The political gamble of Floyd Shivambu: Is he overestimating his popularity?
Floyd Shivambu's political maneuvers raise questions about his future in MK and the potential for a new party. As he navigates a treacherous political landscape, will he succeed or face expulsion?"
Image: X/floydshivambu
Call South African politics and politicians many things but predictable is not one of them.
Fresh from Liam Jacobs crossing over from the Democratic Alliance to his political nemesis, The Patriotic Alliance, South Africans were treated to another bombshell this week.
Former EFF founder turned former uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) Secretary General, Floyd Shivambu announced he was mulling the idea of forming a new party of his own - but not yet. He will remain a member of MK for now. Confused? Don't be. Its the chess game of politics.
Shivambu is pulling off the same stunt as that of former president Jacob Zuma, now MK leader. Remember how Zuma made the shocking announcement he was leading MK while still a member of the ANC in 2023?
He was later expelled from the ANC and returned leading the pack with MK's spectacular victory at the last general elections. Malema did the same when he too was expelled from the ANC in 2012 - and went on to form the EFF together with Shivambu.
The EFF too, drew massive support away from the ANC, which was the catalyst of the party's subsequent decline.
Shivambu is playing the same game. Mudding the political waters. Daring the MK to expel him.
Except he is not Zuma. Or Malema.
South Africans don't take well to political chameleons. Party hopping does not work unless you are a huge political figure. Shivambu is a well known figure - but not a powerful leader in his own right. He was given wings by parties led by powerful public figures who command support. Shivambu was the think-tank behind the EFF and later MK strategist and national organiser.
Less than a year after joining MK, Shivambu's wings were clipped before he could fly. Was that the issue? Was Shivambu seen as a threat within MK by Zuma's inner circle? His feud with Zuma's daughter Duduzile played out on social media as she unleashed her fury at his character, calling him the 'worst thing to happen to MK'.
And, despite her apology, its well known the animosity between them persisted. The tussle for Zuma's ear and ultimately control of the party. Shivambu certainly hinted at that. His axing as MK Secretary General was the final clipping of his wings and clearly ruffled his feathers enough for him to make the decision to go out on his own - at some point.
Shivambu no doubt has the backing of funders who call the tune. That's just how it works. Those who pay the piper, call the tune. But is Shivambu overestimating his popularity in taking on MK and the EFF? Calling the EFF a 'cult' and Zuma 'gullible' is hardly a recipe for success when those leaders still command a massive following, especially on the ground.
And more critically, Shivambu lacks the charm - crucial when mobilising support at grass roots level.
Both Malema and Zuma use their personal populism which appeals to their support base. Malema, a political demagogue, uses his kill the boer song to rile African support while Zuma's identity in Zulu tribalism is his draw card. Both the EFF and MK have leaders as their brand identities. Shivambu taking them on is brave but a huge miscalculation.
Already, the response to him potentially forming his own party is being shot down by most South Africans. Social media is abuzz as South Africans weigh in. Shivambu is being called out as not trust worthy for visiting fraud accused fugitive pastor Shepherd Bushiri. He is also being taken to task for remaining within MK while talking of forming a new party. His bold announcement may have backfired.
During his media briefing, a confident Shivambu threw several salvos at MK - a party he still remains a member of. He accused Zuma of being surrounded by 'political scoundrels' who he said 'take drugs and tweet at night' - a thinly veiled reference to Duduzile, the only one who has openly criticised Shivambu with her late night tweets previously.
Clearly Shivambu is being led to believe the time is right for another political party. Its a path many before him have followed, some popular, others simply overestimating their popularity. And, despite the misguided reference to Zuma as 'gullible,' Shivambu knows too well his days with MK are numbered.
He will be expelled. Others before him faced the same fate for far less transgressions within the party. Zuma will not tolerate Shivambu campaigning for another party while within the MK. And Shivambu's expulsion is not a question of if - but when.
And, given Zuma's fury at Shivambu, that expulsion is likely to be fast and furious.
Until then, Shivambu is a man on the ledge.
