Mike Johnson claims that Gavin Newsom ‘ought to be tarred and feathered' over LA protests
House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday that California Governor Gavin Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered,' even as he criticized the Democrat for allegedly not doing enough to uphold law and order in the face of the ongoing L.A. protests.
The comments mark the latest escalation in a war of words between Newsom and the Republican party, after White House border czar Tom Homan suggested over the weekend that California officials might be arrested if they impeded immigration enforcement, and Newsom responded by daring 'tough guy' federal officials like Homan to detain him. (Homan later said his comments had been blown out of proportion, and that Newsom hadn't done anything warranting arrest.)
'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested, but he ought to be tarred and feathered,' Johnson said during a press conference in Washington, when asked about the fiery back-and-forth.
'The governor is now filing a lawsuit against the president. What a joke,' Johnson continued, referring to the lawsuit California filed Monday against the Trump administration's decision to unilaterally use the state's National Guard to respond to the protests. 'Do your job man, that's what I'd tell Gavin Newsom. Stop working on your rebranding. Be a governor. Stand up for the rule of law.'
Tarring and feathering refers to a form of brutal mob violence made famous during the American Revolution, in which crowds would douse their enemies in hot tar and then cover them in feathers as a form of public punishment and humiliation.
'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700's style forms of punishment,' Newsom responded on X to the comment. 'A fitting threat given the @GOP want to bring our country back to the 18th Century.'
As thousands of police officers, federalized National Guard troops, and Marines descend on Los Angeles in the face of the protests, leaders in both parties have engaged in a parallel effort to dominate the political framing of the crisis.
Democrats like Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass argue that the Trump administration's aggressive immigration tactics — which have included large-scale raids and carrying out arrests at sensitive locations like courthouses and immigration offices — triggered the protests in the first place, a situation only made worse by the provocative decision to federalize the state's National Guard troops over the objection of local officials.
'This is chaos that was started in Washington,' Bass said Monday, accusing Trump of using Los Angeles as an 'experiment' to test how far he could go in seizing local power.
Senator John Fetterman, meanwhile, accused his fellow Democrats of losing 'the moral high ground' when Democrats 'refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.'
'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that,' he wrote on X. 'This is anarchy and true chaos.'
On the other side, figures like White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller have framed these Democratic criticisms as a form of insurrection against federal authority.
'Los Angeles and California are demanding the nullification of the election results, of federal law, of national sovereignty, and of the bedrock constitutional command of one national government,' Miller wrote on X on Tuesday.
President Trump has said he's open to invoking the Insurrection Act, which would mark yet another dramatic escalation in federal emergency powers being used, allowing active-duty military members to be involved in making arrests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Top Trump ally fears terrorists will attack 'on our homeland' after the US dropped bombs on Iran
A top Republican has expressed her fears that terrorists will attack on US soil and cause 'another foreign war' after President Donald Trump attacked Iran overnight. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene - one of Trump's closest allies in Congress and a conservative firebrand who has openly opposed war with Iran - took to X soon after the bombs dropped. She prayed that Americans would not be targeted by terrorists 'on our homeland' in retaliation for Trump's operative strike, noting that it may be possible after having an open border 'for the past four years.' Greene wrote: 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war. There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. 'Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer.' She added: 'Let us pray that we are not attacked by terrorists on our homeland after our border was open for the past 4 years and over 2 Million gotaways came in. Let us pray for peace.' Despite telling the world he was going to come to a decision within two weeks, Trump launched 'Operation Midnight Hammer' Saturday night, sending a fleet of B-2 bombers to key nuclear sites in Iran. The attack left the sites 'severely damaged' as top US officials have urged Iran to surrender. People quickly flooded Greene's post with comments as many disagreed with her and called her a 'traitor.' 'Israel has never said they have a nuclear weapon nor ever threatened to use a nuclear weapon,' one wrote. Another said: 'One question I have for you Marjorie is that "Would you rather Iran have a nuclear weapon?"' 'A strategic strike is not a war,' said another. A user commented: 'You're off on this one, MTG. It was the right decision!' 'You have become a total embarrassment and traitor to the President but nice play to your base,' someone else wrote. Meanwhile, others agreed with her stance, as one wrote: 'I stand with you on this one.' 'I can't believe I'm agreeing with MJT so heavily,' said another. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene took to X shortly after news broke of the US attack on Iran, sharing her fear that 'another foreign war' will soon start 'Boom. Finally some common sense. Our greatness gets derailed by endless wars that aren't ours. Peace over puppets and proxies,' a user said. Her response comes just days after Greene backed Tucker Carlson, another well-known MAGA member, after Trump called the former Fox News host 'kooky' over his views on the president's stance on Iran. Carlson has suggested Trump abandoned 'America First' principles to support Israel against the Iranians which has led to multiple responses from the president. On Monday night he wrote on Truth Social: 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!' Greene then rushed to Carlson's defense after the commander-in-chief immortalized the broadcaster with a nickname. 