EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision
A high-stakes power struggle sprang up inside the U.S. intelligence community as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard moved to wrest control of President Donald Trump 's daily intelligence briefing from the CIA, the Daily Mail has learned.
With the Iran and Israel war in full swing, the Russia-Ukraine war still churning and Chinese military forces training at an accelerated pace, whoever controls the distribution of the nation's most classified intelligence has the upper hand in shaping the decision-making process in whether to wage war.
Last month, Gabbard ruffled feathers by threatening the CIA's influence after reasserting the ODNI's authority over the president's daily briefing (PDB), a role long dominated by the CIA.
'She's trying to move, physically move and take control of the President's daily brief,' one senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail.
Despite the intelligence director taking over responsibility for the PDB in 2004, the CIA maintained the internal systems capable of creating the intelligence reports, which often contain much of the agency's classified information distilled into digestible memos.
But Gabbard's attempt to shift production and delivery of the PDB from CIA headquarters in Langley to her own office has rattled the traditional power structure.
'Obviously, that controls what the president sees,' the source said.
'So she's, I would say, probably caused a lot of ripples within the CIA, especially within the DA, the Director of Analysis, by saying, "Hey, I'm going to take the PDB physically from Langley and move it down the street to the ODNI,"' the source said.
Ratcliffe, the CIA director, is not necessarily thought to be grappling for the president's attention, the official confirmed. But others at Langley have been miffed by the recent move.
'Of course, the CIA is unhappy because they want to keep control of the product,' one ODNI official told the Daily Mail. 'Their phrase at the CIA is 'Whoever controls the information the President sees, controls the President.''
'By housing the PDB staff under the ODNI, the production process aligns more closely with the ODNI's mission to integrate foreign, military, and domestic intelligence,' the official continued. 'This will yield a more cohesive and holistic intelligence product that reflects contributions from all IC agencies, reducing the risk of CIA dominance in the PDB's content.'
The CIA did not return the Daily Mail's request for comment.
'There are a lot of folks at the agency, in particular, the Directorate of Analysis, they're used to being the final say,' the senior intelligence official shared. 'They're not used to someone saying, "Hey, I'm gonna ask you some questions about this."'
Presidents have received regular morning briefings - comprised of intelligence on the most pressing national security issues - since Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. Compiling intelligence reports has traditionally fallen to the CIA, specifically its Directorate for Analysis.
Though in 2004 the Intelligence Reform Act created the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which then began overseeing the PDB.
The ODNI has publicly confirmed last month that some functions located at the CIA will now be moved to the ODNI, including the staff who oversee the PDB.
Gabbard is responsible for overseeing all 18 federal intelligence agencies, including the CIA, though its Director John Ratcliffe is also a Cabinet member, creating a natural tension between the two agencies and its staff.
While the war in Iran and Israel moves into its second week without any indication of a ceasefire, sources familiar with the DNI have shared that Gabbard is in nearly constant contact with the president on intelligence matters.
'She's been in every meeting,' a White House official told the Daily Mail. The official added Gabbard has been spotted at the White House nearly every day since the start of the conflict.
CIA Director Ratcliffe has also reportedly been one of the key figures advising Trump on the war while suggesting the DNI has taken a back seat.
Reports of internal jockeying within the administration come just as the president is at what is perhaps the most tenuous point of his second term.