** Zohra Teke is an independent writer and journalist.
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL
IOL Opinion
Zohra Teke
Image: Independent Newspapers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Godongwana thinks political parties should be wholly funded from national fiscus
CAPE TOWN - Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana is of the view that political parties should be wholly funded from the national fiscus and not have to accept private donations. Speaking to the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC)'s political funding conference in Durban on Thursday, Godongwana said it's unacceptable that some political parties don't submit annual audited financial statements. Godongwana's own political party, the African National Congress (ANC), was among those fined by the Electoral Court last year for falling foul of the law in this regard. The finance minister questioned whether the IEC was the appropriate body to keep political parties in check over their finances, saying it puts the institution at risk of accusations of bias and a lack of independence. "I'm from the ANC. When they do it to us, we say they've been captured. When they do it to another party, they say Ramaphosa has sent them." With a court challenge still pending over plans to double the annual private funding limit to R30 million, while also raising the threshold for declaring donations to R200,000, Godongwana said he hoped the matter was settled before next year's local government elections. He said that the conference should consider the implications of political parties purely being funded by the state. "That raises the question: What is the optimal level of funding and what is the criteria for that? We complain that departments are inefficient. Should we fund political parties for inefficiencies as well?" Godongwana also hinted that if the revenue allowed, more money could be set aside to fund next year's local government election, in addition to the R1.4 billion already allocated in this year's budget.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
SA's greylisting a lesson for govt to operate as a whole, says Godongwana
CAPE TOWN - Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana says government has learnt valuable lessons from being greylisted by the global anti-corruption watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force. This includes increased oversight on whether money guised as political party donations is being used for terrorism activities. Addressing a symposium on political funding in Durban on Thursday, Godongwana said being greylisted had been a good challenge for government. Government's investment and trade prospects were said to have been severely dented when it was greylisted by the FATF in February 2023. Since then, the government has been under the whip to tick off 22 action items to prove it's got a grip on the prevention of money laundering and anti-terrorism financing. The country was removed from the notorious FATF list last week, after introducing new legislation and tightening its financial controls. Godongwana said it was the first time an omnibus bill was tabled, that cut across government departments. 'It was a positive development in that sense, in that it taught us how to operate and work as government, as a whole.' Godongwana says he was being alerted by the United States every six months about South African bank accounts being sanctioned on suspicion of financing terrorist activities.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Bold and decisive steps must be taken to reverse the legacy of the Native Land Act of 1913
Land reform successes have produced jobs and generated income, but more needs to be done. Image: AFP Bold and decisive steps must be taken to reverse the legacy of the Native Land Act of 1913, says Mzwanele Nyhontso, the Minister of Land Reform and Rural Development. He said the Native Land Act of 1913 which became law in South Africa on June 19, (Act No. 27 of 1913), left an indelible mark on the history of South Africa. 'This legislation had a profound and devastating impact on the lives of black people. It was a calculated, cruel instrument and strategy of mass dispossession, that successfully entrenched racial segregation and economic inequality,' Nyhontso said. Land dispossession The Native Land Act, restricted black South Africans to only 7% of the land, forcing them into so called 'native reserves' while reserving the rest of land for white minority ownership. The minister added that through the prohibition of black South Africans from owning land outside the designated so called native reserves, the act stripped millions of their ability to sustain themselves, their families and communities through farming which was the main economic activity. 'The immediate aftermath of the passing of the Native Land Act was the violent and merciless eviction of people from their land, their cattle and crops were confiscated and their homes were destroyed. Up until that point in history, the African had led a lifestyle of self-sufficiency. Black people were stripped of their dignity, effectively forcing them into exploitative farm labour contracts. The act laid the foundation for the migrant system that provided a constant supply of cheap labour for the mines and industries,' the minister added. Undoing the damage The Department said it is committed to reversing this legacy, by ensuring appropriate legislation, policies and programmes are implemented. It added it will intensify its efforts to restore land rights to the historically dispossessed and the equitable redistribution of land. In South Africa, where youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, reaching over 45% of people between the ages of 15 and 34 years, the land reform programme is quietly emerging as a source of employment opportunities and playing an important role in economic development, says the Vumelana Advisory Fund. The organisation said the story of land reform is taking a turn, with some pockets of successes unfolding where young people are leveraging restituted land as a strategy for employment creation and economic transformation. Success stories Peter Setou, Chief Executive of Vumelana said: 'Over time, we've seen the CPP model consistently deliver tangible results and meaningful impact for beneficiaries of the land reform programme. These pockets of success highlight the model's potential. The challenge now is to scale these successes to unlock similar outcomes with other beneficiaries of the land reform programme across the country.' Since its inception, Vumelana said it has supported 26 land reform projects leveraging its transaction advisory support programme and capacity building and institutional support programme. The programme provides the beneficiary communities with access to required resources while negating the need to give up ownership of the land or wait for government grants. The transaction advisory support programme facilitates commercially viable, mutually beneficial partnerships between land reform beneficiary communities and private investors that create jobs, generate income and transfer skills. These successful land reform programmes such as the 151 hectare Moletele-Matuma farm in Limpopo, the Barokologadi-ERP Melorane Game Reserve partnership in North West and the Mkambati Nature Reserve Tourism partnership were said to be examples of success stories resulting from their interventions, where they have collectively managed to create over 2,500 jobs that benefitted over 16,000 households, mobilised over R1 billion in investments and developed approximately 76,000 hectares of land.
