Strongbow ad promotes booze to help manage work stress, watchdog finds
The Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) has ruled against a television commercial for Strongbow Gold Apple cider, citing violations of the Alcohol Industry Communication Code of Conduct. A consumer complaint claimed that the advert promoted alcohol as a way to manage workplace stress, a claim the ARB upheld after its review.
The advert opens with a stressed office worker, overwhelmed by a large pile of paperwork, while being berated by a colleague. The scene transitions to upbeat, fast-paced music accompanied by placards resembling firewalls that fill the worker's computer screen, displaying the words 'WARNING' and 'NEVER STOP PLAYING.'
The focus then returns to the man, still seated at his desk, which is now cleared of the previously piled-up files. He smiles while holding a paper aeroplane, which transforms into a bottle of Strongbow Gold Apple cider. He leans back in his chair, feet propped up on the desk. All visible computer monitor screens display the time as 17:00. The words 'Never stop playing' then come on-screen again, along with a disclaimer that the drinks are not for sale to anyone under the age of 18.
In its findings, the ARB acknowledged the advertiser's argument that the folding of the paper aeroplane and the subsequent transformation into a cider bottle were intended as a lighthearted, metaphorical representation of 'leaving work behind' and embracing post-work leisure. However, the ARB argued that the advert would reasonably be interpreted by viewers as portraying alcohol consumption as a solution to workplace stress.
The ARB took issue with the pivotal moment in the advert: the stressed worker visibly transitioning to a state of happiness after the introduction of the cider.
This, the ARB argued, directly ties emotional relief and relaxation to the product, in line with clause 1.4.1 of the Alcohol Industry Communication Code that explicitly prohibits any suggestion in advertising that alcohol consumption can reduce stress, improve relaxation, or solve personal or professional challenges.
The advertisers for the Strongbow Gold Apple cider were ordered to withdraw the advertisement and prohibited from using it again in its current form.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
an hour ago
- News24
A bank, a retailer and a travel agent walk into the naughty corner
A remarkable variety of companies have employees that let customers down. This week, a prominent retailer, internet service provider, bank and travel service are all doing the walk of shame, says Wendy Knowler. I spend a large part of my work life alerting company higher-ups to the fact their employees are failing their customers. Many of the cases are not particularly unusual or shocking but what it does tell me is that their internal escalation processes are woefully lacking, if not non-existent. It seems to me they'd rather have the various ways in which they mistreat their customers laid bare in traditional and social media than apply themselves to creating a system which red flags a serious, unresolved case and gets it to the attention of someone in the organisation who has the will and the clout to fix it, fast. Here are a just a few of this week's cases to illustrate what I'm getting at… In the naughty corner are a bank, a retailer, an internet service provider and an online travel agency. Nedbank Neville [surname withheld] was in quite a state when he approached me for help. A former police officer who was medically boarded after 30 years of service, he receives a government pension on the last day of the month. But that didn't happen last month because Nedbank unilaterally closed his account, and apparently without reason, on 17 May. He visited the bank's Greenstone Mall branch to query that and as a result the account was reinstated on 28 May, but then closed again the following day. Without informing him. 'So I didn't get my pension payment on the 30th,' Neville said. He was told to ask the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) to reissue the payment, something he was battling to do. 'I demand that Nedbank resolve this problem which was created by them,' he said. 'I am currently too sick to go to the GEPF offices and wait in a queue.' Meanwhile he'd had to borrow money to pay his municipal bill, 'but I have no money for food, and Nedbank won't loan me any.' He later discovered that it could take up to eight weeks for the GEPF to reissue his May pension payment. On taking up his case with Nedbank's media office, I was told that Neville's account was closed by mistake. 'Unfortunately, this resulted in the rejection of the pension payment, which could not be processed as the account was no longer active at the time of the attempted deposit. 'Subsequently, certain debit orders that were still active were processed against the account, leading to an overdraft balance.' I was told that the bank would reverse any debit interest incurred as a result of that mistake, give Neville a formal apology for the distress it had caused him and offer him a 'goodwill payment' of R1 500 to make up for it. 'We take full accountability for the error and we are reviewing our internal processes to prevent a recurrence of such incidents in the future,' the bank said. That includes exploring a bridging finance facility to support clients in such 'unique and exceptional circumstances'. Nice save, but days later, Neville still didn't know about any of that, and nor did the bank manager he was dealing with, who, he said, continued to be 'unsympathetic'. So back I went to Nedbank to report that. Finally Neville got that 'sorry' call. Game Samantha Mewa put a R3 800 hi-fi on lay-by at Game Pinetown (outside Durban) in late December, paying a R1 000 deposit. According to the contract, she had until next month to settle the balance. But when she called the store earlier this month about making final payment and collecting the hi-fi, she was told it had been sold to make space in their storeroom. What? First she was assured by head office, when she complained, that they did have stock of the hi-fi in their warehouse, and then the store contradicted that. 