'Tucker Carlson is one of my favorite people. He fiercely loves his wife, children, and our country. Since being fired by the neocon network Fox News, he has more popularity and viewers than ever before,' she wrote on social media. Greene added that her beliefs are 'unapologetically' the same as Carlson's. She says that 'if we don't fight for our own country and our own people then we will no longer have a country for our children and our grandchildren.' The Georgia Congresswoman added that getting involved in a Middle Eastern war will 'put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.' She ended by referencing Trump's new nickname for Carlson. 'That's not kooky. That's what millions of Americans voted for. It's what we believe is America First.' On Sunday morning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hailed the strikes as 'bold' and 'brilliant.' He also warned Iran that there would be dire consequences if it does not come to the negotiating table. Hegseth said three key nuclear sites were 'severely damaged' around 2.10am Iranian time. 'We devastated the Iranian nuclear program. It's worth noting the operation did not target the Iranian troops or the Iranian people,' he continued. 'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated. Many presidents have dreamed of delivering the final blow to Iran's nuclear program. And none could – until President Trump.' He declared: 'American deterrence is back.' Officials admitted that the strikes on the Fordow site, a deep underground nuclear enrichment facility, may not have been entirely destroyed in the operation. Sources told the New York Times that the B-2 strikes on Iran's facility in Fordow - a uranium enrichment site buried deep underground - did not entirely destroy the site. The press conference came as Iran's foreign minister branded Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed' diplomacy after the US blew up three nuclear bases - as he warned the world has been thrown into an 'unprecedented level of danger'. Early Sunday morning, Iran retaliated by targeting Israel in a devastating set of attacks - with emergency services reporting at least 16 people are injured, including a young man with shrapnel wounds to his upper body.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Democrats say they were left in dark about plans for US strikes on Iran
Senior Democrats have claimed they were left in the dark about operation Midnight Hammer, the US's highly coordinated strike on Saturday on Iran's nuclear enrichment program. Neither the US senator Mark Warner of Virginia nor representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, both top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence panels, were briefed before the attack, according to reports. But that came amid claims that Republican counterparts were given advance notice of the operation, which involved 125 aircraft – including seven B-2 bombers carrying 14 bunker busters weighing three tons – and 75 Tomahawk missiles launched from US submarines. Axios reported that the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, had been informed shortly before the attacks began at 6.40pm eastern time. Himes's committee staff received notification about the strike from the Pentagon only after Donald Trump made the announcement on social media soon before 8pm, according to the outlet. The president's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, told a press conference early on Sunday that the strikes 'took months and weeks of positioning and preparation so that we could be ready when the president called'. 'It took misdirection and the highest of operational security,' Hegseth said, in part alluding to the US's deployment of B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam earlier on Saturday. The US attack of Iran came as most Democrats had left Washington for the Juneteenth holiday – but the apparent lack of forewarning to lawmakers on intelligence committees is striking. Top lawmakers are typically informed of military operations in advance. 'Cost, duration, risk to our troops, strategy – the basics before we make a decision of this consequence,' Chris Coons, a senior Democratic member of the Senate foreign relations committee, said last week. Senators are expected to receive a briefing next week. But the signs that an attack was imminent were there to see: additional US military assets had been moved into the region, and the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, had postponed a briefing with the Senate intelligence committee last week. Moderate and progressive Democrats have been in conflict over the engagement of US forces in support of Israel. Trump's use of force could now deepen the ideological schism. Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, told CNN on Sunday that 'the destruction of these facilities is a positive in the sense that it will set back Iran's program'. But he warned that Iran could now 'sprint for a bomb'. He added that the strikes were 'not constitutional' and Congress should be brought in 'on an action this substantial that could lead to a major outbreak of war'. But Schiff refused to be drawn in on whether the world was safer following the strike. 'We simply don't know,' he said. Schiff maintained that in absence of a briefing 'this is an order that should not have been given'. Prominent Democrats with 2028 presidential aspirations have been notably silent on the 10-day war between Israel and Iran. 'They are sort of hedging their bets,' said Joel Rubin, a former deputy assistant secretary of state during the Obama administration. 