Rubio declares Iran's days of 'playing the world' over after Trump's decisive strike
Iran's days of "playing the world" are over, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News on Sunday, one day after the U.S. obliterated three of the nation's key nuclear facilities in a surprise attack.
"The most important thing I hope that they realize is that the game is up," he told "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo.
"They have played the world for 40-something years with these nuclear talks and delaying things… they're not going to play President Trump, and they found out last night that when he says he's going to do something, he'll do it. And he doesn't want to do it. It's not his first choice, but it's the only choice. That's the choice the Iranian regime left us, because they play too many games."
While distinguishing the regime from the Iranian people, Rubio accused the former of using diplomacy to "hide" and "buy themselves time" in the past.
"They think they're cute," he continued. "They're not cute, and they're not going to get away with this stuff, not under President Trump."
Rubio went further by critiquing Iran's leadership for failing to directly negotiate with the United States, forcing the need for a middleman while the regime opts for "passing messages."
"We're not doing that anymore," he said succinctly.
"With direct negotiations, let's talk about how we peacefully resolve this problem. The Europeans have pressured them on that point, and we encourage them to continue to do so and are grateful that they've been doing that so far."
The U.S. launched "Operation Midnight Hammer" on Saturday with B-2 stealth bombers departing from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri at 12:01 a.m.
Some of the bombers flew to the west and into the Pacific as a decoy, top defense officials revealed on Sunday. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called it a "deception effort known only to an extremely small number of planners and key leaders."
The main strike force proceeded to fly silently eastward, undertaking the 18-hour flight to the target area, Caine said.
President Trump addressed the nation from the White House following the attacks on Saturday night, touting the success in taking out the Iranian regime's three key facilities – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
"Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated," he said, warning that the regime should answer the call for peace or risk "far greater" tragedy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Strikes Iran in Operation Midnight Hammer
On today's Big Take podcast: what's next for the Israel-Iran war after 14 US 'bunker busters.' Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take daily podcast today. The United States conducted airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend, marking a dramatic escalation of the US's involvement in Israel's deepening war with Tehran.
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks
Oil prices surged Sunday evening to the highest levels since President Donald Trump returned to office as energy markets digested the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities — and the risk that Tehran may try to disrupt the flow of crude oil out of the Middle East. U.S. crude oil futures rallied more than 6 percent to peak at $78 a barrel, more than $1 higher than the price on Jan. 20 when Trump was inaugurated. That jump is likely to filter through to gasoline prices just as drivers prepare to hit the road for the long July 4th weekend next week. Trump had campaigned on promises to lower consumer energy prices as part of his 'energy dominance' agenda, but the current average pump price of nearly $3.22 a gallon for regular gasoline is about 10 cents above the price when he was inaugurated — and likely to climb this week. How much higher oil prices might go now depends on how Tehran responds to the attacks. Iran's parliament's voted to close the Strait Of Hormuz, the narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf where a quarter of the world's seaborne oil passes, but only an appointee of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei can make that determination. Even if that were to happen, the impact on the oil market would depend on whether Iran and its allies are satisfied harassing the oil tankers traversing Hormuz or resort to a full-scale campaign to block traffic altogether. Reports that the White House gave Iran a head's up on the bombings and said there wouldn't be more to follow suggests the Trump administration is trying to avoid a full-scale war — and helping to keep oil prices in check. Energy analysts have said a disruption in the shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz could send oil prices above $100 a barrel. 'This choreography underscores that both sides want to calibrate this crisis, not lose control of it,' said Scott Modell, chief executive officer at energy and geopolitics analysis firm Rapidan Energy Group. 'We expect Iran's response to be stage-managed: think harassment of commercial shipping, symbolic seizures of tankers, and limited rocket fire on US military outposts — but not a full-scale campaign to choke energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz.' Some market analysts are confident that even if the fighting does escalate, the United States, OPEC countries such as Saudi Arabia and other suppliers will have enough product to meet demand. But others are warning that a price increase may have only just begun. 'True, these oil market dynamics indicate that investors have incorporated a greater risk premium to account for the increased probability of an oil supply shock,' BCA Research analyst Roukaya Ibrahim said in a note. 'Yet the more important question is whether this pricing adequately reflects the level of risk. Our sense is that crude price pressures will remain tilted to the upside over the near term.'
UPI
16 minutes ago
- UPI
NATO to increase defense spending to Cold War levels
June 22 (UPI) -- Britain and its NATO allies will increase defense spending by at much as 5% of GDP in the next decade, officials have announced. The alliance's 32 member states agreed to the plan in advance of a heads of nations summit this week in The Hague. The meeting is scheduled to take place Tuesday and Wednesday, where the new spending increase is expected to be approved. This is a boost from 2% of defense spending, and seen as a play to appease the Trump administration in addition to addressing a growing military threat from Russia and China. The hike to 5% of GDP spending would bring NATO back to defense spending not seen since the Cold War. By comparison, Britain has said it has plans to increase that nation's defense spending by closer to 3% by 2034, which would be a boost of .7%. Britain was hesitant about the 5% agreed to be NATO and pushed for the timeline to 2035, which would move the increase beyond the next Parliament. Spain was the last country to sign on to the NATO deal. NATO secretary Mark Rutte was largely seen as the driving force behind the spending hike, and said the actual defense spending would amount to 3.5% of GDP and that the other 1.5% could be used for cyber security and other infrastructure.
