logo
Americans say they care about getting enough protein and avoiding food dyes. Their eating habits say otherwise.

Americans say they care about getting enough protein and avoiding food dyes. Their eating habits say otherwise.

Yahoo4 hours ago

Americans are fed a lot of information about what counts as healthy food. We wanted to know if these nutritional values are really as important to Americans as the headlines suggest, so, with the help of YouGov, we polled more than 1,500 U.S. adults in April 2025.
The results: Most people agree that protein is important, and food dyes should be banned. And yet, a much smaller share of Americans are checking food labels for these ingredients. So what gives? We spoke to experts about whether Americans really value the nutritional concerns that make headlines, and what you can do to better align your ideals with your dietary habits.
We asked Americans about whether they consider nutritional information when they choose what to eat and, if so, what factors they prioritize (meaning: calories, sodium, etc.). Then we zoomed in on two nutritional topics that have gotten a lot of buzz lately: protein and red dyes.
Protein has been having a moment, partly because it's what some experts have dubbed 'the last macronutrient standing' amid the bad raps of fats and carbs. Its connection to muscle building and weight loss — especially in conjunction with GLP-1 medications like Ozempic — has been a further boon to protein. Americans seem to have taken note. A large majority (85%) of respondents to the Yahoo News/YouGov poll said that protein is very or somewhat important to them when choosing what to eat. Yet among the two-thirds of respondents who said they check nutritional labels, only 13% said that protein is the factor they pay most attention to when choosing what to eat. And only about a quarter of respondents said they're eating more protein now than they were a year ago.
We found the same pattern when it comes to food dyes. More than two-thirds (65%) of respondents to our poll said they approve of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s move to ban many artificial colorings. But only 37% of respondents said they actively avoid food dyes, and just 27% said they always or usually check food labels for the ingredients (another 24% said they sometimes check).
If we're so aware of what we should be including or avoiding in our food, but don't necessarily act on it, are we just too lazy to make healthy choices? Not exactly. For example, 66% of the respondents to our survey make the effort to check nutritional information. But the most commonly considered factor was calorie content (16%), which isn't necessarily a good indicator of whether a food is healthy, according to recent research. While it might seem fairly easy to check foods for their content of other nutrients, calculating out how much we need of each of these (protein, vitamins, etc.) gets complicated, fast. 'There's a lot of evidence that people don't take actions that are in their best interests based on their knowledge,' says Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, director of Tufts University's Food Is Medicine Institute. 'People have an aspirational image of what they would like to do, and then [there's] what they do in real life.'
This phenomenon is known as the intention-action gap. 'And for nutrition, it's doubly or triply complicated by the beliefs and intentions and knowledge also being a huge source of confusion for people,' says Mozaffarian.
Picture yourself at the grocery store or in the drive-through line. What's on your checklist? Protein? Food dyes? Calories? Whole grains? And how much is enough, or too much, and what even qualifies as a whole grain anyway? Does a Whopper meal count as paleo? 'That confusion dramatically increases the gap between aspirations and actions,' says Mozaffarian.
It also takes time — a lot of it. 'Our lives are all busy, and just because we would like to do something doesn't mean we will actually get around to doing it,' Teresa Fung, an adjunct professor of nutrition at Simmons University and Harvard University, tells Yahoo Life. And with new diet trends and hyped ingredients and priorities cropping up all the time, it can be hard to stay focused on the things that really matter for your personal diet. Fung is glad that people are aware of issues like food additives, 'but hopefully it's not at the expense of other things,' she says. 'If it's just for a few months that I'm paying attention to [any one food issue] and then a year from now I'm not,' that's not helpful, she adds.
However, some public health experts, including Mozzaffarian, believe that certain foods 'just shouldn't be on the shelf,' he says. Specifically, he notes that poor quality diets and ultra-processed foods are linked to health conditions such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome (a collection of related health problems common among overweight and obese people). 'It's not an information problem, it's a product problem,' Mozzaffarian says.
Until food is better regulated, nutrition labels are still key to making healthy choices, says Mozaffarian. Grocery shopping and cooking at home go a long way to help you take control of your health, instead of eating packaged, restaurant or fast foods.
And, perhaps counterintuitively, 'if you want to eat healthier, buy more products without labels,' Mozaffarian says, meaning whole foods like fruits, vegetables and eggs.
When it comes to protein, most people actually don't need to stress too much about whether they're eating enough of it. 'The typical American diet already has enough protein, so if people are already doing it, they don't really need to take the additional action' of checking labels for protein content, she says. Fung also suspects that, like most single-nutrient eating trends, the protein obsession will fade. 'It happens all the time: There are always new discoveries, and people focus on them until they're no longer new, then we wait for the next shiny new thing,' she says. That's another strategy: If the food rules you're trying to follow are super trendy, they probably aren't that sustainable, or essential, Fung adds. However, in some cases, there's a grain of truth to nutritional trends, and some exceptions are worth making. For example, perimenopausal and menopausal women really do need to up their protein intake. And the majority of Americans don't eat enough fiber, so the ongoing fibermaxxing trend actually is dietitian-approved.
Fung and Mozaffarian acknowledge that, even if you aren't trying to keep up with the latest food fad, it takes a lot of time and energy to eat the way you aspire. 'It's like another job you have to do after you come home from your job,' says Fung. She says that if you can afford it, buying precut vegetables that are bagged and washed can save time and make it just a little easier to cook at home. She also advises making one or two simple changes at a time if you're trying to improve your diet.
'Pick two things you want to change, and they have to be things that are changeable within your resources and that you can change for the long haul,' says Fung. 'Healthy dietary habits are never extreme.' She adds: 'Health is a long-term project.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EMDR: The Therapy Treatment That Miley Cyrus Says Saved Her Life
EMDR: The Therapy Treatment That Miley Cyrus Says Saved Her Life