'I have not heard back since,' she said. 'What are my rights?' In such cases – a retailer breaching a lay-by agreement for reasons within their control – they are required by the Consumer Protection Act to double what the customer had paid as compensation. Was Game – part of the Massmart group – willing to do that? I asked. That prospect appeared to enhance the retailer's attempts to find Mewa another hi-fi. 'We have located stock of the exact model the customer originally put on lay-by and the store manager has secured the unit, which is clearly marked for her. 'The customer still has an outstanding balance and it will be released once it has been settled in full,' a spokesperson said. 'I am so sorry that this action was not implemented proactively when the customer raised her concern at the store.' As is Mewa. Webafrica Caitlin da Silva of Milnerton, Cape Town cancelled her contract with Webafrica after being let down for weeks by the internet service provider. It was when she was charged a R1 000 cancellation fee for doing so – instead of being given the apology she deserved - that she felt compelled to share her experience with me. In March she submitted a home move request with Webafrica, which was acknowledged and confirmed. But despite multiple follow-ups, the move was never done and she was left without internet connectivity for weeks at her new address as a result. 'It was an untenable situation as I work remotely,' she said. That's when she cancelled and signed up with another provider. Then came that adding-insult-to-injury cancellation fee. 'They tried to make it my fault, saying I failed to submit sufficient proof of address,' she said, 'but at no point was I informed that the documentation I had provided was insufficient'. 'They refuse to take responsibility, continue to reference their 'terms' and have now closed my support ticket without resolving the issue. Multiple attempts to escalate the matter have been ignored.' Like many other Webafrica clients, Da Silva complained that the company had no direct customer service line – 'only an email system and a poorly monitored WhatsApp chat, leaving customers without real-time support'. 'This is not just about a fee,' she said. 'It's about a company refusing to own up to its own failures, while leaving customers stranded. Responding, WebAfrica CEO Sean Nourse said the company 'takes a lot of pride' in its customer service, 'but we are aware that we are not perfect and occasionally get it horribly wrong'. He called Da Silva's experience 'highly irregular'. While her move request had been captured, an invoice had not been generated – an 'anomaly' which would be addressed, Nourse said. When that problem was identified, he said, Webafrica initiated the order with the network provider, which responded by saying that a service for the same customer and address was already active under a different internet provider. As a result, Da Silva's request was wrongly treated as a provider switch. She was then asked for proof of address and a photograph of the equipment installed at her premises, and on receipt of that, the network updated its records, 'but incorrectly concluded that no installation existed at the address'. 'We are addressing how their information was incorrect,' Nourse said. But by that stage, Da Silva had opted to cancel her service. As for the communication issues, Nourse said the company's systems were designed to route queries based on the status of a customer's service. 'Because the invoice was not generated as expected, her queries were directed to a department not equipped to resolve this specific issue, contributing to the delay,' Nourse said. 'All areas we aim to improve on.' 'We have since issued a credit to bring her account balance to zero, and we extend our sincere apologies to Ms da Silva.' She was grateful for the writing off of that cancelation fee, but not placated by the response. 'Before reaching out to you, I endured weeks of exhausting back-and-forth communication with their complaints department,' she said. 'Despite providing clear evidence and repeatedly requesting escalation to senior management, I received only dismissive and unhelpful replies - often implying that I, as the customer, was at fault. 'It was only after your intervention that Webafrica finally acknowledged its own failings.' Travelstart On 26 March, Dirk Crafford made a booking for Johannesburg to Durban return flights. But when he arrived at ORT International on 20 April for his Durban flight, FlySafair said there had been a payment delay by Travelstart and thus he was forced to buy another ticket. Travelstart promised refund, he told me, but two months on, that had not happened. Instead, Travelstart emailed him to advise him to approach FlySafair for his refund. Travelstart's recently appointed group head of customer operations, Roland Straub, said a technical issue had prevented the first leg of Crafford's trip from being recognised on FlySafair's system. [The airline confirmed to me that it could see a failed attempt by Travelstart to pay for that ticket.] Straub has since received an apology and a refund. 'Please be assured that we are conducting a thorough review of our interactions to identify areas for service improvement,' Straub told me. So why was Crafford unable to secure the refund without my help? 'I have identified an element of refresher training being required,' Straub said. 'The technical issue that occurred 'masked' what the actual issue was, as the ticket appeared paid on our side but wasn't synchronised to the FlySafair system. 'But there were some flags that could have alerted the agent to this that were missed, so we are using this incident as an opportunity to do some refresher training on how to spot this type of incident if it occurs again.' That sounds promising. Oh, that companies would find the will and the way to treat their customers better.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in JSE (JSE:JSE) three years ago are up 59%