'I think those are coming from people who either like drama for the sake of drama, or they're trying to give the CIA more power,' the official shared. 'I think people are trying to play the palace intrigue game,' he added. 'It's a power play.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
JD Vance claims US is at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran
JD Vance has said the US is 'not at war' with Iran – but is with its nuclear weapons program, holding out a position that the White House hopes to maintain over the coming days as the Iranian regime considers a retributive response to Saturday's US strike on three of its nuclear installations. In an interview Sunday with NBC News' Meet the Press, the US vice-president was asked if the US was now at war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance replied. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' But Vance declined to confirm with absolute certainty that Iran's nuclear sites were completely destroyed, a position that Donald Trump set out in a Saturday night address when the president stated that the targeted Iranian facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated' in the US strikes. Vance instead said that he believes the US has 'substantially delayed' Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. 'I'm not going to get into sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground there in Iran, but we've seen a lot, and I feel very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon, and that was the goal of this attack,' Vance said. He continued: 'Severely damaged versus obliterated – I'm not exactly sure what the difference is. 'What we know is we set their nuclear program back substantially.' An Iranian member of parliament claimed on Sunday that the Fordo enrichment plant, the focus of seven B-2 bombers armed with 14 premier bunker-busters from the US arsenal, was not seriously damaged. Separately, Bloomberg News said satellite images of the site undermined the Trump administration's claims that Iran's underground nuclear sites at Fordo and Natanz had been destroyed. Satellite images distributed by Maxar Technologies showed new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge. But the main support building at the facility remained undamaged, the report said. Maxar said in a statement that images of Natanz showed a new crater about 5.5 meters (18ft) in diameter over the underground facility – but they did not offer conclusive evidence that the 40-meter-deep nuclear engineering site had been breached. The chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, said at a Pentagon briefing on Sunday: 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' Nuclear non-proliferation analysts are conflicted on whether the strikes will be effective in bringing Iran to the negotiating table or convince them to move more decisively toward enriching uranium stockpiles to weapons-grade, assembling a bomb, and manufacturing a delivery system. In a statement to Bloomberg, Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said there were slim prospects that the US entering the war would convince Iran to increase International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) cooperation. The nuclear watchdog has said it is not sure where Iran's 400lb stockpile of 60% uranium is. 'The more likely scenario is that they convince Iran that cooperation and transparency don't work and that building deeper facilities and ones not declared openly is more sensible to avoid similar targeting in future,' Dolzikova said.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Fears over WWE with promotion heading to Saudi Arabia for Night of Champions amid Iran's warning to US
FEARS are rising over the WWE's Night of Champions after Iran's warning to the US. The wrestling promotion have scheduled the big fixture for June 28 - next Saturday. 4 4 And the action is due to take place at the Kingdom Arena in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. John Cena is expected to be part of the action, defending his Undisputed WWE Championship against CM Punk. However, fans are growing increasingly worried about the Night of Champions. It comes after President Donald Trump ordered the US' launch of bomb strikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites. America used covert tactics and the world's biggest conventional bombs to inflict the devastating bombardment. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Operation Midnight Hammer was 'an incredible and overwhelming success' that took months and weeks of planning. But Iran - who are set to meet with the Kremlin on Monday - vowed the "outrageous" attacks would have "everlasting consequences". And an Iranian state television anchor claimed that "every American citizen or military personnel in the region is now a target" and that Iran will finish the conflict Trump started. The reason this affects the WWE show is because the United States have bases in Saudi Arabia - thus fitting the category of targets outlined by Iranian TV. To complicate matters further, the UK have advised citizens - including wrestlers and WWE fans - against travelling to nearby UAE and Qatar as tensions in the Middle East escalate further. On Sunday, the British Government also updated information for Saudi Arabia, advising against all travel within 10km of the Yemen border and all but essential travel within 10-80km of the Yemen border. And fans looking forward to the Night of Champions are growing increasingly concerned. One wrote: "With the ever rapid developments happening in that part of the world and especially with what's happened tonight, there's a high chance this ends up getting cancelled. At this point some of the wrestlers might even decide to back out for safety." Another said: "If there was ever a time for WWE to cancel a Saudi Arabia show now is the time they're seriously about to send their entire roster right here in a week." A third added: "Needs to be cancelled and moved to Vegas immediately." And a fourth commented: "To be fair, the event should be postponed or scrapped altogether. Talent's safety should be the primary concern for any wrestling company." WWE is yet to make any statement on next weekend's event. SunSport has contacted WWE for comment. 4 4
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
UK and NATO allies agree to boost spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035
The UK and its NATO allies have agreed to increase spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035, two diplomatic sources with knowledge of the deal have told Sky News. Ambassadors of all 32 alliance member states signed off on the new spending pledge ahead of a major summit of leaders, including Donald Trump, this week, they said. The boost - up from a current goal of 2% of GDP - is as much about keeping the US president onside as it is about responding to what is regarded by the allies as a growing threat from Vladimir Putin and the challenge posed by China. The target will be formally rubber stamped when the heads of state and government meet in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. The ambitious spending goal - secured following a huge amount of persuasion by Mark Rutte, the NATO secretary general - is broken down into 3.5% of GDP spent on pure defence and 1.5% of GDP spence on related areas, which can include infrastructure and cyber security. Spain had been the last to agree. The UK had also been slow to sign up but is understood to have been pushing for the 2035 timeframe, which would mean it is pushed beyond the next parliament. Sir Keir Starmer has said he has an ambition to increase UK defence spending to 3% of GDP from 2.3% by 2034. The new 5% spending goal is the kind of level of defence spending invested by NATO allies during the Cold War.
