Fuel levy increase confirmed as EFF's urgent application is dismissed
The EFF launches an urgent application to interdict the 4% fuel levy increase. at the Western Cape High Court.
Image: Ian Landsberg/Independent Newspapers
The 4% fuel levy increase is set to take effect on Wednesday after the Western Cape High Court dismissed the EFF's urgent application to interdict the fuel levy increase.
The EFF had filed a Notice of Motion, challenging the Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana's decision to increase the general fuel levy.
They sought to have the application heard as an urgent matter, dispensing with the usual requirements for forms and service on Tuesday.
The party through Advocate Mfesane Ka-Siboto had argued that the increase would unfairly burden the working class and poor, worsening inequality and violating constitutional rights.
He said the minister's decision lacked both rationality and parliamentary oversight.
Ka-Siboto further told the court, in accordance with the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act, only a law could serve as the proper instrument for the minister to impose a tax.
The EFF claimed that Godongwana overstepped his powers by announcing the fuel levy increase in his Budget speech, without parliamentary approval.
"What is clear is that the minister is imposing tax," Ka-Siboto said, citing the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act as the legal framework Godongwana should have followed.
The EFF also argued that the fuel levy increase is both economically unjust and unconstitutional, deepening inequality and undermining access to essential goods and services.
EFF National chairperson Noluthando Molutshungu and Convernor of deployees to the Western Cape Rebecca Mohlala at the Western Cape High court on Tuesday to challenge the fuel levy increase.
Image: Ian Landsberg
"It deepens inequality and undermines access to essential goods and services. We are committed to fighting the fuel levy increase in court and in parliament," the party said.
However, Treasury senior counsel, Advocate Kameel Premhid, argued that the fuel levy increase is not a tax but rather a regulation change.
Premhid maintained that the minister has always had the power to adjust fuel levies as part of the budgetary process.
Premhid told the court that the increase is not a tax but a regulation.
"Regulatory charges bring in money, so they might raise revenue. But that doesn't make it a tax, and just because a tax also raises revenue, the two are not the same thing."
The Western Cape High Court's dismissal of the EFF's bid means the fuel levy increase will go ahead as planned.
The increase will see diesel prices rise by 15 cents per litre and gasoline by 16 cents per litre.
The EFF may still pursue its challenge to the fuel levy increase in Part B of its application, which seeks to review and set aside Godongwana's decision.
EFF National chairperson, Noluthando Nolutshungu, said the fuel levy increase is expected to have significant economic consequences, particularly for low-income households and businesses already struggling with high living costs.
She warned that the increase would place an "unjust burden" on the working class and the poor, who are already reeling from rising living costs, stagnant wages, and ongoing economic hardship.
The party has vowed to continue challenging the decision in court and in Parliament.
Despite the setback, the party says it remains committed to fighting for the rights of the poor and working class, who they believe will be disproportionately affected by the hike.
The EFF argues that the increase is unlawful.
Reacting to the dismissal, EFF Treasurer General Omphile Maotwe said the party approached the courts in defence of the poor and working class.
"The party will study the judgment and consider further legal action. Additionally, the EFF plans to introduce amendments to relevant legislation to prevent the National Treasury from imposing taxation without parliamentary approval," Maotwe said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Malema vows to build houses for families of KZN bus crash victims
EFF leader Julius Malema has committed to building houses and boreholes for the families of 10 party members who died in a bus crash last week while returning from a Youth Day rally in Durban. Malema addressed the mass funeral service in Vryheid on Sunday. 'We are going to honour these 10 fallen heroes, each one of them with a house that has all the facilities,' he said. 'If there's no water in those yards, we'll make sure we put [in] boreholes so we restore the dignity of those families. We will build those houses and put [in] those boreholes because we want to build a permanent relationship with these families. We don't want to forget you and don't forget us.' He assured the families they are not alone. 'Your loss is our loss. Your tears are our tears. Your children are not forgotten. The EFF will walk with you, we will support you and we will continue to fight in their name. 'As the EFF, we say their death must not be in vain. Their passing must become a turning point. We must honour them not only with flowers and words but with action. We must fix our roads, regulate the transport industry and demand accountability.' The accident happened on June 17 when the group was returning from the rally. A bus carrying EFF supporters collided with a truck on the R34 near Vryheid. Malema described the members who died as 'soldiers', drawing a parallel to the youth of 1976 who died for freedom. 'These are not just names in headlines or numbers in a report. These were young people who had dreams. They were full of life, full of promise and full of courage that defines the children of working-class and oppressed families. They died while in pursuit of life. They were travelling with hope in their hearts, but the journey that should've taken them towards opportunity ended in tragedy.' He said their parents should be proud that their children did not die from drug or alcohol abuse but on the 'battlefield'. 'Your children are soldiers; they are martyrs and the names of your children will be called when the names of the martyrs are called. Be proud that your children have inspired many generations to come.'
Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
EFF's Malema backs Iran's strikes on Israel, says 'we stand by their right to defend themselves'
JOHANNESBURG - Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema said it was only fair that Israel gets a taste of its own medicine and experience the same devastation as Gaza. Malema said that Iran, which has come under aerial bombardment by the US and Israel, had the right to defend itself. Malema made the remarks on Sunday at the mass funeral of seven EFF members who died in a bus accident while returning from a Youth Day rally last week. ALSO READ: • Iran-Israel war: SA calling on UN to broker peaceful resolution - Presidency • EFF stands in solidarity with Iran after targeted US, Israel airstrikes: Malema The MK party has also weighed in, condemning the US attacks on Iran as reckless and unlawful.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Is R700 million for a national dialogue worth it?
Before the government spends R700 million on a(nother) national dialogue, it is reasonable to ask what the dialogue promises to deliver, is this worth more than R700 million and what are the chances the stated objectives will be achieved, ask the author. Before the government spends R700 million on a(nother) national dialogue, it is reasonable to ask what the dialogue promises to deliver, is this worth more than R700 million and what are the chances the stated objectives will be achieved. Dr Oyama Mabandla, a member of the national dialogue preparatory task team, asks us to give the national dialogue a chance, reminding us that '[t]he national dialogue is an attempt to reinvigorate and fix a dangerously adrift democracy. It will involve the entire populace, instead of the self-selecting and incestuous elites, who have been producing one after another failed plan, while the rest of us have been spectators.' But of course it won't involve the entire populace and the outcome will be a big report that no one reads. How can it be anything other than this? Even if you could speak to everyone. What then? Which ideas do you implement and which do you ignore? No member of the task team can do anything other than talk and although conversations matter, you need executive power to change things and you get executive power through lots of votes. The reason we have elections is that you can't involve the whole populace of 63 million people in any dialogue, no matter how important. So we compromise and although they are very far from perfect, elections are the only way we have to get a sense of what citizens want. South Africans didn't decide to give the ANC 40% of the vote in the last election to teach anyone a lesson, as experts love to tell us. A gogo voted for the DA because she believed they would give her grandchildren the best future and a young, first-time voter put their X next to Juju's face because they believe the EFF will give them the best opportunities, but most didn't even do that. Voting is the only opportunity you have to not get the government all the other idiots deserve. It is only in those few minutes in a cubicle where you can actually get something changed. The national dialogue is not even that. You can say as much as you want in conversations and you will be ignored. This is not personal. It is the very heart of how democracy works. No one vote counts for anything unless millions of others agree with you and then that vote really counts. I have no idea why President Cyril Ramaphosa feels like a(nother) national dialogue will yield anything positive (aside from the events' organisers who will no doubt be skimming their 25%) or why borrowing R700m to fund this will yield more in value than the R700m, plus interest, that will be spent. (We currently borrow around R1 billion per day, so the national dialogue is an extra 17 hours or so of borrowing, which somehow doesn't feel that bad. But it is). It's all about social compacting, we are told. But what is this magical phrase loved by many and understood by few? Does Ramaphosa love social compacting more than Trump loves tariffs? Will the national dialogue make more people less poor or will everyone just be R700mn poorer? Social compacting would pop up in masterplans in the Department of Trade Industry and Competition for example, and mostly seemed to mean that a small number of dominant companies could meet with the government, without minutes or recordings, to determine how the rest of the industry should work. It failed even with the full power of government and the largest companies in the country behind it. South Africans, when you ignore the loudest and emptiest vessels, talk with each other just fine (even if that is mostly to complain about the government). The problem is that South Africans are getting poorer and most citizens don't believe the government, irrespective of which party is in charge, can fix that. That is why so many people don't bother voting. The most important first step to economic transformation is to make it easier for more people not to be poor. The three great social ills in South Africa of poverty, unemployment and inequality, leaves out the fourth great ill which is lack of economic freedom. The EFF hijacked this term for their version of communism, but economic freedom allows people to solve their own problems. Not another pile of the Master's Plans, pushed down onto South Africans, but allowing them more freedom to do what they believe is important for them. But the government doesn't trust its own citizens, so you can be "given" a free house shitty house after waiting decades but you can't sell it, because the government doesn't believe you can be trusted with your own money. You wait for decades because with free stuff, the demand always outstrips the supply and no one has an incentive to increase the supply. We know poor people will pay for houses if they can own them, because poor people currently pay for houses they cannot own. Rich people have economic freedom and poor people are not allowed to make their own economic decisions and so remain poor. We have the only national dialogue that matters, which are the conversations which happen in parliament. Have your say and vote and you are part of the dialogue. Spending R700m so you can be told by a(nother) group of people how they can lift you from poverty, as long as you do as you are told, is a terrible idea.
