From Gaza to Ukraine to Iran, Trump's ‘peacemaker' promise collapses

In his inaugural address this January, Donald Trump declared that his proudest legacy would be that of 'a peacemaker and unifier', pledging that US power would 'stop all wars and bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent, and totally unpredictable'.
Five months later, his second presidency is witnessing the spectacular unraveling of that lofty aspiration.
A president who vowed to end global conflicts – including one which he said he would resolve within his first 24 hours – has instead presided over their escalation – most recently the spiraling conflict between Israel and Iran.
Related: Donald Trump is losing control of American foreign policy | Christopher S Chivvis
The timeline of the latest conflict resuggests a stark disconnect between Trump's aspirations and reality: the wave of Israeli airstrikes came just hours afterTrump urged Israel not to attack Iran.
Marco Rubio, Trump's secretary of state, took pains to describe the Israeli attack as 'unilateral', stressing that the US was 'not involved in strikes against Iran' – only for Trump to then insist he had been well informed of Israel's plans – and warn that further attacks would be 'even more brutal'.
Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who has emerged as Trump's primary diplomatic negotiator in the Middle East and Ukraine, still reportedly plans to go to Oman this weekend for talks on Tehran's nuclear program, but it appeared unlikely the Iranians would attend.
Trump's muddled peace agenda was already disarray long before Thursday's attacks.
The Gaza ceasefire his administration helped broker collapsed within weeks, with Israel resuming massive bombardments and imposing a three-month total blockade on humanitarian aid to the territory, where the death toll has now surpassed at least 55,000.
In Ukraine – a conflict Trump once bragged he would end on his first day back in office – Russian forces have pressed ahead with a summer offensive, entering the Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in three years and accumulating more forces – evidence that Putin has no interest in Trump's peace overtures and intends to expand the war further.
Meanwhile, Trump's abrupt announcement of a ceasefire between India and Pakistan was met with fury in New Delhi, where officials denied his claims of brokering the deal.
And while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged to Congress that the Pentagon has developed contingency plans to seize Greenland and Panama militarily, it's unclear how territorial conquest fits into Trump's definition of peacemaking.
His first term ended no wars, nearly sparked conflict with Iran, and saw his signature 'peace' achievement – the Abraham accords – normalize relations between Israel and countries that weren't fighting it anyway.
Part of Trump's appeal to voters was precisely a promise to avoid foreign entanglements. In the stands at the inauguration viewing party, supporters told the Guardian how they valued his restraint in military deployment and favored his America-first approach that prioritized domestic concerns over international aid and intervention. And there is a an argument that for Trump peace is not an absence of conflict but rather Washington's distance from it.
There is one potentially optimistic interpretation for the latest strikes in Iran. Alex Vatanka, the Iran director from the Middle East Institute in Washington, suggested that Israel's attack could be a calculated gamble to shock Iran into serious negotiations. The theory holds that Israel convinced Trump to allow limited strikes that would pressure Tehran without triggering regime change, essentially using military action to restart stalled diplomacy. On Friday Trump suggested that the strike on Iran might have even improved the chances of a nuclear agreement.
'This is not likely to bring Iran back to the negotiating table,' said Andrew Borene, executive director of global security at Flashpoint and a former staff officer at the US's office of the director of national intelligence. 'It marks the opening of yet another rapidly expanding flashpoint within the global context of a new hybrid cold war, one that will be fought both on the ground and in the darkest corners of the web.'
Whether this strategy succeeds depends entirely on Iran's response. The regime could either return to negotiations chastened, or abandon diplomacy altogether and pursue nuclear weapons more aggressively. Early indicators suggest Tehran may not be in a conciliatory mood after having its facilities bombed and leaders killed.
But even if the more optimistic readings prove correct, it does not change the broader reality: every major conflict Trump inherited or promised to resolve has intensified on his watch.
Trump promised to be a peacemaker. Instead, he's managing multiple wars while his diplomatic initiatives collapse in real time. From Gaza to Ukraine to Iran, the world appears more volatile and dangerous than when he took his oath five months ago.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Axios

19 minutes ago

• Axios

Iran parliament reportedly backs closing Strait of Hormuz, which could spike oil prices

Iran's parliament has endorsed closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil transit point off its coast, but the authority rests with regime security officials, per summaries of state-controlled media. Why it matters: Impeding the strait would likely bring a massive spike in oil prices that would flow through to U.S. consumers. The narrow channel between Iran and Oman is the chokepoint for a quarter of the world's seaborne oil trade — and around one-fifth of all oil movements. Catch up quick: The threat is among the initial responses to yesterday's U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Trying to block the strait would be the first time that the Israel-Iran conflict meaningfully affects global oil flows. Yes, but: Iranian efforts to close the strait and attack energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf are "unlikely," Eurasia Group analysts said in a note earlier Sunday morning. "The US has amassed a massive military presence in the Gulf and surrounding region, and a move by Iran against the strait would almost certainly trigger a significant military response," they write. Eurasia said Iran is unlikely to hit strike targets while its own exports remain intact, but added: "Increased Iranian harassment of tanker traffic is likely in coming days." Driving the news: Vice President JD Vance said Sunday that closing the channel would be economically "suicidal" for the Iranians. "Their entire economy runs through the Strait of Hormuz. If they want to destroy their own economy and cause disruptions in the world, I think that would be their decision," he told NBC's "Meet the Press."