By buying an index fund, investors can approximate the average market return. But many of us dare to dream of bigger returns, and build a portfolio ourselves. For example, JSE Limited (JSE:JSE) shareholders have seen the share price rise 26% over three years, well in excess of the market return (20%, not including dividends). However, more recent returns haven't been as impressive as that, with the stock returning just 25% in the last year, including dividends. So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. JSE was able to grow its EPS at 8.9% per year over three years, sending the share price higher. We don't think it is entirely coincidental that the EPS growth is reasonably close to the 8% average annual increase in the share price. This suggests that sentiment and expectations have not changed drastically. Rather, the share price has approximately tracked EPS growth. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We know that JSE has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? Check if analysts think JSE will grow revenue in the future. When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, JSE's TSR for the last 3 years was 59%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! It's nice to see that JSE shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 25% over the last year. Of course, that includes the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 8%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand JSE better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with JSE . But note: JSE may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on South African exchanges. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Read This Before Considering Reunert Limited (JSE:RLO) For Its Upcoming R00.90 Dividend
Reunert Limited (JSE:RLO) is about to trade ex-dividend in the next 3 days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is an important date to be aware of as any purchase of the stock made on or after this date might mean a late settlement that doesn't show on the record date. Thus, you can purchase Reunert's shares before the 25th of June in order to receive the dividend, which the company will pay on the 30th of June. The company's next dividend payment will be R00.90 per share. Last year, in total, the company distributed R3.66 to shareholders. Looking at the last 12 months of distributions, Reunert has a trailing yield of approximately 6.6% on its current stock price of R055.40. We love seeing companies pay a dividend, but it's also important to be sure that laying the golden eggs isn't going to kill our golden goose! That's why we should always check whether the dividend payments appear sustainable, and if the company is growing. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Dividends are typically paid out of company income, so if a company pays out more than it earned, its dividend is usually at a higher risk of being cut. Reunert paid out 61% of its earnings to investors last year, a normal payout level for most businesses. That said, even highly profitable companies sometimes might not generate enough cash to pay the dividend, which is why we should always check if the dividend is covered by cash flow. Dividends consumed 70% of the company's free cash flow last year, which is within a normal range for most dividend-paying organisations. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously. Check out our latest analysis for Reunert Click here to see how much of its profit Reunert paid out over the last 12 months. Businesses with strong growth prospects usually make the best dividend payers, because it's easier to grow dividends when earnings per share are improving. Investors love dividends, so if earnings fall and the dividend is reduced, expect a stock to be sold off heavily at the same time. This is why it's a relief to see Reunert earnings per share are up 4.2% per annum over the last five years. Earnings per share growth has been slim, and the company is already paying out a majority of its earnings. While there is some room to both increase the payout ratio and reinvest in the business, generally the higher a payout ratio goes, the lower a company's prospects for future growth. The main way most investors will assess a company's dividend prospects is by checking the historical rate of dividend growth. Reunert's dividend payments are effectively flat on where they were 10 years ago. Should investors buy Reunert for the upcoming dividend? Earnings per share growth has been unremarkable, and while the company is paying out a majority of its earnings and cash flow in the form of dividends, the dividend payments don't appear excessive. To summarise, Reunert looks okay on this analysis, although it doesn't appear a stand-out opportunity. So if you want to do more digging on Reunert, you'll find it worthwhile knowing the risks that this stock faces. To help with this, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Reunert that you should be aware of before investing in their shares. A common investing mistake is buying the first interesting stock you see. Here you can find a full list of high-yield dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
