears to be a stumbling block for many industry leaders. Perhaps nowhere are the challenges facing big brands more evident than in food delivery. While the sector as a whole improved slightly to a satisfaction score of 74, smaller delivery brands outperformed the giants. Uber Eats scored 75, while DoorDash and Grubhub each managed only 73. Chick-fil-A also led in the South and West and tied with Culver's in the Midwest, while Starbucks took the Northeast. In the burger category, Culver's edged out Burger King; in pizza, Papa Johns and Pizza Hut came out on top - demonstrating that even within categories, the biggest names don't always win. As the restaurant industry faces economic headwinds and changing consumer expectations, the ACSI survey makes one thing clear: being big isn't enough. Customers want quality, consistency and a personal touch. These are areas where smaller or regional brands can beat out the big nationwide chains. Related: Trader Joe's making huge mistake not copying Walmart, Target The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.