Time​ Magazine

20 minutes ago

• Time​ Magazine

World Leaders React After U.S. Strikes Iran: Gravely Alarmed

The world is reacting after President Donald Trump authorized U.S. strikes on three three key Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel in its conflict with Iran. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' Trump said in an address to the nation on Saturday night. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.' Iran has since responded with a grave new warning, threatening 'everlasting consequences' and calling for an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council. Read More: Iran Delivers Furious Warning, Speaks of 'Unprecedented Level of Danger and Chaos' After 'Heinous' U.S. Strikes As the world awaits to see what Iran's next step will be, global leaders are reacting to the news of the strikes. European Commission European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen posted on social media, saying that 'the negotiating table is the only place to end this crisis.' Von der Leyen maintained that 'Iran must never acquire the bomb,' and said the Middle Eastern country should now 'engage in a credible diplomatic solution.' United Nations Secretary General of the United Nations (U.N.) António Guterres shared a strong statement on social media, stating that he was 'gravely alarmed' by the strikes. He called for de-escalation and shared concerns that the conflict could cause a 'spiral of chaos.' 'This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge—and a direct threat to international peace and security,' Guterres said. 'I call on Member States to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the U.N. Charter and other rules of international law. He continued by saying there is 'no military solution,' and that he believes the only way forward is 'diplomacy.' Argentina Argentina's President Javier Milei, a right-wing ally of Trump's in Latin America, has yet to comment specifically on the U.S. strikes, but he re-posted a message in the early hours of the morning on June 22. 'Today is a great day for Western civilization,' read the post, authored by Argentine billionaire and businessman Marcos Galperin. Australia The Australian government, led by Anthony Albanese, has called for de-escalation but its statement, issued by a spokesperson, did not reveal much of whether or not the government supported the U.S. strikes. "We note the U.S. President's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy." Chile Chilean President Gabriel Boric condemned the U.S. strikes, calling them a violation of international law. He went on to 'demand peace' 'We will defend respect for international humanitarian law at all times,' he said. 'Having power does not authorize you to use it in violation of the rules we have established as humanity. Even if you are the United States.' China China 'strongly condemns' the U.S. strikes, according to state media. 'The actions of the United States seriously violated the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter and international law, and have exacerbated tensions in the Middle East,' a spokesperson said. 'China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible, ensure the safety of civilians, and start dialogue and negotiation.' France The French government released a statement clarifying that France was not involved in the attacks. The European country reiterated 'its firm opposition to Iran gaining access to nuclear weapons,' but also urged both parties to 'to exercise restraint.' 'France is convinced that a lasting solution to this issue requires a negotiated solution within the framework of the Treaty of Non-Proliferation. We remain ready to contribute to this in conjunction with our partners,' the statement read. Israel During Trump's address to the U.S., he thanked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating that the two of them worked as a team on the Iran strikes. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin praised President Trump for conducting the strikes in a video address. 'President Trump and I often say peace through strength. First comes strength, then comes peace," he said. 'And tonight President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength.' Israeli President Isaac Herzog also thanked Trump, calling the evening a 'decisive moment between the axis of terror and evil and the axis of hope.' 'This brave step serves the security and safety of the entire free world. I hope it will lead to a better future for the Middle East—and help advance the urgent release of our hostages held in captivity in Gaza,' he said. Iran Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi accused the U.S. of breaching international law and warned that the strikes will have 'everlasting consequences.' 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the U.N. Charter, international law and the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' Araghchi said. Russia Russia's Foreign Ministry shared a statement on Telegram condemning the airstrikes and calling them 'a dangerous escalation... fraught with further undermining of regional and global security.' The governmental body called the strikes 'a gross violation of international law, the U.N. Charter, and U.N. Security Council resolutions' and called for an "end to aggression and for increased efforts to create conditions for returning the situation to a political and diplomatic track." Saudi Arabia According to the Saudi Press Agency, the country has expressed 'deep concern' over the U.S. strikes and see them as a 'violation' of the sovereignty of Iran. '[The Kingdom] underscores the need to exert all possible efforts to exercise restraint, de-escalate tensions, and avoid further escalation,' read a statement attributed to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 'The Kingdom also calls upon the international community to intensify its efforts during this highly sensitive period to reach a political resolution that would bring an end to the crisis and open a new chapter for achieving security and stability in the region.' Spain Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that he is mourning the civilian lives lost amid the conflict. He highlighted an 'urgent need for restraint and de-escalation, for diplomacy and dialogue.' 'Iran must never have access to nuclear weapons, but stability in the region can only be achieved at the negotiating table, with full respect for international law,' Sánchez said. 'We need a diplomatic solution that establishes a comprehensive framework of peace and security for all.' United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for Iran to 'return to the negotiating table' after the U.S. strikes and referred to Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security.' 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis,' Starmer said.

News24

21 minutes ago

• News24

‘Anxious' South Africa urges dialogue to end Israel-Iran conflict

The South African government says it has 'noted with a great deal of anxiety' the entry of the United States into the Israel-Iran war. The Presidency issued the statement on Sunday just hours after US President Donald Trump said the country had struck three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday night. He said the facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan were 'completely and totally obliterated' and warned of further attacks if Tehran refused to 'make peace'. 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute,' Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said in a statement. 'South Africa calls on the United States, Israel and Iran to give the United Nations the opportunity and space to lead on the peaceful resolution of the matters of dispute, including the inspection and verification of Iran's status of uranium enrichment, as well as its broader nuclear capacity.' Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said the bombing was 'outrageous and will have everlasting consequences'. The US attacks come just over a week after Israel launched missiles at Iran and Tehran hit back by striking targets in Israel.