Vogue

time32 minutes ago

  • Vogue

EMDR: The Therapy Treatment That Miley Cyrus Says Saved Her Life

Anxiety can hinder so much of everyday life, but there are many helpful and safe ways to cope. For Miley Cyrus, she credits a specific type of therapy that helped her with stage fright and what she says also saved her life: EMDR. 'It's so weird because it's like watching a movie in your mind, but it's different than dreaming. You're kind of more in yourself, but still in another place of consciousness that's kind of hard to describe unless you've been in that hypnotic state,' the 32-year-old singer recently said in an interview with The New York Times. EMDR, more formally known as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, is a psychotherapy technique that treats trauma-related stress and other mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, panic, grief, loss, and substance disorders. Developed by psychologist Francine Shapiro, PhD, in 1987, it has since been used to help adults (and even children). Cyrus goes on to explain in the interview that her therapist encouraged her to explore different points in her life that matched the anxiety she feels when she would go sing on stage. After finding herself on a mountaintop in a place where she experienced a lot of trauma, she was surrounded by nature and people—her grandma, her mom, her current boyfriend, her as a little child, and even her dog—who have brought her peace and love. When they all grabbed her hand to play Ring Around the Rosie, she came out of that vision feeling renewed. 'I've never had stage fright again,' she says. How does it work? EMDR involves reprocessing traumatic memories or stressful events using bilateral stimulation. Elizabeth Ochoa, PhD, chief psychologist at Mount Sinai-Behavioral Health Center, explains that you'll be asked to recall an emotion, an image, or words that are linked to that traumatic event while a form of bilateral stimulation is being administered by a clinician. The stimulation can include rapid eye movements, during which a person tracks the movements of a finger, ball, or some sort of stimulus with their eyes, tapping, or auditory cues. The goal, Ochoa says, is to reduce distress related to that painful memory. Who is it for? Ochao says that EMDR is perfect for those who are experiencing depression, anxiety, panic, or other emotional distress whenever a traumatic memory is triggered. If this is something that happens frequently enough over a long period of time and it starts to hinder how you live out your day to day life, she says this might be a treatment to consider. The benefits of EMDR Studies show that those who use EMDR can reap the same benefits as those who use years of psychotherapy, just in a shorter amount of time. The idea is that EMDR can help the mind recover from psychological trauma by removing mental blocks that stop the healing, similar to how the body recovers from physical trauma. 'The brain's information processing system naturally moves toward mental health. If the system is blocked or imbalanced by the impact of a disturbing event, the emotional wound festers and can cause intense suffering. Once the block is removed, healing resumes,' writes the EMDR Institute on its site. 'Using the detailed protocols and procedures learned in EMDR training sessions, clinicians help clients activate their natural healing processes.' The downsides of EMDR EMDR can be quite triggering at first. Ochao says that uncomfortable feelings or distressing thoughts, feelings, and even dreams will emerge as you're reprocessing these traumatic events. Those who are not ready to face those painful feelings may want to look for a gentler treatment option. EMDR is not for those who have personality disorders, diagnosed mental illnesses, or severe psychiatric disorders. She adds that this treatment is not suitable for ongoing trauma that is currently happening in your present life. 'In a general sense, for EMDR to be safely utilized, the patient needs to have sufficient emotional coping skills, distress tolerance, and stability to manage the emotional distress that will emerge during treatment safely,' she says. What to Expect During a Session There are eight phases in a single EMDR session. Ochao explains that the initial phase will focus on identifying the memory that is causing all the trauma. The following phase will try to desensitize that memory, using the same bilateral stimulation techniques. Once that memory is neutralized, she says the focus will shift to instilling positive beliefs. The EMDR Institute breaks it down even further like this:

Health insurers vow to speed approval of medical care
Health insurers vow to speed approval of medical care

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Health insurers vow to speed approval of medical care

UnitedHealthcare , Kaiser Permanente and other major U.S. health insurers say they want to make it faster and easier for patients to obtain care. Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), a trade association that represents the health insurance industry, announced Monday that some of its biggest members are taking steps to streamline "prior authorization" — industry jargon for the process by which health care providers obtain approval from patients' insurance carriers to deliver care. Prior authorization requests can be time-consuming for doctors, resulting in frustrating delays for patients in obtaining essential medical care. According to a survey from the American Medical Medical Association, physicians' offices spend an average of 12 hours per week seeking approval for services from insurers, administrative hurdles that critics say takes time away from providing care. As part of the new agreement, participating insurers have committed to a series of steps they say will speed up the sluggish process. That includes creating a standardized system for submitting prior authorization online, reducing the amount of claims subject to prior authorization and ramping up real-time responses to requests. Such changes are scheduled to take effect in 2026 and 2027. "The health care system remains fragmented and burdened by outdated manual processes, resulting in frustration for patients and providers alike," AHIP CEO Mike Tuffin said in a statement. "Health plans are making voluntary commitments to deliver a more seamless patient experience and enable providers to focus on patient care, while also helping to modernize the system." Shawn Martin, CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians, said in a statement that the insurance industry initiative is a "step in the right direction," but that the real test will be the impact it has on the experiences of patients and physicians. Dozens of insurers signed onto the commitment, including a number of state Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans and some Medicare and Medicaid plans. In all, AHIP says the joint effort to improve prior authorization could benefit more than 250 million Americans. The signatories include: AmeriHealth Caritas Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue ShieldBlue Cross of IdahoBlue Cross Blue Shield of AlabamaBlue Cross Blue Shield of ArizonaBlue Cross and Blue Shield of HawaiiBlue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas CityBlue Cross and Blue Shield of LouisianaBlue Cross Blue Shield of MassachusettsBlue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganBlue Cross and Blue Shield of MinnesotaBlue Cross and Blue Shield of NebraskaBlue Cross and Blue Shield of North CarolinaBlue Cross Blue Shield of North DakotaBlue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode IslandBlue Cross Blue Shield of South CarolinaBlueCross BlueShield of TennesseeBlue Cross Blue Shield of WyomingBlue Shield of CaliforniaCapital Blue CrossCapital District Physicians' Health Plan, Inc. (CDPHP)CareFirst BlueCross BlueShieldCenteneThe Cigna GroupCVS Health AetnaElevance HealthExcellus Blue Cross Blue ShieldGeisinger Health PlanGuideWell Mutual Holding CorporationHealth Care Service CorporationHealthfirst (New York)Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of New JerseyHumana Independence Blue CrossIndependent HealthKaiser PermanenteL.A. Care Health PlanMolina HealthcareNeighborhood Health Plan of Rhode IslandPoint32HealthPremera Blue CrossRegence BlueShield, Regence BlueShield of Idaho, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan HealthSCAN Health PlanSummaCareUnitedHealthcare Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield Kidney dialysis industry accused of maximizing profits over patients Pentagon officials reveal new details about U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites Netanyahu reacts to U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites

Medicaid Cuts Will Hurt Nearly Half of America's Kids
Medicaid Cuts Will Hurt Nearly Half of America's Kids

Bloomberg

time38 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Medicaid Cuts Will Hurt Nearly Half of America's Kids

Republican lawmakers claim their proposal to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicaid is designed to protect the country's most vulnerable — that by focusing on work requirements, they're simply eliminating waste from the bloated program and ensuring the money goes to those who truly need it. In reality, anyone who relies on public insurance could be affected, including about 37 million kids, nearly half of all American children.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store