'The beasts of the Democratic party's constituencies right now are so hostile to Israel's war in Gaza that it's really difficult to come out looking like one would corroborate an unauthorized war that supports Israel without blowback.' But some had spoken out. The California congressman Ro Khanna called the White House threats of an attack on Iran 'a defining moment for our party'. That came as progressive and isolationist lawmakers on the right found themselves uncomfortably aligned. Khanna had introduced legislation with the Kentucky Republican US House member Thomas Massie that called on Trump to 'terminate' the use of US armed forces against Iran unless 'explicitly authorized' by a declaration of war from Congress. Following the strike, Khanna posted on X: 'Trump struck Iran without any authorization of Congress. We need to immediately return to DC and vote on [Massie] and my War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war.' Massie said in response to the strikes: 'This is not Constitutional.' The independent US senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who caucuses with the Democrats, said supporting the Israeli prime minister Benjamin 'Netanyahu's war against Iran would be a catastrophic mistake'. He introduced legislation prohibiting the use of federal money for force against Iran. The New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said on X that the decision to attack Iran's nuclear sites was 'disastrous'. 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment,' Ocasio-Cortez wrote. On NBC's Meet the Press, Vice-President JD Vance maintained that it was untrue to say that Saturday's strikes in Iran exceeded Trump's presidential authority. Schiff, meanwhile, declined to support calls for impeachment proceedings against Trump, saying the failure to brief Democrats ahead of the strike was 'another partisan exercise'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision
A high-stakes power struggle sprang up inside the U.S. intelligence community as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard moved to wrest control of President Donald Trump 's daily intelligence briefing from the CIA, the Daily Mail has learned. With the Iran and Israel war in full swing, the Russia-Ukraine war still churning and Chinese military forces training at an accelerated pace, whoever controls the distribution of the nation's most classified intelligence has the upper hand in shaping the decision-making process in whether to wage war. Last month, Gabbard ruffled feathers by threatening the CIA's influence after reasserting the ODNI's authority over the president's daily briefing (PDB), a role long dominated by the CIA. 'She's trying to move, physically move and take control of the President's daily brief,' one senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail. Despite the intelligence director taking over responsibility for the PDB in 2004, the CIA maintained the internal systems capable of creating the intelligence reports, which often contain much of the agency's classified information distilled into digestible memos. But Gabbard's attempt to shift production and delivery of the PDB from CIA headquarters in Langley to her own office has rattled the traditional power structure. 'Obviously, that controls what the president sees,' the source said. 'So she's, I would say, probably caused a lot of ripples within the CIA, especially within the DA, the Director of Analysis, by saying, "Hey, I'm going to take the PDB physically from Langley and move it down the street to the ODNI,"' the source said. Ratcliffe, the CIA director, is not necessarily thought to be grappling for the president's attention, the official confirmed. But others at Langley have been miffed by the recent move. 'Of course, the CIA is unhappy because they want to keep control of the product,' one ODNI official told the Daily Mail. 'Their phrase at the CIA is 'Whoever controls the information the President sees, controls the President.'' 'By housing the PDB staff under the ODNI, the production process aligns more closely with the ODNI's mission to integrate foreign, military, and domestic intelligence,' the official continued. 'This will yield a more cohesive and holistic intelligence product that reflects contributions from all IC agencies, reducing the risk of CIA dominance in the PDB's content.' The CIA did not return the Daily Mail's request for comment. 'There are a lot of folks at the agency, in particular, the Directorate of Analysis, they're used to being the final say,' the senior intelligence official shared. 'They're not used to someone saying, "Hey, I'm gonna ask you some questions about this."' Presidents have received regular morning briefings - comprised of intelligence on the most pressing national security issues - since Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. Compiling intelligence reports has traditionally fallen to the CIA, specifically its Directorate for Analysis. Though in 2004 the Intelligence Reform Act created the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which then began overseeing the PDB. The ODNI has publicly confirmed last month that some functions located at the CIA will now be moved to the ODNI, including the staff who oversee the PDB. Gabbard is responsible for overseeing all 18 federal intelligence agencies, including the CIA, though its Director John Ratcliffe is also a Cabinet member, creating a natural tension between the two agencies and its staff. While the war in Iran and Israel moves into its second week without any indication of a ceasefire, sources familiar with the DNI have shared that Gabbard is in nearly constant contact with the president on intelligence matters. 'She's been in every meeting,' a White House official told the Daily Mail. The official added Gabbard has been spotted at the White House nearly every day since the start of the conflict. CIA Director Ratcliffe has also reportedly been one of the key figures advising Trump on the war while suggesting the DNI has taken a back seat. Reports of internal jockeying within the administration come just as the president is at what is perhaps the most tenuous point of his second term. 'I think those are coming from people who either like drama for the sake of drama, or they're trying to give the CIA more power,' the official shared. 'I think people are trying to play the palace intrigue game,' he added. 'It's a power play.'
